The Royals

18911131454

Comments

  • DeVlaeminck
    DeVlaeminck Posts: 9,094
    ddraver said:

    ddraver said:

    Jezyboy said:

    The current culture of Internet shaming means that in many cases, individuals can suffer greatly from being racist or (if I'm being contentious) being seen to be racist.

    Being racist on twitter can see you getting sacked which is disastrous on an individual level. Whereas having one racist joke made about you probably doesn't do extreme harm.

    Of course, over time lots of racist abuse is going to be awful for anyone's mental state.

    So what's the answer? I don't have a clue.

    don't be racist?
    Like Danny Baker? Obviously don't be racist but for me he wasn't racist and he lost his job/career over accusations of racism and has to live with the stigma of that. I use that example as it relates to Meghan and Harry.

    Individual cases have to be taken as such.
    If you honestly think white people suffer more from accusations of racism that victims of racism I don't think you understand the problem, genuinely.
    You have to take each instance individually - look at things on their merits. There are times you clearly don't do that.

    How many individual instances do you need before you start wondering if there might be a bigger problem?

    What point are you making here? Assuming it is addressed at me I haven't denied the existence of a problem - it was Rick who implied I had because I disagreed with his universal law.

    I'll give you a couple of examples of posts I've made on these forums.
    1 - I agreed that Quinn Simmonds should be punished for posting a black hand emoji because that act has taken on a racist meaning.
    2 - I agreed that statues of slavers (specifically in Bristol) should be removed if they caused offence to black Bristolians.

    But I don't agree that every accusation of racism or every thing which is attributed to race is necessarily so just because someone says so. I take each case on its merits - look at the evidence.

    As far as Meghan Markle goes I've not commented because I simply don't know - I'm not privy to Harry's private conversations and I've no idea if the tabloid stories about her were of a racist nature - I didn't read them.
    [Castle Donington Ladies FC - going up in '22]
  • DeVlaeminck
    DeVlaeminck Posts: 9,094
    secretsam said:

    ddraver said:

    Jezyboy said:

    The current culture of Internet shaming means that in many cases, individuals can suffer greatly from being racist or (if I'm being contentious) being seen to be racist.

    Being racist on twitter can see you getting sacked which is disastrous on an individual level. Whereas having one racist joke made about you probably doesn't do extreme harm.

    Of course, over time lots of racist abuse is going to be awful for anyone's mental state.

    So what's the answer? I don't have a clue.

    don't be racist?
    Like Danny Baker? Obviously don't be racist but for me he wasn't racist and he lost his job/career over accusations of racism and has to live with the stigma of that. I use that example as it relates to Meghan and Harry.

    Individual cases have to be taken as such.
    If you honestly think white people suffer more from accusations of racism that victims of racism I don't think you understand the problem, genuinely.
    You have to take each instance individually - look at things on their merits. There are times you clearly don't do that.

    "Merits" of racism? There are scales, perhaps? From really racist to just a bit?
    You are either stupid or being disingenuous here - I'm going to assume the former.
    [Castle Donington Ladies FC - going up in '22]
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661

    Maybe it's because I am a lot older than most on here, or maybe I am not very bright, but have to admit to being a bit lost with the direction the debate seems to have taken.

    Prince William has countered Megan's accusation this morning by saying and I quote: "We're very much not a racist family."

    Is this an example of what Rick calls a white man playing the victim, or can his response be given equal consideration?

    It's a non-statement, isn't it?
  • secretsam
    secretsam Posts: 5,120
    edited March 2021

    secretsam said:

    ddraver said:

    Jezyboy said:

    The current culture of Internet shaming means that in many cases, individuals can suffer greatly from being racist or (if I'm being contentious) being seen to be racist.

    Being racist on twitter can see you getting sacked which is disastrous on an individual level. Whereas having one racist joke made about you probably doesn't do extreme harm.

    Of course, over time lots of racist abuse is going to be awful for anyone's mental state.

    So what's the answer? I don't have a clue.

    don't be racist?
    Like Danny Baker? Obviously don't be racist but for me he wasn't racist and he lost his job/career over accusations of racism and has to live with the stigma of that. I use that example as it relates to Meghan and Harry.

    Individual cases have to be taken as such.
    If you honestly think white people suffer more from accusations of racism that victims of racism I don't think you understand the problem, genuinely.
    You have to take each instance individually - look at things on their merits. There are times you clearly don't do that.

