TdF 2016 Stage 12 *Contains spoilers*
Comments
-
Could someone let me know how far seconds wise the Froome, Porte and Mollema group were ahead of Quintana at the time of the crash ?
Thanks0 -
Specialized_Nick wrote:As utterly sh1t as it is for Froomey as least Yatesy takes yellow if the result stands
Not exactly going to get the same buzz as winning it properly though, is he?0 -
Can't they prosecute fans if something like this happens? They do if someone charges on a pitch and disrupts the game at football/rugby/cricket etc...0
-
has no one blamed Froome for looking at his stem yet?0
-
Froome could easily be back in yellow tomorrow. It still feels like the race over.0
-
NorvernRob wrote:smithy21 wrote:Bizarre as it is I think that result will stand.
If it does the sport totally loses credibility. In fact I think Sky should pull the whole team out.
Whether you like Froome or not, this is bigger than that...it's about the sport in general and how it is perceived in the wider world. If you frequent this forum you ought to be pretty negative about this....0 -
They gave Yates back his time gap the other day when the 1km inflatable fell on him0
-
smithy21 wrote:NorvernRob wrote:smithy21 wrote:Bizarre as it is I think that result will stand.
If it does the sport totally loses credibility. In fact I think Sky should pull the whole team out.
But this sort of thing has happened before and results were not changed.
If they do change the results what do they do. Give Froome, Mollema, Porte the same times as the Quintana group or give them the gap they had on Quintana?
Whatever they do its a shambles and I don't think they can change the result as if they do they are just making it up as they go along and only doing it because the yellow jersey is involved.
Quintana had lost the Tour there and now he's on the podium.
Exactly. Froome has smashed Quintana on the flat, uphill and downhill. And he finds himself 40s or so behind. It's a utter shambles, it's not just an also-ran being taken off - we're talking about possibly losing a TdF because of it.0 -
TheBigBean wrote:bobmcstuff wrote:emadden wrote:UCI Rule: 1.2.109: you can cross the finish line on foot as long as you have your bike with you
It does mean he was a bit foolish. I assumed it was a rule that you could run across and he was only a 100m away. Neither of those were true.cedar404 wrote:Could someone let me know how far seconds wise the Froome, Porte and Mollema group were ahead of Quintana at the time of the crash ?0 -
I think they should leave the result as it is. Trying to adjust it makes it even more ridiculous and would be quite complicated.
The only long term answer is masses more barriers. That could really spoil some of the finishes but it may be worth it.0 -
Porte sounds like he's almost crying0
-
No yellow jersey podium ceremony.0
-
bobmcstuff wrote:mfin wrote:IF the results stand, Froome could make a famous win of this.
Whether the results should stand or not we can't tell, as no one has truly seen why the bike stopped.
Why does it matter why the moto stopped?
It does apparently. But, it looks like it had nothing to do with a moto failure, so strictly in this case it the results should stand. There is no footage which shows what happened to the moto really, so we can only go by what it looks like. That's my understanding anyway, I could be wrong.0 -
I think Porte has probably be the most unlucky so far this tour. He even lost time today.0
-
adr82 wrote:cedar404 wrote:Could someone let me know how far seconds wise the Froome, Porte and Mollema group were ahead of Quintana at the time of the crash ?
Porte said in his interview they had 23s, so sounds about right.0 -
Also, although this isn't really the point, Froome will still win from where he is now.0
-
Flecha seems to be comparing this to Contador crashing.
He's an idiot.
I hope Yates doesn't take the jersey on the podium.0 -
TheBigBean wrote:I think Porte has probably be the most unlucky so far this tour. He even lost time today.0
-
bobmcstuff wrote:emadden wrote:UCI Rule: 1.2.109: you can cross the finish line on foot as long as you have your bike with you
Not necessarily. The general tenor of the rule is that the course needs to be completed on a bike. If the bike is broken you are permitted to carry the bike. But by throwing your bike aside and running that is clearly not right... but there may not be a direct rule on this.**************************************************
www.dotcycling.com
***************************************************0 -
emadden wrote:bobmcstuff wrote:emadden wrote:UCI Rule: 1.2.109: you can cross the finish line on foot as long as you have your bike with you
Not necessarily. The general tenor of the rule is that the course needs to be completed on a bike. If the bike is broken you are permitted to carry the bike. But by throwing your bike aside and running that is clearly not right... but there may not be a direct rule on this.0 -
Graeme_S wrote:They gave Yates back his time gap the other day when the 1km inflatable fell on himhttp://www.georgesfoundation.org
http://100hillsforgeorge.blogspot.com/
http://www.12on12in12.blogspot.co.uk/0 -
mfin wrote:emadden wrote:
Poor Froome fanboys
Anyone that reacts to what happened from a Froome bias is daft anyway. It is simply something that's happened to the leader of GC and possibly affecting the standings which makes it interesting.
Personally I'm more gutted for Titchie Richie. He would have moved up with that move. And his efforts were all for nothing.Correlation is not causation.0 -
The only thing we do know here is that a lot of fans on mountains are idiots. Something like this was always going to happen.0
-
mroli wrote:Graeme_S wrote:They gave Yates back his time gap the other day when the 1km inflatable fell on him0
-
Looking at the video it was Porte followed by Froome followed by Mollema as the bike stopped. Porte hit it first camera left, Froome hit it camera right, then Mollema piled into the back of Porte.0
-
mfin wrote:The only thing we do know here is that a lot of fans on mountains are idiots. Something like this was always going to happen.0
-
mfin wrote:Looking at the video it was Porte followed by Froome followed by Mollema as the bike stopped. Porte hit it first camera left, Froome hit it camera right, then Mollema piled into the back of Porte.0
-
More importantly, another late night for me. :roll:
I had hoped for an early finish but I'm off to bed now and won't sleep until I know the jury decision....
I think the fairest outcome is to give Froome, Porte and Mollema 23 seconds over the chasers, as that's what they had when it all went t!ts up.Head Hands Heart Lungs Legs0 -
In this day and age, I find it shocking that they allow spectators so close to the racing!
In the World Rally Championship, the stage would be abandoned for scenes like that, before the crash.================
2020 Voodoo Marasa
2017 Cube Attain GTC Pro Disc 2016
2016 Voodoo Wazoo0