Seemingly trivial things that annoy you

18658668688708711088

Comments

  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,345
    Well, I'm in to Instagram via Chrome... now just to work out how to use it...
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,345
    pblakeney said:

    pblakeney said:

    pblakeney said:

    That I really don't like going to bed with socks on, even when it's really cold.

    Take them off then. 🤣

    But then I get cold feet when (inevitably) I have to get out of bed in the night after the heating has gone off... [/tightwad]
    This may also come over as patronising.
    Slippers.

    Will I need a pipe as well?
    If you choose.
    You can also choose what to put in it. 😉

    Though I think that whatever it is, you're going to tell me to smoke it.
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,345
    Hmm, re Instagram... now can't find the + button the browser version that apparently I need to press to add a photo... while it encourages me to install the app on my phone.


  • First.Aspect
    First.Aspect Posts: 17,167

    It annoys me people don’t understand strikes are supposed to be disruptive as that is the only leverage they have in the dispute.

    Who are they supposed to be disruptive for, though? If the employer, financially, fill your boots. If it is the general public, the case isn't always quite so clear.
    That’s stupid logic.

    Think that one through to the logical conclusion
    Legistlators around the world are stupid then. Stoopid, stoopid, stoopid cos RC sez.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661

    It annoys me people don’t understand strikes are supposed to be disruptive as that is the only leverage they have in the dispute.

    Who are they supposed to be disruptive for, though? If the employer, financially, fill your boots. If it is the general public, the case isn't always quite so clear.
    That’s stupid logic.

    Think that one through to the logical conclusion
    Legistlators around the world are stupid then. Stoopid, stoopid, stoopid cos RC sez.
    Beyond emergencies it is stupid.

  • First.Aspect
    First.Aspect Posts: 17,167

    It annoys me people don’t understand strikes are supposed to be disruptive as that is the only leverage they have in the dispute.

    Who are they supposed to be disruptive for, though? If the employer, financially, fill your boots. If it is the general public, the case isn't always quite so clear.
    That’s stupid logic.

    Think that one through to the logical conclusion
    Legistlators around the world are stupid then. Stoopid, stoopid, stoopid cos RC sez.
    Beyond emergencies it is stupid.

    Have you considered a career in politics? I'd suggest you start somewhere totalitarian, while you work on being able to see the grey areas in policy.
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,149
    edited January 2023

    Hmm, re Instagram... now can't find the + button the browser version that apparently I need to press to add a photo... while it encourages me to install the app on my phone.


    Is it in the middle of that screenshot? Next to the word Posts

    On mine it's down the left hand side.
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,323

    pblakeney said:

    pblakeney said:

    pblakeney said:

    That I really don't like going to bed with socks on, even when it's really cold.

    Take them off then. 🤣

    But then I get cold feet when (inevitably) I have to get out of bed in the night after the heating has gone off... [/tightwad]
    This may also come over as patronising.
    Slippers.

    Will I need a pipe as well?
    If you choose.
    You can also choose what to put in it. 😉

    Though I think that whatever it is, you're going to tell me to smoke it.
    Having a pipe and not smoking it would be for the Intrigues thread. 😉
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,345

    Hmm, re Instagram... now can't find the + button the browser version that apparently I need to press to add a photo... while it encourages me to install the app on my phone.


    Is it in the middle of that screenshot? Next to the word Posts

    On mine it's down the left hand side.

    Aha, that menu has appeared now, thanks KG.
  • First.Aspect
    First.Aspect Posts: 17,167

    Hmm, re Instagram... now can't find the + button the browser version that apparently I need to press to add a photo... while it encourages me to install the app on my phone.


    Is it in the middle of that screenshot? Next to the word Posts

    On mine it's down the left hand side.

    Aha, that menu has appeared now, thanks KG.
    Hang on Brian, does that say "Musician, cyclist, pornographer"?
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,345

    Hmm, re Instagram... now can't find the + button the browser version that apparently I need to press to add a photo... while it encourages me to install the app on my phone.


    Is it in the middle of that screenshot? Next to the word Posts

    On mine it's down the left hand side.

