Thread to tell everyone what bargains you've spotted!

1553554556558559616

Comments

  • london-red
    london-red Posts: 1,266
  • timothyw
    timothyw Posts: 2,482
    London-Red wrote:
    It's not a lot of spokes. Wouldn't want to risk them far away from home.

    If you want to do time trials and are worried about your wheels holding you back these should give you most of the advantage without the expense of deep carbon wheels.
  • TimothyW wrote:
    London-Red wrote:

    It's not a lot of spokes. Wouldn't want to risk them far away from home.

    Straight pull hubs so less worry about the spoke count

    Personally for £200 ish wheels id go for the Askium USTs
    I'm sorry you don't believe in miracles
  • london-red
    london-red Posts: 1,266
    TimothyW wrote:
    London-Red wrote:

    It's not a lot of spokes. Wouldn't want to risk them far away from home.

    Straight pull hubs so less worry about the spoke count

    Personally for £200 ish wheels id go for the Askium USTs

    And I’ve always found low spoke count campag wheels to be pretty much bomb proof, so that doesn’t worry me so much... Running Campag groupsets also limits the choice a bit..
  • N0bodyOfTheGoat
    N0bodyOfTheGoat Posts: 6,057
    https://www.planetx.co.uk/c/q/deals/cle ... =price-asc

    Few good deals, especially for hydraulic brake bikes.
    ================
    2020 Voodoo Marasa
    2017 Cube Attain GTC Pro Disc 2016
    2016 Voodoo Wazoo
  • wolfsbane2k
    wolfsbane2k Posts: 3,056
    david7m wrote:

    Damn, now back to a tenner.
    Shame, as that's the colours of one of the local racing teams..
    Intent on Cycling Commuting on a budget, but keep on breaking/crashing/finding nice stuff to buy.
    Bike 1 (Broken) - Bike 2(Borked) - Bike 3(broken spokes) - Bike 4( Needs Work) - Bike 5 (in bits) - Bike 6* ...
  • kofsw4
    kofsw4 Posts: 39
    Conti GP5000 700 X 25c finally down to a 'reasonable' price: £31.57 each at Amazon.

    Continental Gp5000 Folding Bike Tyre, Black, 700 x 25 https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B07K91B78V/ ... .CbVSJQ1JT
  • indyp
    indyp Posts: 735
    Not showing that price now
  • crossed
    crossed Posts: 237
    Howies bib shorts half price here:

    https://howies.co.uk/collections/mens-b ... 2692991043
  • daniel_b
    daniel_b Posts: 11,985
    Daniel B wrote:
    9200125-009-front_x1000.png?v=1558520175

    Chpt3 shorts arrived yesterday - initial thoughts are positive.
    Material is fairly thin, but then I knew that, so definitely more of a summer short imho.
    Not tried them on for fit \ leg length yet, or for a ride, but will probably do so tomorrow.
    As long as the fit does tie in with Castelli perfectly, then I see no issues, hoping leg length will be sufficient for my liking - I prefer long over short.

    This will be my first pair of Castelli bib shorts as such, as I have their Omloops which are sublime, and also the Sorpasso tights which are equally phenomenal imho - or perhaps it is mostly down to the pad. I've tried their Kiss pad, and it isn't a patch on the Progetto for me.
    Do Castelli make a short with a thicker material but still with the Progetto X2 pad does anyone know?
    The endurance short perhaps?

    What do those who also ordered think of theirs?
    Felt F70 05 (Turbo)
    Marin Palisades Trail 91 and 06
    Scott CR1 SL 12
    Cannondale Synapse Adventure 15 & 16 Di2
    Scott Foil 18
  • DrLex
    DrLex Posts: 2,142
    Mine arrived yesterday. Feel v. good quality, but unable to get the straps over my shoulders, so going back. Not crazy about the gray tone- look almost like faded Lycra.
    Location: ciderspace
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,345
    DrLex wrote:
    Mine arrived yesterday. Feel v. good quality, but unable to get the straps over my shoulders, so going back. Not crazy about the gray tone- look almost like faded Lycra.
    Yup. I think their comparison with Castelli sizes was "optimistic". Next size up apparently arriving this week so I will see if "going up one size for comfort" was the more accurate.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • kofsw4
    kofsw4 Posts: 39
    indyP wrote:
    Not showing that price now

    Random Amazon pricing!

    amazon.png?force=1&zero=0&w=725&h=440&desired=false&legend=1&ilt=1&tp=all&fo=0&lang=en
  • N0bodyOfTheGoat
    N0bodyOfTheGoat Posts: 6,057
    https://www.planetx.co.uk/i/q/YBCL16279 ... zesty-lime £700 for Rival 1x11 hydraulic disc, bargaintastic! :shock:
    ================
    2020 Voodoo Marasa
    2017 Cube Attain GTC Pro Disc 2016
    2016 Voodoo Wazoo
  • j_mcd
    j_mcd Posts: 473

    I've got one of those, and that's 300 quid less than I paid. I paid a grand for mine a few years back and felt quite underwhelmed, I'm sure I could have got more bike for my money elsewhere.

