Paul Kimmage.....
Comments
-
Paul Kimmage @PaulKimmage · 13m
Spent three hours in Monaco with this guy on Wednesday.
Paul Kimmage @PaulKimmage · 10m
The first instalment will be published tomorrow in the Sunday Independent.“New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!0 -
Feed him to the snake, Froomey.0
-
Interesting move from Froome.
Imagine his disciples if he has a positive view of him (unlikely)Fckin' Quintana … that creep can roll, man.0 -
iainf72 wrote:Interesting move from Froome.
Imagine his disciples if he has a positive view of him (unlikely)
Structure of the article. Introduction mostly about Kimmage and his doubts. Plenty of editorialising and impressions. Some out of context statistics. A couple of bland quotes and a finale in which Kimmage is left with as many questions as he started. Sod all about anything not doping related.Twitter: @RichN950 -
RichN95 wrote:iainf72 wrote:Interesting move from Froome.
Imagine his disciples if he has a positive view of him (unlikely)
Structure of the article. Introduction mostly about Kimmage and his doubts. Plenty of editorialising and impressions. Some out of context statistics. A couple of bland quotes and a finale in which Kimmage is left with as many questions as he started. Sod all about anything not doping related.
Froome might not be open but Coco Froome is all over the inter webs. She's the Kardashian of pro-cycling cats. Koko Kardashian if you like.Correlation is not causation.0 -
Above The Cows wrote:
Froome might not be open but Coco Froome is all over the inter webs. She's the Kardashian of pro-cycling cats. Koko Kardashian if you like.Twitter: @RichN950 -
RichN95 wrote:Above The Cows wrote:
Froome might not be open but Coco Froome is all over the inter webs. She's the Kardashian of pro-cycling cats. Koko Kardashian if you like.
*squeak*Correlation is not causation.0 -
TailWindHome wrote:Paul Kimmage @PaulKimmage · 13m
Spent three hours in Monaco with this guy on Wednesday.
Paul Kimmage @PaulKimmage · 10m
The first instalment will be published tomorrow in the Sunday Independent.
what is going on in this picture? :?0 -
Froome, Kimmage, and a doggie went on a 1920s seaside holiday.0
-
RideOnTime wrote:
what is going on in this picture? :?Twitter: @RichN950 -
You're right, it is
0 -
Froome looks like he's about to take on The Guns Of Navarone soon0
-
Fckin' Quintana … that creep can roll, man.0
-
iainf72 wrote:
And as for idea of Vaughters dropping out rather than having an injection for his bee sting being 'the standard' of ethics. Well now it's the actual rules.Twitter: @RichN950 -
It's actually pretty good so far.
Standard Kimmage but still....Fckin' Quintana … that creep can roll, man.0 -
RichN95 wrote:iainf72 wrote:
And as for idea of Vaughters dropping out rather than having an injection for his bee sting being 'the standard' of ethics. Well now it's the actual rules.
This is something that is puzzling me too. When Lionel Birnie reported in 2011 they got a TUE for Uran, I don't remember people freaking out?Fckin' Quintana … that creep can roll, man.0 -
iainf72 wrote:It's actually pretty good so far.
Standard Kimmage but still....
Very interesting indeed.Contador is the Greatest0 -
It is worth noting that PK is a prick and Contador is not a cheat.Contador is the Greatest0
-
Kimmage: "The 'White Kenyan' has a nice ring to it?"
Shudder. No it blooming doesn't Paul. It no more has a nice ring to it than The Black Brit has a nice ring to it.
Ugh and the discussion at the beginning with Ann. I really detest Kimmage.Correlation is not causation.0 -
frenchfighter wrote:It is worth noting that PK is a prick and Contador is not a cheat.
Right.0 -
frenchfighter wrote:It is worth noting that PK is a prick and Contador is not a cheat.
While Contador has been banned and has a gaggle of dodgy associates, there's not that definitive piece that allows anyone to confidently call him a cheat. I may very well think he has been (and even may still be), but I dodn't think you can state it as though it is a fact.
But that's a different discussion.Twitter: @RichN950 -
Not sure why Cound and Froome are so defensive about the TUE issue.
So he had an issue where he wasn't ill but suffering from an asthma induced breathing issue. So he takes a performance enhancing drug to resolve this but that is ok because it condoned by the UCI.
Well to me the issue is quite clear. I am sorry that you had that asthma issue and I am sorry that I wouldn't get to see the second best stage rider compete in Romandie, but at the same time I do not want you in the race with a drug we cant be sure whether has simply, stopped your breathing issues, or actually in addition enhanced your performance.
I dont really care whether it was Sky's policy or not and this is a contravention of that or not. Those policies should not be set in stone and it is already quite clear that Sky are just full of PR BS. After all Chris is here to race not be an upstanding citizen.Contador is the Greatest0 -
RichN95 wrote:frenchfighter wrote:It is worth noting that PK is a prick and Contador is not a cheat.
While Contador has been banned and has a gaggle of dodgy associates, there's not that definitive piece that allows anyone to confidently call him a cheat. I may very well think he has been (and even may still be), but I dodn't think you can state it as though it is a fact.
But that's a different discussion.
Contador is the Greatest0 -
frenchfighter wrote:RichN95 wrote:frenchfighter wrote:It is worth noting that PK is a prick and Contador is not a cheat.
While Contador has been banned and has a gaggle of dodgy associates, there's not that definitive piece that allows anyone to confidently call him a cheat. I may very well think he has been (and even may still be), but I dodn't think you can state it as though it is a fact.
But that's a different discussion.
It is a fact, but you can't state it as a fact as the absolute evidence isn't there. We all know that he has though, otherwise why was he on Fuentes' books?
You don't need to answer this as I can't be bothered to argue.0 -
Yeah exactly we wont go into it. It has been done to death and Contador still hasn't been shown to be a cheat.Contador is the Greatest0
-
An article on "Froome's Secret Battle" from today's Mail on Sunday: http://goo.gl/5wsRoS
One for the doubters of course but germane.
BTW, I enjoyed PK's Indy article. He's a good writer. Still, as one of last year's donators I occasionally wonder how and where my little contribution to his well-being went. A good cause? :roll:"Lick My Decals Off, Baby"0 -
One thing PK and I now have in common is I also didn't realise what a tough upbringing Froome had until I read the book.
I think the PK faithful might be feeling a bit bruised after the first part of the interview.Fckin' Quintana … that creep can roll, man.0 -
mercsport wrote:BTW, I enjoyed PK's Indy article. He's a good writer.http://www.georgesfoundation.org
http://100hillsforgeorge.blogspot.com/
http://www.12on12in12.blogspot.co.uk/0 -
Why is his missus in the interview? Mental.0