    Aha, that menu has appeared now, thanks KG.
    Hang on Brian, does that say "Musician, cyclist, pornographer"?

    How do you think I got all those French women to follow me?
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,345
    Anyway, now I'm going to have to start thinking in square photos for Instagram, if I use it much.
  • mrb123
    mrb123 Posts: 4,815

    Hmm, re Instagram... now can't find the + button the browser version that apparently I need to press to add a photo... while it encourages me to install the app on my phone.


    Is it in the middle of that screenshot? Next to the word Posts

    On mine it's down the left hand side.

    Aha, that menu has appeared now, thanks KG.
    Hang on Brian, does that say "Musician, cyclist, pornographer"?

    How do you think I got all those French women to follow me?
    Did you offer to show them your trumpet?
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,345
    mrb123 said:

    Hmm, re Instagram... now can't find the + button the browser version that apparently I need to press to add a photo... while it encourages me to install the app on my phone.


    Is it in the middle of that screenshot? Next to the word Posts

    On mine it's down the left hand side.

    Aha, that menu has appeared now, thanks KG.
    Hang on Brian, does that say "Musician, cyclist, pornographer"?

    How do you think I got all those French women to follow me?
    Did you offer to show them your trumpet?

    Only the bell end.
  • orraloon
    orraloon Posts: 13,227
    Didn't you play quite a lot of rugby back in the day....?

    You are revealing some personal data, watch out for the spambots / scammer messages. 😉
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,345
    edited January 2023
    orraloon said:

    Didn't you play quite a lot of rugby back in the day....?

    You are revealing some personal data, watch out for the spambots / scammer messages. 😉

    There seems to be someone else with my name.


  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,345
    But point taken, and I've removed the real name. You'll have to promise to keep mum now. Well, you, and the thousands of others in Cakestop.
  • pinno
    pinno Posts: 52,314

    pblakeney said:

    pblakeney said:

    pblakeney said:

    That I really don't like going to bed with socks on, even when it's really cold.

    Take them off then. 🤣

    But then I get cold feet when (inevitably) I have to get out of bed in the night after the heating has gone off... [/tightwad]
    This may also come over as patronising.
    Slippers.

    Will I need a pipe as well?
    If you choose.
    You can also choose what to put in it. 😉

    Though I think that whatever it is, you're going to tell me to smoke it.
    [images in head of BT and a clutch of middle aged French women all naked munching cornflakes at 3am]
    seanoconn - gruagach craic!
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,345
    pinno said:

    pblakeney said:

    pblakeney said:

    pblakeney said:

    That I really don't like going to bed with socks on, even when it's really cold.

    Take them off then. 🤣

    But then I get cold feet when (inevitably) I have to get out of bed in the night after the heating has gone off... [/tightwad]
    This may also come over as patronising.
    Slippers.

    Will I need a pipe as well?
    If you choose.
    You can also choose what to put in it. 😉

    Though I think that whatever it is, you're going to tell me to smoke it.
    [images in head of BT and a clutch of middle aged French women all naked munching cornflakes at 3am]

    How did you know?
  • pinno
    pinno Posts: 52,314

    pinno said:

    pblakeney said:

    pblakeney said:

    pblakeney said:

    That I really don't like going to bed with socks on, even when it's really cold.

    Take them off then. 🤣

    But then I get cold feet when (inevitably) I have to get out of bed in the night after the heating has gone off... [/tightwad]
    This may also come over as patronising.
    Slippers.

    Will I need a pipe as well?
    If you choose.
    You can also choose what to put in it. 😉

    Though I think that whatever it is, you're going to tell me to smoke it.
    [images in head of BT and a clutch of middle aged French women all naked munching cornflakes at 3am]

    How did you know?
    Instagram app.
    seanoconn - gruagach craic!
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,345
    pinno said:

    pinno said:

    pblakeney said:

    pblakeney said:

    pblakeney said:

    That I really don't like going to bed with socks on, even when it's really cold.

    Take them off then. 🤣

    But then I get cold feet when (inevitably) I have to get out of bed in the night after the heating has gone off... [/tightwad]
    This may also come over as patronising.
    Slippers.

