LEAVE the Conservative Party and save your country!

11481491511531541135

Comments

  • TheBigBean
    TheBigBean Posts: 22,079

    Do you think everyone gets out more than they pay in?

    No, but that isn't what I said. It is probably true that some generations get out more, but is getting close to a poester's hobby horse.
  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 29,903

    I pay shitloads to educate other people's kids.

    To repay your debt for the education you received.
    If that was the calculation, I've reckon I've paid that off a long time ago. How much does a university course cost?
    Even if you have now repaid the cost of all the schools, being born and spending a good week in hospital, child benefit your parents received etc. then you need to start getting into credit to fund your retirement costs. Unfortunately, you won't know how much they will be in advance.


    Trust me, I'm a long way in credit.
    Excellent. If you have a quick death prior to retirement, I'll let you complain about it.
    I don't understand why I won't be mostly paying my own way (and tax) in retirement also.
    A state pension is money coming in and may exceed your tax paid at that point, but basically dying is very expensive, so it all depends how you go. There is some stat around percentage of money the NHS spends on the final year of someone's life, and it's significant. There's also potential costs of nursing homes.

    Let me put it another way. If someone like me doesn't put in more than I get out, the country is screwed.
    For now. You may become very expensive at some point for the reasons I mentioned. Or you may not, in which case, congrats, but you'll be dead when that is finally decided.

    Am intrigued by this discussion so have tried to put some rudimentary sums together in today’s money
    Child benefit £1k pa x 18 = £18k
    Education £5k pa x 13 = £65k
    Pension £9k pa x 15 =£135k

    He might get close to that on SDLT, Chuck in income tax, NI, VAT and Duty and he could have chipped multiples of that number.
    He's got to pay for all the other stuff that governments do as well. His childhood edcuation repayment comes from all of his tax currently being wasted on other people's children. Likewise his NHS savings account is built up out of his tax that goes to the NHS. It's an unknown whether he will need very expensive treatment at some point.
    Average lifetime tax contribution seems to be around £700-800k depending on who you ask.

    This also may be useful.

    https://www.ifs.org.uk/uploads/publications/wps/WP201527.pdf

    Fig 3.3, I think.
    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,603

    Do you think everyone gets out more than they pay in?

    No, but that isn't what I said. It is probably true that some generations get out more, but is getting close to a poester's hobby horse.
    That's the thing with Ponzi schemes. Those in early win, those joining later pay for it. Anyone thinking this country isn't a Ponzi scheme with borrowing to keep it afloat isn't paying attention.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • TheBigBean
    TheBigBean Posts: 22,079
    rjsterry said:

    I pay shitloads to educate other people's kids.

    To repay your debt for the education you received.
    If that was the calculation, I've reckon I've paid that off a long time ago. How much does a university course cost?
    Even if you have now repaid the cost of all the schools, being born and spending a good week in hospital, child benefit your parents received etc. then you need to start getting into credit to fund your retirement costs. Unfortunately, you won't know how much they will be in advance.


    Trust me, I'm a long way in credit.
    Excellent. If you have a quick death prior to retirement, I'll let you complain about it.
    I don't understand why I won't be mostly paying my own way (and tax) in retirement also.
    A state pension is money coming in and may exceed your tax paid at that point, but basically dying is very expensive, so it all depends how you go. There is some stat around percentage of money the NHS spends on the final year of someone's life, and it's significant. There's also potential costs of nursing homes.

    Let me put it another way. If someone like me doesn't put in more than I get out, the country is screwed.
    For now. You may become very expensive at some point for the reasons I mentioned. Or you may not, in which case, congrats, but you'll be dead when that is finally decided.

    Am intrigued by this discussion so have tried to put some rudimentary sums together in today’s money
    Child benefit £1k pa x 18 = £18k
    Education £5k pa x 13 = £65k
    Pension £9k pa x 15 =£135k

    He might get close to that on SDLT, Chuck in income tax, NI, VAT and Duty and he could have chipped multiples of that number.
    He's got to pay for all the other stuff that governments do as well. His childhood edcuation repayment comes from all of his tax currently being wasted on other people's children. Likewise his NHS savings account is built up out of his tax that goes to the NHS. It's an unknown whether he will need very expensive treatment at some point.
    Average lifetime tax contribution seems to be around £700-800k depending on who you ask.

    This also may be useful.

    https://www.ifs.org.uk/uploads/publications/wps/WP201527.pdf

    Fig 3.3, I think.
    That graph starts at 18, so ignores children being recipients. Still, it shows that at KingstonGraham is at the bottom of the curve now.

    Also, presumably it will invite comments about how some people have paid that much in tax already ignoring that they could also end up receiving more than average.
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,295

    rjsterry said:

    I pay shitloads to educate other people's kids.

    To repay your debt for the education you received.
    If that was the calculation, I've reckon I've paid that off a long time ago. How much does a university course cost?
    Even if you have now repaid the cost of all the schools, being born and spending a good week in hospital, child benefit your parents received etc. then you need to start getting into credit to fund your retirement costs. Unfortunately, you won't know how much they will be in advance.


