Cars, cars, cars...

11516182021101

Comments

  • veronese68
    veronese68 Posts: 27,872
    Stevo_666 said:

    pinno said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    Pross said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    Pross said:

    pblakeney said:

    Here's a question. How long before we won't be able to drive a car due to elf n safety and the progression of autonomy? There is no doubt in my mind it would save hundreds of thousands, if not millions of lives a year if enforced in the future.

    I think mandatory black boxes will be forced on us by 203*.
    I you can have fun on the road get a fun car now. If you need a track car, get one now. Tracks will be busy and priced accordingly.
    By then the car's computer will be linked to GPS and sign reading software and simply won't let you drive above the posted speed limit (already being tested).
    I predict a surge in car sales just before this becomes mandatory. Hopefully that one will last me until I'm too old to care.
    Not going to help you much if 90% of vehicles are restricted and you can't get past them though. The average age of a car on UK roads is just over 8 years and they average age cars get scrapped is about 14 years. I'm sure some statistician can work out when critical mass would occur but once it does it doesn't matter if your car is restricted, you won't be going any quicker than everyone else.
    Who says I can't get past them? ;)
    They'll clap a mandatory black box on your fireworks Stevo.
    Nah, retrofitting will be too tricky. I can see my self developing an interest in vintage cars.
    Old cars don't even need an MOT now, they figure that the numbers are so low it's not an issue and the owners take pride in looking after their cars. Having spent the last 30 years dealing with classic car owners I can confirm that they are not competent to decide for themselves what is roadworthy.
  • Stevo_666
    Stevo_666 Posts: 61,837

    Stevo_666 said:

    pinno said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    Pross said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    Pross said:

    pblakeney said:

    Here's a question. How long before we won't be able to drive a car due to elf n safety and the progression of autonomy? There is no doubt in my mind it would save hundreds of thousands, if not millions of lives a year if enforced in the future.

    I think mandatory black boxes will be forced on us by 203*.
    I you can have fun on the road get a fun car now. If you need a track car, get one now. Tracks will be busy and priced accordingly.
    By then the car's computer will be linked to GPS and sign reading software and simply won't let you drive above the posted speed limit (already being tested).
    I predict a surge in car sales just before this becomes mandatory. Hopefully that one will last me until I'm too old to care.
    Not going to help you much if 90% of vehicles are restricted and you can't get past them though. The average age of a car on UK roads is just over 8 years and they average age cars get scrapped is about 14 years. I'm sure some statistician can work out when critical mass would occur but once it does it doesn't matter if your car is restricted, you won't be going any quicker than everyone else.
    Who says I can't get past them? ;)
    They'll clap a mandatory black box on your fireworks Stevo.
    Nah, retrofitting will be too tricky. I can see my self developing an interest in vintage cars.
    Old cars don't even need an MOT now, they figure that the numbers are so low it's not an issue and the owners take pride in looking after their cars. Having spent the last 30 years dealing with classic car owners I can confirm that they are not competent to decide for themselves what is roadworthy.
    I was thinking more 'vintage' as when mine is more than 10 years old. Which kinda coincides with sophisticated milk floats becoming compulsory if you want to buy new.
    "I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]
  • focuszing723
    focuszing723 Posts: 8,154
    Flying taxis are set to shuttle passengers from Heathrow to cities in the south of England for the price of an Uber in just four years' time, The Mail on Sunday can reveal.

    Under the plans, passengers arriving at the airport could take an electric air 'taxi' to London's Canary Wharf in just 13 minutes for around £50 per passenger. A similar journey in an Uber costs £46.

    An air taxi from Heathrow to Cambridge would take 28 minutes and cost £58 per person, compared to £102 for an hour-and-a-half hour taxi or £52 for a two-hour train journey.

    https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/markets/article-10123729/Flying-taxis-set-shuttle-passengers-Heathrow.html
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,505
    Sorry. £52 for a two-hour train journey??????
    Rip off Britain.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • veronese68
    veronese68 Posts: 27,872
    pblakeney said:

    Sorry. £52 for a two-hour train journey??????
    Rip off Britain.

    For a train that rarely runs according to RC's complaints about the Cambridge service.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,660
    £58 from Cambridge to Heathrow is barely more expensive than rail.
  • focuszing723
    focuszing723 Posts: 8,154


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzhREYOK0oo

    20 minute flight time and 60 odd mph.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,660
    edited October 2021
    This ULEZ stuff in London will be the future of car travel in built up areas in Europe.

  • pinno
    pinno Posts: 52,534
    ^ No longer sci-fi.

