Seemingly trivial things that intrigue you
Comments
-
When I was in Sweden, they were testing the European fighter jet - from the same base as the SAAB Viggen, not far from where I was.focuszing723 said:I'm glad for the pilot, but when a £90,000,000 F35 jet crashes in the sea, is it insured?
https://www.forces.net/news/what-you-need-know-about-f-35b#:~:text=How much do the jets,grand total of £190m.
One of the fighter jets crashed in a field and the headline in Svenska Dagbladet was: Världens dyraste plog.
'The world's most expensive plough'.seanoconn - gruagach craic!0 -
The family is hardly normal and certainly don't see things as most people would, what did the article say? I'm going to have to go looking and will probably regret it.rjsterry said:That Rachel Johnson article in the Spectator. Why on earth would you write such a thing? Even if that's what you thought.
0 -
I'll try too but IIRC, you need a subscription.veronese68 said:
The family is hardly normal and certainly don't see things as most people would, what did the article say? I'm going to have to go looking and will probably regret it.rjsterry said:That Rachel Johnson article in the Spectator. Why on earth would you write such a thing? Even if that's what you thought.
So far, so good...seanoconn - gruagach craic!0 -
Can't believe she gets paid for writing that drivel.0
-
Are you referring to the dog drivvle followed by the short piece about G Maxwell and if so, which particular comment?rjsterry said:That Rachel Johnson article in the Spectator. Why on earth would you write such a thing? Even if that's what you thought.
She made a few.seanoconn - gruagach craic!0 -
Links please, or it didn't happen. 😉rjsterry said:That Rachel Johnson article in the Spectator. Why on earth would you write such a thing? Even if that's what you thought.
The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
I have a personal opinion on this story.
Anyone able to provide the medical facts?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leicestershire-59323918The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
Can't vouch for medical facts, but I do know a kid who went through a phase where he would literally only eat specific types of cold meat for 2-3 years.pblakeney said:I have a personal opinion on this story.
Anyone able to provide the medical facts?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leicestershire-59323918
His father was in fact a doctor and they were driven to absolute distraction and despair by it.
I also know of parents with autistic children who find it very stressful when firms change their packaging without warning - can trigger tantrums etc.
0 -
Headline: "It's hard not to pity Ghislaine Maxwell"
Amongst mindless stuff about how lovely it is to have a dog.
🤮
1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Part of the anti-growth coalition0 -
Not an ounce of sympathy.
Waste of pixels, but thanks.The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
Why did you read it and then lure other people into reading it? Was it to share the suffering.rjsterry said:Headline: "It's hard not to pity Ghislaine Maxwell"
Amongst mindless stuff about how lovely it is to have a dog.
🤮
(Separately, it is easy to be sympathetic to anyone on remand, they are at that point innocent)1 -
That's what I love about online news, look at the articles and if they wind you up something chronic they can be just skipped passed. The old terrestrial style news is just a suffer fest until the overcast forecast.0
-
They are presumed innocent by the legal system until proved guilty. Obviously if they are subsequently proved guilty, they were already guilty at the point they were charged.TheBigBean said:
Why did you read it and then lure other people into reading it? Was it to share the suffering.rjsterry said:Headline: "It's hard not to pity Ghislaine Maxwell"
Amongst mindless stuff about how lovely it is to have a dog.
🤮
(Separately, it is easy to be sympathetic to anyone on remand, they are at that point innocent)
I don't find it particularly easy to be sympathetic in this case.0 -
especially when they have been in solitary confinement for 500 daysTheBigBean said:
Why did you read it and then lure other people into reading it? Was it to share the suffering.rjsterry said:Headline: "It's hard not to pity Ghislaine Maxwell"
Amongst mindless stuff about how lovely it is to have a dog.
🤮
(Separately, it is easy to be sympathetic to anyone on remand, they are at that point innocent)0 -
Because you know she is guilty of something?kingstongraham said:
They are presumed innocent by the legal system until proved guilty. Obviously if they are subsequently proved guilty, they were already guilty at the point they were charged.TheBigBean said:
Why did you read it and then lure other people into reading it? Was it to share the suffering.rjsterry said:Headline: "It's hard not to pity Ghislaine Maxwell"
Amongst mindless stuff about how lovely it is to have a dog.
🤮
(Separately, it is easy to be sympathetic to anyone on remand, they are at that point innocent)
I don't find it particularly easy to be sympathetic in this case.1 -
Given the state of US prisons, I think I'd choose solitary, but probably I have no idea what I'm talking about?surrey_commuter said:
especially when they have been in solitary confinement for 500 daysTheBigBean said:
Why did you read it and then lure other people into reading it? Was it to share the suffering.rjsterry said:Headline: "It's hard not to pity Ghislaine Maxwell"
Amongst mindless stuff about how lovely it is to have a dog.
