BREXIT - Is This Really Still Rumbling On? 😴

1160816091611161316142110

Comments

  • coopster_the_1st
    coopster_the_1st Posts: 5,158
    edited December 2020

    Some news today:

    - UK attacts record venture capital investment in tech firms in 2020. More than the rest of Europe combined

    Because of Brexit? :wink:
  • john80
    john80 Posts: 2,965
    Take a step back lads. Cancel Brexit because a high end restaurant can't get a specific small bit of cheese from an obscure French producer for their cheese board. I am off to start a restaurant food supply business where I import food such as this and then distribute it to restaurants. This business model can't possibly exist can it.
  • Did you read it?

    The problem with mixed consignments seems to be a recurring theme.
    Except for the rest of the world which seems to cope.
    I am going to ignore you because I refuse to believe that you do not understand the issue.
  • ballysmate
    ballysmate Posts: 15,930

    Why people want this I will never understand

    Being outside the EU perhaps explains why there are no Italian restaurants in New York. Oh... er... hang on a min...
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    Must stop posting things and expecting them to read beyond the headline.

  • Must stop posting things and expecting them to read beyond the headline.

    I thought it was a good article and as I mentioned earlier these type of shipments will likely be the biggest loser.
  • ballysmate
    ballysmate Posts: 15,930
    I read it.

    Until now, it’s always been easy to find enough Sardinians already living in London to keep the kitchens humming and diners happy. Post-Brexit, Europeans wanting to move to the U.K. will need a job offer to get working papers, so Sanna will need to take greater risks in hiring. “It’s hard to know if someone is good or not if you haven’t met them in person,”

    Why do you or San(n)a think that it should be easier for him to hire Sardinians that it should be for the owner of the Thai restaurant next door to him to hire Asian chefs?
  • I read it.

    Until now, it’s always been easy to find enough Sardinians already living in London to keep the kitchens humming and diners happy. Post-Brexit, Europeans wanting to move to the U.K. will need a job offer to get working papers, so Sanna will need to take greater risks in hiring. “It’s hard to know if someone is good or not if you haven’t met them in person,”

    Why do you or San(n)a think that it should be easier for him to hire Sardinians that it should be for the owner of the Thai restaurant next door to him to hire Asian chefs?

    With millions now out of work, they can hire some of those instead.
  • I read it.

    Until now, it’s always been easy to find enough Sardinians already living in London to keep the kitchens humming and diners happy. Post-Brexit, Europeans wanting to move to the U.K. will need a job offer to get working papers, so Sanna will need to take greater risks in hiring. “It’s hard to know if someone is good or not if you haven’t met them in person,”

    Why do you or San(n)a think that it should be easier for him to hire Sardinians that it should be for the owner of the Thai restaurant next door to him to hire Asian chefs?

    You have to see Sanna as an irrelevance, it is there merely as an example to explain a bigger issue.

    The Thai restaurant has come into being with existing rules and regulations and ability to get ingredients and staff.

    There are many other businesses which came into being and flourished because of the SM. Some of these will not be able to adapt and stay profitable and will cease to trade.
  • ballysmate
    ballysmate Posts: 15,930

    I read it.

    Until now, it’s always been easy to find enough Sardinians already living in London to keep the kitchens humming and diners happy. Post-Brexit, Europeans wanting to move to the U.K. will need a job offer to get working papers, so Sanna will need to take greater risks in hiring. “It’s hard to know if someone is good or not if you haven’t met them in person,”

    Why do you or San(n)a think that it should be easier for him to hire Sardinians that it should be for the owner of the Thai restaurant next door to him to hire Asian chefs?

    With millions now out of work, they can hire some of those instead.
    We have millions of ethnic Thais out of work have we?
    Or do you mean that the Thai restaurant owner can make do with the local unemployed , whereas the Italian restaurant owner can have special dispensation because he's a nice European?
  • I read it.

