Tennis G.O.A.T?

1…1819212324

Comments

  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 25,919
    N0bodyOfTheGoat said:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/tennis/64997434

    Oh dear, never mind!

    Not a grand slam though so no biggie. Free to enter after April so will be at the big one.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • focuszing723
    focuszing723 Posts: 7,204
    You'd have to say it's going to be Novac.
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 25,919
    As I said, post 2, page 1. 😉
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • seanoconn
    seanoconn Posts: 11,456
    We have our favourites and Novak is a bit of a prat but he’s also the GOAT.
    Pinno, מלך אידיוט וחרא מכונאי
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 72,922
    seanoconn said:

    We have our favourites and Novak is a bit of a prat but he’s also the GOAT.

    Lol no
    _
  • seanoconn
    seanoconn Posts: 11,456
    rick_chasey said:

    seanoconn said:

    We have our favourites and Novak is a bit of a prat but he’s also the GOAT.

    Lol no
    Uninformed lol.
    Pinno, מלך אידיוט וחרא מכונאי
  • focuszing723
    focuszing723 Posts: 7,204
    He can't be a full on pr@ because he hugs trees and trees are nice.
  • Wheelspinner
    Wheelspinner Posts: 6,571
    seanoconn said:

    We have our favourites and Novak is a bit of a prat complete and utter tw@, but he’s also a contender for the title of GOAT.

    FTFY.

    I've said it before here, I could care less about Nadal, Fed, Djok or any others. Rod Laver is still the GOAT; twice - repeat TWICE - winner of the calendar Grand Slam. If/when anyone else achieves that... I'll reconsider. Carry on.
    Open One+ BMC TE29 Seven 622SL On One Scandal Cervelo RS
  • focuszing723
    focuszing723 Posts: 7,204
    Wheelspinner said:

    seanoconn said:

    We have our favourites and Novak is a bit of a prat complete and utter tw@, but he’s also a contender for the title of GOAT.

    FTFY.

    I've said it before here, I could care less about Nadal, Fed, Djok or any others. Rod Laver is still the GOAT; twice - repeat TWICE - winner of the calendar Grand Slam. If/when anyone else achieves that... I'll reconsider. Carry on.
    Hot can you be the best of all time if you played with a piece of fancy wood?
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 72,922
    seanoconn said:

    rick_chasey said:

    seanoconn said:

    We have our favourites and Novak is a bit of a prat but he’s also the GOAT.

    Lol no
    Uninformed lol.
    On what basis is he the greatest of all time?
    _
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 25,919
    rick_chasey said:

    seanoconn said:

    rick_chasey said:

    seanoconn said:

    We have our favourites and Novak is a bit of a prat but he’s also the GOAT.

    Lol no
    Uninformed lol.
    On what basis is he the greatest of all time?
    Have a read through.

    https://www.bbc.com/sport/tennis/65868835
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • seanoconn
    seanoconn Posts: 11,456
    pblakeney said:

    rick_chasey said:

    seanoconn said:

    rick_chasey said:

    seanoconn said:

    We have our favourites and Novak is a bit of a prat but he’s also the GOAT.

    Lol no
    Uninformed lol.
    On what basis is he the greatest of all time?
    Have a read through.

    https://www.bbc.com/sport/tennis/65868835
    I think Rick’s trolling again.
    Pinno, מלך אידיוט וחרא מכונאי
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 25,919
    seanoconn said:

    pblakeney said:

    rick_chasey said:

    seanoconn said:

    rick_chasey said:

    seanoconn said:

    We have our favourites and Novak is a bit of a prat but he’s also the GOAT.

    Lol no
    Uninformed lol.
    On what basis is he the greatest of all time?
    Have a read through.

    https://www.bbc.com/sport/tennis/65868835
    I think Rick’s trolling again.
    Could be but sometimes I really do wonder….
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • daniel_b
    daniel_b Posts: 11,610
    edited June 2023
    The stats will currently say he is the goat in a purely numbers based approach.

    Personally a 'greatest of all time' would be someone whose style of play, attitude and demeanour strike a cord with me, AND they happen to be very successful.

    I realise that is a very personal goat, and not in the stats etc, but for me Djok will never be my tennis goat :D

    I appreciate no one in the world will care about that either o:)
    Felt F70 05 (Turbo)
    Marin Palisades Trail 91 and 06
    Scott CR1 SL 12
    Cannondale Synapse Adventure 15 & 16 Di2
    Scott Foil 18
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 72,922
    Not all slams are equal in worth really as you need to take the opposition into account.

    He came into two other contenders at the back end of their extremely lengthy careers (which mitigates his head-to-head record with them) and since then he’s had poor competition.
    _
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 25,919
    Djokovic won his first slams a couple of years before Federer peaked. Who would you say is the GOAT?
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 72,922
    pblakeney said:

    Djokovic won his first slams a couple of years before Federer peaked. Who would you say is the GOAT?

    Probably Federer if we’re talking men’s. And not because I’m biased towards grass either.
    _
  • seanoconn
    seanoconn Posts: 11,456
    edited June 2023
    rick_chasey said:

    Not all slams are equal in worth really as you need to take the opposition into account.