    "Merits" of racism? There are scales, perhaps? From really racist to just a bit?
    You are either stupid or being disingenuous here - I'm going to assume the former.
    Nope, really quite smart, actually. Possibly disingenuous, but at least I'm not racist.
    Have a report.

    It's just a hill. Get over it.
  • DeVlaeminck
    DeVlaeminck Posts: 9,094
    edited March 2021
    secretsam said:

    secretsam said:

    ddraver said:

    Jezyboy said:

    The current culture of Internet shaming means that in many cases, individuals can suffer greatly from being racist or (if I'm being contentious) being seen to be racist.

    Being racist on twitter can see you getting sacked which is disastrous on an individual level. Whereas having one racist joke made about you probably doesn't do extreme harm.

    Of course, over time lots of racist abuse is going to be awful for anyone's mental state.

    So what's the answer? I don't have a clue.

    don't be racist?
    Like Danny Baker? Obviously don't be racist but for me he wasn't racist and he lost his job/career over accusations of racism and has to live with the stigma of that. I use that example as it relates to Meghan and Harry.

    Individual cases have to be taken as such.
    If you honestly think white people suffer more from accusations of racism that victims of racism I don't think you understand the problem, genuinely.
    You have to take each instance individually - look at things on their merits. There are times you clearly don't do that.

    "Merits" of racism? There are scales, perhaps? From really racist to just a bit?
    You are either stupid or being disingenuous here - I'm going to assume the former.
    Nope, really quite smart, actually. Possibly disingenuous, but at least I'm not racist.
    Have a report.
    No I think you must just be a bit thick and a racist.
    [Castle Donington Ladies FC - going up in '22]
  • blazing_saddles
    blazing_saddles Posts: 22,722

    Maybe it's because I am a lot older than most on here, or maybe I am not very bright, but have to admit to being a bit lost with the direction the debate seems to have taken.

    Prince William has countered Megan's accusation this morning by saying and I quote: "We're very much not a racist family."

    Is this an example of what Rick calls a white man playing the victim, or can his response be given equal consideration?

    It's a non-statement, isn't it?
    Aaaargh
    "Science is a tool for cheaters". An anonymous French PE teacher.
  • imposter2.0
    imposter2.0 Posts: 12,028



    Prince William has countered Megan's accusation this morning by saying and I quote: "We're very much not a racist family."

    Apart from all the racist stuff that Prince Phillip has said over the years, for example. The 'Royal' family once again scores a direct hit in their own foot...

  • elbowloh
    elbowloh Posts: 7,078
    William didn't deny that the conversation took place
    Felt F1 2014
    Felt Z6 2012
    Red Arthur Caygill steel frame
    Tall....
    www.seewildlife.co.uk
  • blazing_saddles
    blazing_saddles Posts: 22,722



    Prince William has countered Megan's accusation this morning by saying and I quote: "We're very much not a racist family."

    Apart from all the racist stuff that Prince Phillip has said over the years, for example. The 'Royal' family once again scores a direct hit in their own foot...

    But by this logic Harry is a racist.


    "Science is a tool for cheaters". An anonymous French PE teacher.
  • shirley_basso
    shirley_basso Posts: 6,195
    Are H&M's PR advisors working for H to rekindle family relations or M to build profile?

    Feels M at this point and Harry is a pawn but surely he's not that thick after all the stuff about his mother.
  • shortfall
    shortfall Posts: 3,288

    secretsam said:

    ddraver said:

    Jezyboy said:

    The current culture of Internet shaming means that in many cases, individuals can suffer greatly from being racist or (if I'm being contentious) being seen to be racist.

    Being racist on twitter can see you getting sacked which is disastrous on an individual level. Whereas having one racist joke made about you probably doesn't do extreme harm.

    Of course, over time lots of racist abuse is going to be awful for anyone's mental state.

    So what's the answer? I don't have a clue.

    don't be racist?
    Like Danny Baker? Obviously don't be racist but for me he wasn't racist and he lost his job/career over accusations of racism and has to live with the stigma of that. I use that example as it relates to Meghan and Harry.

    Individual cases have to be taken as such.
    If you honestly think white people suffer more from accusations of racism that victims of racism I don't think you understand the problem, genuinely.
    You have to take each instance individually - look at things on their merits. There are times you clearly don't do that.

    "Merits" of racism? There are scales, perhaps? From really racist to just a bit?
    You are either stupid or being disingenuous here - I'm going to assume the former.
    Just wow. This post really got flagged?
  • secretsam
    secretsam Posts: 5,120
    shortfall said:

    Just wow. This post really got flagged?

