Donald Trump

pblakeney

FishFish wrote:

orraloon wrote:

Is your ability to interpret sentences struggling?

Well you are right. But that ability is being tested to the limit because not all of you are capable of constructing sentences, nor in expressing what you mean. I think that some people here should stick to working with electric screwdrivers and let the clever ones do the thinking and expressing of ideas.

Wonderful!
I would be most interested in hearing more about your ideas.

orraloon

What's an electric screwdriver? Did you mean sonic screwdriver but the translation engine got it wrong? Sonic screwdriver - now you're talking...

veronese68

PBlakeney wrote:

FishFish wrote:

orraloon wrote:

Is your ability to interpret sentences struggling?

Well you are right. But that ability is being tested to the limit because not all of you are capable of constructing sentences, nor in expressing what you mean. I think that some people here should stick to working with electric screwdrivers and let the clever ones do the thinking and expressing of ideas.

Wonderful!
I would be most interested in hearing more about your ideas.

No, he said the clever one should think and express their ideas. Considering he can’t understand some pretty simple statements that clearly excludes him.
Makes me laugh how he constantly whines about the quality of posts on here yet his are almost entirely drivel.
Maybe he should go and help poor Bungle with his Merlin problem

pblakeney

Veronese68 wrote:

PBlakeney wrote:

FishFish wrote:

orraloon wrote:

Is your ability to interpret sentences struggling?

Well you are right. But that ability is being tested to the limit because not all of you are capable of constructing sentences, nor in expressing what you mean. I think that some people here should stick to working with electric screwdrivers and let the clever ones do the thinking and expressing of ideas.

Wonderful!
I would be most interested in hearing more about your ideas.

No, he said the clever one should think and express their ideas. Considering he can’t understand some pretty simple statements that clearly excludes him.
Makes me laugh how he constantly whines about the quality of posts on here yet his are almost entirely drivel.
Maybe he should go and help poor Bungle with his Merlin problem

That doesn't mean that I do not wish hear some of his wonderful ideas.

Pross

FishFish wrote:

orraloon wrote:

Is your ability to interpret sentences struggling?

Well you are right. But that ability is being tested to the limit because not all of you are capable of constructing sentences, nor in expressing what you mean.

It's the problem for many foreigners learning English or using interpreting software. It can be a struggle to understand nuance and subtleties such as sarcasm.

FishFish

In general small people do get wound up easily because of pompous self belief because they do not have other atributes to fall back on. Personality or intelligence being a couple of examples.

This is a subset of the internet - a forum - it is as you choose it to be it is not real and it is transient. It is entropic. I don't take any opinions that are expressed in it seriously - including my own and I don't take this site seriously, your prognostications on Donald Trump seriously nor do I take those of any political or social aspect of the UK or Europe seriously.

Seriously. [which by the way is irony].

cooldad

Fishbot found a random sentence generator?

That's not irony.

Matthewfalle

FishFish wrote:

In general small people do get wound up easily because of pompous self belief because they do not have other atributes to fall back on. Personality or intelligence being a couple of examples.

This is a subset of the internet - a forum - it is as you choose it to be it is not real and it is transient. It is entropic. I don't take any opinions that are expressed in it seriously - including my own and I don't take this site seriously, your prognostications on Donald Trump seriously nor do I take those of any political or social aspect of the UK or Europe seriously.

Seriously. [which by the way is irony].

can I use this as my new signature please? its brilliant.

pblakeney

FishFish wrote:

In general small people do get wound up easily because of pompous self belief because they do not have other atributes to fall back on. Personality or intelligence being a couple of examples.

Is this a claim that small people do not have personality or intelligence?
Paging Rick Chasey!

orraloon

PBlakeney wrote:

FishFish wrote:

In general small people do get wound up easily because of pompous self belief because they do not have other atributes to fall back on. Personality or intelligence being a couple of examples.

Is this a claim that small people do not have personality or intelligence?
Paging Rick Chasey!

Oh yeah, you nailed it/her/him there, sizist baxxard. I feel the pain (even though I'm 6'4) #metoo
Rick! Rick!