    He came into two other contenders at the back end of their extremely lengthy careers (which mitigates his head-to-head record with them) and since then he’s had poor competition.

    😂😂😂 Tennis obviously not your forte. He turned pro in 2003! Only two years after Nadal, who’s only a year older. Went toe toe with the big dogs for years. The “back end” of Federer and Nadal were still winning slams so I’d hardly say they were reduced.
    Pinno, מלך אידיוט וחרא מכונאי
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 72,922
    edited June 2023
    seanoconn said:

    rick_chasey said:

    Not all slams are equal in worth really as you need to take the opposition into account.

    He came into two other contenders at the back end of their extremely lengthy careers (which mitigates his head-to-head record with them) and since then he’s had poor competition.

    😂😂😂 Tennis obviously not your forte. He turned pro in 2003! Only two years after Nadal, who’s only a year older. Went toe toe with the big dogs for years. The “back end” of Federer and Nadal were still winning slams so I’d hardly say they were reduced.
    Prime Federer was 2004 to 2009. Prime Djokovic was 2011 - 2016.

    8 of Djokovic’s slams came post 2019 where competition was markedly weaker than before.

    I also reckon Federer’s “peak” was higher.
    _
  • seanoconn
    seanoconn Posts: 11,456
    rick_chasey said:

    seanoconn said:

    rick_chasey said:

    Not all slams are equal in worth really as you need to take the opposition into account.

    He came into two other contenders at the back end of their extremely lengthy careers (which mitigates his head-to-head record with them) and since then he’s had poor competition.

    😂😂😂 Tennis obviously not your forte. He turned pro in 2003! Only two years after Nadal, who’s only a year older. Went toe toe with the big dogs for years. The “back end” of Federer and Nadal were still winning slams so I’d hardly say they were reduced.
    Prime Federer was 2004 to 2009. Prime Djokovic was 2011 - 2016.

    8 of Djokovic’s slams came post 2019 where competition was markedly weaker than before.

    I also reckon Federer’s “peak” was higher.
    So what you’re saying is that Federer only won so many grand slams because Djokovic hadn’t reached prime form and Nadal’s all court game hadn’t matured yet. And once that happened, his opportunities for slams were greatly reduced? Harsh.
    Pinno, מלך אידיוט וחרא מכונאי
  • seanoconn
    seanoconn Posts: 11,456
    And by your own admission. Federer won his first 16 grand slams with markedly weaker competition than after.
    Pinno, מלך אידיוט וחרא מכונאי
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 25,919
    rick_chasey said:

    pblakeney said:

    Djokovic won his first slams a couple of years before Federer peaked. Who would you say is the GOAT?

    Probably Federer if we’re talking men’s. And not because I’m biased towards grass either.
    As pointed out above it could be argued that Federer got his early wins against weak opposition. This argument can be used about anyone at any sport.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • seanoconn
    seanoconn Posts: 11,456
    I do remember Federer being more dominant than the others in his ‘peak’ less competition years and his record for most ATP titles backs this up.

    Was close between Nadal and Djokovic but with easily the most weeks ranked No1 and most slams…. There can be only one.
    Pinno, מלך אידיוט וחרא מכונאי
  • wallace_and_gromit
    wallace_and_gromit Posts: 3,081
    I know his record doesn’t stack up in terms of Grand Slams, but Borg is the man in my view. I’m biased as he won Wimbledon for the first 5 years I was aware of its existence.

    We were spoilt with the Borg-McEnroe rivalry.

    Or maybe I’m a crusty old git falling into the trap of thinking it was all so much better “back in the day”!
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 25,919
    wallace_and_gromit said:

    I know his record doesn’t stack up in terms of Grand Slams, but Borg is the man in my view. I’m biased as he won Wimbledon for the first 5 years I was aware of its existence.

    We were spoilt with the Borg-McEnroe rivalry.

    Or maybe I’m a crusty old git falling into the trap of thinking it was all so much better “back in the day”!

    I’m just glad I’ve seen from Connors through to today, and hopefully a lot more.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • wallace_and_gromit
    wallace_and_gromit Posts: 3,081
    pblakeney said:

    I’m just glad I’ve seen from Connors through to today, and hopefully a lot more.

    Indeed. Same on the ladies' side having seen Evert, Martina, Steffi, Seles, Hingis and Serena all at their best.

  • focuszing723
    focuszing723 Posts: 7,204
    Please can someone give me a Tennis score update on Novac's goatness?

    Cheers.
  • Munsford0
    Munsford0 Posts: 617
    What's the point in being statistically best if most people still think you're a kn0b?
  • seanoconn
    seanoconn Posts: 11,456
    focuszing723 said:

    Please can someone give me a Tennis score update on Novac's goatness?

    Cheers.

    Bikeradar Open tennis goatness championship

    Djokovic 2 sets to 1 up, serving with a break in the 4th.
    Pinno, מלך אידיוט וחרא מכונאי
  • seanoconn
    seanoconn Posts: 11,456
    Munsford0 said:

    What's the point in being statistically best if most people still think you're a kn0b?

    Smugness? 🤷‍♂️
    Pinno, מלך אידיוט וחרא מכונאי

Categories