Seemingly trivial things that annoy you
Comments
-
Well, I'm in to Instagram via Chrome... now just to work out how to use it...0
-
pblakeney said:
If you choose.briantrumpet said:pblakeney said:
This may also come over as patronising.briantrumpet said:pblakeney said:
Take them off then. 🤣briantrumpet said:That I really don't like going to bed with socks on, even when it's really cold.
But then I get cold feet when (inevitably) I have to get out of bed in the night after the heating has gone off... [/tightwad]
Slippers.
Will I need a pipe as well?
You can also choose what to put in it. 😉
Though I think that whatever it is, you're going to tell me to smoke it.0 -
Hmm, re Instagram... now can't find the + button the browser version that apparently I need to press to add a photo... while it encourages me to install the app on my phone.
0 -
Legistlators around the world are stupid then. Stoopid, stoopid, stoopid cos RC sez.rick_chasey said:
That’s stupid logic.First.Aspect said:
Who are they supposed to be disruptive for, though? If the employer, financially, fill your boots. If it is the general public, the case isn't always quite so clear.rick_chasey said:It annoys me people don’t understand strikes are supposed to be disruptive as that is the only leverage they have in the dispute.
Think that one through to the logical conclusion0 -
Beyond emergencies it is stupid.First.Aspect said:
Legistlators around the world are stupid then. Stoopid, stoopid, stoopid cos RC sez.rick_chasey said:
That’s stupid logic.First.Aspect said:
Who are they supposed to be disruptive for, though? If the employer, financially, fill your boots. If it is the general public, the case isn't always quite so clear.rick_chasey said:It annoys me people don’t understand strikes are supposed to be disruptive as that is the only leverage they have in the dispute.
Think that one through to the logical conclusion
0 -
Have you considered a career in politics? I'd suggest you start somewhere totalitarian, while you work on being able to see the grey areas in policy.rick_chasey said:
Beyond emergencies it is stupid.First.Aspect said:
Legistlators around the world are stupid then. Stoopid, stoopid, stoopid cos RC sez.rick_chasey said:
That’s stupid logic.First.Aspect said:
Who are they supposed to be disruptive for, though? If the employer, financially, fill your boots. If it is the general public, the case isn't always quite so clear.rick_chasey said:It annoys me people don’t understand strikes are supposed to be disruptive as that is the only leverage they have in the dispute.
Think that one through to the logical conclusion0 -
Is it in the middle of that screenshot? Next to the word Postsbriantrumpet said:Hmm, re Instagram... now can't find the + button the browser version that apparently I need to press to add a photo... while it encourages me to install the app on my phone.
On mine it's down the left hand side.0 -
Having a pipe and not smoking it would be for the Intrigues thread. 😉briantrumpet said:pblakeney said:
If you choose.briantrumpet said:pblakeney said:
This may also come over as patronising.briantrumpet said:pblakeney said:
Take them off then. 🤣briantrumpet said:That I really don't like going to bed with socks on, even when it's really cold.
But then I get cold feet when (inevitably) I have to get out of bed in the night after the heating has gone off... [/tightwad]
Slippers.
Will I need a pipe as well?
You can also choose what to put in it. 😉
Though I think that whatever it is, you're going to tell me to smoke it.The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
kingstongraham said:
Is it in the middle of that screenshot? Next to the word Postsbriantrumpet said:Hmm, re Instagram... now can't find the + button the browser version that apparently I need to press to add a photo... while it encourages me to install the app on my phone.
On mine it's down the left hand side.
Aha, that menu has appeared now, thanks KG.0 -
Hang on Brian, does that say "Musician, cyclist, pornographer"?briantrumpet said:kingstongraham said:
Is it in the middle of that screenshot? Next to the word Postsbriantrumpet said:Hmm, re Instagram... now can't find the + button the browser version that apparently I need to press to add a photo... while it encourages me to install the app on my phone.
On mine it's down the left hand side.
Aha, that menu has appeared now, thanks KG.1 -
First.Aspect said:
Hang on Brian, does that say "Musician, cyclist, pornographer"?briantrumpet said:kingstongraham said:
Is it in the middle of that screenshot? Next to the word Postsbriantrumpet said:Hmm, re Instagram... now can't find the + button the browser version that apparently I need to press to add a photo... while it encourages me to install the app on my phone.