    I doubt they would get deployed as anything useful on the West coast of Scotland though.
    seanoconn - gruagach craic!
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,505

    This ULEZ stuff in London will be the future of car travel in built up areas in Europe.

    Will the outside lane (upper level) drivers be able to get to their turn off (ground level) though? Only kidding, but visualising the issues of 3D congestion.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • pinno
    pinno Posts: 52,534
    pblakeney said:

    ...but visualising the issues of 3D congestion.

    ...and you thought the Playstation and Xbox was a waste of time.

    seanoconn - gruagach craic!
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,505
    pinno said:

    pblakeney said:

    ...but visualising the issues of 3D congestion.

    ...and you thought the Playstation and Xbox was a waste of time.

    Tetrus?
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • focuszing723
    focuszing723 Posts: 8,154
    pblakeney said:

    This ULEZ stuff in London will be the future of car travel in built up areas in Europe.

    Will the outside lane (upper level) drivers be able to get to their turn off (ground level) though? Only kidding, but visualising the issues of 3D congestion.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCbGwxYiWug

    They could be autonomous though. A Chinese company have already done this.
  • orraloon
    orraloon Posts: 13,275
    Remember what happened when drones (apparently) were sighted over Heathrow and Gatwick? Flying taxis Heathrow to Cambridge in 4 years time? Aye right.
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,505
    orraloon said:

    Remember what happened when drones (apparently) were sighted over Heathrow and Gatwick? Flying taxis Heathrow to Cambridge in 4 years time? Aye right.

    It'll take the government 4 years just to contemplate the practicalities. A further 2 years to do studies, another..........and so on.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • Wheelspinner
    Wheelspinner Posts: 6,712
    orraloon said:

    Remember what happened when drones (apparently) were sighted over Heathrow and Gatwick? Flying taxis Heathrow to Cambridge in 4 years time? Aye right.

    I was a little surprised at that - drones (at least here, anyway) have allegedly fairly sophisticated coding in their inbuilt GPS which automatically blocks them from flying into controlled airspace like an airport. They simply "stop" at the perimeter and will not cross that boundary line. I've a friend who was a keen amateur drone user, did a lot of indoor VR racing and stuff with them and outdoor flying, and he's also a pretty geeky IT expert. He reckoned hacking that GPS block code was pretty damned difficult, if at all possible.

    Open One+ BMC TE29 Seven 622SL On One Scandal Cervelo RS
  • Jezyboy
    Jezyboy Posts: 3,657
    That goes out the minute you build your own drone surely?

  • Wheelspinner
    Wheelspinner Posts: 6,712
    Jezyboy said:

    That goes out the minute you build your own drone surely?

    Who builds their own? From scratch, including the control software?
    Open One+ BMC TE29 Seven 622SL On One Scandal Cervelo RS
  • photonic69
    photonic69 Posts: 2,982
    edited October 2021


    Sometimes. Maybe. Possibly.

  • focuszing723
    focuszing723 Posts: 8,154


    58 kWh: 24 modules (288 cells)
    72.6 kWh: 30 modules (360 cells)
    77.4 kWh: 32 modules (384 cells)


    https://insideevs.com/news/539940/hyundai-ioniq5-battery-pack-opened/

    I found this interesting about the Ioniq5's battery packs.
  • MattFalle
    MattFalle Posts: 11,644
    In a week I haven't seen on 4x4, SUV or other such pile ofshite.

    perhaps its just a UK thang?
    .
    The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
  • wavefront
    wavefront Posts: 397
    MattFalle said:

    In a week I haven't seen on 4x4, SUV or other such pile ofshite.

    perhaps its just a UK thang?

    The UK is on a par with Germany for SUV sales, with other European countries selling 20-25% less (couldn’t work out if that’s because volume of new cars is lower or the appetite for them is lower) But In the UK only 3 of the top 10 new cars are SUV’s. The fiesta, corsa, and focus are still the biggest sellers.

    I see the new Range Rover released this week is already getting rave ‘first look’ reviews. I think it’ll sell like hot cakes, despite its £85k base price tag. Quite how people afford that I just don’t know.
  • Wheelspinner
    Wheelspinner Posts: 6,712
    MattFalle said:

    In a week I haven't seen on 4x4, SUV or other such pile ofshite.

    perhaps its just a UK thang?

    You haven't been out here in a while then? Tonka Toy style utes and SUV's are still the majority of car sales.
    Open One+ BMC TE29 Seven 622SL On One Scandal Cervelo RS
  • veronese68
    veronese68 Posts: 27,872
    wavefront said:

    MattFalle said:

    In a week I haven't seen on 4x4, SUV or other such pile ofshite.

    perhaps its just a UK thang?

