BREXIT - Is This Really Still Rumbling On? 😴

1181818191821182318242110

Comments

  • elbowloh
    elbowloh Posts: 7,078
    rjsterry said:

    elbowloh said:

    Just today Boris has refused to rule out more temporary visas for HGV drivers to fix the current and future supply issues caused by a lack of HGV drivers

    So they're now doing near enough exactly what they told the logistics industry they absolutely couldn't do back in June. Except now the action is three months too late and they have created the panic.
    Its all about ideology, not what's best.
    Felt F1 2014
    Felt Z6 2012
    Red Arthur Caygill steel frame
    Tall....
    www.seewildlife.co.uk
  • tailwindhome
    tailwindhome Posts: 19,436
    I wish we could skip through the crisis to the inevitable government line that greedy HGV drivers are to blame for the empty shelves
    “New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661

    I wish we could skip through the crisis to the inevitable government line that greedy HGV drivers are to blame for the empty shelves

    Bit behind the curve there mate.

    https://forum.bikeradar.com/discussion/comment/20837803/#Comment_20837803
  • elbowloh
    elbowloh Posts: 7,078
    Walked past the local petrol station earlier.

    Still closed.
    Felt F1 2014
    Felt Z6 2012
    Red Arthur Caygill steel frame
    Tall....
    www.seewildlife.co.uk
  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 29,574
    elbowloh said:

    Walked past the local petrol station earlier.

    Still closed.

    Only diesel at our nearest. Still.
    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,387



    To be fair, he didn't say which Christmas.

    Though I'm a bit confused... what are we adjusting to? Shouldn't we be adjusting to much better everything (NHS, international trade and economy etc), given the promise of the Brexit prospectus?

    Or is his 'period of adjustment' pretty much what was labelled as 'Project Fear' before? Is he admitting that everything is going pear-shaped, and we'd better just get used to it?
  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 29,574
    edited October 2021




    To be fair, he didn't say which Christmas.

    Though I'm a bit confused... what are we adjusting to? Shouldn't we be adjusting to much better everything (NHS, international trade and economy etc), given the promise of the Brexit prospectus?

    Or is his 'period of adjustment' pretty much what was labelled as 'Project Fear' before? Is he admitting that everything is going pear-shaped, and we'd better just get used to it?

    Ugh. The sheer f***ing idiocy of the idea that businesses are all sitting on huge cash reserves that they have resisted paying to their staff all this time. And that a couple of difficult months will just magically gift us all a big pay rise and increased productivity.
    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,387
    rjsterry said:




    To be fair, he didn't say which Christmas.

    Though I'm a bit confused... what are we adjusting to? Shouldn't we be adjusting to much better everything (NHS, international trade and economy etc), given the promise of the Brexit prospectus?

    Or is his 'period of adjustment' pretty much what was labelled as 'Project Fear' before? Is he admitting that everything is going pear-shaped, and we'd better just get used to it?

    Ugh. The sheer f***ing idiocy of the idea that businesses are all sitting on huge cash reserves that they have resisted paying to their staff all this time. And that a couple of difficult months will just magically gift us all a big pay rise and increased productivity.

    Two months. Haha. You've got to admit that the bloke's a comedian.
  • ddraver
    ddraver Posts: 26,698
    edited October 2021
    About as good a change as possible...

    edit - this isnt the Roubaix thread...
    We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
    - @ddraver
  • john80
    john80 Posts: 2,965
    Jezyboy said:

    If there's not a shortage of fuel delivery drivers, why are the army getting in on it?

    I feel this has been explained above. Care to suggest your solution to the public buying 182% of the normal fuel volumes.
  • john80
    john80 Posts: 2,965

    john80 said:

    Trade body guy on the radio was stating that fuel sales over the weekend were 182% of normal. So given that there is not a shortage of fuel delivery drivers or fuel at depots as has been stated by the industry chiefs what's the plan cakestoppers. Should the government own as many trucks as the industry and have that many drivers to deliver fuel when the public are thick. Should fuel stations hold X times as much fuel to smooth the general publics stupidity. Should we as consumers pay for industry to have excess trucks and drivers on retainer. Or should we ask the consumer to take responsibility for their decision making.

    So the shortage of lorry drivers isn’t exclusive to the UK, other EU nations have this, but they can dip into the wider labour pool (ie countries without a shortage) really easily as they are within the same market.

