The big Coronavirus thread

183848688891347

Comments

  • Longshot
    Longshot Posts: 940
    You can fool some of the people all of the time. Concentrate on those people.
  • tailwindhome
    tailwindhome Posts: 19,436
    “New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    Stevo_666 said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    Pross said:

    ddraver said:

    See also the surgery in S. Wales who tried to persuade similar people to sign pre-emptive DNRs...

    The Netherlands have certainly taken an interesting approach...

    Rick is unusually quiet on the way the Dutch are doing things whilst acting as though the UK response is the worst in Europe.
    I don't know anything about the Dutch response, but I do know their behaviour in the EU is shameful and they should be given a firm smack behind closed doors.


    I do know there is a culture around quality of end-of-life and there are endless discussions about the perils of living too long or living with terrible health, and they are more fatalistic about their life than in the UK, so the idea of a Dr telling an 80 yr old man the above is not an enormous shock to me.

    I have no idea if they're any better than the UK. I suspect on a very basic level, Netherlands, Scandis etc, have less poverty and so are naturally a little healthier on balance, but who knows.
    Maybe you should go and have a look - below is a link to help you. Their stats are markedly worse than ours on both a cases and deaths per million of population - and people there were still free to wander around outside until after we went into lock down.
    https://worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries

    Have you considered going and preaching to the Dutch about what they're doing wrong?
    It's not really relevant to the UK is it? I could also bang on about how terrible Iran has handled it but again.

    If they've made the same mistake as the UK gov't had then shame on their gov't. They have not covered themselves in international glory already.
    It is very relevant when someone is continually banging on about how badly the UK is handling this crisis and making out that we are 'bottom of the heap'. When that does not appear to be the case looking at the facts.
    Where have I said it's at the 'bottom of the heap'?

    it's supposed to be a world leader in healthcare, but yet it can't equip the health staff, nor can it make anywhere near enough tests?
    You don't deny you are banging on about it. If weren't trying to imply we were bottom of the heap why the focus solely on the UK's perceived shortcomings? And point me to where you have said we are doing anything better than any other country.
    Why have I focused on the UK's shortcomings? Because we all live in the UK and this is a UK forum. Who should we be discussing? India? Brazil? Monaco?

    Do you think the shortage of protective kit for hospital staff is a problem? If not, why not?
  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 29,576
    Stevo_666 said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    Pross said:

    ddraver said:

    See also the surgery in S. Wales who tried to persuade similar people to sign pre-emptive DNRs...

    The Netherlands have certainly taken an interesting approach...

    Rick is unusually quiet on the way the Dutch are doing things whilst acting as though the UK response is the worst in Europe.
    I don't know anything about the Dutch response, but I do know their behaviour in the EU is shameful and they should be given a firm smack behind closed doors.


    I do know there is a culture around quality of end-of-life and there are endless discussions about the perils of living too long or living with terrible health, and they are more fatalistic about their life than in the UK, so the idea of a Dr telling an 80 yr old man the above is not an enormous shock to me.

    I have no idea if they're any better than the UK. I suspect on a very basic level, Netherlands, Scandis etc, have less poverty and so are naturally a little healthier on balance, but who knows.
    Maybe you should go and have a look - below is a link to help you. Their stats are markedly worse than ours on both a cases and deaths per million of population - and people there were still free to wander around outside until after we went into lock down.
    https://worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries

    Have you considered going and preaching to the Dutch about what they're doing wrong?
    It's not really relevant to the UK is it? I could also bang on about how terrible Iran has handled it but again.

    If they've made the same mistake as the UK gov't had then shame on their gov't. They have not covered themselves in international glory already.
    It is very relevant when someone is continually banging on about how badly the UK is handling this crisis and making out that we are 'bottom of the heap'. When that does not appear to be the case looking at the facts.
    I've not seen any reference to us being bottom of the heap, or even that many references to other countries beyond reposting that FT graph. I doubt anyone who's lost a relative to this is thinking "well at least I don't live in the Netherlands".
    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,154

    Stevo_666 said:

    Maybe you should go and have a look - below is a link to help you. Their stats are markedly worse than ours on both a cases and deaths per million of population - and people there were still free to wander around outside until after we went into lock down.

