BREXIT - Is This Really Still Rumbling On? 😴

1157815791581158315842110

Comments

  • john80 said:

    ddraver said:

    Who had Brexit down as the death of the OG Model railway?

    Hornby has a loyal following and come January when the terms are known the company will get its orders back. Pretty smart move for this type of specialist company to manage risk.
    It's also very smart advertising as at least 1m remoaners will spread the brand 8 days before Xmas.
    Finally somebody has been able to point to a Brexit winner
  • If you can't be certain of getting a dispatch done and out of the country by the end of the year, it's understandable to not take the order. Not sure why it's all exports, must be their system.

    They won't be the only website that won't take an order from the eu in the few days before the 31st.

    If they are not dispatching until january they might face a jump in transport costs, so natural to hold for a week until they know how much to bill or if they can absorb.
    Regardless of deal or no deal they will be facing a big jump in transport costs.
    Yes, the market has moved in this sector all over the world world but some stupids, not you I may add, will use Brexit as blame.
    The price of containers from the Far East have quadrupled in price due to container shortages in China.

    Unfortunately, the movement of parcels and pallets to the continent from January is mainly Brexit related.

    The price of a single box to ROI has trebled and a pallet now has a £50 surcharge on to cover the extra paperwork and customs clearances. Even with a FTA the amount of bureaucracy necessary is a big burden on businesses especially SME's. For all of the EU's many faults this is the massive advantage to exporters of the SM.
    Scaremongering has created profiteering.

    After speaking to someone directly affected over the weekend, it's the uncertainty that is gumming everything up. We should have gone No Deal at the beginning of December and removed this uncertainty. It would have done less damage and disruption
    TBF mate, it's not profiteering. They're the same sets of charges and clearances we have paid when importing from any third party country. Paperwork comes at a cost. We are discovering that with the amount we are going to have to deal with to send to the EU. We've had to change our business model to bulk ship rather then individual orders because of the time consuming nature of the processes.

    I'm pragmatic now around the issue of deal or no deal. It is what it is.
    And that is the problem, most people have never bought and sold outside of the EU. When somebody like yourself patiently explains the implications they get dismissed because some bloke down the pub said it would be fine and it is all the fault of Remainer.
  • ddraver
    ddraver Posts: 26,698
    CuSToMs CheCK WhItE PeOPlE ToO???!!! 😡😡😡

    We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
    - @ddraver
  • Pross
    Pross Posts: 43,463

    If you can't be certain of getting a dispatch done and out of the country by the end of the year, it's understandable to not take the order. Not sure why it's all exports, must be their system.

    They won't be the only website that won't take an order from the eu in the few days before the 31st.

    If they are not dispatching until january they might face a jump in transport costs, so natural to hold for a week until they know how much to bill or if they can absorb.
    Regardless of deal or no deal they will be facing a big jump in transport costs.
    Yes, the market has moved in this sector all over the world world but some stupids, not you I may add, will use Brexit as blame.
    The price of containers from the Far East have quadrupled in price due to container shortages in China.

    Unfortunately, the movement of parcels and pallets to the continent from January is mainly Brexit related.

    The price of a single box to ROI has trebled and a pallet now has a £50 surcharge on to cover the extra paperwork and customs clearances. Even with a FTA the amount of bureaucracy necessary is a big burden on businesses especially SME's. For all of the EU's many faults this is the massive advantage to exporters of the SM.
    Scaremongering has created profiteering.

    After speaking to someone directly affected over the weekend, it's the uncertainty that is gumming everything up. We should have gone No Deal at the beginning of December and removed this uncertainty. It would have done less damage and disruption
    You've gone off message, the acceptable terminology is Australia style agreement or no further deal. No deal is very negative and suggests those delivering Brexit have been incapable of agreeing anything over the past 12 months.

  • tailwindhome
    tailwindhome Posts: 19,436
    “New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!
  • If you can't be certain of getting a dispatch done and out of the country by the end of the year, it's understandable to not take the order. Not sure why it's all exports, must be their system.

    They won't be the only website that won't take an order from the eu in the few days before the 31st.

    If they are not dispatching until january they might face a jump in transport costs, so natural to hold for a week until they know how much to bill or if they can absorb.
    Regardless of deal or no deal they will be facing a big jump in transport costs.
    Yes, the market has moved in this sector all over the world world but some stupids, not you I may add, will use Brexit as blame.
    The price of containers from the Far East have quadrupled in price due to container shortages in China.