    UK no longer has easy access to that or any other labour pool - so they can’t draw on that pool of people easily when there is more shorter term demand spikes - longer term that’s less of an issue but not everything is about the long term.

    That’s what I mean by brittle - lack of flexibility.

    Eventually the Uk will adjust, but that will essentially be a type of “excess” resilience. The flexibility will return but at a literally higher price.
    The fuel example is a bad one as we never had access to a foreign pool as delivery driving of fuel is a day or Nightshift job that is well paid and has good terms and conditions. So if we cannot get an army guy who drives a tanker for the army to do it what makes you think the Polish guy is going to solve the problem.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    john80 said:

    john80 said:

    Trade body guy on the radio was stating that fuel sales over the weekend were 182% of normal. So given that there is not a shortage of fuel delivery drivers or fuel at depots as has been stated by the industry chiefs what's the plan cakestoppers. Should the government own as many trucks as the industry and have that many drivers to deliver fuel when the public are thick. Should fuel stations hold X times as much fuel to smooth the general publics stupidity. Should we as consumers pay for industry to have excess trucks and drivers on retainer. Or should we ask the consumer to take responsibility for their decision making.

    So the shortage of lorry drivers isn’t exclusive to the UK, other EU nations have this, but they can dip into the wider labour pool (ie countries without a shortage) really easily as they are within the same market.

    UK no longer has easy access to that or any other labour pool - so they can’t draw on that pool of people easily when there is more shorter term demand spikes - longer term that’s less of an issue but not everything is about the long term.

    That’s what I mean by brittle - lack of flexibility.

    Eventually the Uk will adjust, but that will essentially be a type of “excess” resilience. The flexibility will return but at a literally higher price.
    The fuel example is a bad one as we never had access to a foreign pool as delivery driving of fuel is a day or Nightshift job that is well paid and has good terms and conditions. So if we cannot get an army guy who drives a tanker for the army to do it what makes you think the Polish guy is going to solve the problem.
    Because that is what the industry is saying is the difference.
  • Pross
    Pross Posts: 43,463
    ddraver said:

    About as good a change as possible...

    edit - this isnt the Roubaix thread...

    Ha ha I did the same!
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    edited October 2021
    And as ever, higher wages without higher productivity is just inflation - that’s not economic growth.
  • Jezyboy
    Jezyboy Posts: 3,608

    And as ever, higher wages without higher productivity is just inflation - that’s not economic growth.

    Sounds suspiciously like something an expert would say.
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,387

    And as ever, higher wages without higher productivity is just inflation - that’s not economic growth.


    Well, given that pretty much everything Johnson is doing is socialist in essence now, he might as well do the job of the unions as well. If I remember rightly, the NUM asked for a 35% rise: I wonder what Johnson will give HGV drivers?

    Seems to me he's pretty anti-business now too. (If you ignore the businesses who have cosied up to various Tory ministers.)
  • emanresu
    emanresu Posts: 320
    john80 said:

    Jezyboy said:

    If there's not a shortage of fuel delivery drivers, why are the army getting in on it?

    I feel this has been explained above. Care to suggest your solution to the public buying 182% of the normal fuel volumes.
    The solution to the public buying 182% of the normal fuel volumes is to simply have enough drivers to supply 100% of the normal fuel volumes.

    The only reason the public is buying more fuel is because of panic that there isn't enough drivers to deliver fuel.
  • john80 said:

    john80 said:

    Trade body guy on the radio was stating that fuel sales over the weekend were 182% of normal. So given that there is not a shortage of fuel delivery drivers or fuel at depots as has been stated by the industry chiefs what's the plan cakestoppers. Should the government own as many trucks as the industry and have that many drivers to deliver fuel when the public are thick. Should fuel stations hold X times as much fuel to smooth the general publics stupidity. Should we as consumers pay for industry to have excess trucks and drivers on retainer. Or should we ask the consumer to take responsibility for their decision making.

    So the shortage of lorry drivers isn’t exclusive to the UK, other EU nations have this, but they can dip into the wider labour pool (ie countries without a shortage) really easily as they are within the same market.

    UK no longer has easy access to that or any other labour pool - so they can’t draw on that pool of people easily when there is more shorter term demand spikes - longer term that’s less of an issue but not everything is about the long term.

    That’s what I mean by brittle - lack of flexibility.

