La Vuelta 2023: Stage 18:- Pola de Allande to La Cruz de Linares, 179km ***Spoilers***
Comments
-
JV must be pretty pleased, the furore and intrigue surrounding who they are choosing to let win has completely overshadowed the fact that they are choosing who out of the top three they want to win.2020/2021/2022 Metric Century Challenge Winner1
-
carbonclem said:
JV must be pretty pleased, the furore and intrigue surrounding who they are choosing to let win has completely overshadowed the fact that they are choosing who out of the top three they want to win.
People have forgotten about Hessman's positive drug test tooTwitter: @RichN951 -
Mainly because nobody knows who the f*** Hessman is.RichN95. said:carbonclem said:JV must be pretty pleased, the furore and intrigue surrounding who they are choosing to let win has completely overshadowed the fact that they are choosing who out of the top three they want to win.
People have forgotten about Hessman's positive drug test tooWarning No formatter is installed for the format0 -
No_Ta_Doctor said:
Mainly because nobody knows who the f*** Hessman is.RichN95. said:carbonclem said:JV must be pretty pleased, the furore and intrigue surrounding who they are choosing to let win has completely overshadowed the fact that they are choosing who out of the top three they want to win.
People have forgotten about Hessman's positive drug test too
Nobody knew who Josh Edmondson was either, but he was hauled on to the Ten O'Clock news for using legal drugs.Twitter: @RichN950 -
Jeez that’s a blast from the past. He’s 31 now, only feels like a few years ago he was youngster joining Sky.0
-
What's Tiernan Locke up to these days?0
-
I think there's a correlation between intra-team rivalries (real or invented) and how dull a GT is.
Some of the dullest GTs of recent times
2023 Vuelta
2017 Tour (#freelanda)
2012 Tour Wiggins/Froome
2004 Giro Cunego/Simoni
I imagine the 1986 Tour with three LVC riders in the top four was fairly dull.
The 2009 Tour was OK. But Wiggins was unexpectedly up there
The 1987 Giro literally had second placed Millar protecting winner Roche.
My first introduction to cycling was the 1986 Tour. My first stage I saw was the one where Hinault attacked in yellow and LeMond won the stage. I don't think that stage has ever been bettered. And in time I have respected and understood Hinault completely, even if he is a bit of a d1ck.Twitter: @RichN950 -
Those bold parts are a strange contradiction.RichN95. said:
...
I imagine the 1986 Tour with three LVC riders in the top four was fairly dull.
The 2009 Tour was OK. But Wiggins was unexpectedly up there
The 1987 Giro literally had second placed Millar protecting winner Roche.
My first introduction to cycling was the 1986 Tour. My first stage I saw was the one where Hinault attacked in yellow and LeMond won the stage. I don't think that stage has ever been bettered. And in time I have respected and understood Hinault completely, even if he is a bit of a d1ck.
I certainly remember 1986 being very good. But we only got 30 or 60 minutes of highlights.The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
pblakeney said:
Those bold parts are a strange contradiction.RichN95. said:
...
I imagine the 1986 Tour with three LVC riders in the top four was fairly dull.
The 2009 Tour was OK. But Wiggins was unexpectedly up there
The 1987 Giro literally had second placed Millar protecting winner Roche.
My first introduction to cycling was the 1986 Tour. My first stage I saw was the one where Hinault attacked in yellow and LeMond won the stage. I don't think that stage has ever been bettered. And in time I have respected and understood Hinault completely, even if he is a bit of a d1ck.
I certainly remember 1986 being very good. But we only got 30 or 60 minutes of highlights.
Yes and no. Just like this race it's an internal feud - more real in 1986. Zimmerman wasn't challenging them. But that was a feud that really took off. Also I was a fourteen year old whose endurance sports knowledge was marathon running, and this was so much more. A group can lead by five minutes and not win? Amazing.Twitter: @RichN950 -
In 86 there was an actual battle between Hinault and Lemond though, with Hinault in particular going on daring raids from way out. Here that's not really the case.RichN95. said:pblakeney said:
Those bold parts are a strange contradiction.RichN95. said:
...
I imagine the 1986 Tour with three LVC riders in the top four was fairly dull.
The 2009 Tour was OK. But Wiggins was unexpectedly up there
The 1987 Giro literally had second placed Millar protecting winner Roche.