    I should be OK with being called 'stupid' because I disagree?


    It's just a hill. Get over it.
  • shortfall
    shortfall Posts: 3,288

    Maybe it's because I am a lot older than most on here, or maybe I am not very bright, but have to admit to being a bit lost with the direction the debate seems to have taken.

    Prince William has countered Megan's accusation this morning by saying and I quote: "We're very much not a racist family."

    Is this an example of what Rick calls a white man playing the victim, or can his response be given equal consideration?

    I'm like you. I sometimes think I I live in a parallel universe when I visit cakestop. I mean if a poster as moderate and measured as DeVlaminck starts getting their posts flagged then I wonder if I even want to bother with it anymore.
  • secretsam
    secretsam Posts: 5,120
    shortfall said:

    Maybe it's because I am a lot older than most on here, or maybe I am not very bright, but have to admit to being a bit lost with the direction the debate seems to have taken.

    Prince William has countered Megan's accusation this morning by saying and I quote: "We're very much not a racist family."

    Is this an example of what Rick calls a white man playing the victim, or can his response be given equal consideration?

    I'm like you. I sometimes think I I live in a parallel universe when I visit cakestop. I mean if a poster as moderate and measured as DeVlaminck starts getting their posts flagged then I wonder if I even want to bother with it anymore.
    Well, if he's calling people "stupid" and "Thick", then yes


    It's just a hill. Get over it.
  • DeVlaeminck
    DeVlaeminck Posts: 9,094
    secretsam said:

    shortfall said:

    Maybe it's because I am a lot older than most on here, or maybe I am not very bright, but have to admit to being a bit lost with the direction the debate seems to have taken.

    Prince William has countered Megan's accusation this morning by saying and I quote: "We're very much not a racist family."

    Is this an example of what Rick calls a white man playing the victim, or can his response be given equal consideration?

    I'm like you. I sometimes think I I live in a parallel universe when I visit cakestop. I mean if a poster as moderate and measured as DeVlaminck starts getting their posts flagged then I wonder if I even want to bother with it anymore.
    Well, if he's calling people "stupid" and "Thick", then yes

    I called you racist as well.
    [Castle Donington Ladies FC - going up in '22]
  • imposter2.0
    imposter2.0 Posts: 12,028



    Prince William has countered Megan's accusation this morning by saying and I quote: "We're very much not a racist family."

    Apart from all the racist stuff that Prince Phillip has said over the years, for example. The 'Royal' family once again scores a direct hit in their own foot...

    But by this logic Harry is a racist.


    He's certainly might qualify in some respects. The 'dressing up as Hitler' thing could potentially be deemed as such. And he also once referred to one of the other overseas cadets at Sandhurst as his 'paki' friend.

    However, none of that excuses or justifies the racist abuse the couple seem to be getting now though...

  • blazing_saddles
    blazing_saddles Posts: 22,722



    Prince William has countered Megan's accusation this morning by saying and I quote: "We're very much not a racist family."

    Apart from all the racist stuff that Prince Phillip has said over the years, for example. The 'Royal' family once again scores a direct hit in their own foot...

    But by this logic Harry is a racist.


    He's certainly might qualify in some respects. The 'dressing up as Hitler' thing could potentially be deemed as such. And he also once referred to one of the other overseas cadets at Sandhurst as his 'paki' friend.

    However, none of that excuses or justifies the racist abuse the couple seem to be getting now though...

    See this is where I get confused by the logic used when folks start out with preconceptions.

    If you choose to characterise an entire family in 2021 based upon the historical remarks of a bloke born in 1921, then Harry’s more recent racist misdemeanours would have to characterise his new family.

    Nobody would draw this latter conclusion so you can’t just adopt the former because it supports your POV.




    "Science is a tool for cheaters". An anonymous French PE teacher.
  • david37
    david37 Posts: 1,313

    ddraver said:

    Jezyboy said:

    The current culture of Internet shaming means that in many cases, individuals can suffer greatly from being racist or (if I'm being contentious) being seen to be racist.

    Being racist on twitter can see you getting sacked which is disastrous on an individual level. Whereas having one racist joke made about you probably doesn't do extreme harm.

    Of course, over time lots of racist abuse is going to be awful for anyone's mental state.

    So what's the answer? I don't have a clue.

    don't be racist?
    Like Danny Baker? Obviously don't be racist but for me he wasn't racist and he lost his job/career over accusations of racism and has to live with the stigma of that. I use that example as it relates to Meghan and Harry.

