LEAVE the Conservative Party and save your country!
Comments
-
Robert88 wrote:How to make a small fortune.
1. start off with a large fortune
2. vote for David Cameron's party"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
Stevo 666 wrote:rjsterry wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:rjsterry wrote:Well you do put it out there by bragging about your new car
You've 'just mentioned' it in three separate threads that I can remember, but don't stop on my account. I look forward to the next update.
Another post-it note and length of coloured string added to the wall...
Here are the results from the latest YouGov survey of Conservative party members and their views.
https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/c ... xit_w1.pdf
There's an irony in a party of Brexiters being led by a Remainer and the main opposition being a party of Remainers led by a Brexiter.1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Part of the anti-growth coalition0 -
rjsterry wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:rjsterry wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:rjsterry wrote:Well you do put it out there by bragging about your new car
You've 'just mentioned' it in three separate threads that I can remember, but don't stop on my account. I look forward to the next update.
Another post-it note and length of coloured string added to the wall...
Here are the results from the latest YouGov survey of Conservative party members and their views.
https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/c ... xit_w1.pdf
There's an irony in a party of Brexiters being led by a Remainer and the main opposition being a party of Remainers led by a Brexiter."I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
Stevo 666 wrote:rjsterry wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:rjsterry wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:rjsterry wrote:Well you do put it out there by bragging about your new car
You've 'just mentioned' it in three separate threads that I can remember, but don't stop on my account. I look forward to the next update.
Another post-it note and length of coloured string added to the wall...
Here are the results from the latest YouGov survey of Conservative party members and their views.
https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/c ... xit_w1.pdf
There's an irony in a party of Brexiters being led by a Remainer and the main opposition being a party of Remainers led by a Brexiter.
Here's the same survey alongside Labour and LibDem members.
https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/c ... exit_w.pdf
Membership numbers are interesting.
https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk ... ry/SN05125As of April 2018, Labour had 540,000 members, compared to just under 125,500 SNP members as of August 2018, and 124,000 Conservative members reported in March 2018. As of August 2018, The Liberal Democrats had 99,200, Green Party 39,400, UKIP 23,600 and Plaid Cymru 8,000 members
LibDems and Conservative party members are both outnumbered by SNP members. Don't know where SC got that 50,000 from.1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Part of the anti-growth coalition0 -
rjsterry wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:rjsterry wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:rjsterry wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:rjsterry wrote:Well you do put it out there by bragging about your new car
You've 'just mentioned' it in three separate threads that I can remember, but don't stop on my account. I look forward to the next update.
Another post-it note and length of coloured string added to the wall...
Here are the results from the latest YouGov survey of Conservative party members and their views.
https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/c ... xit_w1.pdf
There's an irony in a party of Brexiters being led by a Remainer and the main opposition being a party of Remainers led by a Brexiter.
Here's the same survey alongside Labour and LibDem members.
https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/c ... exit_w.pdf
Membership numbers are interesting.
https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk ... ry/SN05125As of April 2018, Labour had 540,000 members, compared to just under 125,500 SNP members as of August 2018, and 124,000 Conservative members reported in March 2018. As of August 2018, The Liberal Democrats had 99,200, Green Party 39,400, UKIP 23,600 and Plaid Cymru 8,000 members
LibDems and Conservative party members are both outnumbered by SNP members. Don't know where SC got that 50,000 from.
People have looked at the income from membership and extrapolated that the real number is much lower, possibly even 70,000.
50,000 is all you would need to seize control0 -
Surrey Commuter wrote:People have looked at the income from membership and extrapolated that the real number is much lower, possibly even 70,000.
50,000 is all you would need to seize control"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
Stevo 666 wrote:thegreatdivide wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:rjsterry wrote:Well you do put it out there by bragging about your new car
They're not sold, they're hired out. PCP innit. It's how the gammon can 'afford' their Audis.
Out of interest, how do lefties afford cars?