Moontrane

bianchimoon wrote:

The default position of trump, the NRA and the gun lobby is guns are NOT dangerous, it’s the mental health of the people who use them that is the problem. Yet last year trump cut 18% from the budget of the department responsible for background checks on people buying guns. Of course nothing will ever change in the US it’s a frightened society and events like 14 feb, make it imperative that a vocal minority have weapons to protect themselves. The best the US can eve hope for is a ban on automatic weapons that were designed for war, not protection or hunting.

Automatic weapons are rarely used in mass shootings. I can't recall the last time one was used. Weapons designed for war - the fully automatic, machine-gun types - are used by military and some portions of law enforcement such as SWAT.

Matthewfalle

Moontrane wrote:

bianchimoon wrote:

The default position of trump, the NRA and the gun lobby is guns are NOT dangerous, it’s the mental health of the people who use them that is the problem. Yet last year trump cut 18% from the budget of the department responsible for background checks on people buying guns. Of course nothing will ever change in the US it’s a frightened society and events like 14 feb, make it imperative that a vocal minority have weapons to protect themselves. The best the US can eve hope for is a ban on automatic weapons that were designed for war, not protection or hunting.

Automatic weapons are rarely used in mass shootings. I can't recall the last time one was used. Weapons designed for war - the fully automatic, machine-gun types - are used by military and some portions of law enforcement such as SWAT.

Partially incorrect - mad fukkker at Las Vegas converted his semi automatics into fully automatic using bump stops.

Anyway, a semi automatic still fires as fast as you can pull the trigger so it’s a moot point really.

But overall, it’s a pretty crap point to be arguing over when it’s such a sad event.

End of the day, no one at all apart from the military needs an AR 15 or any equivalent - anyone that tells me differently is a bullshittter. That sort of thing are rubbish for hunting, rubbish for home protection, any of the normal excuses.

Ban the fukkking things, make them illegal, crush them all.

pblakeney

Matthewfalle wrote:

Ban the fukkking things, make them illegal, crush them all.

...and set them on fire.

FishFish

PBlakeney wrote:

Matthewfalle wrote:

Ban the fukkking things, make them illegal, crush them all.

...and set them on fire.

I don't think that they would burn but most of the metal would oxidise.

I agree that the ability to own guns in the USA should be as restricted as it is in the UK which does allow for some limited ownership for firearms and more generous availability of shotguns. Accepting that they are still used in crime is realistic but their availability should be constrained by law.

In the US it is the opposite. They are, by law - the constitution if you wish - allowed. There is a huge job creating industry of shops, manufacturing, ranges and the NRA and similar which will assert that constitutional right.

Of course there are criminal incidents in proportion to the ownership as there always have been but no-one has done anything. Today the administration is a result of populism - the same one that buys guns so the problem will remain.

Matthewfalle

PBlakeney wrote:

Matthewfalle wrote:

Ban the fukkking things, make them illegal, crush them all.

...and set them on fire.

With fire.

I fricking hate guns and everything to do with them.

Ban and crush the whole lot. Farmers, Feds, pest controllers and very, very strictly monitored sporting people. That’s it.

No one needs a Kalash at home. No one needs a Glock.

pblakeney

This guys makes his points way more eloquently than I ever could.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7ZfL-TOZO0

pblakeney

Also, take away all guns. When the gun owners get upset, send them thoughts and prayers.
That supposedly makes everything better.*

*Stolen.

bendertherobot

Donald has a lovely new twitter banner.

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump

Matthewfalle

will someone please go and kick him in the nads.

odious dotard.

Pross

cooldad wrote:

Fishbot found a random sentence generator?

That's not irony.

It’s irony in the Alanis Morissette definition of the word.

bendertherobot

Just checking, does one have to be a Professor to know that, generally, in all 'crime fighting' organisations, there are generally departments which deal with specific things?

bianchimoon

bendertherobot wrote:

Just checking, does one have to be a Professor to know that, generally, in all 'crime fighting' organisations, there are generally departments which deal with specific things?

You know that, I know that, 99% of people on here know that... the commander in chief, however hasn’t yet been told

bianchimoon

Moontrane wrote:

bianchimoon wrote:

The default position of trump, the NRA and the gun lobby is guns are NOT dangerous, it’s the mental health of the people who use them that is the problem. Yet last year trump cut 18% from the budget of the department responsible for background checks on people buying guns. Of course nothing will ever change in the US it’s a frightened society and events like 14 feb, make it imperative that a vocal minority have weapons to protect themselves. The best the US can eve hope for is a ban on automatic weapons that were designed for war, not protection or hunting.