    Unfortunately, the movement of parcels and pallets to the continent from January is mainly Brexit related.

    The price of a single box to ROI has trebled and a pallet now has a £50 surcharge on to cover the extra paperwork and customs clearances. Even with a FTA the amount of bureaucracy necessary is a big burden on businesses especially SME's. For all of the EU's many faults this is the massive advantage to exporters of the SM.
    Scaremongering has created profiteering.

    After speaking to someone directly affected over the weekend, it's the uncertainty that is gumming everything up. We should have gone No Deal at the beginning of December and removed this uncertainty. It would have done less damage and disruption
    TBF mate, it's not profiteering. They're the same sets of charges and clearances we have paid when importing from any third party country. Paperwork comes at a cost. We are discovering that with the amount we are going to have to deal with to send to the EU. We've had to change our business model to bulk ship rather then individual orders because of the time consuming nature of the processes.

    I'm pragmatic now around the issue of deal or no deal. It is what it is.
    And that is the problem, most people have never bought and sold outside of the EU. When somebody like yourself patiently explains the implications they get dismissed because some bloke down the pub said it would be fine and it is all the fault of Remainer.
    Or @kingstongraham could offer a fellow forumite the benefit of his knowledge and experience rather than sit on the sidelines and let him muddle through, as he obviously knows more than he is letting on.

    Or maybe he is happy for @skyblueamateur to be collateral damage in this change to justify his bitterness that he lost the argument in 2016.
  • that govt link was too long to read and Twitter is just weird so am I right in thinking they are arguing over whether EU transactions will now be treated the same as non-EU transactions?

    and all the talk of £135 does that mean they have closed the loophole on Chinese online resellers?
  • tailwindhome
    tailwindhome Posts: 19,436
    Dunno

    I'm just amused Captain Kirk is arguing with Brexiteers over UK customs rules.
    “New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!
  • If you can't be certain of getting a dispatch done and out of the country by the end of the year, it's understandable to not take the order. Not sure why it's all exports, must be their system.

    They won't be the only website that won't take an order from the eu in the few days before the 31st.

    If they are not dispatching until january they might face a jump in transport costs, so natural to hold for a week until they know how much to bill or if they can absorb.
    Regardless of deal or no deal they will be facing a big jump in transport costs.
    Yes, the market has moved in this sector all over the world world but some stupids, not you I may add, will use Brexit as blame.
    The price of containers from the Far East have quadrupled in price due to container shortages in China.

    Unfortunately, the movement of parcels and pallets to the continent from January is mainly Brexit related.

    The price of a single box to ROI has trebled and a pallet now has a £50 surcharge on to cover the extra paperwork and customs clearances. Even with a FTA the amount of bureaucracy necessary is a big burden on businesses especially SME's. For all of the EU's many faults this is the massive advantage to exporters of the SM.
    Scaremongering has created profiteering.

    After speaking to someone directly affected over the weekend, it's the uncertainty that is gumming everything up. We should have gone No Deal at the beginning of December and removed this uncertainty. It would have done less damage and disruption
    TBF mate, it's not profiteering. They're the same sets of charges and clearances we have paid when importing from any third party country. Paperwork comes at a cost. We are discovering that with the amount we are going to have to deal with to send to the EU. We've had to change our business model to bulk ship rather then individual orders because of the time consuming nature of the processes.

    I'm pragmatic now around the issue of deal or no deal. It is what it is.
    And that is the problem, most people have never bought and sold outside of the EU. When somebody like yourself patiently explains the implications they get dismissed because some bloke down the pub said it would be fine and it is all the fault of Remainer.
    Or @kingstongraham could offer a fellow forumite the benefit of his knowledge and experience rather than sit on the sidelines and let him muddle through, as he obviously knows more than he is letting on.

    Or maybe he is happy for @skyblueamateur to be collateral damage in this change to justify his bitterness that he lost the argument in 2016.
    I wasn't aware @skyblueamateur wanted any guidance - seems like they understand what's happening better than me.
  • ddraver
    ddraver Posts: 26,698
    I haven't got.to that bit yet, soz...

    Our trainer is on his third rant about how CDS isnt ready yet despite waiting for decades.