    The discussion on the data visualizations by the FT was interesting on the use of 'per million' stats said that this added nothing to the analysis.

    If you try to analyse on that basis all you learn is that some countries are big and some are small.

    Make of that what you will, I found it interesting.

    I found it interesting too that the statistics are not most relevant "per country", but "per outbreak". This means because the USA has so many centres that have independent outbreaks, their figures are going to look horrific on a country basis.
  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 29,576

    Stevo_666 said:

    Maybe you should go and have a look - below is a link to help you. Their stats are markedly worse than ours on both a cases and deaths per million of population - and people there were still free to wander around outside until after we went into lock down.

    The discussion on the data visualizations by the FT was interesting on the use of 'per million' stats said that this added nothing to the analysis.

    If you try to analyse on that basis all you learn is that some countries are big and some are small.

    Make of that what you will, I found it interesting.

    I found it interesting too that the statistics are not most relevant "per country", but "per outbreak". This means because the USA has so many centres that have independent outbreaks, their figures are going to look horrific on a country basis.
    I guess the point is that overall population size only providing an upper limit on numbers of infections. Numbers of interactions with each infected person determines the rate of spread, hence distancing being the only effective control.
    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    So Gove promised thousands of new ventilators - first batch: 30.

  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    2 weeks ago today BoJo promised 25,000 tests a day. Not even half they number
  • Stevo_666 said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    Pross said:

    ddraver said:

    See also the surgery in S. Wales who tried to persuade similar people to sign pre-emptive DNRs...

    The Netherlands have certainly taken an interesting approach...

    Rick is unusually quiet on the way the Dutch are doing things whilst acting as though the UK response is the worst in Europe.
    I don't know anything about the Dutch response, but I do know their behaviour in the EU is shameful and they should be given a firm smack behind closed doors.


    I do know there is a culture around quality of end-of-life and there are endless discussions about the perils of living too long or living with terrible health, and they are more fatalistic about their life than in the UK, so the idea of a Dr telling an 80 yr old man the above is not an enormous shock to me.

    I have no idea if they're any better than the UK. I suspect on a very basic level, Netherlands, Scandis etc, have less poverty and so are naturally a little healthier on balance, but who knows.
    Maybe you should go and have a look - below is a link to help you. Their stats are markedly worse than ours on both a cases and deaths per million of population - and people there were still free to wander around outside until after we went into lock down.
    https://worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries

    Have you considered going and preaching to the Dutch about what they're doing wrong?
    It's not really relevant to the UK is it? I could also bang on about how terrible Iran has handled it but again.

    If they've made the same mistake as the UK gov't had then shame on their gov't. They have not covered themselves in international glory already.
    It is very relevant when someone is continually banging on about how badly the UK is handling this crisis and making out that we are 'bottom of the heap'. When that does not appear to be the case looking at the facts.
    As I have always said about Rick, if he was in the trenches fighting a war he would be shooting his own side.
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,388

    So Gove promised thousands of new ventilators - first batch: 30.


    Ha - she's having problems making sense of what she's reading, given what Johnson and Gove have been saying.

    If they are going to go down the telling-massive-porkies line, it's not going to go well if they want to introduce harsher restrictions, if we stop believing what they are telling us.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661

    Stevo_666 said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    Pross said:

    ddraver said:

    See also the surgery in S. Wales who tried to persuade similar people to sign pre-emptive DNRs...

    The Netherlands have certainly taken an interesting approach...

    Rick is unusually quiet on the way the Dutch are doing things whilst acting as though the UK response is the worst in Europe.
    I don't know anything about the Dutch response, but I do know their behaviour in the EU is shameful and they should be given a firm smack behind closed doors.


    I do know there is a culture around quality of end-of-life and there are endless discussions about the perils of living too long or living with terrible health, and they are more fatalistic about their life than in the UK, so the idea of a Dr telling an 80 yr old man the above is not an enormous shock to me.

    I have no idea if they're any better than the UK. I suspect on a very basic level, Netherlands, Scandis etc, have less poverty and so are naturally a little healthier on balance, but who knows.
    Maybe you should go and have a look - below is a link to help you. Their stats are markedly worse than ours on both a cases and deaths per million of population - and people there were still free to wander around outside until after we went into lock down.
    https://worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries

    Have you considered going and preaching to the Dutch about what they're doing wrong?
    It's not really relevant to the UK is it? I could also bang on about how terrible Iran has handled it but again.

