TDF 2017: Stage 4- Mondorf-les-Bains - Vittel 207.5kms *Spoilers*

1…151617181921»

Comments

  • larkim
    larkim Posts: 2,485
    The downside of that is that a potentially excluded rider starts influencing the overall outcome. A rider could take time bonuses, and cause other riders to sit up when in fact if they'd known they were chasing down 4 seconds for third place, rather than an equal time for 4th/5th they might have handled things differently.

    Accepting judges decisions as final is part of most sports, even if later review finds the outcome to be "wrong".
    2015 Canyon Nerve AL 6.0 (son #1's)
    2011 Specialized Hardrock Sport Disc (son #4s)
    2013 Decathlon Triban 3 (red) (mine)
    2019 Hoy Bonaly 26" Disc (son #2s)
    2018 Voodoo Bizango (mine)
    2018 Voodoo Maji (wife's)
  • bendertherobot
    bendertherobot Posts: 11,684
    CAS reject appeal
    My blog: http://www.roubaixcycling.cc (kit reviews and other musings)
    https://twitter.com/roubaixcc
    Facebook? No. Just say no.
  • larkim
    larkim Posts: 2,485
    http://www.tas-cas.org/fileadmin/user_u ... e_5225.pdf
    2015 Canyon Nerve AL 6.0 (son #1's)
    2011 Specialized Hardrock Sport Disc (son #4s)
    2013 Decathlon Triban 3 (red) (mine)
    2019 Hoy Bonaly 26" Disc (son #2s)
    2018 Voodoo Bizango (mine)
    2018 Voodoo Maji (wife's)
  • Richmond Racer 2
    Richmond Racer 2 Posts: 4,698
    Told ya
  • above_the_cows
    above_the_cows Posts: 11,406
    bendertherobot wrote:
    CAS reject appeal

    tenor.gif
    Correlation is not causation.
  • bendertherobot
    bendertherobot Posts: 11,684
    Will be interesting to see whether it's because, well, pointless. Or because Sagan was given an opportunity to put his case under 12.02.006
    My blog: http://www.roubaixcycling.cc (kit reviews and other musings)
    https://twitter.com/roubaixcc
    Facebook? No. Just say no.
  • Richmond Racer 2
    Richmond Racer 2 Posts: 4,698
    bendertherobot wrote:
    Will be interesting to see whether it's because, well, pointless. Or because Sagan was given an opportunity to put his case under 12.02.006



    You see that press release from CAS? That's all you're going to get. There will be no 25 page Reasoned Decision pdf to follow
  • RichN95.
    RichN95. Posts: 27,262
    Sagan's appeal may have been rejected, but there's a big change in fortunes for Cavendish

    DEEDZZmXkAEOHT7.jpg
    Twitter: @RichN95
  • graeme_s-2
    graeme_s-2 Posts: 3,382
    RichN95 wrote:
    Sagan's appeal may have been rejected, but there's a big change in fortunes for Cavendish

    DEEDZZmXkAEOHT7.jpg
    I think it's brilliant that the BBC have let UK Cycling Expert guest tweet!
  • above_the_cows
    above_the_cows Posts: 11,406
    ^Ha!
    Correlation is not causation.
  • sherer
    sherer Posts: 2,460
    been working away so only just had a chance to post on the thread. What upset me the most about this was that DD appealed the original decision and it seems that was what lead to Sagan getting DQ'd. Didn't think that was very sporting from DD.

    Anyway it's all over and done with no, guess his next target will be defending his European Champions jersey
  • graeme_s-2
    graeme_s-2 Posts: 3,382
    I only got round to watching the ITV4 Stage 5 highlights last night. They said that before they DQ'ed Sagan the commissaires spoke to the DSs from Dimension Data and Bora Hansgrohe. So although they didn't speak to Sagan directly, it sounds like his representative was able to argue his case.

Categories