Puerto trial
Comments
-
So would a TRC process help?0
-
I have never seen a proper allegation of doping against Cancellara by people whose opinion I would trust.
Would struggle to find anything on google or anything on the doping reference sites.
The guy is a legend and vocal anti dopers but that would certainly be a huge blow to the sport. I don't think there is anything in it.
--
I seriously believe this guy Hamilton is just out for the money and the attention. All he does is leak snippets. If he cared and had any balls he would not say 'a prominent rider' but name him. Although I suppose that could be Cnews deliberately not giving a name.
--
People say that Bartoli is 'luigi'
And RaceRadio on Cnews forum mentioned about rumours of Cancellara and 'Luigi'
However, NRC (I think) have been told that Dekker was 'Classicomano Luigi' by various sources. That is fairly recent also. That being said I don't think Dekker started the ToC in 08, however not sure about that, and I suppose there are other US races (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_USA_C ... ional_Tour).
You could say that the name 'luigi' was given due to those working with him.
Checcini worked with in 2002-2006: Bartoli, Basso, Cancellara, Cipollini, Cunego, Thomas Dekker, Gerdemann, Hamilton, Petacchi, Ullrich
I guess you could link those to Puerto then take out those whose names are known then take out those who didnt race in US that year.
--
There is also the possibility that Hamilton was wrong about the rider he was accusing. It doesn't seem far fetched that he was basically just going on rumours himself. So even if the rider was Cancellara, it doesn't mean he is 'luigi'. As far as I am aware these Puerto riders are not going to a room together and socialising.Contador is the Greatest0 -
FF, Luigi is Cancellara - now there's a cat among the pigeons0
-
Cancellara has always been cleaner than clean soit would be a real blow but not that big a surprise if he was a doper. Hope it isn't true and so far there aren't really any sources other than a few people on forums linking the two0
-
Tyler Hamilton interview 'outing' Cancellara http://www.cyclingnews.com/features/exc ... -hamiltonf0
-
0
-
Micron, Is that your 'source' for your post just above? That link is what is posted on the previous page and I have referred to it in my post.
If you have further source info please post up, cheers.Contador is the Greatest0 -
Be interesting to know if Cancellara is the only rider who complained to the press at that race.
It's also possible that Hamilton's referring to someone else and has misremembered the incident in some way.
Hmmm - there doesn't seem to be a clutching at straws smiley...
0 -
Re. spartacus, one word: Riis0
-
Apologies FF, didn't see that. I will see what other links I can dig up.
ddraver - not explicitly, no. That's where a bit of simple research comes in and produces this http://velonews.competitor.com/2008/02/ ... tart_723910 -
Cool, thanks.Contador is the Greatest0
-
micron wrote:Apologies FF, didn't see that. I will see what other links I can dig up.
ddraver - not explicitly, no. That's where a bit of simple research comes in and produces this http://velonews.competitor.com/2008/02/ ... tart_72391
You mean there is a suggestion that Hamilton may have been talking about Cancellara, although he will not confirm or deny this. That is not the same as CANCELLARA IS LUIGI!
See the difference? Just in case you ve forgotten...micron wrote:FF, Luigi is Cancellara - now there's a cat among the pigeonsWe're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
- @ddraver0 -
I'm guessing it's possible Hamilton doesn't actually know who Luigi is but is just guessing it's Cancellera or has heard rumours and decided that was good enough to have a go back for what Cancellera said about them.
it's a hard life if you don't weaken.0 -
Yeah, it's what I said above. The more I think about it the more I think it is possible.Contador is the Greatest0
-
RichN95 wrote:Fuentes must have been crap then, because Cancellara was much better without him than with him.
Oh I dunno, he was pretty tasty at the '06 Paris Roubaix...
when you look back at CSC's '06 results (Schleck's Amstel, Basso's Giro, Voigt's Tour of Germany) it's hard (impossible?) to believe that the entire team weren't juiced given what we now know about some of those performances and the pharmaceutical death-match cycling had become at that point0 -
Many of Fuentes clients were coached by Cecchini.
Cecchini didn't get himself mucky but the riders worked with an operational guy.
Dekker, Basso, Ullrich etc.
There is a big chinned beast on that list tooFckin' Quintana … that creep can roll, man.0 -
Cicilismo 2005 says they identified Cancellara as Luigi in 2006 http://ciclismo2005.blogspot.co.uk/2013 ... luigi.html
Cancellara = Luigi
Dekker - clasicomano Luigi0 -
I read the interview. My Spanish is rusty but seems to revolve around an interview with Cancellara some years ago about his relationship with Cecchini. Again my spanish is rusty and Google translate makes it works but there is a hell of a lot of insinuation and writers opinions added into the transcripts after it happened.
Also the evidence seemed to be that he had 3 peaks to his season. Think it also mentions that he was outed by El Pais as clasicomano Luigi and not ciclismo? Need to check El Pais...0 -
Hey DD. Rather than just cause problems and tell people they are wrong or talking shite, how about you provide some information that can be useful to other people on this forum.Contador is the Greatest0
-
bipedal wrote:RichN95 wrote:Fuentes must have been crap then, because Cancellara was much better without him than with him.
Oh I dunno, he was pretty tasty at the '06 Paris Roubaix...
when you look back at CSC's '06 results (Schleck's Amstel, Basso's Giro, Voigt's Tour of Germany) it's hard (impossible?) to believe that the entire team weren't juiced given what we now know about some of those performances and the pharmaceutical death-match cycling had become at that point
O'Grady winning Roubaix..."In many ways, my story was that of a raging, Christ-like figure who hauled himself off the cross, looked up at the Romans with blood in his eyes and said 'My turn, sock cookers'"
@gietvangent0 -
Ah ok. Staring at it makes more sense. Its insinuating that his success at CSC in a team with Riis and Basso, and the fact that he had multiple peaks to the season means that he was doping. The dips in the season coincided with training alongside Cecchini on their own. It also mentions the manner of his TT domination after periods of not racing as evidence that something isnt right. It also links his assertion that his main training block at the start of the year is training with Cecchini and that training at the start of the season is what Fuentes has subsequently advocated.0
-
frenchfighter wrote:Hey DD. Rather than just cause problems and tell people they are wrong or talking shite, how about you provide some information that can be useful to other people on this forum.
Oh ho Wow! Where did that come from?!
Did tn think it was that different to understand really but linking that Cancellara said X and because a mystery rider that some thought might have been the mysterious "Luigi" said something similar to X does not prove that Cancellara is the mystery rider.
Rock Racing were hardly the most popular team in the world at that time were they? A lot of people said they should nt be racing
Time to calm down a bit Frenchie, go and watch some Contador clips or something...We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
- @ddraver0 -
frenchfighter wrote:Can hardly read it but a Fuentes doc from 05 with Milan and IG on it:
Hey FF (genuine question, not baiting. Much ) Have you found anywhere the Puerto doc that Hamilton claims in 'Secret Race' has AC as a code name? Although AC would have to be pretty dim to use AC as a 'secret' code name.........unless using reverse psychologyCoach H. (Dont ask me for training advice - 'It's not about the bike')0