    If they've made the same mistake as the UK gov't had then shame on their gov't. They have not covered themselves in international glory already.
    It is very relevant when someone is continually banging on about how badly the UK is handling this crisis and making out that we are 'bottom of the heap'. When that does not appear to be the case looking at the facts.
    As I have always said about Rick, if he was in the trenches fighting a war he would be shooting his own side.
    Alrite general Melchet calm down.
  • focuszing723
    focuszing723 Posts: 8,151
    I have visions of bold RIck with a cunning plan.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    Erm I have some coffee to offer you.
  • surrey_commuter
    surrey_commuter Posts: 18,867

    2 weeks ago today BoJo promised 25,000 tests a day. Not even half they number

    When did he promise 250,000? I suspect they will find upping the lie to be counterproductive. I am sure they have done the angry pointless question as a distraction which only leave blaming JF and denouncing the accuser as a traitor.

    It will be a real test of voting for a monkey so long as it has a blue rosette when the monkey’s indolence and arrogance dramatically increases your chance of a horrible premature death.
  • Stevo_666
    Stevo_666 Posts: 61,429

    Stevo_666 said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    Pross said:

    ddraver said:

    See also the surgery in S. Wales who tried to persuade similar people to sign pre-emptive DNRs...

    The Netherlands have certainly taken an interesting approach...

    Rick is unusually quiet on the way the Dutch are doing things whilst acting as though the UK response is the worst in Europe.
    I don't know anything about the Dutch response, but I do know their behaviour in the EU is shameful and they should be given a firm smack behind closed doors.


    I do know there is a culture around quality of end-of-life and there are endless discussions about the perils of living too long or living with terrible health, and they are more fatalistic about their life than in the UK, so the idea of a Dr telling an 80 yr old man the above is not an enormous shock to me.

    I have no idea if they're any better than the UK. I suspect on a very basic level, Netherlands, Scandis etc, have less poverty and so are naturally a little healthier on balance, but who knows.
    Maybe you should go and have a look - below is a link to help you. Their stats are markedly worse than ours on both a cases and deaths per million of population - and people there were still free to wander around outside until after we went into lock down.
    https://worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries

    Have you considered going and preaching to the Dutch about what they're doing wrong?
    It's not really relevant to the UK is it? I could also bang on about how terrible Iran has handled it but again.

    If they've made the same mistake as the UK gov't had then shame on their gov't. They have not covered themselves in international glory already.
    It is very relevant when someone is continually banging on about how badly the UK is handling this crisis and making out that we are 'bottom of the heap'. When that does not appear to be the case looking at the facts.
    Where have I said it's at the 'bottom of the heap'?

    it's supposed to be a world leader in healthcare, but yet it can't equip the health staff, nor can it make anywhere near enough tests?
    You don't deny you are banging on about it. If weren't trying to imply we were bottom of the heap why the focus solely on the UK's perceived shortcomings? And point me to where you have said we are doing anything better than any other country.
    Why have I focused on the UK's shortcomings? Because we all live in the UK and this is a UK forum. Who should we be discussing? India? Brazil? Monaco?

    Do you think the shortage of protective kit for hospital staff is a problem? If not, why not?
    As I have mentioned above, what other countries are doing and how they are faring in this common crisis is relevant.

    Now care to answer my questions?

    And care to comment on the Netherlands data? That's where you have strong family links to so reasonable to suppose it is relevant to you.
    "I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]
  • Stevo_666
    Stevo_666 Posts: 61,429

    Stevo_666 said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    Pross said:

    ddraver said:

    See also the surgery in S. Wales who tried to persuade similar people to sign pre-emptive DNRs...

    The Netherlands have certainly taken an interesting approach...

    Rick is unusually quiet on the way the Dutch are doing things whilst acting as though the UK response is the worst in Europe.
    I don't know anything about the Dutch response, but I do know their behaviour in the EU is shameful and they should be given a firm smack behind closed doors.