    Until now, it’s always been easy to find enough Sardinians already living in London to keep the kitchens humming and diners happy. Post-Brexit, Europeans wanting to move to the U.K. will need a job offer to get working papers, so Sanna will need to take greater risks in hiring. “It’s hard to know if someone is good or not if you haven’t met them in person,”

    Why do you or San(n)a think that it should be easier for him to hire Sardinians that it should be for the owner of the Thai restaurant next door to him to hire Asian chefs?

    With millions now out of work, they can hire some of those instead.
    We have millions of ethnic Thais out of work have we?
    Or do you mean that the Thai restaurant owner can make do with the local unemployed , whereas the Italian restaurant owner can have special dispensation because he's a nice European?
    Both can employ local workers, just like any other business they need to investcinctheirxworkforcexandctrain them.
  • ballysmate
    ballysmate Posts: 15,930

    I read it.

    Until now, it’s always been easy to find enough Sardinians already living in London to keep the kitchens humming and diners happy. Post-Brexit, Europeans wanting to move to the U.K. will need a job offer to get working papers, so Sanna will need to take greater risks in hiring. “It’s hard to know if someone is good or not if you haven’t met them in person,”

    Why do you or San(n)a think that it should be easier for him to hire Sardinians that it should be for the owner of the Thai restaurant next door to him to hire Asian chefs?

    With millions now out of work, they can hire some of those instead.
    We have millions of ethnic Thais out of work have we?
    Or do you mean that the Thai restaurant owner can make do with the local unemployed , whereas the Italian restaurant owner can have special dispensation because he's a nice European?
    Both can employ local workers, just like any other business they need to investcinctheirxworkforcexandctrain them.
    I agree. The person in Rick's article is complaining about an issue that is easily overcome.
  • TheBigBean
    TheBigBean Posts: 21,919

    I read it.

    Until now, it’s always been easy to find enough Sardinians already living in London to keep the kitchens humming and diners happy. Post-Brexit, Europeans wanting to move to the U.K. will need a job offer to get working papers, so Sanna will need to take greater risks in hiring. “It’s hard to know if someone is good or not if you haven’t met them in person,”

    Why do you or San(n)a think that it should be easier for him to hire Sardinians that it should be for the owner of the Thai restaurant next door to him to hire Asian chefs?

    You have to see Sanna as an irrelevance, it is there merely as an example to explain a bigger issue.

    The Thai restaurant has come into being with existing rules and regulations and ability to get ingredients and staff.

    There are many other businesses which came into being and flourished because of the SM. Some of these will not be able to adapt and stay profitable and will cease to trade.
    I see. So you do understand that there is a solution.
  • ballysmate
    ballysmate Posts: 15,930
    edited December 2020

    I read it.

    Until now, it’s always been easy to find enough Sardinians already living in London to keep the kitchens humming and diners happy. Post-Brexit, Europeans wanting to move to the U.K. will need a job offer to get working papers, so Sanna will need to take greater risks in hiring. “It’s hard to know if someone is good or not if you haven’t met them in person,”

    Why do you or San(n)a think that it should be easier for him to hire Sardinians that it should be for the owner of the Thai restaurant next door to him to hire Asian chefs?

    You have to see Sanna as an irrelevance, it is there merely as an example to explain a bigger issue.

    The Thai restaurant has come into being with existing rules and regulations and ability to get ingredients and staff.

    There are many other businesses which came into being and flourished because of the SM. Some of these will not be able to adapt and stay profitable and will cease to trade.
    Like the tradesmen that were undercut when FoM was introduced? They had to adapt to survive or went under.
    Before my time on here. There may have been posts on here supporting plumbers, chippies and the like, when the rules were changed, but I somehow doubt it.
  • Stevo_666
    Stevo_666 Posts: 61,425

    Stevo_666 said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    Where’s SC to talk about compound rates

    Don't think he's saying 4% pa though, just 4% in total which is obviously massively different.

    Yes he is,

    He is saying the economy will be 4% smaller in year 15, so will have been 3.75% smaller in year 14.