    Individual cases have to be taken as such.
    If you honestly think white people suffer more from accusations of racism that victims of racism I don't think you understand the problem, genuinely.
    You're not wrong, but isn't this actually just a type of whataboutery?

    What is it about racism that makes it OK for someone to have their life ruined by false accusations of it?
    Explain to me how you call it out then?

    What's your solution? You have evidence across the board of constant and relentless racism and you're worried about a radio presenter gobshite on a radio station with a small audience?


    There is absolutely a problem that when you discuss the issue of racism or diversity, white men, especially older men, feel threatened by the discussion, and often feel accused.

    In the real world one needs to be sensitive to that as they are usually (or in my experience always) the people with the power to change it. If you want to make progress, you need to approach it in a different way (which, FWIW, I do and have, with success).

    The reaction to "but what about false accusations" is really a question of feeling threatened by something - you're worried you or someone you know and like might be falsely accused.

    But because you likely don't know many young black men, you're quite relaxed about the *police* falsely accusing them of a crime, for example.

    So there is a disconnect. I get it, it threatens white men and they're not used to that - and i'll include myself in that.

    But the solution to the racism problem isn't to say "let's not talk about it" or "keep it to yourself" or "only bring it when someone says something explicit" because that doesn't move the dial on the actual problem.

    Constant and incessant racism across the board?????? no constant whining

    White men feel accused??? they are. Directly and regularly.

    Personally unlike most on here im not racist. I treat people as people, I think of people as people and if they're black or white straight or gay or bi or young or old they're people.

    Perhaps if some victim groups stopped identifying themselves by their characteristics they could get on and achieve something.

    they perpetuate the problem. no one owes anyone a living, sooner they get that through whatever status related shoulder chips they're carrying the sooner we can all get on.

    and this constant snowflake rushing from one panic to another like a flock of chicken lickins exacerbates the problem. there needs to be balance for progress.

    eg person drives round London on the wrong side of the road, refuses to identify themselves then kicks off is not racism. and being an MP or athlete doesn't make acting like a drug dealer any less likely to get you pulled over.







  • imposter2.0
    imposter2.0 Posts: 12,028



    If you choose to characterise an entire family in 2021 based upon the historical remarks of a bloke born in 1921, then Harry’s more recent racist misdemeanours would have to characterise his new family.

    A better question from the journo might have been "is anyone in your family racist?"

  • david37
    david37 Posts: 1,313
    edited March 2021
    secretsam said:

    david37 said:

    Why? did she provide any credible evidence? and who are you to announce how people should react or behave or how they should think?

    So, I have to show you referral letters for MH counselling in order for you to believe that I have depression? Is that how it works? Someone has to prove that they are ill, just to satisfy you?

    if you want me to treat you as a special case yes. You have depression, its your problem don't expect me to take it on board too. What a totally self centred attitude you have. No one is special because they have depression loads of people have it and you don't know wether the person you're burdening with your outpourings has issues of their own to deal with.

    Personally I don't think its wrong to expect to be treated with dignity whatever your personal circumstances. I do think its a lack of courtesy to burden strangers with your problems and frankly its boring. there are loads of people who need to help others and embrace others problems go and be tedious with them. Or health professionals who are equipped to actually help. or the samaritans.
  • david37
    david37 Posts: 1,313
    elbowloh said:

    William didn't deny that the conversation took place

    he didn't confirm it did either did he?
  • elbowloh
    elbowloh Posts: 7,078
    david37 said:

    elbowloh said:

    William didn't deny that the conversation took place

    he didn't confirm it did either did he?
    Do you not think it weird he didn't address the specific accusation that was made?
    Felt F1 2014
    Felt Z6 2012
    Red Arthur Caygill steel frame
    Tall....
    www.seewildlife.co.uk
  • john80
    john80 Posts: 2,965
    I have a next door neighbour that pulls the mental health card. You could listen to her tales of woe and think that all her problems are caused by others. However if you speak to the other side then you start to realise the frosty attitude is a result of her actions. As always if you have a racist family member it is probably best to deal with it to their face than bring it onto the front pages. Makes me wonder how Harry got through military training if I am being honest.

    As to the William conversation do I really believe that it was him standing their giving his brother craic about the colour of his kid. I doubt it very much. He should not be in the position to have to deny the allegation in the first place. If you have not got the balls to name names then you probably should keep the issue inside your head. If I was William and I had been smeared this way which should have been obvious to Harry then I would not be too happy.
  • pinkbikini
    pinkbikini Posts: 876
    Blimey, people are getting in a froth again on here!