🤮
(Separately, it is easy to be sympathetic to anyone on remand, they are at that point innocent)1 -
She's going through the legal process.TheBigBean said:
Because you know she is guilty of something?kingstongraham said:
They are presumed innocent by the legal system until proved guilty. Obviously if they are subsequently proved guilty, they were already guilty at the point they were charged.TheBigBean said:
Why did you read it and then lure other people into reading it? Was it to share the suffering.rjsterry said:Headline: "It's hard not to pity Ghislaine Maxwell"
Amongst mindless stuff about how lovely it is to have a dog.
🤮
(Separately, it is easy to be sympathetic to anyone on remand, they are at that point innocent)
I don't find it particularly easy to be sympathetic in this case.0 -
😆TheBigBean said:
Why did you read it and then lure other people into reading it? Was it to share the suffering.rjsterry said:Headline: "It's hard not to pity Ghislaine Maxwell"
Amongst mindless stuff about how lovely it is to have a dog.
🤮
(Separately, it is easy to be sympathetic to anyone on remand, they are at that point innocent)
No, I was just intrigued that the apparently more well adjusted member of the family should write something so obviously lacking in self-awareness.1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Part of the anti-growth coalition0 -
Why do car companies make cars with daytime running lights on the front but not the rear?
I see load of people driving around with no rear lights at this time of year and when I pass them the front DRLs are usually on - presumably giving the impression to the driver that their proper lights are on (i guess it lights up the dash as well?)
Surely once you are permanently wiring in the front lights, you'd do the rear at the same time, especially since the LED bulbs pretty much last forever.0 -
And why do they make the DRLs brighter than the sun and angled appallingly.monkimark said:Why do car companies make cars with daytime running lights on the front but not the rear?
I see load of people driving around with no rear lights at this time of year and when I pass them the front DRLs are usually on - presumably giving the impression to the driver that their proper lights are on (i guess it lights up the dash as well?)
Surely once you are permanently wiring in the front lights, you'd do the rear at the same time, especially since the LED bulbs pretty much last forever.0 -
I would add a slightly between apparently and more there.rjsterry said:
😆TheBigBean said:
Why did you read it and then lure other people into reading it? Was it to share the suffering.rjsterry said:Headline: "It's hard not to pity Ghislaine Maxwell"
Amongst mindless stuff about how lovely it is to have a dog.
🤮
(Separately, it is easy to be sympathetic to anyone on remand, they are at that point innocent)
No, I was just intrigued that the apparently more well adjusted member of the family should write something so obviously lacking in self-awareness.
I think it's an odd thing to write about... Maybe she was struggling to provide the requisite number of words0 -
That next Wednesday marks the 30th (thirtieth) anniversary of the death of Freddie Mercury. That's 30 years. Xxxx I feel old.0
-
Another one bites the dust.
Who wants to live forever.0 -
If it makes you feel any better I have a hifi older than that. It is mostly in the loft though. 😉 I'm waiting on someone who will appreciate a NAD 3020 system and Dolby.orraloon said:That next Wednesday marks the 30th (thirtieth) anniversary of the death of Freddie Mercury. That's 30 years. Xxxx I feel old.
The Technics turntable stays mine and will be used again when wfh office is history though.
The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
More than 40 years since John Lennon was shot.orraloon said:That next Wednesday marks the 30th (thirtieth) anniversary of the death of Freddie Mercury. That's 30 years. Xxxx I feel old.
Open One+ BMC TE29 Seven 622SL On One Scandal Cervelo RS0 -
Blur's debut album is more than 30 years old.orraloon said:That next Wednesday marks the 30th (thirtieth) anniversary of the death of Freddie Mercury. That's 30 years. Xxxx I feel old.
(By months).
The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
-
C
MM minor is currently using that amp and turntable combo, having been rescued from the loft after a 20 year break.pblakeney said:
If it makes you feel any better I have a hifi older than that. It is mostly in the loft though. 😉 I'm waiting on someone who will appreciate a NAD 3020 system and Dolby.orraloon said:That next Wednesday marks the 30th (thirtieth) anniversary of the death of Freddie Mercury. That's 30 years. Xxxx I feel old.
The Technics turntable will be used again when wfh office is history though.
1 -
I ought to get my Quad 606 amp repaired... a great bit of kit, until, er, it stopped working.0