    Trust me, I'm a long way in credit.
    Excellent. If you have a quick death prior to retirement, I'll let you complain about it.
    I don't understand why I won't be mostly paying my own way (and tax) in retirement also.
    A state pension is money coming in and may exceed your tax paid at that point, but basically dying is very expensive, so it all depends how you go. There is some stat around percentage of money the NHS spends on the final year of someone's life, and it's significant. There's also potential costs of nursing homes.

    Let me put it another way. If someone like me doesn't put in more than I get out, the country is screwed.
    For now. You may become very expensive at some point for the reasons I mentioned. Or you may not, in which case, congrats, but you'll be dead when that is finally decided.

    Am intrigued by this discussion so have tried to put some rudimentary sums together in today’s money
    Child benefit £1k pa x 18 = £18k
    Education £5k pa x 13 = £65k
    Pension £9k pa x 15 =£135k

    He might get close to that on SDLT, Chuck in income tax, NI, VAT and Duty and he could have chipped multiples of that number.
    He's got to pay for all the other stuff that governments do as well. His childhood edcuation repayment comes from all of his tax currently being wasted on other people's children. Likewise his NHS savings account is built up out of his tax that goes to the NHS. It's an unknown whether he will need very expensive treatment at some point.
    Average lifetime tax contribution seems to be around £700-800k depending on who you ask.

    This also may be useful.

    https://www.ifs.org.uk/uploads/publications/wps/WP201527.pdf

    Fig 3.3, I think.
    That graph starts at 18, so ignores children being recipients. Still, it shows that at KingstonGraham is at the bottom of the curve now.

    Also, presumably it will invite comments about how some people have paid that much in tax already ignoring that they could also end up receiving more than average.
    That's cash benefits, but an interesting doc nonetheless.
  • Stevo_666
    Stevo_666 Posts: 61,967
    Jezyboy said:

    Stevo will be pleased to hear that the young Labour fans on my Facebook have decided that what is wrong with Starmer is that he's white straight and middle aged.

    The sort of approach that will really win back any floating voters.

    True. Have you told your Facebook friends that they are deluded?
    "I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]
  • john80
    john80 Posts: 2,965
    Stevo_666 said:

    Jezyboy said:

    Stevo will be pleased to hear that the young Labour fans on my Facebook have decided that what is wrong with Starmer is that he's white straight and middle aged.

    The sort of approach that will really win back any floating voters.

    True. Have you told your Facebook friends that they are deluded?
    It has not worked that well this approach on the bike radar forum.
  • tailwindhome
    tailwindhome Posts: 19,474
    What if Brexit didn't give Boris an 80 seat majority?

    What if Brexit limited his majority at 80,and that limiting factor has been removed?
    “New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!
  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 29,903
    john80 said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    Jezyboy said:

    Stevo will be pleased to hear that the young Labour fans on my Facebook have decided that what is wrong with Starmer is that he's white straight and middle aged.

    The sort of approach that will really win back any floating voters.

    True. Have you told your Facebook friends that they are deluded?
    It has not worked that well this approach on the bike radar forum.
    😆
    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition
  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 29,903
    One for Rick and Stevo: local elections in Surrey and Kent, the Conservatives are losing quite a few seats with the LibDems and Greens seeing the benefit.
    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition
  • verylonglegs
    verylonglegs Posts: 4,023

    Why is a constituency that was nearly 70% leave voting then following it up with a vote for UKIP in all by name at a by-election newsworthy? Surely it would have been a surprise and therefore worth talking about if they had elected a Labour MP?

    It’s been labour for a long time.

    Labour also got a spanking on all sides in local elections
    I don't like to dismiss history any more than you but there are moments when you have to accept that what has been for a long time can become irrelevant pretty quickly and for me the Hartlepool by-election is one of those moments. Brexit has been so seismic that pointing to how an area voted even in the 00's tells you very little.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,660
    edited May 2021
    rjsterry said:

    One for Rick and Stevo: local elections in Surrey and Kent, the Conservatives are losing quite a few seats with the LibDems and Greens seeing the benefit.

    Tories lost control of the county council here too, all to LDs.

    Have always wondered why LDs continue to do well at local level.
  • morstar
    morstar Posts: 6,190

    rjsterry said:

    One for Rick and Stevo: local elections in Surrey and Kent, the Conservatives are losing quite a few seats with the LibDems and Greens seeing the benefit.

    Tories lost control of the county council here too, all to LDs.

    Have always wondered why LDs continue to do well at local level.
    Because people are happier to vote with their true leanings in local elections.

    GE’s are totally distorted by fptp and the need to avoid certain outcomes/wasted vote scenario.
  • Dorset_Boy
    Dorset_Boy Posts: 7,623
    SE England - big remainer areas. Won't vote Labour, not happy with Boris and Brexit, so the Lim Dems pick up their 'protest vote', coupled with the Lib Dems generally being OK in local government.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,660
    I don’t live in the SE
  • morstar
    morstar Posts: 6,190
    On the BBC right now interviewing a father and son.
    Son a tory voter and business owner, dad traditional lifelong labour voter. Dad disappointed in exactly way you'd expect and lamenting direction of labour and loss of services e.g. police etc. under conservatives.
    Son then pipes up saying he had to select hospital carefully for childbirth due to lack of doctors at hospitals.

