Donald Trump
Comments
-
For $99 it would've almost be worth it to see your family's faces when you give them their special pressie.Pross said:
Phew! Glad I got in there early or my family would have been disappointed on Christmas morningmasjer said:Trump's NFTs have bloody sold out!!! My god, there are some gullible mugs out there.
https://bbc.co.uk/news/business-639955630 -
masjer said:
Trump's NFTs have bloody sold out!!! My god, there are some gullible mugs out there.
https://bbc.co.uk/news/business-63995563
There's a not entirely implausible theory that they are for money laundering purposes, not entirely unconnected with his hoarding of classified information.
Mind you, just about anything is plausible with such a venal, corrupt, batshit-crazy POS.0 -
Maybe I'm as thick as a Trump, but they talk about them being cards and also NFTs. I thought an NFT was a purely digital thing, admittedly I really don't understand the point of them.0
-
But if you missed out on the sale, eBay to your rescue. Only $1000 for a downloadable image? I'm in.0
-
But, but, but... Where's the card then?orraloon said:But if you missed out on the sale, eBay to your rescue. Only $1000 for a downloadable image? I'm in.
0 -
i think they describe them as both because the target market is generally #thickaspigshit and so won't understand NFT but will understand baseball cards although yhats not what they are, but, hey, since when has Dotard been worried about a bit of artistic marketing?veronese68 said:Maybe I'm as thick as a Trump, but they talk about them being cards and also NFTs. I thought an NFT was a purely digital thing, admittedly I really don't understand the point of them.
.The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
0 -
The Grifter's mob are hoovering as much dosh as poss, driven I guess by the rumbling of ongoing / upcoming legal problems multiple. Mayhap the House investigation drops him a 'nice' Chrissie pressie next week.
Oh btw, you want a card? I can sell you a printer...0 -
Which is what I was thinking, so will the morons that bought them be disappointed not to get a card? In which case is it false marketing from the ex liar in chief? If they do get a card, it's not an NFT.0
-
TBF by his normal standards that’s just a little white lie. It’s not like it will result in insurrection and rival politicians being assaultedveronese68 said:Which is what I was thinking, so will the morons that bought them be disappointed not to get a card? In which case is it false marketing from the ex liar in chief? If they do get a card, it's not an NFT.
0 -
Found this explanation of NFTs elsewhere, thought aye that's about right so sharing
0 -
-
This speech was prepared in conjunction with Liz Truss speech, speech, urm, , cheese, pork, erm, creator people associates.briantrumpet said:America is so screwed.
0 -
The only way it could have been better is if it would have turned into a massive pillow fight, only, in this instance, with breeze blocks hidden inside the pillows.
2,321 enter
none leave.The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
0 -
😆briantrumpet said:America is so screwed.
Love the way he totally loses his thread.
Must have missed rehearsals.1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Part of the anti-growth coalition0 -
Ah that’s painful!0
-
All the images appear to be photoshopped copyrighted material used without licence. He is in deep doo doos now.veronese68 said:Which is what I was thinking, so will the morons that bought them be disappointed not to get a card? In which case is it false marketing from the ex liar in chief? If they do get a card, it's not an NFT.
0 -
You can't make it up, he's so dodgy. Derek Trotter if he'd started out as an American billionaire rather than a council flat in Peckham.darkhairedlord said:
All the images appear to be photoshopped copyrighted material used without licence. He is in deep doo doos now.veronese68 said:Which is what I was thinking, so will the morons that bought them be disappointed not to get a card? In which case is it false marketing from the ex liar in chief? If they do get a card, it's not an NFT.
0 -
And had his personality removedveronese68 said:
You can't make it up, he's so dodgy. Derek Trotter if he'd started out as an American billionaire rather than a council flat in Peckham.darkhairedlord said:
All the images appear to be photoshopped copyrighted material used without licence. He is in deep doo doos now.veronese68 said:Which is what I was thinking, so will the morons that bought them be disappointed not to get a card? In which case is it false marketing from the ex liar in chief? If they do get a card, it's not an NFT.
0 -
The bell tolls for the Orangee.
0 -
Be interesting to see what happens when / if he gets charged. Will it lead to another riot and will he help incite it?0
-
links?darkhairedlord said:
All the images appear to be photoshopped copyrighted material used without licence. He is in deep doo doos now.veronese68 said:Which is what I was thinking, so will the morons that bought them be disappointed not to get a card? In which case is it false marketing from the ex liar in chief? If they do get a card, it's not an NFT.
.The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
0 -
Only source I found was the Daily Heil.MattFalle said:
links?darkhairedlord said:
All the images appear to be photoshopped copyrighted material used without licence. He is in deep doo doos now.veronese68 said:Which is what I was thinking, so will the morons that bought them be disappointed not to get a card? In which case is it false marketing from the ex liar in chief? If they do get a card, it's not an NFT.
Need more than that I'm afraid.The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
.
The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
0 -
agree - heil isn't worthshit.pblakeney said:
Only source I found was the Daily Heil.MattFalle said:
links?darkhairedlord said:
All the images appear to be photoshopped copyrighted material used without licence. He is in deep doo doos now.veronese68 said:Which is what I was thinking, so will the morons that bought them be disappointed not to get a card? In which case is it false marketing from the ex liar in chief? If they do get a card, it's not an NFT.
Need more than that I'm afraid..The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
0 -
.
The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
0 -
@First.Aspect - you be legal trade mark dude: waddya say?.
The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
0 -
Patents, so I've not got a clue.MattFalle said:@First.Aspect - you be legal trade mark dude: waddya say?
0 -
oh.
never mind. have a NFT for your troubles.
.The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
0 -
Okay so I've got a bit of a clue. Copyright could protect something like the DC Superman artwork, or a still of John Wayne from a movie, in which case splashing the face of a twat onto it could infringe copyright. But those are entirely new artworks, it looks like. Copyright is fairly narrow, and new images created in the same style are unlikely to infringe anything.
Where's the trade mark? T for Twat is probably owned by the Trump corporation already.
Pity, the Netflix dramatisation of an IP infringement case would have been a winner.1 -
There's one where you can still see part of the shutterstock logo on it.First.Aspect said:Okay so I've got a bit of a clue. Copyright could protect something like the DC Superman artwork, or a still of John Wayne from a movie, in which case splashing the face of a censored onto it could infringe copyright. But those are entirely new artworks, it looks like. Copyright is fairly narrow, and new images created in the same style are unlikely to infringe anything.
Where's the trade mark? T for censored is probably owned by the Trump corporation already.
Pity, the Netflix dramatisation of an IP infringement case would have been a winner.
0