    FYI, they re going to test it by using it on the GB:NI border first so no pressure...
    We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
    - @ddraver
  • that govt link was too long to read and Twitter is just weird so am I right in thinking they are arguing over whether EU transactions will now be treated the same as non-EU transactions?

    and all the talk of £135 does that mean they have closed the loophole on Chinese online resellers?
    It looks like it is replacing the EU VAT rules, whereby any sale to a customer who is inside the EU but does not have a VAT registration is treated for tax purposes as a domestic sale (so if you are in France, selling to a person in Italy, you charge French tax, assuming you don't have an Italian tax registration, in which case you can charge VAT on destination rates).

    Seems like if this was not replaced, then EU companies would be able to sell into the UK without charging VAT on consignments up to £135.

    Re: the loophole on online sellers - yes. It removes the £15 low value consignment relief and the relief of customs duty on parcels valued under £135.

    Sounds similar to the US online sales tax situation following the Wayfair tax decision.

    I agree that it's weird to learn about this from TJ Hooker
  • Dunno

    I'm just amused Captain Kirk is arguing with Brexiteers over UK customs rules.

    one of my issues with people sharing Twitter feeds is that they do not say whether the person is a random nutter or expert in that area. I like the fact that I know who William Shatner is
  • If you can't be certain of getting a dispatch done and out of the country by the end of the year, it's understandable to not take the order. Not sure why it's all exports, must be their system.

    They won't be the only website that won't take an order from the eu in the few days before the 31st.

    If they are not dispatching until january they might face a jump in transport costs, so natural to hold for a week until they know how much to bill or if they can absorb.
    Regardless of deal or no deal they will be facing a big jump in transport costs.
    Yes, the market has moved in this sector all over the world world but some stupids, not you I may add, will use Brexit as blame.
    The price of containers from the Far East have quadrupled in price due to container shortages in China.

    Unfortunately, the movement of parcels and pallets to the continent from January is mainly Brexit related.

    The price of a single box to ROI has trebled and a pallet now has a £50 surcharge on to cover the extra paperwork and customs clearances. Even with a FTA the amount of bureaucracy necessary is a big burden on businesses especially SME's. For all of the EU's many faults this is the massive advantage to exporters of the SM.
    Scaremongering has created profiteering.

    After speaking to someone directly affected over the weekend, it's the uncertainty that is gumming everything up. We should have gone No Deal at the beginning of December and removed this uncertainty. It would have done less damage and disruption
    TBF mate, it's not profiteering. They're the same sets of charges and clearances we have paid when importing from any third party country. Paperwork comes at a cost. We are discovering that with the amount we are going to have to deal with to send to the EU. We've had to change our business model to bulk ship rather then individual orders because of the time consuming nature of the processes.

    I'm pragmatic now around the issue of deal or no deal. It is what it is.
    And that is the problem, most people have never bought and sold outside of the EU. When somebody like yourself patiently explains the implications they get dismissed because some bloke down the pub said it would be fine and it is all the fault of Remainer.
    Or @kingstongraham could offer a fellow forumite the benefit of his knowledge and experience rather than sit on the sidelines and let him muddle through, as he obviously knows more than he is letting on.

    Or maybe he is happy for @skyblueamateur to be collateral damage in this change to justify his bitterness that he lost the argument in 2016.
    I think you are being very rude to SBA describing him as "muddling through" and should apologise to him as he has been nothing but courteous to everybody.

    I read his posts as him being in the logistics business, shipping in and out or the EU and knows more than 99% of the population what the impact of leaving the SM/CU will be.
  • Pross
    Pross Posts: 43,463

    If you can't be certain of getting a dispatch done and out of the country by the end of the year, it's understandable to not take the order. Not sure why it's all exports, must be their system.

    They won't be the only website that won't take an order from the eu in the few days before the 31st.

    If they are not dispatching until january they might face a jump in transport costs, so natural to hold for a week until they know how much to bill or if they can absorb.
    Regardless of deal or no deal they will be facing a big jump in transport costs.
    Yes, the market has moved in this sector all over the world world but some stupids, not you I may add, will use Brexit as blame.
    The price of containers from the Far East have quadrupled in price due to container shortages in China.

    Unfortunately, the movement of parcels and pallets to the continent from January is mainly Brexit related.