    I do know there is a culture around quality of end-of-life and there are endless discussions about the perils of living too long or living with terrible health, and they are more fatalistic about their life than in the UK, so the idea of a Dr telling an 80 yr old man the above is not an enormous shock to me.

    I have no idea if they're any better than the UK. I suspect on a very basic level, Netherlands, Scandis etc, have less poverty and so are naturally a little healthier on balance, but who knows.
    Maybe you should go and have a look - below is a link to help you. Their stats are markedly worse than ours on both a cases and deaths per million of population - and people there were still free to wander around outside until after we went into lock down.
    https://worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries

    Have you considered going and preaching to the Dutch about what they're doing wrong?
    It's not really relevant to the UK is it? I could also bang on about how terrible Iran has handled it but again.

    If they've made the same mistake as the UK gov't had then shame on their gov't. They have not covered themselves in international glory already.
    It is very relevant when someone is continually banging on about how badly the UK is handling this crisis and making out that we are 'bottom of the heap'. When that does not appear to be the case looking at the facts.
    As I have always said about Rick, if he was in the trenches fighting a war he would be shooting his own side.
    More like moaning at them and criticising them because he reckons they're not as good as the Germans...
    "I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    Stevo_666 said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    Pross said:

    ddraver said:

    See also the surgery in S. Wales who tried to persuade similar people to sign pre-emptive DNRs...

    The Netherlands have certainly taken an interesting approach...

    Rick is unusually quiet on the way the Dutch are doing things whilst acting as though the UK response is the worst in Europe.
    I don't know anything about the Dutch response, but I do know their behaviour in the EU is shameful and they should be given a firm smack behind closed doors.


    I do know there is a culture around quality of end-of-life and there are endless discussions about the perils of living too long or living with terrible health, and they are more fatalistic about their life than in the UK, so the idea of a Dr telling an 80 yr old man the above is not an enormous shock to me.

    I have no idea if they're any better than the UK. I suspect on a very basic level, Netherlands, Scandis etc, have less poverty and so are naturally a little healthier on balance, but who knows.
    Maybe you should go and have a look - below is a link to help you. Their stats are markedly worse than ours on both a cases and deaths per million of population - and people there were still free to wander around outside until after we went into lock down.
    https://worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries

    Have you considered going and preaching to the Dutch about what they're doing wrong?
    It's not really relevant to the UK is it? I could also bang on about how terrible Iran has handled it but again.

    If they've made the same mistake as the UK gov't had then shame on their gov't. They have not covered themselves in international glory already.
    It is very relevant when someone is continually banging on about how badly the UK is handling this crisis and making out that we are 'bottom of the heap'. When that does not appear to be the case looking at the facts.
    Where have I said it's at the 'bottom of the heap'?

    it's supposed to be a world leader in healthcare, but yet it can't equip the health staff, nor can it make anywhere near enough tests?
    You don't deny you are banging on about it. If weren't trying to imply we were bottom of the heap why the focus solely on the UK's perceived shortcomings? And point me to where you have said we are doing anything better than any other country.
    Why have I focused on the UK's shortcomings? Because we all live in the UK and this is a UK forum. Who should we be discussing? India? Brazil? Monaco?

    Do you think the shortage of protective kit for hospital staff is a problem? If not, why not?
    As I have mentioned above, what other countries are doing and how they are faring in this common crisis is relevant.

    Now care to answer my questions?

    And care to comment on the Netherlands data? That's where you have strong family links to so reasonable to suppose it is relevant to you.
    What is the data?

  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    edited April 2020
    Meanwhile 950,000 new universal credit claimants this fortnight.

    Monster number. Gigantic.
  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 29,576

    Stevo_666 said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    Pross said:

    ddraver said:

    See also the surgery in S. Wales who tried to persuade similar people to sign pre-emptive DNRs...

    The Netherlands have certainly taken an interesting approach...

    Rick is unusually quiet on the way the Dutch are doing things whilst acting as though the UK response is the worst in Europe.
    I don't know anything about the Dutch response, but I do know their behaviour in the EU is shameful and they should be given a firm smack behind closed doors.