    The UK is on a par with Germany for SUV sales, with other European countries selling 20-25% less
    I'm a little surprised at that. Totally unscientific observations when on holiday in Europe it seemed the British, Italians and Eastern Europeans like the bling of SUVs. Scandinavians and Germans seemed to favour regular estate cars, although the scandi's often have a 4wd version.
  • wavefront said:

    MattFalle said:

    In a week I haven't seen on 4x4, SUV or other such pile ofshite.

    perhaps its just a UK thang?

    The UK is on a par with Germany for SUV sales, with other European countries selling 20-25% less (couldn’t work out if that’s because volume of new cars is lower or the appetite for them is lower) But In the UK only 3 of the top 10 new cars are SUV’s. The fiesta, corsa, and focus are still the biggest sellers.

    I see the new Range Rover released this week is already getting rave ‘first look’ reviews. I think it’ll sell like hot cakes, despite its £85k base price tag. Quite how people afford that I just don’t know.
    Probably just earn more?

    I really like the current Range Rover - but like all of them, it is riddled with expensive defects. The new one appears to be a re-launch of the existing one, rather than a big evolution. Hopefully that will mean a lot of the reliability issued are fixed and / or the price of the current one falls through the floor. Even now you can pick up relatively clean examples of a 2015 car with 70k miles for around £30k
  • john80
    john80 Posts: 2,965

    wavefront said:

    MattFalle said:

    In a week I haven't seen on 4x4, SUV or other such pile ofshite.

    perhaps its just a UK thang?

    The UK is on a par with Germany for SUV sales, with other European countries selling 20-25% less (couldn’t work out if that’s because volume of new cars is lower or the appetite for them is lower) But In the UK only 3 of the top 10 new cars are SUV’s. The fiesta, corsa, and focus are still the biggest sellers.

    I see the new Range Rover released this week is already getting rave ‘first look’ reviews. I think it’ll sell like hot cakes, despite its £85k base price tag. Quite how people afford that I just don’t know.
    Probably just earn more?

    I really like the current Range Rover - but like all of them, it is riddled with expensive defects. The new one appears to be a re-launch of the existing one, rather than a big evolution. Hopefully that will mean a lot of the reliability issued are fixed and / or the price of the current one falls through the floor. Even now you can pick up relatively clean examples of a 2015 car with 70k miles for around £30k
    They own them primarily through finance. A 7 year old range will be about a grand for every electrical fault requiring a new board. Mate had one and whilst he liked it and was an electrical engineer so could sort the electrical faults the mechanical aspects were also tough. A lot of the suspension components are getting on for bring commercial in size and as are the tools to do a basic ball joint etc. I will leave looking cool to others on this one.
  • That's the worry - they are hideously unreliable and equally expensive to fix, but they do look so awesome. I'll take the plunge one day. Skoda estate for now....
  • veronese68
    veronese68 Posts: 27,872
    john80 said:

    wavefront said:

    MattFalle said:

    In a week I haven't seen on 4x4, SUV or other such pile ofshite.

    perhaps its just a UK thang?

    The UK is on a par with Germany for SUV sales, with other European countries selling 20-25% less (couldn’t work out if that’s because volume of new cars is lower or the appetite for them is lower) But In the UK only 3 of the top 10 new cars are SUV’s. The fiesta, corsa, and focus are still the biggest sellers.

    I see the new Range Rover released this week is already getting rave ‘first look’ reviews. I think it’ll sell like hot cakes, despite its £85k base price tag. Quite how people afford that I just don’t know.
    Probably just earn more?

    I really like the current Range Rover - but like all of them, it is riddled with expensive defects. The new one appears to be a re-launch of the existing one, rather than a big evolution. Hopefully that will mean a lot of the reliability issued are fixed and / or the price of the current one falls through the floor. Even now you can pick up relatively clean examples of a 2015 car with 70k miles for around £30k
    I will leave looking cool to others on this one.
    This is the thing I really don't get. I just don't think they look cool, to me they look like someone is just bragging. The vehicular equivalent of Donald Trump.
  • I think the navy blue with silver 'gills' and cream interior looks pretty unoffensive.

    I agree they are imperious, but also it is a pretty iconic car.
  • First.Aspect
    First.Aspect Posts: 17,402
    I really don't know why anyone would buy a brand new car. I've done this precisely once, because a LR dealer was offering a stupidly good deal to shift a car that had been ordered then cancelled.

    Rest of the time I've gone for a 1-2 year old one that some one else has paid half the cost of. Who the people are who buy new cars and run them for such a short time before handing them back, I don't know, but I'm very grateful.