    I thought the Royal Family were losing their relevance with younger generations - seems to not be the case at all.
  • david37
    david37 Posts: 1,313
    elbowloh said:

    david37 said:

    elbowloh said:

    William didn't deny that the conversation took place

    he didn't confirm it did either did he?
    Do you not think it weird he didn't address the specific accusation that was made?
    nope, id be surprised if he had.

  • Jezyboy
    Jezyboy Posts: 3,601
    david37 said:

    ddraver said:

    Jezyboy said:

    The current culture of Internet shaming means that in many cases, individuals can suffer greatly from being racist or (if I'm being contentious) being seen to be racist.

    Being racist on twitter can see you getting sacked which is disastrous on an individual level. Whereas having one racist joke made about you probably doesn't do extreme harm.

    Of course, over time lots of racist abuse is going to be awful for anyone's mental state.

    So what's the answer? I don't have a clue.

    don't be racist?
    Like Danny Baker? Obviously don't be racist but for me he wasn't racist and he lost his job/career over accusations of racism and has to live with the stigma of that. I use that example as it relates to Meghan and Harry.

    Individual cases have to be taken as such.
    If you honestly think white people suffer more from accusations of racism that victims of racism I don't think you understand the problem, genuinely.
    You're not wrong, but isn't this actually just a type of whataboutery?

    What is it about racism that makes it OK for someone to have their life ruined by false accusations of it?
    Explain to me how you call it out then?

    What's your solution? You have evidence across the board of constant and relentless racism and you're worried about a radio presenter gobshite on a radio station with a small audience?


    There is absolutely a problem that when you discuss the issue of racism or diversity, white men, especially older men, feel threatened by the discussion, and often feel accused.

    In the real world one needs to be sensitive to that as they are usually (or in my experience always) the people with the power to change it. If you want to make progress, you need to approach it in a different way (which, FWIW, I do and have, with success).

    The reaction to "but what about false accusations" is really a question of feeling threatened by something - you're worried you or someone you know and like might be falsely accused.

    But because you likely don't know many young black men, you're quite relaxed about the *police* falsely accusing them of a crime, for example.

    So there is a disconnect. I get it, it threatens white men and they're not used to that - and i'll include myself in that.

    But the solution to the racism problem isn't to say "let's not talk about it" or "keep it to yourself" or "only bring it when someone says something explicit" because that doesn't move the dial on the actual problem.

    Constant and incessant racism across the board?????? no constant whining

    White men feel accused??? they are. Directly and regularly.

    Personally unlike most on here im not racist. I treat people as people, I think of people as people and if they're black or white straight or gay or bi or young or old they're people.

    Perhaps if some victim groups stopped identifying themselves by their characteristics they could get on and achieve something.

    they perpetuate the problem. no one owes anyone a living, sooner they get that through whatever status related shoulder chips they're carrying the sooner we can all get on.

    and this constant snowflake rushing from one panic to another like a flock of chicken lickins exacerbates the problem. there needs to be balance for progress.

    eg person drives round London on the wrong side of the road, refuses to identify themselves then kicks off is not racism. and being an MP or athlete doesn't make acting like a drug dealer any less likely to get you pulled over.







    Haha.

    Complains about white men being accused of racism, then goes and calls everyone on here racist.

  • ddraver
    ddraver Posts: 26,691

    Blimey, people are getting in a froth again on here!

    I thought the Royal Family were losing their relevance with younger generations - seems to not be the case at all.

    There are only about 3 of us under 40 here...
    We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
    - @ddraver
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,094
    edited March 2021
    I, personally, am shocked to hear that there may be hints of a slightly less than progressive attitude among at least one member of a hereditary royal family. To. The. Core.
  • blazing_saddles
    blazing_saddles Posts: 22,722



    If you choose to characterise an entire family in 2021 based upon the historical remarks of a bloke born in 1921, then Harry’s more recent racist misdemeanours would have to characterise his new family.

    A better question from the journo might have been "is anyone in your family racist?"

    Absolutely.
    Far better
    "Science is a tool for cheaters". An anonymous French PE teacher.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661



    If you choose to characterise an entire family in 2021 based upon the historical remarks of a bloke born in 1921, then Harry’s more recent racist misdemeanours would have to characterise his new family.

    A better question from the journo might have been "is anyone in your family racist?"

    Absolutely.
    Far better
    It's about as helpful as asking a rider if they're doping, or "is anyone on your team doping?"