    Eventually the Uk will adjust, but that will essentially be a type of “excess” resilience. The flexibility will return but at a literally higher price.
    The fuel example is a bad one as we never had access to a foreign pool as delivery driving of fuel is a day or Nightshift job that is well paid and has good terms and conditions. So if we cannot get an army guy who drives a tanker for the army to do it what makes you think the Polish guy is going to solve the problem.
    They used to come over and live here so could work day or night shifts
  • Does anybody else think the army drivers will get offered the chance to double their salaries?
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,387

    john80 said:

    john80 said:

    Trade body guy on the radio was stating that fuel sales over the weekend were 182% of normal. So given that there is not a shortage of fuel delivery drivers or fuel at depots as has been stated by the industry chiefs what's the plan cakestoppers. Should the government own as many trucks as the industry and have that many drivers to deliver fuel when the public are thick. Should fuel stations hold X times as much fuel to smooth the general publics stupidity. Should we as consumers pay for industry to have excess trucks and drivers on retainer. Or should we ask the consumer to take responsibility for their decision making.

    So the shortage of lorry drivers isn’t exclusive to the UK, other EU nations have this, but they can dip into the wider labour pool (ie countries without a shortage) really easily as they are within the same market.

    UK no longer has easy access to that or any other labour pool - so they can’t draw on that pool of people easily when there is more shorter term demand spikes - longer term that’s less of an issue but not everything is about the long term.

    That’s what I mean by brittle - lack of flexibility.

    Eventually the Uk will adjust, but that will essentially be a type of “excess” resilience. The flexibility will return but at a literally higher price.
    The fuel example is a bad one as we never had access to a foreign pool as delivery driving of fuel is a day or Nightshift job that is well paid and has good terms and conditions. So if we cannot get an army guy who drives a tanker for the army to do it what makes you think the Polish guy is going to solve the problem.
    They used to come over and live here so could work day or night shifts

    Wasn't there something called 'Freedom of Movement', or something? Kinda made these things easier, as I remember.
  • tailwindhome
    tailwindhome Posts: 19,436
    john80 said:

    The fuel example is a bad one as we never had access to a foreign pool as delivery driving of fuel is a day or Nightshift job that is well paid and has good terms and conditions.

    I don't understand this sentence.

    Are you saying better wages, terms and conditions were a barrier to foreign workers?
    “New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!
  • john80
    john80 Posts: 2,965

    john80 said:

    john80 said:

    Trade body guy on the radio was stating that fuel sales over the weekend were 182% of normal. So given that there is not a shortage of fuel delivery drivers or fuel at depots as has been stated by the industry chiefs what's the plan cakestoppers. Should the government own as many trucks as the industry and have that many drivers to deliver fuel when the public are thick. Should fuel stations hold X times as much fuel to smooth the general publics stupidity. Should we as consumers pay for industry to have excess trucks and drivers on retainer. Or should we ask the consumer to take responsibility for their decision making.

    So the shortage of lorry drivers isn’t exclusive to the UK, other EU nations have this, but they can dip into the wider labour pool (ie countries without a shortage) really easily as they are within the same market.

    UK no longer has easy access to that or any other labour pool - so they can’t draw on that pool of people easily when there is more shorter term demand spikes - longer term that’s less of an issue but not everything is about the long term.

    That’s what I mean by brittle - lack of flexibility.

    Eventually the Uk will adjust, but that will essentially be a type of “excess” resilience. The flexibility will return but at a literally higher price.
    The fuel example is a bad one as we never had access to a foreign pool as delivery driving of fuel is a day or Nightshift job that is well paid and has good terms and conditions. So if we cannot get an army guy who drives a tanker for the army to do it what makes you think the Polish guy is going to solve the problem.
    Because that is what the industry is saying is the difference.
    That's funny. Fuel boss after fuel boss has been on saying they don't have a shortage of drivers. As always you know best though.
  • john80
    john80 Posts: 2,965

    john80 said:

    The fuel example is a bad one as we never had access to a foreign pool as delivery driving of fuel is a day or Nightshift job that is well paid and has good terms and conditions.

    I don't understand this sentence.

    Are you saying better wages, terms and conditions were a barrier to foreign workers?
    You get up every day and drive to the fuel depot. Pick up your truck and do your job then go home. Not really a job for a polish trucker is it when he has to rent a house locally to take the job. Your inability to understand how foreign workers typically work the UK market to their benefit is not my problem.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    john80 said:

    john80 said:

    john80 said:

    Trade body guy on the radio was stating that fuel sales over the weekend were 182% of normal. So given that there is not a shortage of fuel delivery drivers or fuel at depots as has been stated by the industry chiefs what's the plan cakestoppers. Should the government own as many trucks as the industry and have that many drivers to deliver fuel when the public are thick. Should fuel stations hold X times as much fuel to smooth the general publics stupidity. Should we as consumers pay for industry to have excess trucks and drivers on retainer. Or should we ask the consumer to take responsibility for their decision making.

