Poo tin... Put@in...
Comments
-
that bit was lighthearted.MattFalle said:
sorry - what? a bit harsh listing a man who willingly firebombed cities with the main aim of totsl destruction and as many civilian casualties as possible?surrey_commuter said:
Bit harsh on Arthur bracketing him with the others on that list.MattFalle said:
eh?focuszing723 said:I think it's crazy that people can be in these positions without regular checks to make sure they are of sound mind. MRI Brain scans should be carried out at least once a year amongst other tests. Make it the remit of WHO that any new *leader* has to do this.
I know this never going to happen, but it's the new generation who will suffer, big time too if it all goes nukeynoo.
how i an MRI scan going yo do anything about a megslomsniac pyscopathic lunatic fascist state of mental belief?
There was nothing wrong wiyh Thatcher that snd MRI would have picked up but she was an evil creature
There is nothing wrong with Bolsonaro that an MRI would pick but he's a horrible fascist
Albanian dude the same
Marine Le Pen - horrible fascist but MRI pass
Blair - war criminal but MRI pass
Bomber Harris - total war criminal but MRI pass
De Pfeffel - lying cheating adultering narcissist but MRI pass
Nadine Dorres - nothing to MRI but still a total liability
utter bizarre suggestion.
I think if we had lost the war Barnes Wallis may have been strung up for designing a bomb intended to cause mass civilian casualties
and you're questioning this?
If we had lost then Harris would have been in the dock alongside his boss and counterparts in the USAF and their bosses.1 -
ah - soz. missed the laughing emoticonsurrey_commuter said:
that bit was lighthearted.MattFalle said:
sorry - what? a bit harsh listing a man who willingly firebombed cities with the main aim of totsl destruction and as many civilian casualties as possible?surrey_commuter said:
Bit harsh on Arthur bracketing him with the others on that list.MattFalle said:
eh?focuszing723 said:I think it's crazy that people can be in these positions without regular checks to make sure they are of sound mind. MRI Brain scans should be carried out at least once a year amongst other tests. Make it the remit of WHO that any new *leader* has to do this.
I know this never going to happen, but it's the new generation who will suffer, big time too if it all goes nukeynoo.
how i an MRI scan going yo do anything about a megslomsniac pyscopathic lunatic fascist state of mental belief?
There was nothing wrong wiyh Thatcher that snd MRI would have picked up but she was an evil creature
There is nothing wrong with Bolsonaro that an MRI would pick but he's a horrible fascist
Albanian dude the same
Marine Le Pen - horrible fascist but MRI pass
Blair - war criminal but MRI pass
Bomber Harris - total war criminal but MRI pass
De Pfeffel - lying cheating adultering narcissist but MRI pass
Nadine Dorres - nothing to MRI but still a total liability
utter bizarre suggestion.
I think if we had lost the war Barnes Wallis may have been strung up for designing a bomb intended to cause mass civilian casualties
and you're questioning this?
If we had lost then Harris would have been in the dock alongside his boss and counterparts in the USAF and their bosses.
and yes, agree completely. some - many of the non gammon variety in fact - believe he should have been anyway......The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
0 -
I think the debate is more nuanced than that after all they started itMattFalle said:
ah - soz. missed the laughing emoticonsurrey_commuter said:
that bit was lighthearted.MattFalle said:
sorry - what? a bit harsh listing a man who willingly firebombed cities with the main aim of totsl destruction and as many civilian casualties as possible?surrey_commuter said:
Bit harsh on Arthur bracketing him with the others on that list.MattFalle said:
eh?focuszing723 said:I think it's crazy that people can be in these positions without regular checks to make sure they are of sound mind. MRI Brain scans should be carried out at least once a year amongst other tests. Make it the remit of WHO that any new *leader* has to do this.
I know this never going to happen, but it's the new generation who will suffer, big time too if it all goes nukeynoo.
how i an MRI scan going yo do anything about a megslomsniac pyscopathic lunatic fascist state of mental belief?