It's possible to be financially comfortable and left leaning. I'm lucky enough to have never needed credit to buy new cars. A steady royalty payment helps.0 -
thegreatdivide wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:thegreatdivide wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:rjsterry wrote:Well you do put it out there by bragging about your new car
They're not sold, they're hired out. PCP innit. It's how the gammon can 'afford' their Audis.
Out of interest, how do lefties afford cars?
It's possible to be financially comfortable and left leaning. I'm lucky enough to have never needed credit to buy new cars. A steady royalty payment helps.
http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/to-explain-voting-intentions-income-is-more-important-for-the-conservatives-than-for-labour/"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
Surrey Commuter wrote:rjsterry wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:rjsterry wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:rjsterry wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:rjsterry wrote:Well you do put it out there by bragging about your new car
You've 'just mentioned' it in three separate threads that I can remember, but don't stop on my account. I look forward to the next update.
Another post-it note and length of coloured string added to the wall...
Here are the results from the latest YouGov survey of Conservative party members and their views.
https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/c ... xit_w1.pdf
There's an irony in a party of Brexiters being led by a Remainer and the main opposition being a party of Remainers led by a Brexiter.
Here's the same survey alongside Labour and LibDem members.
https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/c ... exit_w.pdf
Membership numbers are interesting.
https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk ... ry/SN05125As of April 2018, Labour had 540,000 members, compared to just under 125,500 SNP members as of August 2018, and 124,000 Conservative members reported in March 2018. As of August 2018, The Liberal Democrats had 99,200, Green Party 39,400, UKIP 23,600 and Plaid Cymru 8,000 members
LibDems and Conservative party members are both outnumbered by SNP members. Don't know where SC got that 50,000 from.
People have looked at the income from membership and extrapolated that the real number is much lower, possibly even 70,000.
50,000 is all you would need to seize control1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Part of the anti-growth coalition0 -
rjsterry wrote:Surrey Commuter wrote:rjsterry wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:rjsterry wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:rjsterry wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:rjsterry wrote:Well you do put it out there by bragging about your new car
You've 'just mentioned' it in three separate threads that I can remember, but don't stop on my account. I look forward to the next update.
Another post-it note and length of coloured string added to the wall...
Here are the results from the latest YouGov survey of Conservative party members and their views.
https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/c ... xit_w1.pdf
There's an irony in a party of Brexiters being led by a Remainer and the main opposition being a party of Remainers led by a Brexiter.
Here's the same survey alongside Labour and LibDem members.
https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/c ... exit_w.pdf
Membership numbers are interesting.
https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk ... ry/SN05125As of April 2018, Labour had 540,000 members, compared to just under 125,500 SNP members as of August 2018, and 124,000 Conservative members reported in March 2018. As of August 2018, The Liberal Democrats had 99,200, Green Party 39,400, UKIP 23,600 and Plaid Cymru 8,000 members
LibDems and Conservative party members are both outnumbered by SNP members. Don't know where SC got that 50,000 from.
People have looked at the income from membership and extrapolated that the real number is much lower, possibly even 70,000.
50,000 is all you would need to seize control
Have not read up on their rules and regs but could you not deselect your MP (Grayling) and select a candidate of your choice.0 -
Stevo 666 wrote:Surrey Commuter wrote:People have looked at the income from membership and extrapolated that the real number is much lower, possibly even 70,000.
50,000 is all you would need to seize control
I was going to do it on the train.
What are the meetings and things like? Is there pressure to stuff envelopes?0 -
Surrey Commuter wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:Surrey Commuter wrote:People have looked at the income from membership and extrapolated that the real number is much lower, possibly even 70,000.
50,000 is all you would need to seize control
I was going to do it on the train.
What are the meetings and things like? Is there pressure to stuff envelopes?"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
Surrey Commuter wrote:rjsterry wrote:Surrey Commuter wrote:rjsterry wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:rjsterry wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:rjsterry wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:rjsterry wrote:Well you do put it out there by bragging about your new car
You've 'just mentioned' it in three separate threads that I can remember, but don't stop on my account. I look forward to the next update.