    So the shortage of lorry drivers isn’t exclusive to the UK, other EU nations have this, but they can dip into the wider labour pool (ie countries without a shortage) really easily as they are within the same market.

    UK no longer has easy access to that or any other labour pool - so they can’t draw on that pool of people easily when there is more shorter term demand spikes - longer term that’s less of an issue but not everything is about the long term.

    That’s what I mean by brittle - lack of flexibility.

    Eventually the Uk will adjust, but that will essentially be a type of “excess” resilience. The flexibility will return but at a literally higher price.
    The fuel example is a bad one as we never had access to a foreign pool as delivery driving of fuel is a day or Nightshift job that is well paid and has good terms and conditions. So if we cannot get an army guy who drives a tanker for the army to do it what makes you think the Polish guy is going to solve the problem.
    Because that is what the industry is saying is the difference.
    That's funny. Fuel boss after fuel boss has been on saying they don't have a shortage of drivers. As always you know best though.
    BP literally said the opposite hence the panic
  • john80
    john80 Posts: 2,965

    john80 said:

    john80 said:

    Trade body guy on the radio was stating that fuel sales over the weekend were 182% of normal. So given that there is not a shortage of fuel delivery drivers or fuel at depots as has been stated by the industry chiefs what's the plan cakestoppers. Should the government own as many trucks as the industry and have that many drivers to deliver fuel when the public are thick. Should fuel stations hold X times as much fuel to smooth the general publics stupidity. Should we as consumers pay for industry to have excess trucks and drivers on retainer. Or should we ask the consumer to take responsibility for their decision making.

    So the shortage of lorry drivers isn’t exclusive to the UK, other EU nations have this, but they can dip into the wider labour pool (ie countries without a shortage) really easily as they are within the same market.

    UK no longer has easy access to that or any other labour pool - so they can’t draw on that pool of people easily when there is more shorter term demand spikes - longer term that’s less of an issue but not everything is about the long term.

    That’s what I mean by brittle - lack of flexibility.

    Eventually the Uk will adjust, but that will essentially be a type of “excess” resilience. The flexibility will return but at a literally higher price.
    The fuel example is a bad one as we never had access to a foreign pool as delivery driving of fuel is a day or Nightshift job that is well paid and has good terms and conditions. So if we cannot get an army guy who drives a tanker for the army to do it what makes you think the Polish guy is going to solve the problem.
    They used to come over and live here so could work day or night shifts
    They just didn't in any great numbers drive fuel tankers. Stop pushing a false narrative.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    john80 said:

    john80 said:

    The fuel example is a bad one as we never had access to a foreign pool as delivery driving of fuel is a day or Nightshift job that is well paid and has good terms and conditions.

    I don't understand this sentence.

    Are you saying better wages, terms and conditions were a barrier to foreign workers?
    You get up every day and drive to the fuel depot. Pick up your truck and do your job then go home. Not really a job for a polish trucker is it when he has to rent a house locally to take the job. Your inability to understand how foreign workers typically work the UK market to their benefit is not my problem.
    I think you don’t understand “foreign workers” and how they work.

    Some people chose to live here, you know. Not everyone is wedded to the motherland like you are
  • verylonglegs
    verylonglegs Posts: 4,023
    I think he regards anyone outside of Cumbria as foreign.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    How does he think I ended up here?!
  • tailwindhome
    tailwindhome Posts: 19,436
    john80 said:

    john80 said:

    The fuel example is a bad one as we never had access to a foreign pool as delivery driving of fuel is a day or Nightshift job that is well paid and has good terms and conditions.

    I don't understand this sentence.

    Are you saying better wages, terms and conditions were a barrier to foreign workers?
    You get up every day and drive to the fuel depot. Pick up your truck and do your job then go home. Not really a job for a polish trucker is it when he has to rent a house locally to take the job. Your inability to understand how foreign workers typically work the UK market to their benefit is not my problem.
    If that is what you meant, that is what you should have written.



    “New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    This leak of where the world’s corrupt hide and launder their money is not a good look for the City of London.