2023 Transfer rumours and confirmed moves

1131416181924

Comments

  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 26,189
    edited October 2023

    If the riders have a contract, they can't just be told that it's over, surely. It's not like the team has gone bust.

    They'd need to settle with the riders based on the future value of the contract even if they wanted no transfer fee.

    Slightly different but having worked on a contract basis for many years I can assure you that clauses make most contracts not worth the paper they are written on for duration.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • "Slightly different" :smiley:

  • joeyhalloran
    joeyhalloran Posts: 1,080

    andyrac said:

    It's an absolute 5hitshow.....and reflects badly on the sport, and the viability of the sport. Still relying on handouts from sponsors...

    But if (as seems likely) it ends up with Vingegaard, Evenepoel, Roglic and Pogacar all at different teams with decent money behind them, and also Evenepoel, Pogacar, Van Aert and Van Der Poel all at different teams, then we have some racing on our hands, don't we?
    The only difference from this season to the "racing on our hands" scenario above is Roglic moving team, which would likely happen anyway (as the trigger for that was the Vuelta rather than the merger) so I still don't think the merger is at all good for the viability of cycling.
  • TheBigBean
    TheBigBean Posts: 20,914

    I'd say he made the 2020 Tour pretty exciting, and him on a different team would have made the 2023 Vuelta more exciting.

    Vingegaard would have just won it easily. Roglic might have finished second, but might not have done.
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 26,189

    "Slightly different" :smiley:

    Time will tell but reports are that this is the case.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • pblakeney said:

    "Slightly different" :smiley:

    Time will tell but reports are that this is the case.
    I just thought if I compared my situation when I was working on a contract basis to Harry Kane's, it was more than slightly different.
  • Let's face it, if professional cyclists contracts could just be terminated without compensation, Chris Froome would have been living a somewhat different life the last couple of years.
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 26,189

    Let's face it, if professional cyclists contracts could just be terminated without compensation, Chris Froome would have been living a somewhat different life the last couple of years.

    I guess it comes down to the lawyer you use when negotiating.
    Top dogs will have top lawyers, lower tiers?
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • If the riders have a contract, they can't just be told that it's over, surely. It's not like the team has gone bust.

    They'd need to settle with the riders based on the future value of the contract even if they wanted no transfer fee.

    I might eat my words here but this still hasn't happened yet has it? Still very much speculation and the teams have only said (have they even said?) that they're talking to each other. No word of what happens to riders in event of a merger.

    Agree if it's bad if it goes through in the manner you suggest but at the moment it smacks of journos trying to get the inside scoop for clicks in the quiet part of the season. So far we've had Remco to Ineos, Ineos Quickstep merger, Jumbo Apple, Jumbo Amazon, Jumbo Apple and Amazon, Jumbo Quickstep merger, Jumbo Quickstep merger with added Amazon and or Apple, Alaphillipe's contract terminated, all QS contracts voided... off the top of my head in the last couple of weeks. None of them have been confirmed so far.
  • mididoctors
    mididoctors Posts: 17,647

    andyrac said:

    It's an absolute 5hitshow.....and reflects badly on the sport, and the viability of the sport. Still relying on handouts from sponsors...

    But if (as seems likely) it ends up with Vingegaard, Evenepoel, Roglic and Pogacar all at different teams with decent money behind them, and also Evenepoel, Pogacar, Van Aert and Van Der Poel all at different teams, then we have some racing on our hands, don't we?
    I hope so
    "If I was a 38 year old man, I definitely wouldn't be riding a bright yellow bike with Hello Kitty disc wheels, put it that way. What we're witnessing here is the world's most high profile mid-life crisis" Afx237vi Mon Jul 20, 2009 2:43 pm
  • Pross
    Pross Posts: 41,384
    Sounds like classic Lefevere 'negotiation' to me. I wouldn't be surprised if he is behind any leaks / rumours.
  • mididoctors
    mididoctors Posts: 17,647
    What a weird mess
    "If I was a 38 year old man, I definitely wouldn't be riding a bright yellow bike with Hello Kitty disc wheels, put it that way. What we're witnessing here is the world's most high profile mid-life crisis" Afx237vi Mon Jul 20, 2009 2:43 pm
  • mididoctors
    mididoctors Posts: 17,647
    Pross said:

    Sounds like classic Lefevere 'negotiation' to me. I wouldn't be surprised if he is behind any leaks / rumours.

    Some sort of ruse huh .....
    "If I was a 38 year old man, I definitely wouldn't be riding a bright yellow bike with Hello Kitty disc wheels, put it that way. What we're witnessing here is the world's most high profile mid-life crisis" Afx237vi Mon Jul 20, 2009 2:43 pm
  • roscoe
    roscoe Posts: 475
    Would be quite something if nothing happened.............
  • andyp
    andyp Posts: 10,208
    roscoe said:

    Would be quite something if nothing happened.............



    It's clear something is happening.
  • daniel_b
    daniel_b Posts: 11,652
    Nicely said that man. Those are the people I feel really sorry for, the riders and probably more so the lower paid staff who are likely to be out of work.

    Yes it may all well end up we have a nice even field for competition, but I wonder what the cost will be to the various team members.
    Felt F70 05 (Turbo)
    Marin Palisades Trail 91 and 06
    Scott CR1 SL 12
    Cannondale Synapse Adventure 15 & 16 Di2
    Scott Foil 18
  • joeyhalloran
    joeyhalloran Posts: 1,080
    daniel_b said:

    Nicely said that man. Those are the people I feel really sorry for, the riders and probably more so the lower paid staff who are likely to be out of work.

    Yes it may all well end up we have a nice even field for competition, but I wonder what the cost will be to the various team members.