    The price of a single box to ROI has trebled and a pallet now has a £50 surcharge on to cover the extra paperwork and customs clearances. Even with a FTA the amount of bureaucracy necessary is a big burden on businesses especially SME's. For all of the EU's many faults this is the massive advantage to exporters of the SM.
    Scaremongering has created profiteering.

    After speaking to someone directly affected over the weekend, it's the uncertainty that is gumming everything up. We should have gone No Deal at the beginning of December and removed this uncertainty. It would have done less damage and disruption
    TBF mate, it's not profiteering. They're the same sets of charges and clearances we have paid when importing from any third party country. Paperwork comes at a cost. We are discovering that with the amount we are going to have to deal with to send to the EU. We've had to change our business model to bulk ship rather then individual orders because of the time consuming nature of the processes.

    I'm pragmatic now around the issue of deal or no deal. It is what it is.
    And that is the problem, most people have never bought and sold outside of the EU. When somebody like yourself patiently explains the implications they get dismissed because some bloke down the pub said it would be fine and it is all the fault of Remainer.
    Or @kingstongraham could offer a fellow forumite the benefit of his knowledge and experience rather than sit on the sidelines and let him muddle through, as he obviously knows more than he is letting on.

    Or maybe he is happy for @skyblueamateur to be collateral damage in this change to justify his bitterness that he lost the argument in 2016.
    I think you are being very rude to SBA describing him as "muddling through" and should apologise to him as he has been nothing but courteous to everybody.

    I read his posts as him being in the logistics business, shipping in and out or the EU and knows more than 99% of the population what the impact of leaving the SM/CU will be.
    Agreed, he seems to be one of the very few on here who is actually at the frontline of these changes and has some understanding of their impact.
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,387

    I think you are being very rude to SBA describing him as "muddling through" and should apologise to him as he has been nothing but courteous to everybody.


    Being rude is just one of the techniques. As long as people respond, it'll get used. You know not to expect an apology, any more than Trump is going to say "sorry".
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,154
    edited December 2020



    and all the talk of £135 does that mean they have closed the loophole on Chinese online resellers?

    FWIW, the removal of the low value (£15/22€) exemption and replacement with a VAT payment requirement with a threshold of £135/150€ for VAT rather than duties and tariffs is an EU initiative that has been delayed until July in the EU, but the UK equivalent has not been delayed.

    https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/business/vat/modernising-vat-cross-border-ecommerce_en


  • If you can't be certain of getting a dispatch done and out of the country by the end of the year, it's understandable to not take the order. Not sure why it's all exports, must be their system.

    They won't be the only website that won't take an order from the eu in the few days before the 31st.

    If they are not dispatching until january they might face a jump in transport costs, so natural to hold for a week until they know how much to bill or if they can absorb.
    Regardless of deal or no deal they will be facing a big jump in transport costs.
    Yes, the market has moved in this sector all over the world world but some stupids, not you I may add, will use Brexit as blame.
    The price of containers from the Far East have quadrupled in price due to container shortages in China.

    Unfortunately, the movement of parcels and pallets to the continent from January is mainly Brexit related.

    The price of a single box to ROI has trebled and a pallet now has a £50 surcharge on to cover the extra paperwork and customs clearances. Even with a FTA the amount of bureaucracy necessary is a big burden on businesses especially SME's. For all of the EU's many faults this is the massive advantage to exporters of the SM.
    Scaremongering has created profiteering.

    After speaking to someone directly affected over the weekend, it's the uncertainty that is gumming everything up. We should have gone No Deal at the beginning of December and removed this uncertainty. It would have done less damage and disruption
    TBF mate, it's not profiteering. They're the same sets of charges and clearances we have paid when importing from any third party country. Paperwork comes at a cost. We are discovering that with the amount we are going to have to deal with to send to the EU. We've had to change our business model to bulk ship rather then individual orders because of the time consuming nature of the processes.

    I'm pragmatic now around the issue of deal or no deal. It is what it is.
    And that is the problem, most people have never bought and sold outside of the EU. When somebody like yourself patiently explains the implications they get dismissed because some bloke down the pub said it would be fine and it is all the fault of Remainer.
    Or @kingstongraham could offer a fellow forumite the benefit of his knowledge and experience rather than sit on the sidelines and let him muddle through, as he obviously knows more than he is letting on.

