Donald Trump
Comments
-
bianchimoon wrote:Yup, some gems from Woodward, the fake president will Be in another Twitter rage soon
So has this predicted 'Twitter rage' , whatever that is , started yet - GREAT SAGE?...take your pickelf on your holibobs....
jeez :roll:0 -
InconveniencedBadger wrote:This question is an insult to muppets.
What does this mean - what quesation - what muppets.? Thankyou....take your pickelf on your holibobs....
jeez :roll:0 -
FishFish wrote:bianchimoon wrote:Yup, some gems from Woodward, the fake president will Be in another Twitter rage soon
So has this predicted 'Twitter rage' , whatever that is , started yet - GREAT SAGE?
Yes I am the GREAT SAGE, because as predicted it has.. thank you :roll:All lies and jest..still a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest....0 -
FishFish wrote:bianchimoon wrote:Yup, some gems from Woodward, the fake president will Be in another Twitter rage soon
So has this predicted 'Twitter rage' , whatever that is , started yet - GREAT SAGE?
Does that count?The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
Trouble at mill. Who,d a thunk it?
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... resistance
#resistancePostby team47b » Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:53 am
De Sisti wrote:
This is one of the silliest threads I've come across.
Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honoursmithy21 wrote:
He's right you know.0 -
Matthewfalle wrote:Trouble at mill. Who,d a thunk it?
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... resistance
#resistanceThe anonymous author describes Trump as amoral, “anti-trade and anti-democratic” and prone to making “half-baked, ill-informed and occasionally reckless decisions”.
Of course, to be fair we already knew this but always helpful to have confirmation from direct from the nut house......Faster than a tent.......0 -
Do you think it's Pence?0
-
My money's on MattisAll lies and jest..still a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest....0
-
I'd contribute to payment for any senior official who can bring Trump down. If that's legal. A kind of reward offered for information that results in impeachment and conviction of Trump and hopefully his cronies.0
-
Tangled Metal wrote:I'd contribute to payment for any senior official who can bring Trump down. If that's legal. A kind of reward offered for information that results in impeachment and conviction of Trump and hopefully his cronies.
Impeachment would deal with Trump, and be quite satisfying of course.
But the problem is that it wouldn't in any way deal with his supporters. In fact it would encourage them, because it would feed right into their "done in by the elite" mentality.
Trump needs to be defeated politically, and demonstrating that he is an 4rsehole / criminal might help with this, but the bad news is that the evidence so far suggests that it hasn't.0 -
bompington wrote:Tangled Metal wrote:I'd contribute to payment for any senior official who can bring Trump down. If that's legal. A kind of reward offered for information that results in impeachment and conviction of Trump and hopefully his cronies.
Impeachment would deal with Trump, and be quite satisfying of course.
But the problem is that it wouldn't in any way deal with his supporters. In fact it would encourage them, because it would feed right into their "done in by the elite" mentality.
Trump needs to be defeated politically, and demonstrating that he is an 4rsehole / criminal might help with this, but the bad news is that the evidence so far suggests that it hasn't.0 -
A resignation however would probably incense his followers - Trump could claim he was driven out/set up/was a victim of fake news.
But, perhaps that would disenfranchise them from the 'democratic system' and never vote again.
(Probably a good thing).seanoconn - gruagach craic!0 -
bompington wrote:
Impeachment would deal with Trump, and be quite satisfying of course.
But the problem is that it wouldn't in any way deal with his supporters. In fact it would encourage them, because it would feed right into their "done in by the elite" mentality.
Trump needs to be defeated politically, and demonstrating that he is an 4rsehole / criminal might help with this, but the bad news is that the evidence so far suggests that it hasn't.
I agree that defeat through political means is the only way. Impeachment is an alien concept to the UK judicial system because it is felt wrong to have parliament throw out the monarch....take your pickelf on your holibobs....
jeez :roll:0 -
darkhairedlord wrote:Trump has twisted the narrative to the point where criminal behaviour is acceptable if the president says so.
No he has not....take your pickelf on your holibobs....
jeez :roll:0 -
FishFish wrote:darkhairedlord wrote:Trump has twisted the narrative to the point where criminal behaviour is acceptable if the president says so.
No he has not.
Glad to hear you say that.0 -
bianchimoon wrote:My money's on Mattis
NOt his style - Mattis would put his name to it and dare anyone to take him on.