    We are already 2.5% smaller so the compounded loss would far surpass the Covid losses.

    Let’s assume 0.5% of UK economy is £ the cumulative loss is;
    Year 1 = £10bn
    Year 2 = £20bn
    Year 3 = £40bn
    Year 4 = £80bn
    Year 5 = £160bn
    Year 6 =

    That is so horrific I am doubting my maths.

    So am I. Don't recall seeing any forecasts like that.
    OBR and Andrew Bailey
    Still haven't seen them. Link to your source please.

    If this involves extrapolation of forecasts over a period beyond which forecasting is khown to be vaguely accurate then I'm sure you know my views on that already.
    https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-gdp/failure-to-get-brexit-trade-deal-would-wipe-extra-2-off-uk-output-obr-idUSKBN285209

    This is publicly available information and really would have been quicker for you to Google than write that sentence.
    I wanted to see your source.

    No mention of specific timescales other than 'the long run'. And we all know about the accuracy of long range forecasts. No mention of other possible compensation given a times (which are equally hard to forecast accurately the long run). So I will give it the appropriate weighting.
    "I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]
  • I read it.

    Until now, it’s always been easy to find enough Sardinians already living in London to keep the kitchens humming and diners happy. Post-Brexit, Europeans wanting to move to the U.K. will need a job offer to get working papers, so Sanna will need to take greater risks in hiring. “It’s hard to know if someone is good or not if you haven’t met them in person,”

    Why do you or San(n)a think that it should be easier for him to hire Sardinians that it should be for the owner of the Thai restaurant next door to him to hire Asian chefs?

    You have to see Sanna as an irrelevance, it is there merely as an example to explain a bigger issue.

    The Thai restaurant has come into being with existing rules and regulations and ability to get ingredients and staff.

    There are many other businesses which came into being and flourished because of the SM. Some of these will not be able to adapt and stay profitable and will cease to trade.
    Like the tradesmen that were undercut when FoM was introduced? They had to adapt to survive or went under.
    Before my time on here. There may have been posts on here supporting plumbers, chippies and the like, when the rules were changed, but I somehow doubt it.
    You may well not care that various businesses will cease to exist but the point of the article is to explain the difference between what we had and what we are getting
  • Stevo_666 said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    Where’s SC to talk about compound rates

    Don't think he's saying 4% pa though, just 4% in total which is obviously massively different.

    Yes he is,

    He is saying the economy will be 4% smaller in year 15, so will have been 3.75% smaller in year 14.

    We are already 2.5% smaller so the compounded loss would far surpass the Covid losses.

    Let’s assume 0.5% of UK economy is £ the cumulative loss is;
    Year 1 = £10bn
    Year 2 = £20bn
    Year 3 = £40bn
    Year 4 = £80bn
    Year 5 = £160bn
    Year 6 =

    That is so horrific I am doubting my maths.

    So am I. Don't recall seeing any forecasts like that.
    OBR and Andrew Bailey
    Still haven't seen them. Link to your source please.

    If this involves extrapolation of forecasts over a period beyond which forecasting is khown to be vaguely accurate then I'm sure you know my views on that already.
    https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-gdp/failure-to-get-brexit-trade-deal-would-wipe-extra-2-off-uk-output-obr-idUSKBN285209

    This is publicly available information and really would have been quicker for you to Google than write that sentence.
    I wanted to see your source.

    No mention of specific timescales other than 'the long run'. And we all know about the accuracy of long range forecasts. No mention of other possible compensation given a times (which are equally hard to forecast accurately the long run). So I will give it the appropriate weighting.
    And you wonder why people don’t bother posting you links, no matter how good the source you will just career off at an obtuse angle in a desperate attempt to maintain the illusion that nothing bad will come of Brexit
  • david37
    david37 Posts: 1,313

    david37 said:

    david37 said:

    david37 said:

    No fs passporting

    Have you been following the last 9 months?
    Worth reiterating.