There was nothing wrong wiyh Thatcher that snd MRI would have picked up but she was an evil creature
There is nothing wrong with Bolsonaro that an MRI would pick but he's a horrible fascist
Albanian dude the same
Marine Le Pen - horrible fascist but MRI pass
Blair - war criminal but MRI pass
Bomber Harris - total war criminal but MRI pass
De Pfeffel - lying cheating adultering narcissist but MRI pass
Nadine Dorres - nothing to MRI but still a total liability
utter bizarre suggestion.
I think if we had lost the war Barnes Wallis may have been strung up for designing a bomb intended to cause mass civilian casualties
and you're questioning this?
If we had lost then Harris would have been in the dock alongside his boss and counterparts in the USAF and their bosses.
and yes, agree completely. some - many of the non gammon variety in fact - believe he should have been anyway.....0 -
How about a questionnaire then and a brain scanning thing, to check they aren't potential nukeynooists?MattFalle said:
an mri won't pick up anynukeynookists as you do "comedicslly" put it.focuszing723 said:Even if it stopped one nukeynooist, surely it's worth it?
For example if my mind was scanned and I had to say whether I wanted to destroy humanity. I would say "No, Not Good, let's have a nice game of chess." and the brain scanning machine would reaffirm my belief.0 -
I wonder if the people involved in delopying nukeynoos have to do such tests, to see whether they are fully committed to the stupidity cause?0
-
"Will you deploy a nukeynoo?"
"Ahhh, yes SIR!"
"Nukeynoo away!"0 -
Reminds me of one of the questions on the U.S. landing form.
"Do you intend carrying out acts of terrorism?"
You'd have to be very, very stupid to tick the yes box.The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
Has some practical joker been swapping the keys around on your keyboard this morning?MattFalle said:
de pffeffel eouldn't trump wouldn't have. the indin and pskistani dudes won't.surrey_commuter said:
The list of countries with nukes is quite short. If you ignore those with checks and balances that would stop a mentally impaired leader from unilaterally launching then you have an even shorter list. Now how many of the leaders on that list would subject themselves to an WHO test and allow action upon the findings?focuszing723 said:Even if it stopped one nukeynooist, surely it's worth it?
overall though, its a dumb suggestion.1 -
seriously?focuszing723 said:
How about a questionnaire then and a brain scanning thing, to check they aren't potential nukeynooists?MattFalle said:
an mri won't pick up anynukeynookists as you do "comedicslly" put it.focuszing723 said:Even if it stopped one nukeynooist, surely it's worth it?
For example if my mind was scanned and I had to say whether I wanted to destroy humanity. I would say "No, Not Good, let's have a nice game of chess." and the brain scanning machine would reaffirm my belief.
like seriously, seriously?
no. just no.
why do you think a brain scanning machine would be any use at all in these things?
are we genuinly missing the point and are you just takingthepiss?
.The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
0 -
Reminded me of this... this girl used to work at my company (where she was a total legend, for lots of reasons)pblakeney said:Reminds me of one of the questions on the U.S. landing form.
"Do you intend carrying out acts of terrorism?"
You'd have to be very, very stupid to tick the yes box.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-456785171 -
seems that way, doesn't it?Pross said:
Has some practical joker been swapping the keys around on your keyboard this morning?MattFalle said:
de pffeffel eouldn't trump wouldn't have. the indin and pskistani dudes won't.surrey_commuter said:
The list of countries with nukes is quite short. If you ignore those with checks and balances that would stop a mentally impaired leader from unilaterally launching then you have an even shorter list. Now how many of the leaders on that list would subject themselves to an WHO test and allow action upon the findings?focuszing723 said:Even if it stopped one nukeynooist, surely it's worth it?
overall though, its a dumb suggestion.
just a new telephone and letters are closer together than old telephone so sausage fingers type random words.The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
0 -
doesn't matter who started it if you then go and burn hundreds of thousands of women and children alive.surrey_commuter said:
I think the debate is more nuanced than that after all they started itMattFalle said:
ah - soz. missed the laughing emoticonsurrey_commuter said:
that bit was lighthearted.MattFalle said:
sorry - what? a bit harsh listing a man who willingly firebombed cities with the main aim of totsl destruction and as many civilian casualties as possible?surrey_commuter said:
Bit harsh on Arthur bracketing him with the others on that list.MattFalle said:
eh?focuszing723 said:I think it's crazy that people can be in these positions without regular checks to make sure they are of sound mind. MRI Brain scans should be carried out at least once a year amongst other tests. Make it the remit of WHO that any new *leader* has to do this.
