TdF 2017: Stage 9 Nantua - Chambéry 181.5KM *Spoilers*

12122232426

Comments

  • Pross
    Pross Posts: 43,156
    RichN95 wrote:
    Anyway, enough of Aru, there's a more important question to ask?

    Is George Bennett the new Haimar Zubeldia?

    I think Bennett goes unnoticed at the moment because he doesn't have the history to suggest he's a contender. If he keeps up his current level he'll soon start to get noticed. Besides, I actually saw him on TV yesterday so I now he's real whereas HZ has never actually been seen and I still think his existence might be some peloton in joke (is there an anagram in his name or anything?).
  • No_Ta_Doctor
    No_Ta_Doctor Posts: 14,535
    When we have to rely on people going to A&E to have a bit of fun, it's sad racing really... three major climbs and not a single noteworthy attack from any of the GC men... maybe they shouldn't allow chimps to design mountain stages. What was wrong with a mountain top finish?

    Well people complained that MTFs were only raced in the last 3km, for a handful of seconds. If those seconds went to Froome then everyone complained that the race was over.

    I don't think there's much race designers can do, tbh. The real issue is that Sky have the strongest team and the strongest rider.
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 27,760
    When we have to rely on people going to A&E to have a bit of fun, it's sad racing really... three major climbs and not a single noteworthy attack from any of the GC men... maybe they shouldn't allow chimps to design mountain stages. What was wrong with a mountain top finish?

    Froome made a meaningful attack, and managed to drop the weaker "contenders".

    After seeing how much slower Porte was than Froome descending in the Dauphine, it was likely to end in tears when that group went down that descent on the absolute limit for descenders as good as Froome and Bardet.
  • RichN95.
    RichN95. Posts: 27,241
    When we have to rely on people going to A&E to have a bit of fun, it's sad racing really... three major climbs and not a single noteworthy attack from any of the GC men... maybe they shouldn't allow chimps to design mountain stages. What was wrong with a mountain top finish?
    We're only at the first rest day. Lots of climbing in the first week and it would be all over. It would be like a movie thriller where the heroes catch the villain after forty minutes followed by an hour of them doing their paperwork.
    Not a lot had happened in the Giro at this stage either (other than crashes)
    Twitter: @RichN95
  • Alex99
    Alex99 Posts: 1,407
    When we have to rely on people going to A&E to have a bit of fun, it's sad racing really... three major climbs and not a single noteworthy attack from any of the GC men... maybe they shouldn't allow chimps to design mountain stages. What was wrong with a mountain top finish?

    Froome made a meaningful attack, and managed to drop the weaker "contenders".

    After seeing how much slower Porte was than Froome descending in the Dauphine, it was likely to end in tears when that group went down that descent on the absolute limit for descenders as good as Froome and Bardet.

    I recall Porte, although looking a bit more 'on the limit', being only a few seconds slower than Froome over a whole descent.
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 27,760
    Alex99 wrote:
    When we have to rely on people going to A&E to have a bit of fun, it's sad racing really... three major climbs and not a single noteworthy attack from any of the GC men... maybe they shouldn't allow chimps to design mountain stages. What was wrong with a mountain top finish?

    Froome made a meaningful attack, and managed to drop the weaker "contenders".

    After seeing how much slower Porte was than Froome descending in the Dauphine, it was likely to end in tears when that group went down that descent on the absolute limit for descenders as good as Froome and Bardet.

    I recall Porte, although looking a bit more 'on the limit', being only a few seconds slower than Froome over a whole descent.

    Which stage were you thinking of?
  • onyourright
    onyourright Posts: 509
    The impressive thing about Froome’s descending, these days, is that he never looks to be seriously on the limit. The only thing that hints at effort is his hard pedalling out of corners.

    He’s turned into the best all-round bike racer in the peloton. I love watching him. He has no significant weaknesses except perhaps endurance, which isn’t much of a weakness in an era of adults having prepubescent attention spans and 200 km stages being called ‘long’.
  • bobmcstuff
    bobmcstuff Posts: 11,398
    The impressive thing about Froome’s descending, these days, is that he never looks to be seriously on the limit. The only thing that hints at effort is his hard pedalling out of corners.

    He’s turned into the best all-round bike racer in the peloton. I love watching him. He has no significant weaknesses except perhaps endurance, which isn’t much of a weakness in an era of adults having prepubescent attention spans and 200 km stages being called ‘long’.

    For me the most impressive thing about his descending is how bad he used to be!
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 27,760
    He also doesn't care about looking like an idiot. If he finds something is most efficient and fastest, he'll do it.

    He'd underarm free throws in basketball, that's for sure.
  • Right. Listened to the Cycling Podcast fellas discussing yday's stage and the Aru move, and they've won me over

    Go ahead and attack the leader. It's supposed to be a race

    (but also have the cojones - both Aru and Froome - not to spin the 'I never saw nuffink' bullsheet)
  • RichN95.
    RichN95. Posts: 27,241
    Right. Listened to the Cycling Podcast fellas discussing yday's stage and the Aru move, and they've won me over
    You needed winning over that someone should attack Froome by any means necessary?
    Twitter: @RichN95
  • lordy

    such emotive stuff

    may I point you to my initial posts/tweets yday

    But listening to Moore, Birnie and Thomazeau debate the issue....#jesuisCyclingPodcast
  • tailwindhome
    tailwindhome Posts: 19,310
    lordy

    such emotive stuff

    may I point you to my initial posts/tweets yday

    But listening to Moore, Birnie and Thomazeau debate the issue....#jesuisCyclingPodcast