    The riders are mostly protected by UCI rules, the current contracts should be paid if they can find a spot. I'm sure many teams would happily pick up free agents with salaries paid for it. It's a knock on impact on other rides in other teams that don't have a contract. And of course the support staff,.mechanics, etc...
  • roscoe
    roscoe Posts: 475
    andyp said:

    roscoe said:

    Would be quite something if nothing happened.............



    It's clear something is happening.
    I hope my comment didn’t come across as flippant, not what I intended.

    Well said Ilan, strong feelings on show there.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 73,674
    Maybe I am just a hard nosed bastard but I am a little taken aback by how sensitive and soft everyone's being about the prospect of job losses.

    Since January my firm has cut headcount by 1/3 and we find out when they don't turn up for 2 weeks and then the Friday evening HR email goes around.

    Sh!t like this happens in downturns.
  • r0bh
    r0bh Posts: 2,226
    I guess it's because it's primarily the low paid behind the scenes workers in the teams that will suffer the most whilst the (relatively) well paid riders and bosses will mostly come out of this just fine
  • joeyhalloran
    joeyhalloran Posts: 1,080

    Maybe I am just a hard nosed censored but I am a little taken aback by how sensitive and soft everyone's being about the prospect of job losses.

    Since January my firm has cut headcount by 1/3 and we find out when they don't turn up for 2 weeks and then the Friday evening HR email goes around.

    Sh!t like this happens in downturns.

    For me the bit that's sad is that it's the best cycling team in the world being unable survive without a merger. Imagine Manchester City and Arsenal saying "we're having to merge because we can't find any sponsors".

  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 73,674
    r0bh said:

    I guess it's because it's primarily the low paid behind the scenes workers in the teams that will suffer the most whilst the (relatively) well paid riders and bosses will mostly come out of this just fine

    Well yeah, funnily enough, the biggest earners for the business here have survived.

    That kinda how it works. It sucks, sure, not pretending their jobs or livelihoods don't matter, but it's like this all over the place at the moment.

    I'm helping out more than a few mates with CVs and how to run their job searches etc. It's brutal out there.
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 26,189

    Maybe I am just a hard nosed censored but I am a little taken aback by how sensitive and soft everyone's being about the prospect of job losses.

    Since January my firm has cut headcount by 1/3 and we find out when they don't turn up for 2 weeks and then the Friday evening HR email goes around.

    Sh!t like this happens in downturns.

    For me the bit that's sad is that it's the best cycling team in the world being unable survive without a merger. Imagine Manchester City and Arsenal saying "we're having to merge because we can't find any sponsors".

    Exactly.
    Professional cycle racing in 2024 could be pretty bleak.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 73,674
    It's all gonna be bleak in 24!
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 26,189

    It's all gonna be bleak in 24!

    Wrong thread for that discussion.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • andyrac
    andyrac Posts: 1,140

    Maybe I am just a hard nosed censored but I am a little taken aback by how sensitive and soft everyone's being about the prospect of job losses.

    Since January my firm has cut headcount by 1/3 and we find out when they don't turn up for 2 weeks and then the Friday evening HR email goes around.

    Sh!t like this happens in downturns.

    For me the bit that's sad is that it's the best cycling team in the world being unable survive without a merger. Imagine Manchester City and Arsenal saying "we're having to merge because we can't find any sponsors".

    Or Red Bull Racing merging with McLaren.......
    It doesn't happen in a well run/ financed sport. But it will happen again as nobody wants, or is unable to do anything.
    All Road/ Gravel: tbcWinter: tbcMTB: tbcRoad: tbc"Look at the time...." "he's fallen like an old lady on a cruise ship..."
  • Maybe a Belgian glue company just can't compete with an oil country who doesn't care about value.
  • pinno
    pinno Posts: 51,685
    Things go around in circles.
    The early 90's saw a depression and then again in the late 90's.
    Things didn't really take off until the Armstrong years and then there was a further depression and black clouds over the whole sport following that era which took considerable time to disperse with numerous positive tests amongst the stars just to dampen the sparks of recovery for the next few years.
    I really don't think that the current situation is anything near that or that 'bleak'.

    I Presume Amazon are jumping on the Sepp Kuss success which shows a huge naivety as I don't think Sepp wants to be a team leader nor wants to be a GC contender. Yes, I realise there are other Americans in the fold but they are an unknown as potential GC winners and it has to be GC winners, few yanks would know much cycling outside The toor de Free-ance let alone the classics.
    I also don't think Sepp will win another GT.

    Do we want the might of Amazon with all it's financial power pushing up wages and budgets to levels that are unsustainable? Would their presence be transient anyway?
    Would a Jumbo-Visma/Amazon team be just unbeatable? We have to be careful what we wish for.

    The US sponsorship interest in cycling with Lemond, LA, Landis etc has always been transient. There will be no change there.

    Did the Lotto-QS sponsors bank on a GC win and failing is instrumental in not securing sponsorship? If the sponsorship of the sport is really that fickle, then cracks will appear.
    Or is this simply part of an economic downturn coupled with increasing budgets and astronomical wage commitment, or a bit of all 3?

    Economic downturns often follow buoyancy that was paper thin. Cycling is no different and inextricably linked.

    The press are harping on about the 4 major contenders being amongst 4 teams and the mouth watering prospect of 4 riders lining up for the TdF next year. But we know the reality would be something different. If say Remco decides he can't win it in the face of the opposition, Roglic will be 34 soon, Remco in a steadily weakening INEOS squad(?), then add an accident to a protagonist and suddenly there is no perfect storm, merely a damp flannel.

    Must go, sorry to ramble; the rollers are calling.
    seanoconn - gruagach craic!
  • Understandable rumours swirling that Mørkøv will be heading to Astana