Euro 2020/21 (more football, sorry Brian)

1394042444572

Comments

  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,228
    seanoconn said:

    Kane still doesn't fit into that team. He needs to move like sterling if he's going to get chances. Currently he moves like the Ever Given.

    If they are only going to try and break fast and put crosses into him in the last 10 minutes, bring him on as a sub.

    Even if he’s non existent for 89mins he can still score with a half a chance, have faith.
    He needed more than half a chance yesterday.
  • Pross
    Pross Posts: 43,597
    mrb123 said:

    Pross said:

    Anyone wondering why the non-English people in the country quite often want England to lose they should look at this morning's TV coverage. You'd think they had just won the tournament not won a second round game. And that censored song!

    The footage of behaviour afterwards doesn't look great with Covid rates surging.

    Lucky there wasn't a far better sporting story yesterday that isn't getting a mention.

    BBC Breakfast had a lovely story about Stormzy going back to a house party after the match with a load of England fans. Didn't look very Covid-compliant to me.

    Was thinking the same, I was surprised they showed it. Probably not more than 30 people in the shots but I suspect there were a lot more around.
  • seanoconn
    seanoconn Posts: 11,739

    seanoconn said:

    Kane still doesn't fit into that team. He needs to move like sterling if he's going to get chances. Currently he moves like the Ever Given.

    If they are only going to try and break fast and put crosses into him in the last 10 minutes, bring him on as a sub.

    Even if he’s non existent for 89mins he can still score with a half a chance, have faith.
    He needed more than half a chance yesterday.
    Under pressure, big game, I’d rather the ball fell to Kane than anyone else.
    Pinno, מלך אידיוט וחרא מכונאי
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,228
    seanoconn said:

    Kane still doesn't fit into that team. He needs to move like sterling if he's going to get chances. Currently he moves like the Ever Given.

    If they are only going to try and break fast and put crosses into him in the last 10 minutes, bring him on as a sub.

    Even if he’s non existent for 89mins he can still score with a half a chance, have faith.
    Even if you think this, isn't that a case of choosing the best striker rather than the best player for the system that the rest of the team actually play?
  • seanoconn
    seanoconn Posts: 11,739

    seanoconn said:

    Kane still doesn't fit into that team. He needs to move like sterling if he's going to get chances. Currently he moves like the Ever Given.

    If they are only going to try and break fast and put crosses into him in the last 10 minutes, bring him on as a sub.

    Even if he’s non existent for 89mins he can still score with a half a chance, have faith.
    Even if you think this, isn't that a case of choosing the best striker rather than the best player for the system that the rest of the team actually play?
    Would you seriously drop Kane?

    Or change a winning system to suit him?
    Pinno, מלך אידיוט וחרא מכונאי
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,228
    seanoconn said:

    seanoconn said:

    Kane still doesn't fit into that team. He needs to move like sterling if he's going to get chances. Currently he moves like the Ever Given.

    If they are only going to try and break fast and put crosses into him in the last 10 minutes, bring him on as a sub.

    Even if he’s non existent for 89mins he can still score with a half a chance, have faith.
    Even if you think this, isn't that a case of choosing the best striker rather than the best player for the system that the rest of the team actually play?
    Would you seriously drop Kane?

    Or change a winning system to suit him?
    Sure, why would he be undroppable when he's not playing well in an otherwise well drilled system?
  • focuszing723
    focuszing723 Posts: 8,154
    Pross said:

    Anyone wondering why the non-English people in the country quite often want England to lose they should look at this morning's TV coverage. You'd think they had just won the tournament not won a second round game. And that censored song!

    The footage of behaviour afterwards doesn't look great with Covid rates surging.

    Lucky there wasn't a far better sporting story yesterday that isn't getting a mention.

    It's just the news though. Don't forget plenty of pro riders have won spoty.

    I'm pleased for both but it's not changing my world.
  • surrey_commuter
    surrey_commuter Posts: 18,867
    seanoconn said:

    Kane still doesn't fit into that team. He needs to move like sterling if he's going to get chances. Currently he moves like the Ever Given.

    If they are only going to try and break fast and put crosses into him in the last 10 minutes, bring him on as a sub.

    Even if he’s non existent for 89mins he can still score with a half a chance, have faith.
    But if he is nonexistent for 359 minutes and then scores is that good enough? I think he is very lucky there is no credible alternative
  • surrey_commuter
    surrey_commuter Posts: 18,867
    Pross said:

    seanoconn said:

    Why's the Ukraine dude wearing a sports bra?

    It is a fitness tracker.


    Ah, probably gets a bonus for showing it on telly and making me ask about it.
    Technical wizardry or not, it’s still a crop top on a man 😕
    Not sure why they can't build something into the shirt like they do in rugby.
    Do they not monitor them in training?
  • surrey_commuter
    surrey_commuter Posts: 18,867

    Kane still doesn't fit into that team. He needs to move like sterling if he's going to get chances. Currently he moves like the Ever Given.

