The big Coronavirus thread
Comments
-
This is not a disease where herd immunity can be reached.pblakeney said:
It is an effective method to reach herd immunity.kingstongraham said:
Nope. If you're fully vaccinated, you need to take a pcr test if you have symptoms, otherwise you are free to go infect your workplace.Ncovidius said:
I thought you still have to isolate if you’ve been in direct / close contact with a confirmed positive case.rick_chasey said:So my boss' daughter caught rona at that Boardmaster's festival - his wife who got the jabs very early on has now got it and is bedridden with it and he's coming into the office tomorrow.
*facepalm*
Not a good method, but an effective one.1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Part of the anti-growth coalition0 -
I'm not suggesting that it can.rjsterry said:
This is not a disease where herd immunity can be reached.pblakeney said:
It is an effective method to reach herd immunity.kingstongraham said:
Nope. If you're fully vaccinated, you need to take a pcr test if you have symptoms, otherwise you are free to go infect your workplace.Ncovidius said:
I thought you still have to isolate if you’ve been in direct / close contact with a confirmed positive case.rick_chasey said:So my boss' daughter caught rona at that Boardmaster's festival - his wife who got the jabs very early on has now got it and is bedridden with it and he's coming into the office tomorrow.
*facepalm*
Not a good method, but an effective one.
It's the only logic I can see behind the thinking. Flawed, but what else is there?The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
"live with it"pblakeney said:
I'm not suggesting that it can.rjsterry said:
This is not a disease where herd immunity can be reached.pblakeney said:
It is an effective method to reach herd immunity.kingstongraham said:
Nope. If you're fully vaccinated, you need to take a pcr test if you have symptoms, otherwise you are free to go infect your workplace.Ncovidius said:
I thought you still have to isolate if you’ve been in direct / close contact with a confirmed positive case.rick_chasey said:So my boss' daughter caught rona at that Boardmaster's festival - his wife who got the jabs very early on has now got it and is bedridden with it and he's coming into the office tomorrow.
*facepalm*
Not a good method, but an effective one.
It's the only logic I can see behind the thinking. Flawed, but what else is there?0 -
Agree it's poor going into the office if he doesn't have to. At the same time we couldn't go on with compulsory 10 day isolation as it is too disruptive - I had two within a month and at no point did I catch Covid - not everyone can afford to isolate repeatedly.
I guess the answer is some half way position where people in contact with positive people avoid contact where they reasonably can and test regularly .[Castle Donington Ladies FC - going up in '22]0 -
I think that's right - it's surely bad for business to infect your staff.DeVlaeminck said:Agree it's poor going into the office if he doesn't have to. At the same time we couldn't go on with compulsory 10 day isolation as it is too disruptive - I had two within a month and at no point did I catch Covid - not everyone can afford to isolate repeatedly.
I guess the answer is some half way position where people in contact with positive people avoid contact where they reasonably can and test regularly .0 -
Your choice, and the current government giulelines. This may change once schools have been back for a couple of weeks. I'll stay wfh and socially distant.Jezyboy said:
"live with it"pblakeney said:
I'm not suggesting that it can.rjsterry said:
This is not a disease where herd immunity can be reached.pblakeney said:
It is an effective method to reach herd immunity.kingstongraham said:
Nope. If you're fully vaccinated, you need to take a pcr test if you have symptoms, otherwise you are free to go infect your workplace.Ncovidius said:
I thought you still have to isolate if you’ve been in direct / close contact with a confirmed positive case.rick_chasey said:So my boss' daughter caught rona at that Boardmaster's festival - his wife who got the jabs very early on has now got it and is bedridden with it and he's coming into the office tomorrow.
*facepalm*
Not a good method, but an effective one.
It's the only logic I can see behind the thinking. Flawed, but what else is there?The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
I'm not particularly in support of it as a strategy.pblakeney said:
Your choice, and the current government giulelines. This may change once schools have been back for a couple of weeks. I'll stay wfh and socially distant.Jezyboy said:
"live with it"pblakeney said:
I'm not suggesting that it can.rjsterry said:
This is not a disease where herd immunity can be reached.pblakeney said:
It is an effective method to reach herd immunity.kingstongraham said:
Nope. If you're fully vaccinated, you need to take a pcr test if you have symptoms, otherwise you are free to go infect your workplace.Ncovidius said:
I thought you still have to isolate if you’ve been in direct / close contact with a confirmed positive case.rick_chasey said:So my boss' daughter caught rona at that Boardmaster's festival - his wife who got the jabs very early on has now got it and is bedridden with it and he's coming into the office tomorrow.
*facepalm*
Not a good method, but an effective one.
It's the only logic I can see behind the thinking. Flawed, but what else is there?
I think the current variant would be extremely challenging to control with any kind of measures. I am concerned that the level of protection given by the vaccine isn't quite what one would hope for.
0 -
If it keeps you out of hospital then that is a success.Jezyboy said:
I'm not particularly in support of it as a strategy.pblakeney said:
Your choice, and the current government giulelines. This may change once schools have been back for a couple of weeks. I'll stay wfh and socially distant.Jezyboy said:
"live with it"pblakeney said:
I'm not suggesting that it can.rjsterry said:
This is not a disease where herd immunity can be reached.pblakeney said:
It is an effective method to reach herd immunity.kingstongraham said:
Nope. If you're fully vaccinated, you need to take a pcr test if you have symptoms, otherwise you are free to go infect your workplace.Ncovidius said:
I thought you still have to isolate if you’ve been in direct / close contact with a confirmed positive case.rick_chasey said:So my boss' daughter caught rona at that Boardmaster's festival - his wife who got the jabs very early on has now got it and is bedridden with it and he's coming into the office tomorrow.