I know this never going to happen, but it's the new generation who will suffer, big time too if it all goes nukeynoo.
how i an MRI scan going yo do anything about a megslomsniac pyscopathic lunatic fascist state of mental belief?
There was nothing wrong wiyh Thatcher that snd MRI would have picked up but she was an evil creature
There is nothing wrong with Bolsonaro that an MRI would pick but he's a horrible fascist
Albanian dude the same
Marine Le Pen - horrible fascist but MRI pass
Blair - war criminal but MRI pass
Bomber Harris - total war criminal but MRI pass
De Pfeffel - lying cheating adultering narcissist but MRI pass
Nadine Dorres - nothing to MRI but still a total liability
utter bizarre suggestion.
I think if we had lost the war Barnes Wallis may have been strung up for designing a bomb intended to cause mass civilian casualties
and you're questioning this?
If we had lost then Harris would have been in the dock alongside his boss and counterparts in the USAF and their bosses.
and yes, agree completely. some - many of the non gammon variety in fact - believe he should have been anyway......The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
0 -
Wait til you hear about Hiroshima, or Nagasaki. Or Lubeck, or the Baedecker raids.surrey_commuter said:
If we had lost then Harris would have been in the dock alongside his boss and counterparts in the USAF and their bosses.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerial_bombardment_and_international_law
0 -
I evolved my WHO nukeynooist protection scheme to involve a questionnaire combined with mind scanning.MattFalle said:
seriously?focuszing723 said:
How about a questionnaire then and a brain scanning thing, to check they aren't potential nukeynooists?MattFalle said:
an mri won't pick up anynukeynookists as you do "comedicslly" put it.focuszing723 said:Even if it stopped one nukeynooist, surely it's worth it?
For example if my mind was scanned and I had to say whether I wanted to destroy humanity. I would say "No, Not Good, let's have a nice game of chess." and the brain scanning machine would reaffirm my belief.
like seriously, seriously?
no. just no.
why do you think a brain scanning machine would be any use at all in these things?
are we genuinly missing the point and are you just takingthepiss?
1 -
Imagine if you were near to a RED button saying "Destroy Humanity!"MattFalle said:
seems that way, doesn't it?Pross said:
Has some practical joker been swapping the keys around on your keyboard this morning?MattFalle said:
de pffeffel eouldn't trump wouldn't have. the indin and pskistani dudes won't.surrey_commuter said:
The list of countries with nukes is quite short. If you ignore those with checks and balances that would stop a mentally impaired leader from unilaterally launching then you have an even shorter list. Now how many of the leaders on that list would subject themselves to an WHO test and allow action upon the findings?focuszing723 said:Even if it stopped one nukeynooist, surely it's worth it?
overall though, its a dumb suggestion.
just a new telephone and letters are closer together than old telephone so sausage fingers type random words1 -
DO NOT ALLOW MATTFALLE NEAR NUKES!
1 -
Ah mate, we'd be stuffed.focuszing723 said:
Imagine if you were near to a RED button saying "Destroy Humanity!"MattFalle said:
seems that way, doesn't it?Pross said:
Has some practical joker been swapping the keys around on your keyboard this morning?MattFalle said:
de pffeffel eouldn't trump wouldn't have. the indin and pskistani dudes won't.surrey_commuter said:
The list of countries with nukes is quite short. If you ignore those with checks and balances that would stop a mentally impaired leader from unilaterally launching then you have an even shorter list. Now how many of the leaders on that list would subject themselves to an WHO test and allow action upon the findings?focuszing723 said:Even if it stopped one nukeynooist, surely it's worth it?
overall though, its a dumb suggestion.
just a new telephone and letters are closer together than old telephone so sausage fingers type random words
i'd be sitting there trying to order a curry and a naan bread for lunch and suddenly BOOOOOM. Alsager. gone.
although, tbh, perhaps that's not a bad thing..The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
0 -
nicely edited my friend 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣focuszing723 said:DO NOT ALLOW MATTFALLE NEAR NUKES!