    I do know there is a culture around quality of end-of-life and there are endless discussions about the perils of living too long or living with terrible health, and they are more fatalistic about their life than in the UK, so the idea of a Dr telling an 80 yr old man the above is not an enormous shock to me.

    I have no idea if they're any better than the UK. I suspect on a very basic level, Netherlands, Scandis etc, have less poverty and so are naturally a little healthier on balance, but who knows.
    Maybe you should go and have a look - below is a link to help you. Their stats are markedly worse than ours on both a cases and deaths per million of population - and people there were still free to wander around outside until after we went into lock down.
    https://worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries

    Have you considered going and preaching to the Dutch about what they're doing wrong?
    It's not really relevant to the UK is it? I could also bang on about how terrible Iran has handled it but again.

    If they've made the same mistake as the UK gov't had then shame on their gov't. They have not covered themselves in international glory already.
    It is very relevant when someone is continually banging on about how badly the UK is handling this crisis and making out that we are 'bottom of the heap'. When that does not appear to be the case looking at the facts.
    As I have always said about Rick, if he was in the trenches fighting a war he would be shooting his own side.
    It's not a war.
    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition
  • tailwindhome
    tailwindhome Posts: 19,436

    As I have always said about Rick, if he was in the trenches fighting a war he would be shooting his own side.

    You want to send 250k 'over the top' to ensure your own standard of living.

    “New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!
  • Stevo_666
    Stevo_666 Posts: 61,429

    Stevo_666 said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    Pross said:

    ddraver said:

    See also the surgery in S. Wales who tried to persuade similar people to sign pre-emptive DNRs...

    The Netherlands have certainly taken an interesting approach...

    Rick is unusually quiet on the way the Dutch are doing things whilst acting as though the UK response is the worst in Europe.
    I don't know anything about the Dutch response, but I do know their behaviour in the EU is shameful and they should be given a firm smack behind closed doors.


    I do know there is a culture around quality of end-of-life and there are endless discussions about the perils of living too long or living with terrible health, and they are more fatalistic about their life than in the UK, so the idea of a Dr telling an 80 yr old man the above is not an enormous shock to me.

    I have no idea if they're any better than the UK. I suspect on a very basic level, Netherlands, Scandis etc, have less poverty and so are naturally a little healthier on balance, but who knows.
    Maybe you should go and have a look - below is a link to help you. Their stats are markedly worse than ours on both a cases and deaths per million of population - and people there were still free to wander around outside until after we went into lock down.
    https://worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries

    Have you considered going and preaching to the Dutch about what they're doing wrong?
    It's not really relevant to the UK is it? I could also bang on about how terrible Iran has handled it but again.

    If they've made the same mistake as the UK gov't had then shame on their gov't. They have not covered themselves in international glory already.
    It is very relevant when someone is continually banging on about how badly the UK is handling this crisis and making out that we are 'bottom of the heap'. When that does not appear to be the case looking at the facts.
    Where have I said it's at the 'bottom of the heap'?

    it's supposed to be a world leader in healthcare, but yet it can't equip the health staff, nor can it make anywhere near enough tests?
    You don't deny you are banging on about it. If weren't trying to imply we were bottom of the heap why the focus solely on the UK's perceived shortcomings? And point me to where you have said we are doing anything better than any other country.
    Why have I focused on the UK's shortcomings? Because we all live in the UK and this is a UK forum. Who should we be discussing? India? Brazil? Monaco?

    Do you think the shortage of protective kit for hospital staff is a problem? If not, why not?
    As I have mentioned above, what other countries are doing and how they are faring in this common crisis is relevant.

    Now care to answer my questions?

    And care to comment on the Netherlands data? That's where you have strong family links to so reasonable to suppose it is relevant to you.
    What is the data?

    See my post above and here it is again in case you claim you can't be bothered to look a few posts up the thread:
    https://worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries

    Specifically; cases per million population and deaths per million population.
    "I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]
  • Stevo_666
    Stevo_666 Posts: 61,429
    rjsterry said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    Pross said:

    ddraver said:

    See also the surgery in S. Wales who tried to persuade similar people to sign pre-emptive DNRs...

    The Netherlands have certainly taken an interesting approach...