    Makes a difference to my job
    Doesn't have free movement of people either. Lots of things it doesn't have that weren't expected.
    Depending upon how you look at it this will come to be seen as the biggest omission or biggest accomplishment and in many ways symptomatic of the exclusion of 80% of the UK economy from Boris’s world beating FTA.
    Glass always totally empty still. I wish you were negotiating it would have gone swimmingly.
    How could it be worse? He missed 80% of the economy. I guess if I had missed services and fishing I could have got to 80.1%.

    But I am genuinely interested how you feel it could have been worse.
    within hours of a deal being announced and before it was published your superior brain and negotiating skills announce what is so wrong?

    You are a political social media bot and I claim my £5

    Did you mean to put the ?

    I never used to think of myself as intellectually superior.

    What bit do you think is the difficult bit that makes me clever;
    Knowing 80% of our economy is services?
    Knowing we have a £20bn trade surplus in services?
    Knowing we have a £100bn trade deficit in goods?
    Knowing Boris’s deal does not cover services?
    Yes I meant to put the question mark, it’s indicating incredulity and asking if your position of insight on a deal that hadnt been published and you hadn’t read and much less understood, was where you really stood.

    Far from it being a genuine suggestion you had intellectual superiority i was pointing out the crass stupidity of your position.

    That you thought otherwise merely serves to reinforce my opinion (based on fact) that you are actually a bit thick and prone to hysterical outburst.
    I could sit quietly and wait for you to discover that I am right and achieve godlike status in your eyes.

    As it is Xmas I will admit that this is all publicly available info and even Boris has conceded it is a shame services are not included.

    Now if I am not an intellectual colossus then what other possibility does that leave?
    Colossally deluded?
  • I read it.

    Until now, it’s always been easy to find enough Sardinians already living in London to keep the kitchens humming and diners happy. Post-Brexit, Europeans wanting to move to the U.K. will need a job offer to get working papers, so Sanna will need to take greater risks in hiring. “It’s hard to know if someone is good or not if you haven’t met them in person,”

    Why do you or San(n)a think that it should be easier for him to hire Sardinians that it should be for the owner of the Thai restaurant next door to him to hire Asian chefs?

    You have to see Sanna as an irrelevance, it is there merely as an example to explain a bigger issue.

    The Thai restaurant has come into being with existing rules and regulations and ability to get ingredients and staff.

    There are many other businesses which came into being and flourished because of the SM. Some of these will not be able to adapt and stay profitable and will cease to trade.
    I see. So you do understand that there is a solution.

    By definition they will be sub-optimum solutions.

    In a bizarre reversal, you are looking at this issue in a too binary fashion.
  • ballysmate
    ballysmate Posts: 15,930
    Of course I care if businesses go bump. My sympathy thins when people moan about not being able to employ people from a a very narrow ethnic background for the sole reason that they are from that very narrow ethnic background.
  • tailwindhome
    tailwindhome Posts: 19,436


    Still worth reading
    “New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!
  • david37 said:

    david37 said:

    david37 said:

    david37 said:

    No fs passporting

    Have you been following the last 9 months?
    Worth reiterating.

    Makes a difference to my job
    Doesn't have free movement of people either. Lots of things it doesn't have that weren't expected.
    Depending upon how you look at it this will come to be seen as the biggest omission or biggest accomplishment and in many ways symptomatic of the exclusion of 80% of the UK economy from Boris’s world beating FTA.
    Glass always totally empty still. I wish you were negotiating it would have gone swimmingly.
    How could it be worse? He missed 80% of the economy. I guess if I had missed services and fishing I could have got to 80.1%.

    But I am genuinely interested how you feel it could have been worse.
    within hours of a deal being announced and before it was published your superior brain and negotiating skills announce what is so wrong?

    You are a political social media bot and I claim my £5

    Did you mean to put the ?

    I never used to think of myself as intellectually superior.