    If they are only going to try and break fast and put crosses into him in the last 10 minutes, bring him on as a sub.


    At the World Cup the tactic was to get it up to him quickly and then play for free kicks. He seems to have lost his diving boots.
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,493
    seanoconn said:

    seanoconn said:

    Kane still doesn't fit into that team. He needs to move like sterling if he's going to get chances. Currently he moves like the Ever Given.

    If they are only going to try and break fast and put crosses into him in the last 10 minutes, bring him on as a sub.

    Even if he’s non existent for 89mins he can still score with a half a chance, have faith.
    Even if you think this, isn't that a case of choosing the best striker rather than the best player for the system that the rest of the team actually play?
    Would you seriously drop Kane?

    Or change a winning system to suit him?
    I think you have just succeeded in arguing against your own point.
    You don't change a winning system to suit an individual.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • surrey_commuter
    surrey_commuter Posts: 18,867
    seanoconn said:

    seanoconn said:

    Kane still doesn't fit into that team. He needs to move like sterling if he's going to get chances. Currently he moves like the Ever Given.

    If they are only going to try and break fast and put crosses into him in the last 10 minutes, bring him on as a sub.

    Even if he’s non existent for 89mins he can still score with a half a chance, have faith.
    Even if you think this, isn't that a case of choosing the best striker rather than the best player for the system that the rest of the team actually play?
    Would you seriously drop Kane?

    Or change a winning system to suit him?
    If we assume he is injured then I hope we have a plan in case he breaks down, I assume in training this works worse.

    As we have no like for like replacement I guess it would be playing with a false nine which with our mix of players does not sound the worse idea.
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,228
    If he's going to be a false 9 which the system looks like it needs, he needs to move around more unpredictably and actually touch the ball.
  • Dorset_Boy
    Dorset_Boy Posts: 7,611

    Pross said:

    seanoconn said:

    Why's the Ukraine dude wearing a sports bra?

    It is a fitness tracker.


    Ah, probably gets a bonus for showing it on telly and making me ask about it.
    Technical wizardry or not, it’s still a crop top on a man 😕
    Not sure why they can't build something into the shirt like they do in rugby.
    Do they not monitor them in training?
    Yes they do, which helps with providing base lines, and then, certainly in rugby, they are getting live feedback during the match to see when a player is becoming fatigued and likely to need to be subbed.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,660
    Pross said:

    Anyone wondering why the non-English people in the country quite often want England to lose they should look at this morning's TV coverage. You'd think they had just won the tournament not won a second round game. And that censored song!

    The footage of behaviour afterwards doesn't look great with Covid rates surging.

    Lucky there wasn't a far better sporting story yesterday that isn't getting a mention.

    I think the celebrations are fine - England are really a tier two team so beating big nations is worth celebrating.

    It is the fact that booing the German anthem is so normal it doesn't even get commented on. It was really loud.

    Pathetic.
  • seanoconn
    seanoconn Posts: 11,739

    seanoconn said:

    Kane still doesn't fit into that team. He needs to move like sterling if he's going to get chances. Currently he moves like the Ever Given.

    If they are only going to try and break fast and put crosses into him in the last 10 minutes, bring him on as a sub.

    Even if he’s non existent for 89mins he can still score with a half a chance, have faith.
    But if he is nonexistent for 359 minutes and then scores is that good enough? I think he is very lucky there is no credible alternative
    Yes. The point is there is no credible alternative. Yes he’s as slow as a big slow thingy but he’s professionalism, attitude and belief are a level above any other British striker. The other 10 players want and need him in the team.
    Pinno, מלך אידיוט וחרא מכונאי
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,228
    seanoconn said:

    seanoconn said:

    Kane still doesn't fit into that team. He needs to move like sterling if he's going to get chances. Currently he moves like the Ever Given.

    If they are only going to try and break fast and put crosses into him in the last 10 minutes, bring him on as a sub.

    Even if he’s non existent for 89mins he can still score with a half a chance, have faith.
    But if he is nonexistent for 359 minutes and then scores is that good enough? I think he is very lucky there is no credible alternative
    Yes. The point is there is no credible alternative. Yes he’s as slow as a big slow thingy but he’s professionalism, attitude and belief are a level above any other British striker. The other 10 players want and need him in the team.
    If he got injured, who would take his place?
  • elbowloh
    elbowloh Posts: 7,078
    pblakeney said:

    seanoconn said:

    seanoconn said:

    Kane still doesn't fit into that team. He needs to move like sterling if he's going to get chances. Currently he moves like the Ever Given.

    If they are only going to try and break fast and put crosses into him in the last 10 minutes, bring him on as a sub.