#zerofucksgivenPostby team47b » Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:53 am
De Sisti wrote:
This is one of the silliest threads I've come across.
Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honoursmithy21 wrote:
He's right you know.0 -
Apparently Pence is the only one that uses the word 'Lodestar' frequently, so someone's being clever framing Pence as he's not allowed to write joined up letteringAll lies and jest..still a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest....0
-
KingstonGraham wrote:FishFish wrote:darkhairedlord wrote:Trump has twisted the narrative to the point where criminal behaviour is acceptable if the president says so.
No he has not.
Glad to hear you say that.
How could you hear it - maybe you could see it....take your pickelf on your holibobs....
jeez :roll:0 -
bianchimoon wrote:FishFish wrote:bianchimoon wrote:Yup, some gems from Woodward, the fake president will Be in another Twitter rage soon
So has this predicted 'Twitter rage' , whatever that is , started yet - GREAT SAGE?
Yes I am the GREAT SAGE, because as predicted it has.. thank you :roll:
I've looked on twitter - there is no 'Twitter Rage'. Are you spreading fake news? Can you identify enraged comments? I'm just curious to see them. Great Sage and Great Onion....take your pickelf on your holibobs....
jeez :roll:0 -
FishFish wrote:bianchimoon wrote:FishFish wrote:bianchimoon wrote:Yup, some gems from Woodward, the fake president will Be in another Twitter rage soon
So has this predicted 'Twitter rage' , whatever that is , started yet - GREAT SAGE?
Yes I am the GREAT SAGE, because as predicted it has.. thank you :roll:
I've looked on twitter - there is no 'Twitter Rage'. Are you spreading fake news? Can you identify enraged comments? I'm just curious to see them. Great Sage and Great Onion.
Stuffing comes to mindAll lies and jest..still a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest....0 -
Kavanaugh's confirmation hearing is a fun watch/read.My blog: http://www.roubaixcycling.cc (kit reviews and other musings)
https://twitter.com/roubaixcc
Facebook? No. Just say no.0 -
FishFish wrote:darkhairedlord wrote:Trump has twisted the narrative to the point where criminal behaviour is acceptable if the president says so.
No he has not.
Too early?The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
What's this?! The BR panto?seanoconn - gruagach craic!0
-
Pinno wrote:What's this?! The BR panto?The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
Oh yes it is
#he’sbehindyouPostby team47b » Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:53 am
De Sisti wrote:
This is one of the silliest threads I've come across.
Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honoursmithy21 wrote:
He's right you know.0 -
Matthewfalle wrote:Oh yes it is
#he’sbehindyou
You bar steward!The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
Well I still cant see the Twitter Rage - but checked on the top items on the BBC - now that is:
1. How Comedy duo's TV break turned sour.
2. Is Idlib set to end the Syrian war?
3. I quit teaching to become an acrobat.
4. 'I've had enough 0- it's making me angry' - about a weather forecaster - sorry presenter.
5. First 'dementia friendly' rail line - could be of use to some of the forum members.
Where is the Trump issue! Thank God we are discussing it here - and praying that he wins the mid terms.
By contrast in my household:
1. Yes he took his sports kit.
2. No I'm not travelling next week
3. Well that means we are both NOT BOTHERING to go to work today.
4. I'd like one of those pies from Aldi - no the chicken one.
5. Current algebra is a substitute for Hamiltonian formulations - not an extension....take your pickelf on your holibobs....
jeez :roll:0 -
Conway!0
-
FishFish wrote:Well I still cant see the Twitter Rage - but checked on the top items on the BBC - now that is:
1. How Comedy duo's TV break turned sour.
2. Is Idlib set to end the Syrian war?
3. I quit teaching to become an acrobat.
4. 'I've had enough 0- it's making me angry' - about a weather forecaster - sorry presenter.
5. First 'dementia friendly' rail line - could be of use to some of the forum members.
Where is the Trump issue! Thank God we are discussing it here - and praying that he wins the mid terms.
By contrast in my household:
1. Yes he took his sports kit.
2. No I'm not travelling next week
3. Well that means we are both NOT BOTHERING to go to work today.
4. I'd like one of those pies from Aldi - no the chicken one.
5. Current algebra is a substitute for Hamiltonian formulations - not an extension.
How does Trump win an election in which he's not standing?1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Part of the anti-growth coalition0 -
0