2024 Election thread
Comments
-
Pross said:
It’s getting beyond parody now. If I was a dyed in the wool Tory I’d be furious at what these idiots are doing to the Party but it seems they’re still happy to support the team without question whilst chanting about how much it would be under the Lefties.
Can you imagine?0 -
We clearly didn't have enough centreleftiewhineybollox threads in Cake Stop judging by the fresh outpouring of bile on here. I can't keep up with it all"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0
-
Think we're mostly just pointing and laughing at the ever decreasing circles but it's fun to have one loyalist.Stevo_666 said:We clearly didn't have enough centreleftiewhineybollox threads in Cake Stop judging by the fresh outpouring of bile on here. I can't keep up with it all
1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Part of the anti-growth coalition0 -
If you don't enjoy reading bile, I've no idea why you like the Telegraph so much, which spends most of its time complaining about the Blob, wokery, the EU, ECHR, the BBC, LGBT rights, LTNs, ULEZ etc. with bile meisters Hannan, Frost, Farrage, Ross Clark, Tom Harris, Nick Timothy, Allister Heath, Allison Pearson, Janet Daly, Philip Johnson and Charles Moore being masters of the Art of Bile.Stevo_666 said:We clearly didn't have enough centreleftiewhineybollox threads in Cake Stop judging by the fresh outpouring of bile on here. I can't keep up with it all
Maybe you need to start a website called Bile Radar and invite them all to join the forum.1 -
This should be campaign ending.
“New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!0 -
It has indeed been quite a day at the Conservative conferenceStevo_666 said:We clearly didn't have enough centreleftiewhineybollox threads in Cake Stop judging by the fresh outpouring of bile on here. I can't keep up with it all
“New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!0 -
It would take a heart of stone not to find it funny that they've ended up cancelling a railway to Manchester while having a conference in a converted railway station in Manchester.1
-
Tory chair of the London Assembly has been removed from the hall for speaking during Bravermans speech“New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!0
-
https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/1709219717175533621?s=20tailwindhome said:Tory chair of the London Assembly has been removed from the hall for speaking during Bravermans speech
https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/1709225668238512469?s=20
You're the light wiping out my batteries; You're the cream in my airport coffee's.0 -
Those links don’t work.evil_breakfast said:
https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/1709219717175533621?s=20tailwindhome said:Tory chair of the London Assembly has been removed from the hall for speaking during Bravermans speech
https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/1709225668238512469?s=200 -
Did for me. 🤔webboo said:
Those links don’t work.The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
as it's party pantomime season, oh yes they do!webboo said:
Those links don’t work.evil_breakfast said:
https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/1709219717175533621?s=20tailwindhome said:Tory chair of the London Assembly has been removed from the hall for speaking during Bravermans speech
https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/1709225668238512469?s=20my bike - faster than god's and twice as shiny1 -
I'm getting big "everything is fine" vibes from the party conference.tailwindhome said:Tory chair of the London Assembly has been removed from the hall for speaking during Bravermans speech
0 -
If they genuinely believe that then they are in for a big surprise.Jezyboy said:
I'm getting big "everything is fine" vibes from the party conference.tailwindhome said:Tory chair of the London Assembly has been removed from the hall for speaking during Bravermans speech
The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
“New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!0 -
We're at the 'barring accident or injury' point
“New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!0 -
When I first read that I thought it was a prediction. FA will be happy to see the SNP get a thrashing like that.tailwindhome said:0 -
-
I won't have as much skin in the game for much longer. But yes. It's actually a good thing for the whole UK if Labour get 20-30 seats in Scotland.Pross said:
When I first read that I thought it was a prediction. FA will be happy to see the SNP get a thrashing like that.tailwindhome said:
Irks me that all the people based in the SE whinging about the Tories at the same time discount the situation in Scotland as being something that doesn't affect them.
If Labour get in and if they do so with a centre of gravity in the north of England and Scotland, there's also a built-in leveling up agenda, in my view. Unless that is (and I think it unlikely) that Labour somehow have as much hubris as the Tories and take all of those people for granted.
0 -
I think the Tories gave up on Scotland, in all senses, a long time ago, whereas I'm pretty sure that Labour recognise it's always likely to be an electoral asset.First.Aspect said:
I won't have as much skin in the game for much longer. But yes. It's actually a good thing for the whole UK if Labour get 20-30 seats in Scotland.Pross said:
When I first read that I thought it was a prediction. FA will be happy to see the SNP get a thrashing like that.tailwindhome said:
Irks me that all the people based in the SE whinging about the Tories at the same time discount the situation in Scotland as being something that doesn't affect them.
If Labour get in and if they do so with a centre of gravity in the north of England and Scotland, there's also a built-in leveling up agenda, in my view. Unless that is (and I think it unlikely) that Labour somehow have as much hubris as the Tories and take all of those people for granted.0 -
You'd think so. But according to Wiki, Labour only have 22/129 seats in Scotland.briantrumpet said:
I think the Tories gave up on Scotland, in all senses, a long time ago, whereas I'm pretty sure that Labour recognise it's always likely to be an electoral asset.First.Aspect said:
I won't have as much skin in the game for much longer. But yes. It's actually a good thing for the whole UK if Labour get 20-30 seats in Scotland.Pross said:
When I first read that I thought it was a prediction. FA will be happy to see the SNP get a thrashing like that.tailwindhome said:
Irks me that all the people based in the SE whinging about the Tories at the same time discount the situation in Scotland as being something that doesn't affect them.