    Will I need a pipe as well?
    If you choose.
    You can also choose what to put in it. 😉

    Though I think that whatever it is, you're going to tell me to smoke it.
    [images in head of BT and a clutch of middle aged French women all naked munching cornflakes at 3am]

    How did you know?
    Instagram app.

    Nah, must have been that Lego thing with the camera on... I wondered what it was doing in the room.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    edited January 2023

    It annoys me people don’t understand strikes are supposed to be disruptive as that is the only leverage they have in the dispute.

    Who are they supposed to be disruptive for, though? If the employer, financially, fill your boots. If it is the general public, the case isn't always quite so clear.
    That’s stupid logic.

    Think that one through to the logical conclusion
    Legistlators around the world are stupid then. Stoopid, stoopid, stoopid cos RC sez.
    Beyond emergencies it is stupid.

    Have you considered a career in politics? I'd suggest you start somewhere totalitarian, while you work on being able to see the grey areas in policy.
    Stand by the comment. Most people seem to think public opinion matters in industrial disputes, or indeed, is the point
  • First.Aspect
    First.Aspect Posts: 17,167

    It annoys me people don’t understand strikes are supposed to be disruptive as that is the only leverage they have in the dispute.

    Who are they supposed to be disruptive for, though? If the employer, financially, fill your boots. If it is the general public, the case isn't always quite so clear.
    That’s stupid logic.

    Think that one through to the logical conclusion
    Legistlators around the world are stupid then. Stoopid, stoopid, stoopid cos RC sez.
    Beyond emergencies it is stupid.

    Have you considered a career in politics? I'd suggest you start somewhere totalitarian, while you work on being able to see the grey areas in policy.
    Stand by the comment. Most people seem to think public opinion matters in industrial disputes, or indeed, is the point
    Who said anything about public opinion?
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    edited January 2023

    It annoys me people don’t understand strikes are supposed to be disruptive as that is the only leverage they have in the dispute.

    Who are they supposed to be disruptive for, though? If the employer, financially, fill your boots. If it is the general public, the case isn't always quite so clear.
    That’s stupid logic.

    Think that one through to the logical conclusion
    Legistlators around the world are stupid then. Stoopid, stoopid, stoopid cos RC sez.
    Beyond emergencies it is stupid.

    Have you considered a career in politics? I'd suggest you start somewhere totalitarian, while you work on being able to see the grey areas in policy.
    Stand by the comment. Most people seem to think public opinion matters in industrial disputes, or indeed, is the point
    Who said anything about public opinion?
    Pretty much *all the coverage* (including the BBC) except for the FT and Economist.

    Why are people asking union leaders about public opinion? They are paid to not give a sh!t.
  • Jezyboy
    Jezyboy Posts: 3,605
    Train journeys. On the trip out miss my connection due to a combo of arriving train being late, and some **** redesigning Birmingham new street to be a shopping mall with a train station attached as a secondary thought, and now after COVID, there is one train an hour from Birmingham to Reading, instead of 2.

    On the way back, miss my connection due to an apparently serious incident requiring the train to wait an absolute age for transport police at a number of stations...

    And apparently the last train from Birmingham to my moderately sized market town is at 9 on a Sunday!

    I have to say, they did see me right with a taxi so full credit to the customer service team at New St, who were actually quite helpful once I was able to speak to the right person.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    edited January 2023


    Post-Covid train system is on its knees.
  • First.Aspect
    First.Aspect Posts: 17,167

    It annoys me people don’t understand strikes are supposed to be disruptive as that is the only leverage they have in the dispute.

    Who are they supposed to be disruptive for, though? If the employer, financially, fill your boots. If it is the general public, the case isn't always quite so clear.
    That’s stupid logic.

    Think that one through to the logical conclusion
    Legistlators around the world are stupid then. Stoopid, stoopid, stoopid cos RC sez.
    Beyond emergencies it is stupid.

    Have you considered a career in politics? I'd suggest you start somewhere totalitarian, while you work on being able to see the grey areas in policy.
    Stand by the comment. Most people seem to think public opinion matters in industrial disputes, or indeed, is the point
    Who said anything about public opinion?
    Pretty much *all the coverage* (including the BBC) except for the FT and Economist.