Automatic weapons are rarely used in mass shootings. I can't recall the last time one was used. Weapons designed for war - the fully automatic, machine-gun types - are used by military and some portions of law enforcement such as SWAT.

Phew, American kids eh, such a bunch of drama queens, worrying about whether those pesky shooters have bump stocked their rifles or have a nifty finger action.

bendertherobot

It's a distinction I had to google. But, I have to say, it's all still a bit lost on me.

Still, it's a 'dream to shoot this rifle.' (This was the Pulse Nightclub weapon).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgyArFYkl3Q

kingstongraham

Moontrane wrote:

bianchimoon wrote:

The default position of trump, the NRA and the gun lobby is guns are NOT dangerous, it’s the mental health of the people who use them that is the problem. Yet last year trump cut 18% from the budget of the department responsible for background checks on people buying guns. Of course nothing will ever change in the US it’s a frightened society and events like 14 feb, make it imperative that a vocal minority have weapons to protect themselves. The best the US can eve hope for is a ban on automatic weapons that were designed for war, not protection or hunting.

Automatic weapons are rarely used in mass shootings. I can't recall the last time one was used. Weapons designed for war - the fully automatic, machine-gun types - are used by military and some portions of law enforcement such as SWAT.

That is most likely because they are banned unless they were manufactured before 1986, and have to be registered with the federal government even then. This makes them difficult to get, and expensive. It's quite a good argument for gun control.

FishFish

Veronese68 wrote:

PBlakeney wrote:

FishFish wrote:

orraloon wrote:

Is your ability to interpret sentences struggling?

No, he said the clever one should think and express their ideas. Considering he can’t understand some pretty simple statements that clearly excludes him.
Makes me laugh how he constantly whines about the quality of posts on here yet his are almost entirely drivel.
Maybe he should go and help poor Bungle with his Merlin problem

Well this is your post on Friday - or is it Fryday. Whatever that means. Your post is utter drivel, shows a huge degree of immaturity and is singularly unfunny.

I misread that and thought ice dogging was your new hobby.

Morning rusty sherrifs,
Bit chilly out this morning but still dry at least. Very glad it's Fryday as obviously dead pig will feature heavily in my lunch plans. Later should be pub with the Mrs as I'm told beer is good for curing the plague. Until then I will have to content myself with tea or coffee.

Matthewfalle

FishFish wrote:

Veronese68 wrote:

PBlakeney wrote:

FishFish wrote:

orraloon wrote:

Is your ability to interpret sentences struggling?

No, he said the clever one should think and express their ideas. Considering he can’t understand some pretty simple statements that clearly excludes him.
Makes me laugh how he constantly whines about the quality of posts on here yet his are almost entirely drivel.
Maybe he should go and help poor Bungle with his Merlin problem

Well this is your post on Friday - or is it Fryday. Whatever that means. Your post is utter drivel, shows a huge degree of immaturity and is singularly unfunny.

I misread that and thought ice dogging was your new hobby.

Morning rusty sherrifs,
Bit chilly out this morning but still dry at least. Very glad it's Fryday as obviously dead pig will feature heavily in my lunch plans. Later should be pub with the Mrs as I'm told beer is good for curing the plague. Until then I will have to content myself with tea or coffee.

Nope - that post looks fine to me..

Salutation
Climate report
Plans for the day
Current events

Exactly in keeping with the theme of that thread.

One of the more simple ones methinks.

Can you please explain what part you don't understand?

orraloon

On malo chto ponimayet.

Matthewfalle

Indeed.

Prestigigitateur.

pinno

FishFish wrote:

...ice dogging was your new hobby.

Now you should know what effect cold rides do to parts of your anatomy.

FishFish wrote:

.Morning rusty sherrifs,
Bit chilly out this morning but still dry at least. Very glad it's Fryday as obviously dead pig will feature heavily in my lunch plans. Later should be pub with the Mrs as I'm told beer is good for curing the plague. Until then I will have to content myself with tea or coffee.

:?