Boris as PM
Comments
-
More to the point, why?chris_bass said:as an aside (an sorry if this has been covered long long ago!) does anyone know how they collect the data for the polls? where do they ask people?
i could probably just google it but i'm being lazy!
I'd like to think that people are going to vote according to their principles rather than by what other people think, but I realise that I am probably over estimating the public.
The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
I don't think that's the point he's making.pblakeney said:
More to the point, why?chris_bass said:as an aside (an sorry if this has been covered long long ago!) does anyone know how they collect the data for the polls? where do they ask people?
i could probably just google it but i'm being lazy!
I'd like to think that people are going to vote according to their principles rather than by what other people think, but I realise that I am probably over estimating the public.
Although I voted by post today according to my principles"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
The conservative party I grew up with has transmogrified beyond reasonable expectation. How bad must it have got that Kenny Clarke and Micky Heseltine have walked away from it?0
-
Brexit is a divisive isue and those two are strongly remain.motogull said:The conservative party I grew up with has transmogrified beyond reasonable expectation. How bad must it have got that Kenny Clarke and Micky Heseltine have walked away from it?
Now look at who has walked away from the Labour party and why."I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
do you why do they collect the data or why do i want to know?pblakeney said:
More to the point, why?chris_bass said:as an aside (an sorry if this has been covered long long ago!) does anyone know how they collect the data for the polls? where do they ask people?
i could probably just google it but i'm being lazy!
I'd like to think that people are going to vote according to their principles rather than by what other people think, but I realise that I am probably over estimating the public.
you'd be very surprised how people are swayed by what others do/are doing, either consciously or subconsciously - there is a whole load of marketing for almost anything that works on the "people like you are..." principle.
i was more interested from a reliability standpoint - it must be really really difficult to get a representative sample - once you take into account location, age, gender, nationality, religion, previous voting, occupation, income and any number of other things that may be a contributing factor you'd need a huge sample size to make it remotely usable, with any statistical significance at least.www.conjunctivitis.com - a site for sore eyes0 -
The "why" was about the relevance of polls.chris_bass said:
do you why do they collect the data or why do i want to know?pblakeney said:
More to the point, why?chris_bass said:as an aside (an sorry if this has been covered long long ago!) does anyone know how they collect the data for the polls? where do they ask people?
i could probably just google it but i'm being lazy!
I'd like to think that people are going to vote according to their principles rather than by what other people think, but I realise that I am probably over estimating the public.
you'd be very surprised how people are swayed by what others do/are doing, either consciously or subconsciously - there is a whole load of marketing for almost anything that works on the "people like you are..." principle.
i was more interested from a reliability standpoint - it must be really really difficult to get a representative sample - once you take into account location, age, gender, nationality, religion, previous voting, occupation, income and any number of other things that may be a contributing factor you'd need a huge sample size to make it remotely usable, with any statistical significance at least.
I'd like to think people will vote according to their principles rather than what other people think. I acknowledge that I will be disappointed. People after all...
Also, who do they ask, and are they reliable? Chances are if I answer a random on the street I will wind them up for wasting my time, assuming I stop in the first place.The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0