Another post-it note and length of coloured string added to the wall...
Here are the results from the latest YouGov survey of Conservative party members and their views.
https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/c ... xit_w1.pdf
There's an irony in a party of Brexiters being led by a Remainer and the main opposition being a party of Remainers led by a Brexiter.
Here's the same survey alongside Labour and LibDem members.
https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/c ... exit_w.pdf
Membership numbers are interesting.
https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk ... ry/SN05125As of April 2018, Labour had 540,000 members, compared to just under 125,500 SNP members as of August 2018, and 124,000 Conservative members reported in March 2018. As of August 2018, The Liberal Democrats had 99,200, Green Party 39,400, UKIP 23,600 and Plaid Cymru 8,000 members
LibDems and Conservative party members are both outnumbered by SNP members. Don't know where SC got that 50,000 from.
People have looked at the income from membership and extrapolated that the real number is much lower, possibly even 70,000.
50,000 is all you would need to seize control
Have not read up on their rules and regs but could you not deselect your MP (Grayling) and select a candidate of your choice.
Not sure how selection works, but I would imagine that you would need a GE unless the MP voluntarily steps down. You'd need to find a convincing alternative as well.
That is still a long way from changing the direction of the party. Maybe you should move to Maidenhead.
Some further info on the membership numbers.
https://www.conservativehome.com/parlia ... -fast.html1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Part of the anti-growth coalition0 -
For SC:
https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/u ... eselection
https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/u ... ct-tory-mp
https://www.conservativehome.com/platfo ... ur-mp.html
You're going to need to put in a fair bit of effort and a lot of money to achieve your goal, but I wish you success. I have no idea how he remains a minister other than as a useful distraction when one is needed.1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Part of the anti-growth coalition0 -
Stevo 666 wrote:Robert88 wrote:How to make a small fortune.
1. start off with a large fortune
2. vote for David Cameron's party
In reality it would make no difference.
As it happens I am trying to guess the low point although with yields over 6% ..0 -
Robert88 wrote:As it happens I am trying to guess the low point although with yields over 6% .."I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0
-
Stevo 666 wrote:Robert88 wrote:As it happens I am trying to guess the low point although with yields over 6% ..
Many experts argue that trying to buy and sell on cycles is a fools errand as you should be holding shares as part of a long term strategy.0 -
Surrey Commuter wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:Robert88 wrote:As it happens I am trying to guess the low point although with yields over 6% ..
Many experts argue that trying to buy and sell on cycles is a fools errand as you should be holding shares as part of a long term strategy.
I can find you a Japanese equities PM who’s fired his sales guy because he kept saying that if you want.0 -
Rick Chasey wrote:Surrey Commuter wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:Robert88 wrote:As it happens I am trying to guess the low point although with yields over 6% ..
Many experts argue that trying to buy and sell on cycles is a fools errand as you should be holding shares as part of a long term strategy.
I can find you a Japanese equities PM who’s fired his sales guy because he kept saying that if you want.
And I am sure you can find an equal number of examples to prove the opposite.
My point is that on paper it is a no-brained but in reality is virtually impossible.0 -
No it’s more Japanese equities have not reached their late ‘90s high since, and long term equity investors therefore have not done so well there.
If you want clues to where the rest of the Western economies are going, Japan usually has some clues.0 -
Surrey Commuter wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:Robert88 wrote:As it happens I am trying to guess the low point although with yields over 6% ..
Many experts argue that trying to buy and sell on cycles is a fools errand as you should be holding shares as part of a long term strategy.
That is certainly Mr Buffet's view.0 -
Rick Chasey wrote:No it’s more Japanese equities have not reached their late ‘90s high since, and long term equity investors therefore have not done so well there.
If you want clues to where the rest of the Western economies are going, Japan usually has some clues.
do you have some examples?0 -
Surrey Commuter wrote:Rick Chasey wrote:No it’s more Japanese equities have not reached their late ‘90s high since, and long term equity investors therefore have not done so well there.