If Labour get in and if they do so with a centre of gravity in the north of England and Scotland, there's also a built-in leveling up agenda, in my view. Unless that is (and I think it unlikely) that Labour somehow have as much hubris as the Tories and take all of those people for granted.
That translates to 2/59 Scottish seats in Westminster. Potential, but not guaranteed.The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
It's a pity. When I moved up, I remember the statistic that there were more millionaires per capita in Edinburgh than in London. There's a lot of potential.briantrumpet said:
I think the Tories gave up on Scotland, in all senses, a long time ago, whereas I'm pretty sure that Labour recognise it's always likely to be an electoral asset.First.Aspect said:
I won't have as much skin in the game for much longer. But yes. It's actually a good thing for the whole UK if Labour get 20-30 seats in Scotland.Pross said:
When I first read that I thought it was a prediction. FA will be happy to see the SNP get a thrashing like that.tailwindhome said:
Irks me that all the people based in the SE whinging about the Tories at the same time discount the situation in Scotland as being something that doesn't affect them.
If Labour get in and if they do so with a centre of gravity in the north of England and Scotland, there's also a built-in leveling up agenda, in my view. Unless that is (and I think it unlikely) that Labour somehow have as much hubris as the Tories and take all of those people for granted.
In case anyone wasn't paying attention, for a period after the IndyRef, the Tories - yes the Tories - were a strong second to the SNP at all levels of Scottish politics. And this was after the Brexit referendum. They have somehow managed to discard that.
0 -
pblakeney said:
You'd think so. But according to Wiki, Labour only have 22/129 seats in Scotland.briantrumpet said:
I think the Tories gave up on Scotland, in all senses, a long time ago, whereas I'm pretty sure that Labour recognise it's always likely to be an electoral asset.First.Aspect said:
I won't have as much skin in the game for much longer. But yes. It's actually a good thing for the whole UK if Labour get 20-30 seats in Scotland.Pross said:
When I first read that I thought it was a prediction. FA will be happy to see the SNP get a thrashing like that.tailwindhome said:
Irks me that all the people based in the SE whinging about the Tories at the same time discount the situation in Scotland as being something that doesn't affect them.
If Labour get in and if they do so with a centre of gravity in the north of England and Scotland, there's also a built-in leveling up agenda, in my view. Unless that is (and I think it unlikely) that Labour somehow have as much hubris as the Tories and take all of those people for granted.
That translates to 2/59 Scottish seats in Westminster. Potential, but not guaranteed.
I have a feeling that the SNP will be seen as an historical blip that took most of their votes from Labour... I think that the move back towards Labour from SNP will be reinforced if Labour improve relations (to whatever degree) with the EU, and give the UK Tories a good electoral kicking, to a degree which the SNP never would be able to.
I suspect also that Scots have lost quite a bit of the appetite for independence in a big scary world, and that was really all the SNP had.0 -
Oh, I suspect a big turn around. I also think long term that turnaround will be a smaller blip too, before a levelling off. Of course that depends on politics becoming stable.briantrumpet said:pblakeney said:
You'd think so. But according to Wiki, Labour only have 22/129 seats in Scotland.briantrumpet said:
I think the Tories gave up on Scotland, in all senses, a long time ago, whereas I'm pretty sure that Labour recognise it's always likely to be an electoral asset.First.Aspect said:
I won't have as much skin in the game for much longer. But yes. It's actually a good thing for the whole UK if Labour get 20-30 seats in Scotland.Pross said:
When I first read that I thought it was a prediction. FA will be happy to see the SNP get a thrashing like that.tailwindhome said:
Irks me that all the people based in the SE whinging about the Tories at the same time discount the situation in Scotland as being something that doesn't affect them.
If Labour get in and if they do so with a centre of gravity in the north of England and Scotland, there's also a built-in leveling up agenda, in my view. Unless that is (and I think it unlikely) that Labour somehow have as much hubris as the Tories and take all of those people for granted.
That translates to 2/59 Scottish seats in Westminster. Potential, but not guaranteed.
I have a feeling that the SNP will be seen as an historical blip that took most of their votes from Labour... I think that the move back towards Labour from SNP will be reinforced if Labour improve relations (to whatever degree) with the EU, and give the UK Tories a good electoral kicking, to a degree which the SNP never would be able to.
I suspect also that Scots have lost quite a bit of the appetite for independence in a big scary world, and that was really all the SNP had.The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
I suspect the last GE may have taken away any complacency Labour had in the north of the country.First.Aspect said:
I won't have as much skin in the game for much longer. But yes. It's actually a good thing for the whole UK if Labour get 20-30 seats in Scotland.Pross said:
When I first read that I thought it was a prediction. FA will be happy to see the SNP get a thrashing like that.tailwindhome said:
Irks me that all the people based in the SE whinging about the Tories at the same time discount the situation in Scotland as being something that doesn't affect them.
If Labour get in and if they do so with a centre of gravity in the north of England and Scotland, there's also a built-in leveling up agenda, in my view. Unless that is (and I think it unlikely) that Labour somehow have as much hubris as the Tories and take all of those people for granted.0 -
Beginning to look as if the Truss premiership has left a permanent scar on the polls
“New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!0 -
How did the cake stop bubble take over the polling companies!tailwindhome said:Beginning to look as if the Truss premiership has left a permanent scar on the polls
0 -
Or the replacement of Boris? When did they tank exactly?tailwindhome said:Beginning to look as if the Truss premiership has left a permanent scar on the polls
0 -
0