On mine it's down the left hand side.
Aha, that menu has appeared now, thanks KG.
How do you think I got all those French women to follow me?1 -
Anyway, now I'm going to have to start thinking in square photos for Instagram, if I use it much.0
-
Did you offer to show them your trumpet?briantrumpet said:First.Aspect said:
Hang on Brian, does that say "Musician, cyclist, pornographer"?briantrumpet said:kingstongraham said:
Is it in the middle of that screenshot? Next to the word Postsbriantrumpet said:Hmm, re Instagram... now can't find the + button the browser version that apparently I need to press to add a photo... while it encourages me to install the app on my phone.
On mine it's down the left hand side.
Aha, that menu has appeared now, thanks KG.
How do you think I got all those French women to follow me?0 -
mrb123 said:
Did you offer to show them your trumpet?briantrumpet said:First.Aspect said:
Hang on Brian, does that say "Musician, cyclist, pornographer"?briantrumpet said:kingstongraham said:
Is it in the middle of that screenshot? Next to the word Postsbriantrumpet said:Hmm, re Instagram... now can't find the + button the browser version that apparently I need to press to add a photo... while it encourages me to install the app on my phone.
On mine it's down the left hand side.
Aha, that menu has appeared now, thanks KG.
How do you think I got all those French women to follow me?
Only the bell end.1 -
Didn't you play quite a lot of rugby back in the day....?
You are revealing some personal data, watch out for the spambots / scammer messages. 😉0 -
There seems to be someone else with my name.orraloon said:Didn't you play quite a lot of rugby back in the day....?
You are revealing some personal data, watch out for the spambots / scammer messages. 😉
2 -
But point taken, and I've removed the real name. You'll have to promise to keep mum now. Well, you, and the thousands of others in Cakestop.0
-
[images in head of BT and a clutch of middle aged French women all naked munching cornflakes at 3am]briantrumpet said:pblakeney said:
If you choose.briantrumpet said:pblakeney said:
This may also come over as patronising.briantrumpet said:pblakeney said:
Take them off then. 🤣briantrumpet said:That I really don't like going to bed with socks on, even when it's really cold.
But then I get cold feet when (inevitably) I have to get out of bed in the night after the heating has gone off... [/tightwad]
Slippers.
Will I need a pipe as well?
You can also choose what to put in it. 😉
Though I think that whatever it is, you're going to tell me to smoke it.seanoconn - gruagach craic!0 -
pinno said:
[images in head of BT and a clutch of middle aged French women all naked munching cornflakes at 3am]briantrumpet said:pblakeney said:
If you choose.briantrumpet said:pblakeney said:
This may also come over as patronising.briantrumpet said:pblakeney said:
Take them off then. 🤣briantrumpet said:That I really don't like going to bed with socks on, even when it's really cold.
But then I get cold feet when (inevitably) I have to get out of bed in the night after the heating has gone off... [/tightwad]
Slippers.
Will I need a pipe as well?
You can also choose what to put in it. 😉
Though I think that whatever it is, you're going to tell me to smoke it.
How did you know?0 -
Instagram app.briantrumpet said:pinno said:
[images in head of BT and a clutch of middle aged French women all naked munching cornflakes at 3am]briantrumpet said:pblakeney said:
If you choose.briantrumpet said:pblakeney said:
This may also come over as patronising.briantrumpet said:pblakeney said:
Take them off then. 🤣briantrumpet said:That I really don't like going to bed with socks on, even when it's really cold.
But then I get cold feet when (inevitably) I have to get out of bed in the night after the heating has gone off... [/tightwad]
Slippers.
Will I need a pipe as well?
You can also choose what to put in it. 😉
Though I think that whatever it is, you're going to tell me to smoke it.
How did you know?seanoconn - gruagach craic!0 -
pinno said:
Instagram app.briantrumpet said:pinno said:
[images in head of BT and a clutch of middle aged French women all naked munching cornflakes at 3am]briantrumpet said:pblakeney said:
If you choose.briantrumpet said:pblakeney said:
This may also come over as patronising.briantrumpet said:pblakeney said:
Take them off then. 🤣briantrumpet said:That I really don't like going to bed with socks on, even when it's really cold.
But then I get cold feet when (inevitably) I have to get out of bed in the night after the heating has gone off... [/tightwad]
Slippers.