If you want clues to where the rest of the Western economies are going, Japan usually has some clues.
do you have some examples?
So broadly speaking their bubble burst, subsequent lost decade, demographics, stagnant wages with a tight labour market, sluggish inflation, are all things Japan has experienced 10 years earlier than Europe.0 -
Rick Chasey wrote:Surrey Commuter wrote:Rick Chasey wrote:No it’s more Japanese equities have not reached their late ‘90s high since, and long term equity investors therefore have not done so well there.
If you want clues to where the rest of the Western economies are going, Japan usually has some clues.
do you have some examples?
So broadly speaking their bubble burst, subsequent lost decade, demographics, stagnant wages with a tight labour market, sluggish inflation, are all things Japan has experienced 10 years earlier than Europe.
not something I know a whole lot about but that does look a little too simplistic. Didn't Japan's troubles start in about 1990 so way more than a lost decade and surely most of their problems stem from the fall in working population with no way out?0 -
Surrey Commuter wrote:
not something I know a whole lot about but that does look a little too simplistic. Didn't Japan's troubles start in about 1990 so way more than a lost decade and surely most of their problems stem from the fall in working population with no way out?
Doesn't that sound familiar?0 -
KingstonGraham wrote:Surrey Commuter wrote:
not something I know a whole lot about but that does look a little too simplistic. Didn't Japan's troubles start in about 1990 so way more than a lost decade and surely most of their problems stem from the fall in working population with no way out?
Doesn't that sound familiar?
Difference is is that the Japanese haven't got a Europe to blame for all their problems..... But then nor will we soon.Faster than a tent.......0 -
Rolf F wrote:KingstonGraham wrote:Surrey Commuter wrote:
not something I know a whole lot about but that does look a little too simplistic. Didn't Japan's troubles start in about 1990 so way more than a lost decade and surely most of their problems stem from the fall in working population with no way out?
Doesn't that sound familiar?
Difference is is that the Japanese haven't got a Europe to blame for all their problems..... But then nor will we soon."I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
KingstonGraham wrote:Surrey Commuter wrote:
not something I know a whole lot about but that does look a little too simplistic. Didn't Japan's troubles start in about 1990 so way more than a lost decade and surely most of their problems stem from the fall in working population with no way out?
Doesn't that sound familiar?
our working age population is forecast to carry on growing.
IMHO our post GFC performance is not long enough to call as a new normal when it might well be a blip in response to exceptional circumstances.
I also think that historically there are stronger trends coming from the USA than Japan which is a very different economy with very different issues.0 -
Surrey Commuter wrote:KingstonGraham wrote:Surrey Commuter wrote:
not something I know a whole lot about but that does look a little too simplistic. Didn't Japan's troubles start in about 1990 so way more than a lost decade and surely most of their problems stem from the fall in working population with no way out?
Doesn't that sound familiar?
our working age population is forecast to carry on growing.
IMHO our post GFC performance is not long enough to call as a new normal when it might well be a blip in response to exceptional circumstances.
I also think that historically there are stronger trends coming from the USA than Japan which is a very different economy with very different issues.
Is that true as a percentage?0 -
Stevo 666 wrote:It's possible to be financially comfortable and left leaning. I'm lucky enough to have never needed credit to buy new cars. A steady royalty payment helps.
http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/to-explain-voting-intentions-income-is-more-important-for-the-conservatives-than-for-labour/[/quote]
It's not just possible, Stevo, it's an actual thing. Well off people are left- as well as right-leaning. It doesn't take a genius to understand why financially successful people tend to vote Conservative. It's just a shame the trend is such and that more people don't think about those not as fortunate as themselves.Ben
Bikes: Donhou DSS4 Custom | Condor Italia RC | Gios Megalite | Dolan Preffisio | Giant Bowery '76
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ben_h_ppcc/
Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/143173475@N05/0