    In addition, ask yourself, do you really want a 1x gear set? I find that I never use the dinner plate sized cog and can easily spin out on the sprints. Not had to replace a cassette yet but I've heard that they aren't cheap! The whole package is heavy as well, probably not helped by those wheels!
    Giant Defy Advanced 0 - Best
    Planet X London Road - Wet
    Montague Fit - Foldy thing that rarely gets used these days
  • whyamihere
    whyamihere Posts: 7,715
    J_MCD wrote:

    I've got one of those, and that's 300 quid less than I paid. I paid a grand for mine a few years back and felt quite underwhelmed, I'm sure I could have got more bike for my money elsewhere.

    In addition, ask yourself, do you really want a 1x gear set? I find that I never use the dinner plate sized cog and can easily spin out on the sprints. Not had to replace a cassette yet but I've heard that they aren't cheap! The whole package is heavy as well, probably not helped by those wheels!
    The bolded bit suggests you need a bigger chainring.
  • apreading
    apreading Posts: 4,535
    Yeah - that bike only has a 42T chainring - 42x11 will spin out easily. I find on my 50T chainring, I could live without the 11 but wouldnt want to be without the 12 so to give the same ratio as 50x12 you would need to be 46x11.

    Ideally I would go 48 at the front, with a 42T cassette, that would still give a low gear the equivalent of 34x30 so plenty low enough for most.

    If you want an easier low gear then a 46 at the front would be OK and unlikely to spin out.
  • tgotb
    tgotb Posts: 4,714
    apreading wrote:
    Yeah - that bike only has a 42T chainring - 42x11 will spin out easily.
    Blimey. I have 38 x 12-32 on my CX bike, and it seems to be fine for 35mph; it's about 84", which is a reasonable track gearing. Decent Youth B (U14) riders will happily spin a 79" gear (48x16) up to nearly 40mph in a bunch sprint.

    At what cadence are you "spinning" out?
    Pannier, 120rpm.
  • PhilipPirrip
    PhilipPirrip Posts: 616
    edited June 2019
    To be clear, the London Road is sold as a commuter bike designed for carrying a person and a load to and from work, and at that price it's a good bike for the money.

    It's not designed for racing or sprinting so to criticise it for not being something it doesn't claim to be is unfair.
  • apreading
    apreading Posts: 4,535
    I can only guess that the 42T chainring was chosen as half way between the 34 and 50 on the most popular compact chainset. Which would be the obvious compromise if they had a standard 11-28 or 11-32 cassette on the back. But with a dirty great 42 tooth cassette they have absolutely no need for such a small chainring - even a beginner on the steepest of hills wouldn’t need 42x42. So a 46T chainring would have been a much more sensible choice.

    I border on spinning out on 50x12 at the bottom of a descent when I want to try and carry that speed onto the next flat bit. It’s not a problem but would be if all I had to call on was 42x11.
  • timothyw
    timothyw Posts: 2,482
    TGOTB wrote:
    apreading wrote:
    Yeah - that bike only has a 42T chainring - 42x11 will spin out easily.
    Blimey. I have 38 x 12-32 on my CX bike, and it seems to be fine for 35mph; it's about 84", which is a reasonable track gearing. Decent Youth B (U14) riders will happily spin a 79" gear (48x16) up to nearly 40mph in a bunch sprint.

    At what cadence are you "spinning" out?
    You are fine at 35mph on a 38x12 gear?

    Even with 700x32 cyclocross tyres that would require an 138rpm cadence....

    I'm calling Strava or it didn't happen.

    Or when you say fine, do you mean that you are fine going downhill at 35mph, with the occasional manic spin to keep the speed up?

    Similarly I doubt happy is how you can describe anyone trying to spin a 79" gear at nearly 40mph... at 35mph we're talking 150rpm, 40mph would require 170rpm... it's basically the fact that these youths are capable of spinning the pedals that fast which makes them decent youth riders, because they are limited on gear inches. Adult riders free from these restrictions use much bigger gears.