*facepalm*
Not a good method, but an effective one.
It's the only logic I can see behind the thinking. Flawed, but what else is there?
I think the current variant would be extremely challenging to control with any kind of measures. I am concerned that the level of protection given by the vaccine isn't quite what one would hope for.
Doesn't mean people should be socialising/working together while potentially carrying.The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
To clarify, it's "learning to live with it" that I'm not particularly sure of as a strategy.
0 -
I'm happy with it as a strategy - but it seems to be used to mean "learning nothing and carrying on as before".Jezyboy said:To clarify, it's "learning to live with it" that I'm not particularly sure of as a strategy.
Learning to live with it would include learning not to go to the office unnecessarily when your whole family is infected.1 -
I think there are people out there that believe learning to live with it means completely ignoring it. They seem incapable of learning anything.kingstongraham said:
I'm happy with it as a strategy - but it seems to be used to mean "learning nothing and carrying on as before".Jezyboy said:To clarify, it's "learning to live with it" that I'm not particularly sure of as a strategy.
Learning to live with it would include learning not to go to the office unnecessarily when your whole family is infected.0 -
-
You are quite capable of being unreasonable, but not in this case. He's an idiot.rick_chasey said:I am not being unreasonable here for thinking that's a sh!tty move, right?
0 -
At least he's told people.0
-
Hah, that's true. I remember meeting some people one evening pre covid and a woman saying she'd just come from dealing with 2 of her kids who both had a vomiting bug.kingstongraham said:At least he's told people.
- Genesis Croix de Fer
- Dolan Tuono0 -
Honestly, if the only changes are masking up occasionally and staying home once in a blue moon, its pretty easy to live the virus.kingstongraham said:
I'm happy with it as a strategy - but it seems to be used to mean "learning nothing and carrying on as before".Jezyboy said:To clarify, it's "learning to live with it" that I'm not particularly sure of as a strategy.
Learning to live with it would include learning not to go to the office unnecessarily when your whole family is infected.
The current reality is that with so much virus about it is quite difficult to avoid being pinged/coming into reasonably close contact with someone who has got busted.0 -
Does feel pretty stupid (and irresponsible, especially if it's bad enough to keep his OH in bed) to risk infecting your workforce. It took me 5 days to test positive after my son did, and then a further couple of days for the wife to test positive.rick_chasey said:I am not being unreasonable here for thinking that's a sh!tty move, right?
0 -
I hadn't previously heard of boardmasters festival despite seemingly every teenager going. Definite sign of being old.1
-
The daughter of my wife's colleague is currently in ICU with what's suspected to be post Covid complications.
She's 13.
“New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!0 -
Hopefully the 12+ cohort will be offered vaccines soon
“New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!0 -
Has anyone argued it is in the interests of 12 year olds? Most of the arguments seem to be about the benefits for society.tailwindhome said:Hopefully the 12+ cohort will be offered vaccines soon
0 -
I guess if you're 12 it's in your interests for your parents not to get Covid.TheBigBean said:
Has anyone argued it is in the interests of 12 year olds? Most of the arguments seem to be about the benefits for society.tailwindhome said:Hopefully the 12+ cohort will be offered vaccines soon
1 -
It is right on the line. Depends on long term non fatal Covid effects, which aren't yet clear. That's why some countries' advisers say yes, others no.TheBigBean said:
Has anyone argued it is in the interests of 12 year olds? Most of the arguments seem to be about the benefits for society.tailwindhome said:Hopefully the 12+ cohort will be offered vaccines soon
0 -
Do you people ever talk about anything other than work!!!!
I'm sure hedgehogs have to work but don't bleat on about it 24 hours a day.0 -
Maybe they do. I don't speak hedgehog.womack said:Do you people ever talk about anything other than work!!!!
I'm sure hedgehogs have to work but don't bleat on about it 24 hours a day.The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
Already recommended for 12-15s living with vulnerable people.mrb123 said:
I guess if you're 12 it's in your interests for your parents not to get Covid.TheBigBean said:
Has anyone argued it is in the interests of 12 year olds? Most of the arguments seem to be about the benefits for society.tailwindhome said:Hopefully the 12+ cohort will be offered vaccines soon
But the crux of it is that your argument is potentially unethical, if the risk to the 12 year old themselves is lower than the risk of taking the vaccine. Which is is, if you measure risk of death.
What may tip the balance is evidence of longer term covid effects. Which requires there to be more covid for longer in order to assess.0 -
Double jabbed 30s guy in our office had a positive test then hospitalised last night.
Released this morning. No further details but logical conclusion is respiratory issues.The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
Have you discussed with your union rep?rick_chasey said:Sort of.
Either way, I think it's a bit of a d!ck move to go into the office when 2/3rds of your home are confirmed positive covid cases *right now*.
H&S rep?0 -
lol. Where do you think I work. I have never worked in a firm with any of that.darkhairedlord said:
Have you discussed with your union rep?rick_chasey said:Sort of.
Either way, I think it's a bit of a d!ck move to go into the office when 2/3rds of your home are confirmed positive covid cases *right now*.
H&S rep?0 -
The 1970s?rick_chasey said:
lol. Where do you think I work.darkhairedlord said:
Have you discussed with your union rep?rick_chasey said:Sort of.
Either way, I think it's a bit of a d!ck move to go into the office when 2/3rds of your home are confirmed positive covid cases *right now*.
H&S rep?
I would have loved to take Bob Crowe into an HR meeting with me0