Will I need a pipe as well?
You can also choose what to put in it. 😉
Though I think that whatever it is, you're going to tell me to smoke it.
How did you know?
Nah, must have been that Lego thing with the camera on... I wondered what it was doing in the room.0 -
Stand by the comment. Most people seem to think public opinion matters in industrial disputes, or indeed, is the pointFirst.Aspect said:
Have you considered a career in politics? I'd suggest you start somewhere totalitarian, while you work on being able to see the grey areas in policy.rick_chasey said:
Beyond emergencies it is stupid.First.Aspect said:
Legistlators around the world are stupid then. Stoopid, stoopid, stoopid cos RC sez.rick_chasey said:
That’s stupid logic.First.Aspect said:
Who are they supposed to be disruptive for, though? If the employer, financially, fill your boots. If it is the general public, the case isn't always quite so clear.rick_chasey said:It annoys me people don’t understand strikes are supposed to be disruptive as that is the only leverage they have in the dispute.
Think that one through to the logical conclusion
0 -
Who said anything about public opinion?rick_chasey said:
Stand by the comment. Most people seem to think public opinion matters in industrial disputes, or indeed, is the pointFirst.Aspect said:
Have you considered a career in politics? I'd suggest you start somewhere totalitarian, while you work on being able to see the grey areas in policy.rick_chasey said:
Beyond emergencies it is stupid.First.Aspect said:
Legistlators around the world are stupid then. Stoopid, stoopid, stoopid cos RC sez.rick_chasey said:
That’s stupid logic.First.Aspect said:
Who are they supposed to be disruptive for, though? If the employer, financially, fill your boots. If it is the general public, the case isn't always quite so clear.rick_chasey said:It annoys me people don’t understand strikes are supposed to be disruptive as that is the only leverage they have in the dispute.
Think that one through to the logical conclusion0 -
Pretty much *all the coverage* (including the BBC) except for the FT and Economist.First.Aspect said:
Who said anything about public opinion?rick_chasey said:
Stand by the comment. Most people seem to think public opinion matters in industrial disputes, or indeed, is the pointFirst.Aspect said:
Have you considered a career in politics? I'd suggest you start somewhere totalitarian, while you work on being able to see the grey areas in policy.rick_chasey said:
Beyond emergencies it is stupid.First.Aspect said:
Legistlators around the world are stupid then. Stoopid, stoopid, stoopid cos RC sez.rick_chasey said:
That’s stupid logic.First.Aspect said:
Who are they supposed to be disruptive for, though? If the employer, financially, fill your boots. If it is the general public, the case isn't always quite so clear.rick_chasey said:It annoys me people don’t understand strikes are supposed to be disruptive as that is the only leverage they have in the dispute.
Think that one through to the logical conclusion
Why are people asking union leaders about public opinion? They are paid to not give a sh!t.0 -
Train journeys. On the trip out miss my connection due to a combo of arriving train being late, and some **** redesigning Birmingham new street to be a shopping mall with a train station attached as a secondary thought, and now after COVID, there is one train an hour from Birmingham to Reading, instead of 2.
On the way back, miss my connection due to an apparently serious incident requiring the train to wait an absolute age for transport police at a number of stations...
And apparently the last train from Birmingham to my moderately sized market town is at 9 on a Sunday!
I have to say, they did see me right with a taxi so full credit to the customer service team at New St, who were actually quite helpful once I was able to speak to the right person.0 -
-
What else are they supposed to report on?rick_chasey said:
Pretty much *all the coverage* (including the BBC) except for the FT and Economist.First.Aspect said:
Who said anything about public opinion?rick_chasey said:
Stand by the comment. Most people seem to think public opinion matters in industrial disputes, or indeed, is the pointFirst.Aspect said:
Have you considered a career in politics? I'd suggest you start somewhere totalitarian, while you work on being able to see the grey areas in policy.rick_chasey said:
Beyond emergencies it is stupid.First.Aspect said:
Legistlators around the world are stupid then. Stoopid, stoopid, stoopid cos RC sez.rick_chasey said:
That’s stupid logic.First.Aspect said:
Who are they supposed to be disruptive for, though? If the employer, financially, fill your boots. If it is the general public, the case isn't always quite so clear.rick_chasey said:It annoys me people don’t understand strikes are supposed to be disruptive as that is the only leverage they have in the dispute.