    #itsbullshit
    “New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!
  • richa
    richa Posts: 1,632
    If you don't like Moore, Birnie et al you could always try LA's pod...
    Rich
  • m.r.m.
    m.r.m. Posts: 3,455
    He’s turned into the best all-round bike racer in the peloton. I love watching him. He has no significant weaknesses except perhaps endurance, which isn’t much of a weakness in an era of adults having prepubescent attention spans and 200 km stages being called ‘long’.
    That is still Valverde. Troubled history notwithstanding. I'd put Sagan ahead for that as well.
    PTP Champion 2019, 2022 & 2023
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,648
    Stef Clement on Froome's bike handling

    "Froome - oh man he's just terrible - he crashes 4 times a day - almost - - and that breathing he does when he looks down - nightmare - don't want to ride anywhere near that."

    *on watching the Froome veer rightwards into Art*

    "yeah Froome doesn't have teammates there to clear a route for him so he can follow. It was the same with Schleck who had Voigt and Cancellara to follow".

    "Froome is so busy looknig at his power and his weird breathing technique he regularly misses stuff and bounces into riders."

    "he gives off an aura in the peloton (on the rare occasion i'm with him) that you need to give him some space otherwise he gets very nervous"

    Bahahahaha

    :lol::lol::lol::lol:
  • FocusZing
    FocusZing Posts: 4,373
    ^Do you want to quote the source then?
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,648
    FocusZing wrote:
    ^Do you want to quote the source then?

    https://www.rtl.nl/video/4006be66-2efb- ... 1499635591

    enjoy.

    Translate it yourself if you want ;).
  • ddraver
    ddraver Posts: 26,660
    edited July 2017
    Wrong thread soz
    We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
    - @ddraver
  • iainf72
    iainf72 Posts: 15,784
    I think it was Ferrari who said years ago that his looking down was probably a breathing technique rather than power meter related

    Yep in 2013

    https://www.53x12.com/tdf-2013---part-iii
    Fckin' Quintana … that creep can roll, man.
  • tailwindhome
    tailwindhome Posts: 19,310
    DESw6ZpXgAAGNUv.jpg

    DADOU‏ @davidbuonomo · Jul 9

    La tactique d' AG2R par #Dadou
    “New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!
  • RichN95.
    RichN95. Posts: 27,241
    DESw6ZpXgAAGNUv.jpg

    DADOU‏ @davidbuonomo · Jul 9

    La tactique d' AG2R par #Dadou
    What is that meant to be saying? In that cartoon AG2R are going all plunge to their death, which is a harsh assessment of tactics that had some success.
    Twitter: @RichN95
  • tailwindhome
    tailwindhome Posts: 19,310
    RichN95 wrote:
    What is that meant to be saying? In that cartoon AG2R are going all plunge to their death, which is a harsh assessment of tactics that had some success.

    I took it as an assessment that the AG2R tactics were desperate, reckless and as liable to cause injury to their own riders as the rest.

    Had you not described the tactic as a 'stunt' achieving nothing but 'putting a few riders in hospital'?
    “New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!
  • RichN95.
    RichN95. Posts: 27,241
    RichN95 wrote:
    What is that meant to be saying? In that cartoon AG2R are going all plunge to their death, which is a harsh assessment of tactics that had some success.

    I took it as an assessment that the AG2R tactics were desperate, reckless and as liable to cause injury to their own riders as the rest.

    Had you not described the tactic as a 'stunt' achieving nothing but 'putting a few riders in hospital'?
    Their mid stage antics, yes. As soon as they got to the valley they deferred to Sky. Bardet at the end achieved something. But ultimately others did the real damage.
    Twitter: @RichN95
  • tailwindhome
    tailwindhome Posts: 19,310
    RichN95 wrote:
    RichN95 wrote:
    What is that meant to be saying? In that cartoon AG2R are going all plunge to their death, which is a harsh assessment of tactics that had some success.

    I took it as an assessment that the AG2R tactics were desperate, reckless and as liable to cause injury to their own riders as the rest.

    Had you not described the tactic as a 'stunt' achieving nothing but 'putting a few riders in hospital'?
    Their mid stage antics, yes. As soon as they got to the valley they deferred to Sky. Bardet at the end achieved something. But ultimately others did the real damage.

    I'd have thought the cartoon refers to the mid stage 'antics'
    “New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!
  • FocusZing
    FocusZing Posts: 4,373
    DEcn8N_UMAAXbrF.jpg
  • No_Ta_Doctor
    No_Ta_Doctor Posts: 14,535
    FocusZing wrote:
    DEcn8N_UMAAXbrF.jpg

    If cyclists could gain an advantage by feigning injury, they would.
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format
  • FocusZing
    FocusZing Posts: 4,373
    Fictitious Tues I guess.
  • RichN95.
    RichN95. Posts: 27,241
    ^^Football would have brought on a substitute and treated their competitors as valuable assets, not crash porn.

    Neymar may be faking it to try and gain a free kick/card, but when your sport had a decade or two of an EPO free for all the moral high ground is as shaky as a half hour old game of Jenga.
    Twitter: @RichN95
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 27,760
    Also, we've all seen riders who shake their heads because they've got no energy left to work with a break and miraculously recover for the sprint.