    I've got a 1x bike with a 46 chainring and an 11-36 cassette and I'm thinking of getting rid to reclaim the space - the range is fine (similar to 50-34 with 12-28) but there's very little joy in riding it (always feel like I'm in the wrong gear..) so I always take one of my other bikes.
  • tgotb
    tgotb Posts: 4,714
    TimothyW wrote:
    TGOTB wrote:
    apreading wrote:
    Yeah - that bike only has a 42T chainring - 42x11 will spin out easily.
    Blimey. I have 38 x 12-32 on my CX bike, and it seems to be fine for 35mph; it's about 84", which is a reasonable track gearing. Decent Youth B (U14) riders will happily spin a 79" gear (48x16) up to nearly 40mph in a bunch sprint.

    At what cadence are you "spinning" out?
    You are fine at 35mph on a 38x12 gear?

    Even with 700x32 cyclocross tyres that would require an 138rpm cadence....

    I'm calling Strava or it didn't happen.

    Or when you say fine, do you mean that you are fine going downhill at 35mph, with the occasional manic spin to keep the speed up?

    Similarly I doubt happy is how you can describe anyone trying to spin a 79" gear at nearly 40mph... at 35mph we're talking 150rpm, 40mph would require 170rpm... it's basically the fact that these youths are capable of spinning the pedals that fast which makes them decent youth riders, because they are limited on gear inches. Adult riders free from these restrictions use much bigger gears.
    This was all on the flat. I don't cruise along at 35mph; neither do you. I hit 35mph in the sprint at the start of a CX race on the tarmac at Hillingdon a few years back; I'm not on Strava, but there's a photo of me winning the holeshot somewhere. I don't actually know whether I was in 38x12, but it's the longest gear on that bike, so it's a reasonable assumption. And yes, that's ~138rpm. No big deal, trackies will hit much higher cadence than that.

    And yes, 40mph on a 79" gear is 170rpm. That probably is on Strava; I've no idea how to search it, but if you can find someone's trace from the final stage of this year's Isle of Man Youth Tour (Youth B category) you'll see the boys were nudging 40mph on the finishing straight (which is dead flat). The girls were a couple of mph slower, I think we calculated 165rpm.

    I'm not suggesting anyone rides around at those cadences for prolonged periods; my point is that if your gearing's good for 35-40mph in a sprint, you're probably not spinning out at normal riding speeds.
    Pannier, 120rpm.
  • daniel_b
    daniel_b Posts: 11,985
    PBlakeney wrote:
    DrLex wrote:
    Mine arrived yesterday. Feel v. good quality, but unable to get the straps over my shoulders, so going back. Not crazy about the gray tone- look almost like faded Lycra.
    Yup. I think their comparison with Castelli sizes was "optimistic". Next size up apparently arriving this week so I will see if "going up one size for comfort" was the more accurate.

    Tried my 30's on this morning - plenty of Sumo moves to get them on, straps are spot on for me as I have a short torso comparatively.

    Observations -
    Liking the grey finish, and goes with my CR1 :D
    Not very flexible fabric, fit wise I would say this 30 is on a par with Rapha XS.
    Quite a low cut at the front, not very flattering if you have a bit of an overhang.
    Pad position felt good, general fabric felt thicker when on, than out of the bag if that makes sense.

    Will keep them, but they will definitely only be for when I am at my lightest weight!
    Suspect if I went up to a 31 the straps would be too long for me.
    Felt F70 05 (Turbo)
    Marin Palisades Trail 91 and 06
    Scott CR1 SL 12
    Cannondale Synapse Adventure 15 & 16 Di2
    Scott Foil 18
  • matt-h
    matt-h Posts: 847

    Its not new.
    The description notes it as a used return
  • itsrob
    itsrob Posts: 95
    Daniel B wrote:
    PBlakeney wrote:
    DrLex wrote:
    Mine arrived yesterday. Feel v. good quality, but unable to get the straps over my shoulders, so going back. Not crazy about the gray tone- look almost like faded Lycra.
    Yup. I think their comparison with Castelli sizes was "optimistic". Next size up apparently arriving this week so I will see if "going up one size for comfort" was the more accurate.

    Tried my 30's on this morning - plenty of Sumo moves to get them on, straps are spot on for me as I have a short torso comparatively.