My first introduction to cycling was the 1986 Tour. My first stage I saw was the one where Hinault attacked in yellow and LeMond won the stage. I don't think that stage has ever been bettered. And in time I have respected and understood Hinault completely, even if he is a bit of a d1ck.
I certainly remember 1986 being very good. But we only got 30 or 60 minutes of highlights.
Yes and no. Just like this race it's an internal feud - more real in 1986. Zimmerman wasn't challenging them. But that was a feud that really took off. Also I was a fourteen year old whose endurance sports knowledge was marathon running, and this was so much more. A group can lead by five minutes and not win? Amazing.0 -
80 s tours were highlight reels . Created a bit of a false memory thing ."If I was a 38 year old man, I definitely wouldn't be riding a bright yellow bike with Hello Kitty disc wheels, put it that way. What we're witnessing here is the world's most high profile mid-life crisis" Afx237vi Mon Jul 20, 2009 2:43 pm0
-
Does kuss getting in the break with team mates effectively blocking behind count?phreak said:
In 86 there was an actual battle between Hinault and Lemond though, with Hinault in particular going on daring raids from way out. Here that's not really the case.RichN95. said:pblakeney said:
Those bold parts are a strange contradiction.RichN95. said:
...
I imagine the 1986 Tour with three LVC riders in the top four was fairly dull.
The 2009 Tour was OK. But Wiggins was unexpectedly up there
The 1987 Giro literally had second placed Millar protecting winner Roche.
My first introduction to cycling was the 1986 Tour. My first stage I saw was the one where Hinault attacked in yellow and LeMond won the stage. I don't think that stage has ever been bettered. And in time I have respected and understood Hinault completely, even if he is a bit of a d1ck.
I certainly remember 1986 being very good. But we only got 30 or 60 minutes of highlights.
Yes and no. Just like this race it's an internal feud - more real in 1986. Zimmerman wasn't challenging them. But that was a feud that really took off. Also I was a fourteen year old whose endurance sports knowledge was marathon running, and this was so much more. A group can lead by five minutes and not win? Amazing.
The 80s were good but I am not overly sold on the nostalgia."If I was a 38 year old man, I definitely wouldn't be riding a bright yellow bike with Hello Kitty disc wheels, put it that way. What we're witnessing here is the world's most high profile mid-life crisis" Afx237vi Mon Jul 20, 2009 2:43 pm0 -
I read Roche and Lemond's books in the early 90s which provided more details. Obviously viewed through their eyes.mididoctors said:80 s tours were highlight reels . Created a bit of a false memory thing .
Also the footage of Roche almost catching Delgado means I find it hard to believe it wasn't entertaining at the time.0 -
Ive not found this Vuelta that bad.[Castle Donington Ladies FC - going up in '22]0
-
Kuss would be more akin to Voeckler going in his break and getting the jersey before his team then decided to try and help him keep it.mididoctors said:
Does kuss getting in the break with team mates effectively blocking behind count?phreak said:
In 86 there was an actual battle between Hinault and Lemond though, with Hinault in particular going on daring raids from way out. Here that's not really the case.RichN95. said:pblakeney said:
Those bold parts are a strange contradiction.RichN95. said:
...
I imagine the 1986 Tour with three LVC riders in the top four was fairly dull.
The 2009 Tour was OK. But Wiggins was unexpectedly up there
The 1987 Giro literally had second placed Millar protecting winner Roche.
My first introduction to cycling was the 1986 Tour. My first stage I saw was the one where Hinault attacked in yellow and LeMond won the stage. I don't think that stage has ever been bettered. And in time I have respected and understood Hinault completely, even if he is a bit of a d1ck.
I certainly remember 1986 being very good. But we only got 30 or 60 minutes of highlights.
Yes and no. Just like this race it's an internal feud - more real in 1986. Zimmerman wasn't challenging them. But that was a feud that really took off. Also I was a fourteen year old whose endurance sports knowledge was marathon running, and this was so much more. A group can lead by five minutes and not win? Amazing.
The 80s were good but I am not overly sold on the nostalgia.0 -
Almost like a sport that was invented to sell newspapers doesn't always lend itself to wall to wall coverage?mididoctors said:80 s tours were highlight reels . Created a bit of a false memory thing .
0 -
I find it a lot like cricket in that regard, in that watching the highlights is usually a good way to follow but when it's really good and you're watching live, absolutely nothing can beat it1