    Rick is unusually quiet on the way the Dutch are doing things whilst acting as though the UK response is the worst in Europe.
    I don't know anything about the Dutch response, but I do know their behaviour in the EU is shameful and they should be given a firm smack behind closed doors.


    I do know there is a culture around quality of end-of-life and there are endless discussions about the perils of living too long or living with terrible health, and they are more fatalistic about their life than in the UK, so the idea of a Dr telling an 80 yr old man the above is not an enormous shock to me.

    I have no idea if they're any better than the UK. I suspect on a very basic level, Netherlands, Scandis etc, have less poverty and so are naturally a little healthier on balance, but who knows.
    Maybe you should go and have a look - below is a link to help you. Their stats are markedly worse than ours on both a cases and deaths per million of population - and people there were still free to wander around outside until after we went into lock down.
    https://worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries

    Have you considered going and preaching to the Dutch about what they're doing wrong?
    It's not really relevant to the UK is it? I could also bang on about how terrible Iran has handled it but again.

    If they've made the same mistake as the UK gov't had then shame on their gov't. They have not covered themselves in international glory already.
    It is very relevant when someone is continually banging on about how badly the UK is handling this crisis and making out that we are 'bottom of the heap'. When that does not appear to be the case looking at the facts.
    I've not seen any reference to us being bottom of the heap, or even that many references to other countries beyond reposting that FT graph. I doubt anyone who's lost a relative to this is thinking "well at least I don't live in the Netherlands".
    As explained above, what we are doing and how we are doing compared to other countries is relevant . Especially in a debate where some seem to have lost a bit of perspective.
    "I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    So what’s remarkable about the Dutch response? You keep banging on about it.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    edited April 2020
    Italy is obviously more worrying given the debt situation and that will soon be an EU problem.

    On top of the awful death & suffering.
  • Stevo_666
    Stevo_666 Posts: 61,429

    So what’s remarkable about the Dutch response? You keep banging on about it.

    ATFA Rick...this is following a familiar pattern of you dodging questions....
    "I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    Stevo I don’t know much about the Dutch situation so I can’t really answer.

    You seem to know a bit so enlighten me.
  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 29,576
    Stevo_666 said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    Pross said:

    ddraver said:

    See also the surgery in S. Wales who tried to persuade similar people to sign pre-emptive DNRs...

    The Netherlands have certainly taken an interesting approach...

    Rick is unusually quiet on the way the Dutch are doing things whilst acting as though the UK response is the worst in Europe.
    I don't know anything about the Dutch response, but I do know their behaviour in the EU is shameful and they should be given a firm smack behind closed doors.


    I do know there is a culture around quality of end-of-life and there are endless discussions about the perils of living too long or living with terrible health, and they are more fatalistic about their life than in the UK, so the idea of a Dr telling an 80 yr old man the above is not an enormous shock to me.

    I have no idea if they're any better than the UK. I suspect on a very basic level, Netherlands, Scandis etc, have less poverty and so are naturally a little healthier on balance, but who knows.
    Maybe you should go and have a look - below is a link to help you. Their stats are markedly worse than ours on both a cases and deaths per million of population - and people there were still free to wander around outside until after we went into lock down.
    https://worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries

    Have you considered going and preaching to the Dutch about what they're doing wrong?
    It's not really relevant to the UK is it? I could also bang on about how terrible Iran has handled it but again.

    If they've made the same mistake as the UK gov't had then shame on their gov't. They have not covered themselves in international glory already.
    It is very relevant when someone is continually banging on about how badly the UK is handling this crisis and making out that we are 'bottom of the heap'. When that does not appear to be the case looking at the facts.
    Where have I said it's at the 'bottom of the heap'?

    it's supposed to be a world leader in healthcare, but yet it can't equip the health staff, nor can it make anywhere near enough tests?
    You don't deny you are banging on about it. If weren't trying to imply we were bottom of the heap why the focus solely on the UK's perceived shortcomings? And point me to where you have said we are doing anything better than any other country.
    Why have I focused on the UK's shortcomings? Because we all live in the UK and this is a UK forum. Who should we be discussing? India? Brazil? Monaco?

    Do you think the shortage of protective kit for hospital staff is a problem? If not, why not?
    As I have mentioned above, what other countries are doing and how they are faring in this common crisis is relevant.