    Observations -
    Liking the grey finish, and goes with my CR1 :D
    Not very flexible fabric, fit wise I would say this 30 is on a par with Rapha XS.
    Quite a low cut at the front, not very flattering if you have a bit of an overhang.
    Pad position felt good, general fabric felt thicker when on, than out of the bag if that makes sense.

    Will keep them, but they will definitely only be for when I am at my lightest weight!
    Suspect if I went up to a 31 the straps would be too long for me.


    Size L / 32 showing as stock this morning. Ive gone for some. Thats very optimistic - and based on my nanoflex being XL, will see if I can get into them :shock:
  • tgotb
    tgotb Posts: 4,714
    TimothyW wrote:
    I'm calling Strava or it didn't happen.
    I was bored, so I found it. This is the Girls Youth B (U14) winner of the last stage of this year's IOM Youth Tour:
    https://www.strava.com/activities/2345160969/analysis
    The bunch sprint occurs at about 27.5km (looks like she also recorded a warm-down lap). Top speed 61.9km/h (38.5mph) at 162rpm.

    Here's one of the leading boys (posted under his Dad's name):
    https://www.strava.com/activities/2343965152/analysis
    The boys did an extra lap, and he seems to have stopped recording after the finish, which was at ~34.5km. He hit 67.3km (41.8mph) in the bunch sprint, at 174rpm.

    Edit: Unlike a lot of the Isle of Man, this stage was essentially flat (for petrolheads it's the Southern 100 course).
    Pannier, 120rpm.
  • timothyw
    timothyw Posts: 2,482
    TGOTB wrote:
    TimothyW wrote:
    I'm calling Strava or it didn't happen.
    I was bored, so I found it. This is the Girls Youth B (U14) winner of the last stage of this year's IOM Youth Tour:
    https://www.strava.com/activities/2345160969/analysis
    The bunch sprint occurs at about 27.5km (looks like she also recorded a warm-down lap). Top speed 61.9km/h (38.5mph) at 162rpm.

    Here's one of the leading boys (posted under his Dad's name):
    https://www.strava.com/activities/2343965152/analysis
    The boys did an extra lap, and he seems to have stopped recording after the finish, which was at ~34.5km. He hit 67.3km (41.8mph) in the bunch sprint, at 174rpm.

    Edit: Unlike a lot of the Isle of Man, this stage was essentially flat (for petrolheads it's the Southern 100 course).
    I wasn't calling Strava on the under 14s spinning at those speeds. I was calling Strava on you being fine at 140rpm.

    I mean that's pretty rare that you hit that surely?

    Just for fun I did a bit of spinning this morning on the commute, peaked at 129rpm... and decided that was quite enough of that and changed gear. If I need/want to go fast I'd rather have gears that let me do it at my natural mid eighties cadence.
  • Tashman
    Tashman Posts: 3,496
    TimothyW wrote:
    TGOTB wrote:
    TimothyW wrote:
    I'm calling Strava or it didn't happen.
    I was bored, so I found it. This is the Girls Youth B (U14) winner of the last stage of this year's IOM Youth Tour:
    https://www.strava.com/activities/2345160969/analysis
    The bunch sprint occurs at about 27.5km (looks like she also recorded a warm-down lap). Top speed 61.9km/h (38.5mph) at 162rpm.

    Here's one of the leading boys (posted under his Dad's name):
    https://www.strava.com/activities/2343965152/analysis
    The boys did an extra lap, and he seems to have stopped recording after the finish, which was at ~34.5km. He hit 67.3km (41.8mph) in the bunch sprint, at 174rpm.

    Edit: Unlike a lot of the Isle of Man, this stage was essentially flat (for petrolheads it's the Southern 100 course).
    I wasn't calling Strava on the under 14s spinning at those speeds. I was calling Strava on you being fine at 140rpm.

    I mean that's pretty rare that you hit that surely?

    Just for fun I did a bit of spinning this morning on the commute, peaked at 129rpm... and decided that was quite enough of that and changed gear. If I need/want to go fast I'd rather have gears that let me do it at my natural mid eighties cadence.
    Calling Strava?? Is that like Jimmy reckon?
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,345
    edited June 2019
    itsrob wrote:
    Size L / 32 showing as stock this morning. Ive gone for some. Thats very optimistic - and based on my nanoflex being XL, will see if I can get into them :shock:
    You won't. Unless your Nanoflex are loose fitting.
    Edit - I suspect the ones showing up as available are ones that others have already returned.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.