Think that one through to the logical conclusion
Why are people asking union leaders about public opinion? They are paid to not give a sh!t.0 -
I mean, they could do their homework and report on the *industrial dispute*, which is actually what is happening here.First.Aspect said:
What else are they supposed to report on?rick_chasey said:
Pretty much *all the coverage* (including the BBC) except for the FT and Economist.First.Aspect said:
Who said anything about public opinion?rick_chasey said:
Stand by the comment. Most people seem to think public opinion matters in industrial disputes, or indeed, is the pointFirst.Aspect said:
Have you considered a career in politics? I'd suggest you start somewhere totalitarian, while you work on being able to see the grey areas in policy.rick_chasey said:
Beyond emergencies it is stupid.First.Aspect said:
Legistlators around the world are stupid then. Stoopid, stoopid, stoopid cos RC sez.rick_chasey said:
That’s stupid logic.First.Aspect said:
Who are they supposed to be disruptive for, though? If the employer, financially, fill your boots. If it is the general public, the case isn't always quite so clear.rick_chasey said:It annoys me people don’t understand strikes are supposed to be disruptive as that is the only leverage they have in the dispute.
Think that one through to the logical conclusion
Why are people asking union leaders about public opinion? They are paid to not give a sh!t.
Why not discuss what they are actually striking on. One thing I've learned on the rare occasion I speak to people who are striking, is that they're usually as bothered, if not more, about conditions and rules etc as they are on the headline figures.
You'd not ever know if you followed the coverage. For example, guy I was speaking to works nightshifts at the postal sorting office. His main gripe was that there was a plan to stop paying night-shift staff extra for covering the nightshift, and instead pay them the same as day shift. So he was taking a 15% haircut and still working anti-social hours.
From that perspective, him voting to strike seems entirely reasonable, right? And i'm sure from the employer's perspective there are also some reasonable changes they want to make. I'd love to hear them reported on.
Frame it for what it is, an industrial dispute and cover it. The public opinion of a strike is never going to be that positive - we want both the employer and unions to just sort it out so we can get on using or buying whatever they provide.
0 -
RC, that second one is about pay.rick_chasey said:
I mean, they could do their homework and report on the *industrial dispute*, which is actually what is happening here.First.Aspect said:
What else are they supposed to report on?rick_chasey said:
Pretty much *all the coverage* (including the BBC) except for the FT and Economist.First.Aspect said:
Who said anything about public opinion?rick_chasey said:
Stand by the comment. Most people seem to think public opinion matters in industrial disputes, or indeed, is the pointFirst.Aspect said:
Have you considered a career in politics? I'd suggest you start somewhere totalitarian, while you work on being able to see the grey areas in policy.rick_chasey said:
Beyond emergencies it is stupid.First.Aspect said:
Legistlators around the world are stupid then. Stoopid, stoopid, stoopid cos RC sez.rick_chasey said:
That’s stupid logic.First.Aspect said:
Who are they supposed to be disruptive for, though? If the employer, financially, fill your boots. If it is the general public, the case isn't always quite so clear.rick_chasey said:It annoys me people don’t understand strikes are supposed to be disruptive as that is the only leverage they have in the dispute.
Think that one through to the logical conclusion
Why are people asking union leaders about public opinion? They are paid to not give a sh!t.
Why not discuss what they are actually striking on. One thing I've learned on the rare occasion I speak to people who are striking, is that they're usually as bothered, if not more, about conditions and rules etc as they are on the headline figures.
You'd not ever know if you followed the coverage. For example, guy I was speaking to works nightshifts at the postal sorting office. His main gripe was that there was a plan to stop paying night-shift staff extra for covering the nightshift, and instead pay them the same as day shift. So he was taking a 15% haircut and still working anti-social hours.
From that perspective, him voting to strike seems entirely reasonable, right? And i'm sure from the employer's perspective there are also some reasonable changes they want to make. I'd love to hear them reported on.
Frame it for what it is, an industrial dispute and cover it. The public opinion of a strike is never going to be that positive - we want both the employer and unions to just sort it out so we can get on using or buying whatever they provide.
0 -
Is that to do with headline numbers? No it is not. Has that side of it been reported on in the press? No it hasn't.0