.The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
0 -
well its still a mad idea (see what I did there?)focuszing723 said:
I evolved my WHO nukeynooist protection scheme to involve a questionnaire combined with mind scanning.MattFalle said:
seriously?focuszing723 said:
How about a questionnaire then and a brain scanning thing, to check they aren't potential nukeynooists?MattFalle said:
an mri won't pick up anynukeynookists as you do "comedicslly" put it.focuszing723 said:Even if it stopped one nukeynooist, surely it's worth it?
For example if my mind was scanned and I had to say whether I wanted to destroy humanity. I would say "No, Not Good, let's have a nice game of chess." and the brain scanning machine would reaffirm my belief.
like seriously, seriously?
no. just no.
why do you think a brain scanning machine would be any use at all in these things?
are we genuinly missing the point and are you just takingthepiss?.The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
0 -
MattFalle said:
i'd be sitting there trying to order a curry and a naan bread for lunch and suddenly BOOOOOM. Alsager. gone.
although, tbh, perhaps that's not a bad thing.
Come friendly bombs and fall on Alsager,
It isn't fit for humans, erm, er...
(J. Betjeman, first draft, 1937)1 -
OK, so I shouldn't be near the big read button too. My edit count will confirm this. Perhaps that's part of the Deployer Nukeynooist test...MattFalle said:
nicely edited my friend 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣focuszing723 said:DO NOT ALLOW MATTFALLE NEAR NUKES!
1 -
the red button either I'd say.....focuszing723 said:
OK, so I shouldn't be near the big read button too. My edit count will confirm this. Perhaps that's part of the Deployer Nukeynooist test...MattFalle said:
nicely edited my friend 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣focuszing723 said:DO NOT ALLOW MATTFALLE NEAR NUKES!
oh the japes..The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
0 -
we should give Alsager to the Russians as punishment for everything they have fone.briantrumpet said:MattFalle said:
i'd be sitting there trying to order a curry and a naan bread for lunch and suddenly BOOOOOM. Alsager. gone.
although, tbh, perhaps that's not a bad thing.
Come friendly bombs and fall on Alsager,
It isn't fit for humans, erm, er...
(J. Betjeman, first draft, 1937).The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
0 -
You've got to hand it to Ivan the C*nt - combining tanks with their space programme is pretty damn clever...
0 -
bet that hurt
couldn't have happened to a nicer bunch of fellas tbh.....The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
0 -
thegreatdivide said:
You've got to hand it to Ivan the C*nt - combining tanks with their space programme is pretty damn clever...
Ridiculous how high that turret goes.0 -
They found one stuck in a block of flats recently.
This what they do when they hit the ground.
0 -
kingstonian said:thegreatdivide said:
You've got to hand it to Ivan the C*nt - combining tanks with their space programme is pretty damn clever...
Ridiculous how high that turret goes.
This is an interesting thread on that tank's denouement....
0 -
Seems to be related to where those tanks store the ammo I believe?thegreatdivide said:They found one stuck in a block of flats recently.
This what they do when they hit the ground.
The new Russian tanks separate where the ammo is stored.0 -
Not just the tanks, a large majority of the APC tracked vehicles (possibly all the models, I'm not sure) have them stored under the turret.rick_chasey said:
Seems to be related to where those tanks store the ammo I believe?
The new Russian tanks separate where the ammo is stored.
The newer T-90 has its ammo still stored under the turret. As for the T-14 Armata - it's not a real tank. It's not in service because a) it costs too much, and b) it's just for show so they can try and export it to other countries.
0
