The Hour *** spoilers ***
Comments
-
As Ferrari (kinda) points out, it's a shame that Boardman isn't still the record holder. The seat post/seat tube area might be outside the UCI rules but i can't see much else and certainly nothing that shouts an advantage over today (in fact today's bikes are surely better).
0 -
TailWindHome wrote:Back in the 80's we were convinced that longest tracks were the fastest, and that long straights could favor the speed of the cyclist. As a matter of fact, it is truly the exact opposite.
The banked curves allow the center of gravity of the rider to travel a shorter distance than the measurement line followed by the wheels: in substance, the mass of the cyclist "cuts" the curves, saving about 2-3 meters per lap, depending on the velodrome.
In fact, the longer the curves compared to the straights, the faster the track....a rare 100% loyal Pro Race poster. A poster boy for the community.0 -
Macaloon wrote:TailWindHome wrote:Back in the 80's we were convinced that longest tracks were the fastest, and that long straights could favor the speed of the cyclist. As a matter of fact, it is truly the exact opposite.
The banked curves allow the center of gravity of the rider to travel a shorter distance than the measurement line followed by the wheels: in substance, the mass of the cyclist "cuts" the curves, saving about 2-3 meters per lap, depending on the velodrome.
In fact, the longer the curves compared to the straights, the faster the track.
Apart from the fact that the comment about ratio of curve to straight makes no sense. The amount of distance saved on a curve depends upon 2 things: the angle swept by the curve and the horizontal distance between the point your wheels contact the track and your center of mass: the length of the curve is irrelevant. In fact for a given length of track you're better off with shorter curves compared to the straights as you will have to lean more into them and so increase the horizontal distance between contact point and center of mass. (On a side note I feel like it should be talking about some combination of the center of drag and center of mass, not center of mass alone but it won't make any difference to the general point).
Of course shortening the track will help by increasing the number of corners. Also going faster will help as you have to lean more and so save more distance (but not by much)0 -
Good point about the impact of corner radius on the true distance traveled by different elements of the bike/rider.
It's doesn't look like a straightforward calculation as to which track shape is going to be fastest since there are many parameters to consider. To cover all the bases, drag calculations would need to consider a velocity gradient whereby every part of the bike is experiencing slightly different airspeed. If you're not using the wheel contact point as the measure of distance then the locus of the centre of mass is the obvious alternative but that's not necessarily the most important in defining the effort required since drag and mass are not really linked.0 -
It'd be interesting to know what 'extra distance' the superman position gave Boardman in '96.
Or put another way, what Boardman could have done in '96 on a current bike.Facts are meaningless, you can use facts to prove anything that's remotely true! - Homer0 -
The_Boy wrote:RichN95 wrote:Pross wrote:My guess is Wiggins graph will start close to Brandle's and be shaped similarly to Voigt's.
I think that was Pross' point. It'll look the same, but starting from a higher point. Or am I misreading due to the Half Man Half Biscuit induced ringing in my ears?
Yep, exactly.0 -
inseine wrote:As Ferrari (kinda) points out, it's a shame that Boardman isn't still the record holder. The seat post/seat tube area might be outside the UCI rules but i can't see much else and certainly nothing that shouts an advantage over today (in fact today's bikes are surely better).You only need two tools: WD40 and Duck Tape.
If it doesn't move and should, use the WD40.
If it shouldn't move and does, use the tape.0 -
Daz555 wrote:inseine wrote:As Ferrari (kinda) points out, it's a shame that Boardman isn't still the record holder. The seat post/seat tube area might be outside the UCI rules but i can't see much else and certainly nothing that shouts an advantage over today (in fact today's bikes are surely better).
He's loosing a fair chunk by not riding disc wheels though, surely?2020 Reilly Spectre - raw titanium
2020 Merida Reacto Disc Ltd - black on black
2015 CAAD8 105 - very green - stripped to turbo bike
2018 Planet X Exocet 2 - grey
The departed:
2017 Cervelo R3 DI2 - sold
Boardman CX Team - sold
Cannondale Synapse - broken
Cube Streamer - stolen
Boardman Road Comp - stolen0 -
IC. wrote:Daz555 wrote:inseine wrote:As Ferrari (kinda) points out, it's a shame that Boardman isn't still the record holder. The seat post/seat tube area might be outside the UCI rules but i can't see much else and certainly nothing that shouts an advantage over today (in fact today's bikes are surely better).
He's loosing a fair chunk by not riding disc wheels though, surely?
Saddle position is way too far forward for current UCI regs, he may also be breaking the 75(+5cm) extension rule. Double discs would certainly have helped, and different forks.0 -
So Rohan Dennis goes today.
There's a live stream on the UCI channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1czalpk4j7E for anyone desperate to know what his playlist is.
Coverage from 12.50-14.15Warning No formatter is installed for the format0 -
Only a couple of minutes in - but he looks super smooth
Should he be aiming to break the record or aiming to ride as far as he can?
I reckon the former“New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!0 -
Jim Ochowicz says he's aiming for consistency and getting gradually faster.
Target 52.4k“New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!0 -
TailWindHome wrote:Only a couple of minutes in - but he looks super smooth
Should he be aiming to break the record or aiming to ride as far as he can?
I reckon the former
Both, perhaps? According to his team he's aiming for 52.4, but if he's on that and has something left then I'd expect him to push it as far as he can, see if he can hit 53.Warning No formatter is installed for the format0 -
when the commentator says "he's up by 4.8 seconds" what is the reference point? Up on what?
Is it just a simple calculation that he's going faster than the record speed, or...
...is it where Brandle was at this particular lap number?
If it's the latter then it depends on how Brandle paced it as to whether this gap is meaningful.Facts are meaningless, you can use facts to prove anything that's remotely true! - Homer0 -
-
Quick question for anyone in the know (Xav?) Is saddle position determined by the regs? Riding on the tip of his Arione with most of the saddle unused looks very uncomfortable.0
-
Cadel in the commentary box, but aparently the mikes can't pick up the high frequency whine... ;-)Warning No formatter is installed for the format0
-
He looks good. Bobridge was starting to squirm a bit by now.0
-
Yellow Peril wrote:He looks good. Bobridge was starting to squirm a bit by now.
Yeah, still very smooth, and looks like he's gradually upping the pace as well.Warning No formatter is installed for the format0 -
Slowing slightly0
-
DeadCalm wrote:Slowing slightly
Still over 52.7, 50s up on the record, but dropping a little.Warning No formatter is installed for the format0 -
huge margin of 50 secs over Brandle at the moment0
-
Yellow Peril wrote:huge margin of 50 secs over Brandle at the moment0
-
his line is starting to suffer0
-
52.491“New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!0
-
TailWindHome wrote:52.491
Tremendous effort. One for the Dowsett/wiggins/Martin camps to pull apart.
Also bike lifting antics showing how well prepared he was compared to Bobridge0 -
shows he didn't try hard enough"Unfortunately these days a lot of people don’t understand the real quality of a bike" Ernesto Colnago0
-
Superb effort.Warning No formatter is installed for the format0