    It's just weird.
  • morstar
    morstar Posts: 6,190
    A bit of conjecture...

    Is the disinterest in large scale manufacturing a conscious decision to break down the traditional labour heartlands and not just simple economics at work.

    Not saying it definitely is, just contemplating. If you look at the old industrial areas, that cohesion built around the industrial plants and unionisation was the stranglehold on labour voting with consistent lines of communication. It simply doesn't exist anymore.
  • DeVlaeminck
    DeVlaeminck Posts: 9,112

    What if Brexit didn't give Boris an 80 seat majority?

    What if Brexit limited his majority at 80,and that limiting factor has been removed?

    Yes I mean I've seen it said that Hartlepool was inevitably going Tory as UKIP split the Tory vote last time. As if these voters were long time Tories who are just returning to the fold rather than traditional Labour voters who have deserting the party first for UKIP now Conservative.
    [Castle Donington Ladies FC - going up in '22]
  • Jezyboy
    Jezyboy Posts: 3,674
    morstar said:

    On the BBC right now interviewing a father and son.
    Son a tory voter and business owner, dad traditional lifelong labour voter. Dad disappointed in exactly way you'd expect and lamenting direction of labour and loss of services e.g. police etc. under conservatives.
    Son then pipes up saying he had to select hospital carefully for childbirth due to lack of doctors at hospitals.

    It's just weird.

    I do think there must be a way for boring competency to gain traction. But perhaps that's too dull for 140 characters.

  • Jezyboy
    Jezyboy Posts: 3,674
    Stevo_666 said:

    Jezyboy said:

    Stevo will be pleased to hear that the young Labour fans on my Facebook have decided that what is wrong with Starmer is that he's white straight and middle aged.

    The sort of approach that will really win back any floating voters.

    True. Have you told your Facebook friends that they are deluded?
    Nah he seems happy in his delusion that everyone is super on board with every aspect of modern social justice. It would be cruel to take that away from him.


  • morstar
    morstar Posts: 6,190
    Jezyboy said:

    morstar said:

    On the BBC right now interviewing a father and son.
    Son a tory voter and business owner, dad traditional lifelong labour voter. Dad disappointed in exactly way you'd expect and lamenting direction of labour and loss of services e.g. police etc. under conservatives.
    Son then pipes up saying he had to select hospital carefully for childbirth due to lack of doctors at hospitals.

    It's just weird.

    I do think there must be a way for boring competency to gain traction. But perhaps that's too dull for 140 characters.

    I think that only now happens when the corruption and incompetence of the incumbents becomes too great to bear.
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,295
    Wales voted leave and stayed with Labour. There's certainly been a big boost for the leaders with the volume of media coverage which shouldn't be overlooked.
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,295
    He is going to be destitute.


  • morstar
    morstar Posts: 6,190

    He is going to be destitute.


    Surfing a wave all the way to the rocks is a risky strategy too.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,660

    Why is a constituency that was nearly 70% leave voting then following it up with a vote for UKIP in all by name at a by-election newsworthy? Surely it would have been a surprise and therefore worth talking about if they had elected a Labour MP?

    It’s been labour for a long time.

    Labour also got a spanking on all sides in local elections
    I don't like to dismiss history any more than you but there are moments when you have to accept that what has been for a long time can become irrelevant pretty quickly and for me the Hartlepool by-election is one of those moments. Brexit has been so seismic that pointing to how an area voted even in the 00's tells you very little.
    Sure. I’m just giving a reason why it’s newsworthy
  • Pross
    Pross Posts: 43,686

    Wales voted leave and stayed with Labour. There's certainly been a big boost for the leaders with the volume of media coverage which shouldn't be overlooked.

    Yeah, the Plaid leader was making the point it was a challenging election for them when the Labour leader was on TV daily (and is generally considered to have done a reasonable job). Labour has increased their majority and effectively have overall control now. Lib Dems managed to get a regional seat, it looked like there might only be 3 parties in the Senedd yesterday

    The collapse of UKIP has also had a very big influence on all results.
  • elbowloh
    elbowloh Posts: 7,078
    Pross said:

    Wales voted leave and stayed with Labour. There's certainly been a big boost for the leaders with the volume of media coverage which shouldn't be overlooked.

    Yeah, the Plaid leader was making the point it was a challenging election for them when the Labour leader was on TV daily (and is generally considered to have done a reasonable job). Labour has increased their majority and effectively have overall control now. Lib Dems managed to get a regional seat, it looked like there might only be 3 parties in the Senedd yesterday

    The collapse of UKIP has also had a very big influence on all results.
    It does help when Boris has been on a prime channel in a prime slot, in what seems like every day since Covid began, with two people either side of him to make him seem competent.
    Felt F1 2014
    Felt Z6 2012
    Red Arthur Caygill steel frame
    Tall....
    www.seewildlife.co.uk
  • tailwindhome
    tailwindhome Posts: 19,474
    I think we can all agree that the humiliation of Jayda Fransen, receiving just the 46 votes in Glasgow, is a good thing.

    “New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!