    Why are people asking union leaders about public opinion? They are paid to not give a sh!t.
    What else are they supposed to report on?
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    edited January 2023

    It annoys me people don’t understand strikes are supposed to be disruptive as that is the only leverage they have in the dispute.

    Who are they supposed to be disruptive for, though? If the employer, financially, fill your boots. If it is the general public, the case isn't always quite so clear.
    That’s stupid logic.

    Think that one through to the logical conclusion
    Legistlators around the world are stupid then. Stoopid, stoopid, stoopid cos RC sez.
    Beyond emergencies it is stupid.

    Have you considered a career in politics? I'd suggest you start somewhere totalitarian, while you work on being able to see the grey areas in policy.
    Stand by the comment. Most people seem to think public opinion matters in industrial disputes, or indeed, is the point
    Who said anything about public opinion?
    Pretty much *all the coverage* (including the BBC) except for the FT and Economist.

    Why are people asking union leaders about public opinion? They are paid to not give a sh!t.
    What else are they supposed to report on?
    I mean, they could do their homework and report on the *industrial dispute*, which is actually what is happening here.

    Why not discuss what they are actually striking on. One thing I've learned on the rare occasion I speak to people who are striking, is that they're usually as bothered, if not more, about conditions and rules etc as they are on the headline figures.

    You'd not ever know if you followed the coverage. For example, guy I was speaking to works nightshifts at the postal sorting office. His main gripe was that there was a plan to stop paying night-shift staff extra for covering the nightshift, and instead pay them the same as day shift. So he was taking a 15% haircut and still working anti-social hours.

    From that perspective, him voting to strike seems entirely reasonable, right? And i'm sure from the employer's perspective there are also some reasonable changes they want to make. I'd love to hear them reported on.


    Frame it for what it is, an industrial dispute and cover it. The public opinion of a strike is never going to be that positive - we want both the employer and unions to just sort it out so we can get on using or buying whatever they provide.

  • First.Aspect
    First.Aspect Posts: 17,167

    It annoys me people don’t understand strikes are supposed to be disruptive as that is the only leverage they have in the dispute.

    Who are they supposed to be disruptive for, though? If the employer, financially, fill your boots. If it is the general public, the case isn't always quite so clear.
    That’s stupid logic.

    Think that one through to the logical conclusion
    Legistlators around the world are stupid then. Stoopid, stoopid, stoopid cos RC sez.
    Beyond emergencies it is stupid.

    Have you considered a career in politics? I'd suggest you start somewhere totalitarian, while you work on being able to see the grey areas in policy.
    Stand by the comment. Most people seem to think public opinion matters in industrial disputes, or indeed, is the point
    Who said anything about public opinion?
    Pretty much *all the coverage* (including the BBC) except for the FT and Economist.

    Why are people asking union leaders about public opinion? They are paid to not give a sh!t.
    What else are they supposed to report on?
    I mean, they could do their homework and report on the *industrial dispute*, which is actually what is happening here.

    Why not discuss what they are actually striking on. One thing I've learned on the rare occasion I speak to people who are striking, is that they're usually as bothered, if not more, about conditions and rules etc as they are on the headline figures.

    You'd not ever know if you followed the coverage. For example, guy I was speaking to works nightshifts at the postal sorting office. His main gripe was that there was a plan to stop paying night-shift staff extra for covering the nightshift, and instead pay them the same as day shift. So he was taking a 15% haircut and still working anti-social hours.

    From that perspective, him voting to strike seems entirely reasonable, right? And i'm sure from the employer's perspective there are also some reasonable changes they want to make. I'd love to hear them reported on.


    Frame it for what it is, an industrial dispute and cover it. The public opinion of a strike is never going to be that positive - we want both the employer and unions to just sort it out so we can get on using or buying whatever they provide.

    RC, that second one is about pay.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    edited January 2023
    Is that to do with headline numbers? No it is not. Has that side of it been reported on in the press? No it hasn't.