    Or maybe he is happy for @skyblueamateur to be collateral damage in this change to justify his bitterness that he lost the argument in 2016.
    I think you are being very rude to SBA describing him as "muddling through" and should apologise to him as he has been nothing but courteous to everybody.

    I read his posts as him being in the logistics business, shipping in and out or the EU and knows more than 99% of the population what the impact of leaving the SM/CU will be.
    It's the usual lashing out in anger when he gets shown up for his thorough lack of knowledge, disinformation and general spitefulness.
  • ddraver
    ddraver Posts: 26,698
    We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
    - @ddraver
  • ddraver said:
    thanks for the heads up, i'll get the rest of this springs spares in now!
  • If you can't be certain of getting a dispatch done and out of the country by the end of the year, it's understandable to not take the order. Not sure why it's all exports, must be their system.

    They won't be the only website that won't take an order from the eu in the few days before the 31st.

    If they are not dispatching until january they might face a jump in transport costs, so natural to hold for a week until they know how much to bill or if they can absorb.
    Regardless of deal or no deal they will be facing a big jump in transport costs.
    Yes, the market has moved in this sector all over the world world but some stupids, not you I may add, will use Brexit as blame.
    The price of containers from the Far East have quadrupled in price due to container shortages in China.

    Unfortunately, the movement of parcels and pallets to the continent from January is mainly Brexit related.

    The price of a single box to ROI has trebled and a pallet now has a £50 surcharge on to cover the extra paperwork and customs clearances. Even with a FTA the amount of bureaucracy necessary is a big burden on businesses especially SME's. For all of the EU's many faults this is the massive advantage to exporters of the SM.
    Scaremongering has created profiteering.

    After speaking to someone directly affected over the weekend, it's the uncertainty that is gumming everything up. We should have gone No Deal at the beginning of December and removed this uncertainty. It would have done less damage and disruption
    TBF mate, it's not profiteering. They're the same sets of charges and clearances we have paid when importing from any third party country. Paperwork comes at a cost. We are discovering that with the amount we are going to have to deal with to send to the EU. We've had to change our business model to bulk ship rather then individual orders because of the time consuming nature of the processes.

    I'm pragmatic now around the issue of deal or no deal. It is what it is.
    And that is the problem, most people have never bought and sold outside of the EU. When somebody like yourself patiently explains the implications they get dismissed because some bloke down the pub said it would be fine and it is all the fault of Remainer.
    Or @kingstongraham could offer a fellow forumite the benefit of his knowledge and experience rather than sit on the sidelines and let him muddle through, as he obviously knows more than he is letting on.

    Or maybe he is happy for @skyblueamateur to be collateral damage in this change to justify his bitterness that he lost the argument in 2016.
    I think you are being very rude to SBA describing him as "muddling through" and should apologise to him as he has been nothing but courteous to everybody.

    I read his posts as him being in the logistics business, shipping in and out or the EU and knows more than 99% of the population what the impact of leaving the SM/CU will be.
    Haha I don't think I'm owed an apology and Kingston, thank you but we have a fairly robust plan to deal with business from January.

    I try to refrain from posting on such topics and stay away from the arguments as views on both sides are very much entrenched and I don't think me coming across as a smartarse is going to change much.

    The only thing I find frustrating is the fact that tariffs are viewed as being a retaliation in the event of a no deal. They aren't, we are just exchanging one set of rules, the EU's, with another, the WTO's.

    People need to be aware that a FTA isn't the silver bullet in all of this. There will be still be a lot of bureaucracy, paperwork and cost involved regardless.

    We are where we are and we need to be pragmatic about the realities so that we are fully prepared.
  • Stevo_666
    Stevo_666 Posts: 61,428

    that govt link was too long to read and Twitter is just weird so am I right in thinking they are arguing over whether EU transactions will now be treated the same as non-EU transactions?

    Effectively, yes. Needs to be aligned otherwise one group would get a competitive advantage. If you look at certain online market places where the same product is being offered by EU and non-EU suppliers there is often a price gap in favour of the non-EU sellers which closes up when you pay the UK VAT on arrival - typically the courier company takes the payment before releasing the goods to you.

    Something I've experienced for myself recently when importing from US and Japan.
    "I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]
  • Stevo_666 said:

    that govt link was too long to read and Twitter is just weird so am I right in thinking they are arguing over whether EU transactions will now be treated the same as non-EU transactions?