    Now care to answer my questions?

    And care to comment on the Netherlands data? That's where you have strong family links to so reasonable to suppose it is relevant to you.
    Yes, surprise surprise, time adjusted infection rates and death rates are almost identical in each country before lock down provisions are introduced. Who'd have thought? It's almost as though people are in fact all pretty much the same the world over.

    The arguments have been about testing and provision of PPE. If the Netherlands are testing even less than us then more the fool them, but that doesn't really help or hinder us. The lack of the testing is having a measurable impact on the number of NHS staff available for work (and to a less critical extent those available for work in other industries where WFH isn't practical). That is unrelated to any other country's success or failure. Same applies to the lack of PPE. While this won't make any difference to infection rates, it can't help the treatment of those who need it.
    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition
  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 29,576
    Stevo_666 said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    Pross said:

    ddraver said:

    See also the surgery in S. Wales who tried to persuade similar people to sign pre-emptive DNRs...

    The Netherlands have certainly taken an interesting approach...

    Rick is unusually quiet on the way the Dutch are doing things whilst acting as though the UK response is the worst in Europe.
    I don't know anything about the Dutch response, but I do know their behaviour in the EU is shameful and they should be given a firm smack behind closed doors.


    I do know there is a culture around quality of end-of-life and there are endless discussions about the perils of living too long or living with terrible health, and they are more fatalistic about their life than in the UK, so the idea of a Dr telling an 80 yr old man the above is not an enormous shock to me.

    I have no idea if they're any better than the UK. I suspect on a very basic level, Netherlands, Scandis etc, have less poverty and so are naturally a little healthier on balance, but who knows.
    Maybe you should go and have a look - below is a link to help you. Their stats are markedly worse than ours on both a cases and deaths per million of population - and people there were still free to wander around outside until after we went into lock down.
    https://worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries

    Have you considered going and preaching to the Dutch about what they're doing wrong?
    It's not really relevant to the UK is it? I could also bang on about how terrible Iran has handled it but again.

    If they've made the same mistake as the UK gov't had then shame on their gov't. They have not covered themselves in international glory already.
    It is very relevant when someone is continually banging on about how badly the UK is handling this crisis and making out that we are 'bottom of the heap'. When that does not appear to be the case looking at the facts.
    Where have I said it's at the 'bottom of the heap'?

    it's supposed to be a world leader in healthcare, but yet it can't equip the health staff, nor can it make anywhere near enough tests?
    You don't deny you are banging on about it. If weren't trying to imply we were bottom of the heap why the focus solely on the UK's perceived shortcomings? And point me to where you have said we are doing anything better than any other country.
    Why have I focused on the UK's shortcomings? Because we all live in the UK and this is a UK forum. Who should we be discussing? India? Brazil? Monaco?

    Do you think the shortage of protective kit for hospital staff is a problem? If not, why not?
    As I have mentioned above, what other countries are doing and how they are faring in this common crisis is relevant.

    Now care to answer my questions?

    And care to comment on the Netherlands data? That's where you have strong family links to so reasonable to suppose it is relevant to you.
    What is the data?

    See my post above and here it is again in case you claim you can't be bothered to look a few posts up the thread:
    https://worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries

    Specifically; cases per million population and deaths per million population.
    It's been discussed why cases/deaths per million isn't that useful a statistic. The virus spreads to infect all the available hosts (just as almost everyone has had chicken pox) unless distancing is introduced. Comparing these stats doesn't tell you how 'well' a country is doing.
    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,333

    2 weeks ago today BoJo promised 25,000 tests a day. Not even half they number

    When did he promise 250,000? I suspect they will find upping the lie to be counterproductive. I am sure they have done the angry pointless question as a distraction which only leave blaming JF and denouncing the accuser as a traitor.

    It will be a real test of voting for a monkey so long as it has a blue rosette when the monkey’s indolence and arrogance dramatically increases your chance of a horrible premature death.
    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/mar/18/uk-coronavirus-testing-will-increase-to-25000-a-day-says-boris-johnson
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,154
    I know the Dutch didn't lockdown until later, and wanted to be more cavalier with the spread, like the UK's initial response. They took longer to move on.