TDF 2017: Stage 4- Mondorf-les-Bains - Vittel 207.5kms *Spoilers*
Comments
-
As mentioned by Chris Boardman, for consistency a penalty should also have been given to Demare for impeding Bouhanni.
But of course that was never going to happen.
That would have robbed the TDF of a French victory.I'm not getting old... I'm just using lower gears......
Sirius - Steel Reynolds 631
Cove Handjob - Steel Columbus Nivacrom
Trek Madone - Carbon0 -
Blazing Saddles wrote:Rick Chasey wrote:NOS interview one of the jury members.
Basically says Tour can't tolerate deliberately shoulder barging people into barriers, & they feel movement and the elbow particularly shows it's deliberate.
Currently watching.
Avond is currently getting owned by Vive le velo, guest wise.
Getting hard to spot a bloke.
Leontien van Moorsel and Thijs Zonneveld versus Robbie McEwen and Kris Boeckmans, tonight.
No contest.
What was Robbie saying??0 -
At least they have the balls to do something. Better than FIA and Vettel/Ferrari.ROAD < Scott Foil HMX Di2, Volagi Liscio Di2, Jamis Renegade Elite Di2, Cube Reaction Race > ROUGH0
-
Pross wrote:Wonder if Cav injured the shoulder in the crash or when Degenkolb? rode into him when he was on the ground? He appeared to slide down the barriers so as sprint crashes go it should have been a relatively soft landing but then he got hit hard on the ground.0
-
Slim Boy Fat wrote:
Took a risk, lost out.
Don't think he'd have done the full tour anyway given his glandular fever.
Ho hum, poorer tour without both of them
Racing incident imo- Sagan maybe cavalier in his ways but is not nasty as some seem to be suggesting.
Roll on Vuelta0 -
Cannock Chase wrote:As mentioned by Chris Boardman, for consistency a penalty should also have been given to Demare for impeding Bouhanni.
But of course that was never going to happen.
That would have robbed the TDF of a French victory.
Not sure I agree with Boardman on this - Demare didn't force anyone into a barrier. Whilst i totally agree that Demare could have been throwing puppies into everyone's spokes and tieing virgins to railway tracks and still not be disqualified today, I can sort of see where the jury had wriggle room to not throw even a tiny book at him.
Wouldn't be surprised if an unofficial word was had about future direction though.0 -
meanredspider wrote:At least they have the balls to do something. Better than FIA and Vettel/Ferrari.
Well, quite - but now they have to be consistent, and punish anything remotely similar.....but will they?
It's almost the equivalent in horse racing of careless riding - with a probable 5-10 day ban.All Road/ Gravel: tbcWinter: tbcMTB: tbcRoad: tbc"Look at the time...." "he's fallen like an old lady on a cruise ship..."0 -
Sagans arm is on Cavs bars, then when Cav falls to his right his shifters push up Sagans arm. Their front wheels are almost level. Sagan doesn't look to his right, heads straight down.0 -
It was a sprint finish in a bike race. A racing incident. The disqualification is ridiculous.0
-
Blazing Saddles wrote:Leontien van Moorsel
Did I ever tell you about the time I met one of Leontien's ex domestiques in one of Den Haag's less posh nightclubs at 5am..?
It was because I had a pedaleur de charme t-shirt on actually...We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
- @ddraver0 -
Ha, it does though I tell thee!0
-
meanredspider wrote:At least they have the balls to do something. Better than FIA and Vettel/Ferrari.
But is doing something anything as a knee jerk reaction and then getting it wrong, better than not doing anything at all ?"The Prince of Wales is now the King of France" - Calton Kirby0 -
FocusZing wrote:
Cavs bars push Sagans arm up. Their front wheels are almost level. Sagan doesn't look to his right, heads straight down.
Need to go further back than that. The elbow isn't the issue so much as Sagan closing the door, by the first frame there Cav is pretty much already going down.[Castle Donington Ladies FC - going up in '22]0 -
Please make it stop.0
-
Pross wrote:Wonder if Cav injured the shoulder in the crash or when Degenkolb? rode into him when he was on the ground? He appeared to slide down the barriers so as sprint crashes go it should have been a relatively soft landing but then he got hit hard on the ground.
he shoulder checked a Carrefour stick out advert on the barriers at full speed just before he hit the deck with his right shoulder, its presumably foam based, but hit it at sprinting speed and its going to be like falling flat on a dive into water, its going to hurt alot and Im not surprised he broke something in his shoulder as a result0 -
Bluemoon17 wrote:Griepel: "Sometimes I should watch images before I say something. Apologies to @petosagan as I think that decision of the judge is too hard".
Fair play to Griepel. Prepared to apologise when he believes that he has gotten it wrong.
DD.0 -
As one of the few Nacer fans that exist can I just say how touched I am by the people in this thread who have used him as a comparison.0
-
The frame by frame picture collage really shows beautifully how Sagan didn't throw an elbow. Think the decision is too harsh, but I can understand how outcome colours such things.PTP Champion 2019, 2022 & 20230
-
The organisers have to ensure that 60km/hr sprints are safe. It's a disaster to lose Cav and Sagan of course but in the long term it ensures these accidents don't occur again. The message is clear - safety first. Everything else is semantics.'Performance analysis and Froome not being clean was a media driven story. I haven’t heard one guy in the peloton say a negative thing about Froome, and I haven’t heard a single person in the peloton suggest Froome isn’t clean.' TSP0
-
This frame by frame stuff is odd.
When I saw the sprint I thought "Sagan elbowed Cav and he crashed".
Next thing I saw was Sagan going over to Cav and saying in an interview "I was partly to blame."
I don't have strong views on if it's a DQ or whatever but he knew some punishment was inbound.
All this "he's totally innocent" is just dying in a ditch chat. Not even Sagan agrees with you on that.0 -
Andre Greipel @AndreGreipel 11h
Sometimes I should watch images before I say something. Apologies to @petosagan as I think that decision of the judge is too hard.0 -
Rick Chasey wrote:This frame by frame stuff is odd.
When I saw the sprint I thought "Sagan elbowed Cav and he crashed".
Next thing I saw was Sagan going over to Cav and saying in an interview "I was partly to blame."
I don't have strong views on if it's a DQ or whatever but he knew some punishment was inbound.
All this "he's totally innocent" is just dying in a ditch chat. Not even Sagan agrees with you on that.0 -
Apparently Sagan's team have appealed...Rich0
-
If you sent someone you get on with crashing to the ground with possible injuries, wouldn't you sound shaken?0
-
FocusZing wrote:Andre Greipel @AndreGreipel 11h
Sometimes I should watch images before I say something. Apologies to @petosagan as I think that decision of the judge is too hard.
People who are saying "Cav was already falling!!! The elbow is just instinct!! Nothing to do with the crash!! It's Cav's fault!!!"
Now, what's a more worthy discussion is what a better punishment would be.
My personal favourite would be 3hrs on GC and x number of points in every competition, where x is the number which is JUST about achievable but only if Sagan has a monster Tour....0 -
Hang on! Don't you have to establish if the elbow is intentional before you start on worthiness?0
-
-
Bo Duke wrote:The organisers have to ensure that 60km/hr sprints are safe. It's a disaster to lose Cav and Sagan of course but in the long term it ensures these accidents don't occur again. The message is clear - safety first. Everything else is semantics.
Changing lines in the finale is the cause of most accidents, and usually the offence getting punished, so Demare should have been relegated/punished too.
But as someone said, that's France's first sprint victory in Le Tour since Jimmy Casper in 2006. :roll:0