    Effectively, yes. Needs to be aligned otherwise one group would get a competitive advantage. If you look at certain online market places where the same product is being offered by EU and non-EU suppliers there is often a price gap in favour of the non-EU sellers which closes up when you pay the UK VAT on arrival - typically the courier company takes the payment before releasing the goods to you.

    Something I've experienced for myself recently when importing from US and Japan.
    Hence the "your parcel will be marked as a gift" on some ebay listings.
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,387
    Stevo_666 said:

    that govt link was too long to read and Twitter is just weird so am I right in thinking they are arguing over whether EU transactions will now be treated the same as non-EU transactions?

    Effectively, yes. Needs to be aligned otherwise one group would get a competitive advantage. If you look at certain online market places where the same product is being offered by EU and non-EU suppliers there is often a price gap in favour of the non-EU sellers which closes up when you pay the UK VAT on arrival - typically the courier company takes the payment before releasing the goods to you.

    Something I've experienced for myself recently when importing from US and Japan.

    I've had with trumpets I've bought from US eBay: VAT charged on the item cost + shipping cost + import duty, plus duty handling cost. A bit cheeky charging VAT on the import duty.
  • Stevo_666
    Stevo_666 Posts: 61,428

    Stevo_666 said:

    that govt link was too long to read and Twitter is just weird so am I right in thinking they are arguing over whether EU transactions will now be treated the same as non-EU transactions?

    Effectively, yes. Needs to be aligned otherwise one group would get a competitive advantage. If you look at certain online market places where the same product is being offered by EU and non-EU suppliers there is often a price gap in favour of the non-EU sellers which closes up when you pay the UK VAT on arrival - typically the courier company takes the payment before releasing the goods to you.

    Something I've experienced for myself recently when importing from US and Japan.

    I've had with trumpets I've bought from US eBay: VAT charged on the item cost + shipping cost + import duty, plus duty handling cost. A bit cheeky charging VAT on the import duty.
    Probably gets factored into the pricing in the end. Not a problem for me as what I was importing had no/nominal import duty.
    "I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]
  • ddraver
    ddraver Posts: 26,698
    Duty is part of the cost of bringing it into the market...

    We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
    - @ddraver
  • Fake news, nothing bad can come of it.
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,387
    Stevo_666 said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    that govt link was too long to read and Twitter is just weird so am I right in thinking they are arguing over whether EU transactions will now be treated the same as non-EU transactions?

    Effectively, yes. Needs to be aligned otherwise one group would get a competitive advantage. If you look at certain online market places where the same product is being offered by EU and non-EU suppliers there is often a price gap in favour of the non-EU sellers which closes up when you pay the UK VAT on arrival - typically the courier company takes the payment before releasing the goods to you.

    Something I've experienced for myself recently when importing from US and Japan.

    I've had with trumpets I've bought from US eBay: VAT charged on the item cost + shipping cost + import duty, plus duty handling cost. A bit cheeky charging VAT on the import duty.
    Probably gets factored into the pricing in the end. Not a problem for me as what I was importing had no/nominal import duty.
    I reckoned on the buy-it price (before shipping costs) in $ being slightly higher than the end cost in £, at a time when the rate was about $1.70. One or two slipped through with no extra costs, which was a nice bonus.
  • coopster_the_1st
    coopster_the_1st Posts: 5,158
    edited December 2020
    Sounds like UK based businesses are about to get another positive shot in the arm or businesses will relocate here to service the 6th biggest economy in the world.

    Both of the above scenario leads to more much needed jobs for the UK economy.
  • Sounds like UK based businesses are about to get another positive shot in the arm or businesses will relocate here to service the 6th biggest economy in the world.

    Both of the above scenario leads to more much needed jobs for the UK economy.

    What's this related to?
  • Pross
    Pross Posts: 43,463

    Sounds like UK based businesses are about to get another positive shot in the arm or businesses will relocate here to service the 6th biggest economy in the world.

    Both of the above scenario leads to more much needed jobs for the UK economy.

    What's this related to?
    I think the idea is that we are such a big market that if we stop buying because tariffs are too high the business will locate to the UK.

    It's a bit like we are too big a market for German car manufacturers to lose so they will ensure we get a good deal out of Brexit. We have all the cards.