    Even if he’s non existent for 89mins he can still score with a half a chance, have faith.
    Even if you think this, isn't that a case of choosing the best striker rather than the best player for the system that the rest of the team actually play?
    Would you seriously drop Kane?

    Or change a winning system to suit him?
    I think you have just succeeded in arguing against your own point.
    You don't change a winning system to suit an individual.
    You could see yesterday though, that Germany were doubling up on Kane. He's occupying two defenders, meaning there's space for Sterling and/or Sako to run into.

    If you had, say Rashford up front, would they double up? No sure, as Rashford is more likely to be looking for a through ball or a ball over the top. Kane is looking for a ball to feet or played into the air.
    Felt F1 2014
    Felt Z6 2012
    Red Arthur Caygill steel frame
    Tall....
    www.seewildlife.co.uk
  • elbowloh
    elbowloh Posts: 7,078

    seanoconn said:

    seanoconn said:

    Kane still doesn't fit into that team. He needs to move like sterling if he's going to get chances. Currently he moves like the Ever Given.

    If they are only going to try and break fast and put crosses into him in the last 10 minutes, bring him on as a sub.

    Even if he’s non existent for 89mins he can still score with a half a chance, have faith.
    But if he is nonexistent for 359 minutes and then scores is that good enough? I think he is very lucky there is no credible alternative
    Yes. The point is there is no credible alternative. Yes he’s as slow as a big slow thingy but he’s professionalism, attitude and belief are a level above any other British striker. The other 10 players want and need him in the team.
    If he got injured, who would take his place?
    Without changing the system, it would have to be Dominic Calvert Lewin.
    Felt F1 2014
    Felt Z6 2012
    Red Arthur Caygill steel frame
    Tall....
    www.seewildlife.co.uk
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,228
    What about Foden? He's not a like for like replacement, but that's the point.
  • elbowloh
    elbowloh Posts: 7,078
    How do they calculate xg? I'd have thought those chances for Kane and Sterling were almost sitters / tap ins on the edge of the 6 yard box?

    Is it calculated from the ratio of similar chances that actually result in a goal?
    Felt F1 2014
    Felt Z6 2012
    Red Arthur Caygill steel frame
    Tall....
    www.seewildlife.co.uk
  • Jezyboy
    Jezyboy Posts: 3,657
    Have thought Foden has been the best individual player when he's been on the pitch.

    But that's probably why I'm not a football coach.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,660
    edited June 2021
    elbowloh said:

    How do they calculate xg? I'd have thought those chances for Kane and Sterling were almost sitters / tap ins on the edge of the 6 yard box?

    Is it calculated from the ratio of similar chances that actually result in a goal?
    It's some algo that calculates if all the players are roughly positioned as they are and the ball is in a certain place, what is the likelihood that chance is scored, based on how many of those similar chances previously were scored.

    There are some anomalies like own goals have a zero xg because if the way it's calcuated.

    It's sort of best to use it as a guide for how many decent chances a team had. They're pretty irrelevant in tournament football but say in the league when you're playing 40 odd games, if in the first half of the season your team is regularly exceeding xg, you can expect them to trend downwards in the second half (which may not happen).
  • DeVlaeminck
    DeVlaeminck Posts: 9,108
    pblakeney said:

    seanoconn said:

    seanoconn said:

    Kane still doesn't fit into that team. He needs to move like sterling if he's going to get chances. Currently he moves like the Ever Given.

    If they are only going to try and break fast and put crosses into him in the last 10 minutes, bring him on as a sub.

    Even if he’s non existent for 89mins he can still score with a half a chance, have faith.
    Even if you think this, isn't that a case of choosing the best striker rather than the best player for the system that the rest of the team actually play?
    Would you seriously drop Kane?

    Or change a winning system to suit him?
    I think you have just succeeded in arguing against your own point.
    You don't change a winning system to suit an individual.

    We changed a winning system for Germany. I'm on the fence with Kane it's a difficult one.
    [Castle Donington Ladies FC - going up in '22]
  • TheBigBean
    TheBigBean Posts: 22,026
    One of things I hate about football stats is this. He should have done better. It was a good chance.

    Kane’s 45+1 chance doesn’t qualify on xG as he doesn’t get a shot away (good clearance from German defender)
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,660
    yeah it's not perfect.
  • TheBigBean
    TheBigBean Posts: 22,026
    edited June 2021

    yeah it's not perfect.

    It's better than shots on target, but still misses quite a bit of the game.
  • TheBigBean
    TheBigBean Posts: 22,026
    Also, things like Sterling's goal. It is a goal a quick player will score, but a slow player is far less likely to score. Sterling is quick, so made it look easy. But then he is occupying that position, and the pass was made, in part, because he is quick.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,660
    Sterling has been outstanding.