    What bit do you think is the difficult bit that makes me clever;
    Knowing 80% of our economy is services?
    Knowing we have a £20bn trade surplus in services?
    Knowing we have a £100bn trade deficit in goods?
    Knowing Boris’s deal does not cover services?
    Yes I meant to put the question mark, it’s indicating incredulity and asking if your position of insight on a deal that hadnt been published and you hadn’t read and much less understood, was where you really stood.

    Far from it being a genuine suggestion you had intellectual superiority i was pointing out the crass stupidity of your position.

    That you thought otherwise merely serves to reinforce my opinion (based on fact) that you are actually a bit thick and prone to hysterical outburst.
    I could sit quietly and wait for you to discover that I am right and achieve godlike status in your eyes.

    As it is Xmas I will admit that this is all publicly available info and even Boris has conceded it is a shame services are not included.

    Now if I am not an intellectual colossus then what other possibility does that leave?
    Colossally deluded?
    I do worry about you and as such I am going to decline your kind offer to debate whether or not services are covered in the FTA

    If I remember rightly you are the bloke who voted Leave because your mother in law hates Germans which is good as I think it is important you are not alone.
  • TheBigBean
    TheBigBean Posts: 21,919



    Still worth reading
    I did read it. Thanks for posting. This thread is too pessimistic already though.


  • Still worth reading
    I did read it. Thanks for posting. This thread is too pessimistic already though.
    Despite not liking Twitter I responded to your insistence and even read the linked thread on fish. There was a question in there that went unanswered of what happened to our existing fishing rights in EU waters. The silence is either ominous or it should be obvious the same mechanisms exist for both sides
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    edited December 2020

    Of course I care if businesses go bump. My sympathy thins when people moan about not being able to employ people from a a very narrow ethnic background for the sole reason that they are from that very narrow ethnic background.

    Surprised you have enough sympathy to thin! Thought it was already thin to begin with!

    Your whole bit is lacking empathy for those affected by Brexit because you feel people had no sympathy for the “victims” of EU membership.

    Forcing firms to be more competitive due to market liberalisation vs making firms less competitive due to regulation isn’t the same thing but you don’t seem to care about that bit.

    (This is where the costs of Brexit lie)
  • ballysmate
    ballysmate Posts: 15,930
    Of course I have sympathy for people losing their businesses. Not said otherwise.
    I pointed out that I suspect sympathy for people affected by the introduction of FoM would have been in short supply from some on here.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661

    Of course I have sympathy for people losing their businesses. Not said otherwise.
    I pointed out that I suspect sympathy for people affected by the introduction of FoM would have been in short supply from some on here.

    You do understand the differences right?

    Am I the only one the massive improvement in tradesman services after 2004?

    Night and day and I wasn’t even an adult and I could see the difference.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    edited December 2020
    Maybe it’s just me. I grew up with my family doing a lot of work on the house(s).

    Often the tradesmen would just take the absolute p!ss.

    I mean, just appalling behaviour. Turning up late, not correcting mistakes, working short hours, not even turning up, leaving projects in various appalling states.

    Around 2006-7 we had loads more work done and they stated using all the foreign tradesmen and oh my god it felt like a miracle. Turned up bang on time, worked so fast, no 2hr lunches reading the sun with sarnies. When there was a big mistake we called him at 10pm and he gruffly said he’d come now, worked till 12 to fix it, no extra cost. Can you even imagine!

    Honestly it was remarkable.

    I think since then that entire world has upped its game.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    Speaking of strategy if you’re remain what’s the strategy you take?

    I guess you spend your time lobbying for closer integration on various issues and piecemeal make your way towards a Norway scenario?

  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 29,562

    Of course I have sympathy for people losing their businesses. Not said otherwise.
    I pointed out that I suspect sympathy for people affected by the introduction of FoM would have been in short supply from some on here.

    I could have sworn advice that people looking for a better life should get on their bike came from a Conservative politician. FoM was very much in that spirit. I'm not sure why anyone is owed sympathy for having to deal with straightforward business competition.
    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition