Wife of ISIS fighter wants to return to the UK

rjsterry

Alejandrosdog wrote:

rjsterry wrote:

Alejandrosdog wrote:

rjsterry wrote:

I think it's the wishing someone dead because of their thoughts or actions. Doesn't sound all that different from "death to the apostates".

I think some more rigorous thinking would help you there.

Well either you wish someone dead or you don't. You've made it pretty clear which side of the fence you sit on.

So to summarise, your deep and intense thinking brings you to the point where governments not acting as you think, or posters on bike radar not having the same terrorist appeasing approach that you appear to prefer, means they are to be dismissed by assigning terrorist tags to them.

Riiiiight. Any more tantrums from bed wetting Islington?

The government hasn't said they want her dead. That's just you. Feel free to keep making chippy but irrelevant references to random bits of London.

shirley_basso

Surrey Commuter wrote:

Alejandrosdog wrote:

darkhairedlord wrote:

rjsterry wrote:

Alejandrosdog wrote:

rjsterry wrote:

I think it's the wishing someone dead because of their thoughts or actions. Doesn't sound all that different from "death to the apostates".

I think some more rigorous thinking would help you there.

Well either you wish someone dead or you don't. You've made it pretty clear which side of the fence you sit on.

Bet he voted brexit too.

Def voted brexit and favour a hard brexit. I also did rather well with the scientists statistics test.

Man joins website and adopts the persona of a moron, man tires of being thought of as a moron and tries to change his persona by writing some meaningless words and takes up using baffling emojis... how long until the flounce?

I only know three Leavers in the real world, one wants soft and the other two are pensioner mad. On here there are only you Coopster and SteveO so could I ask why you want a hard Brexit

Stevo is a remainder but making the most of the situation. No point pushing water uphill

surrey_commuter

Shirley Basso wrote:

Surrey Commuter wrote:

Alejandrosdog wrote:

darkhairedlord wrote:

rjsterry wrote:

Alejandrosdog wrote:

rjsterry wrote:

I think it's the wishing someone dead because of their thoughts or actions. Doesn't sound all that different from "death to the apostates".

I think some more rigorous thinking would help you there.

Well either you wish someone dead or you don't. You've made it pretty clear which side of the fence you sit on.

Bet he voted brexit too.

Def voted brexit and favour a hard brexit. I also did rather well with the scientists statistics test.

Man joins website and adopts the persona of a moron, man tires of being thought of as a moron and tries to change his persona by writing some meaningless words and takes up using baffling emojis... how long until the flounce?

I only know three Leavers in the real world, one wants soft and the other two are pensioner mad. On here there are only you Coopster and SteveO so could I ask why you want a hard Brexit

Stevo is a remainder but making the most of the situation. No point pushing water uphill

But he does a very good impression of a Leaver and as such is the best we have

Stevo_666

Shirley Basso wrote:

Surrey Commuter wrote:

Alejandrosdog wrote:

darkhairedlord wrote:

rjsterry wrote:

Alejandrosdog wrote:

rjsterry wrote:

I think it's the wishing someone dead because of their thoughts or actions. Doesn't sound all that different from "death to the apostates".

I think some more rigorous thinking would help you there.

Well either you wish someone dead or you don't. You've made it pretty clear which side of the fence you sit on.

Bet he voted brexit too.

Def voted brexit and favour a hard brexit. I also did rather well with the scientists statistics test.

Man joins website and adopts the persona of a moron, man tires of being thought of as a moron and tries to change his persona by writing some meaningless words and takes up using baffling emojis... how long until the flounce?

I only know three Leavers in the real world, one wants soft and the other two are pensioner mad. On here there are only you Coopster and SteveO so could I ask why you want a hard Brexit

Stevo is a remainder but making the most of the situation. No point pushing water uphill

That sounds mathematical to me Shirley but honestly, how many times to I need to tell people which way I voted in 2016? :roll: And they say that leavers are thick

rolf_f

Stevo 666 wrote:

Shirley Basso wrote:

Surrey Commuter wrote:

Alejandrosdog wrote:

darkhairedlord wrote:

rjsterry wrote:

Alejandrosdog wrote:

rjsterry wrote:

I think it's the wishing someone dead because of their thoughts or actions. Doesn't sound all that different from "death to the apostates".

I think some more rigorous thinking would help you there.

Well either you wish someone dead or you don't. You've made it pretty clear which side of the fence you sit on.

Bet he voted brexit too.

Def voted brexit and favour a hard brexit. I also did rather well with the scientists statistics test.

Man joins website and adopts the persona of a moron, man tires of being thought of as a moron and tries to change his persona by writing some meaningless words and takes up using baffling emojis... how long until the flounce?

I only know three Leavers in the real world, one wants soft and the other two are pensioner mad. On here there are only you Coopster and SteveO so could I ask why you want a hard Brexit

Stevo is a remainder but making the most of the situation. No point pushing water uphill

That sounds mathematical to me Shirley but honestly, how many times to I need to tell people which way I voted in 2016? :roll: And they say that leavers are thick

Surely you can understand though. I mean, TM is/was a remainer. It gets confusing. Though, in reality, TM is simply a demented party obsessed Tory who doesn't care much about anything else.

shirley_basso

Alejandrosdog wrote:

Hopefully he's judged fairly before people benevolently decide he should have the the right support and punishment.

Sexism isnt illegal. Even in PC Britain.

Alejandro's views on an alleged spouse abuser.

Alejandrosdog

Shirley Basso wrote:

Alejandrosdog wrote:

Hopefully he's judged fairly before people benevolently decide he should have the the right support and punishment.

Sexism isnt illegal. Even in PC Britain.

Alejandro's views on an alleged spouse abuser.

Yes? whats the issue? Man alledged to have committed crime, hasnt admitted them. is it ridiculous to not condem him till he's found guilty or are you one of the shrill internets who condemn people for pc reasons? its funny how your views change with the wind. Take wiggins the drug cheat as an example.

Its not like the terrorist, it's a fact she supports ISIS.

Of course you can pillory me for taking a reasoned approach but it just makes you look like a twunt.

Alejandrosdog

Surrey Commuter wrote:

Alejandrosdog wrote:

darkhairedlord wrote:

rjsterry wrote:

Alejandrosdog wrote:

rjsterry wrote:

I think it's the wishing someone dead because of their thoughts or actions. Doesn't sound all that different from "death to the apostates".

I think some more rigorous thinking would help you there.

Well either you wish someone dead or you don't. You've made it pretty clear which side of the fence you sit on.

Bet he voted brexit too.

Def voted brexit and favour a hard brexit. I also did rather well with the scientists statistics test.

Man joins website and adopts the persona of a moron, man tires of being thought of as a moron and tries to change his persona by writing some meaningless words and takes up using baffling emojis... how long until the flounce?

I only know three Leavers in the real world, one wants soft and the other two are pensioner mad. On here there are only you Coopster and SteveO so could I ask why you want a hard Brexit

Any more deductions or have you finished reverting to name calling in the face of your inadequacy?

thegreatdivide

Surrey Commuter wrote:

Man joins website and adopts the persona of a moron

You do realise it's Vino's Ghost don't you? Gave his new alter ego away after posting 'lolol'.

rjsterry

thegreatdivide wrote:

Surrey Commuter wrote:

Man joins website and adopts the persona of a moron

You do realise it's Vino's Ghost don't you? Gave his new alter ego away after posting 'lolol'.

I wonder what his next persona will be after the inevitable flounce/ban. Renshaw's Hamster?

Stevo_666

Rolf F wrote:

Surely you can understand though. I mean, TM is/was a remainer. It gets confusing. Though, in reality, TM is simply a demented party obsessed Tory who doesn't care much about anything else.

You're welcome to your view Rolf. Just trying to avoid the repeated misunderstandings when I dare to question anything about the EU or those that worship it so unreservedly

Alejandrosdog

rjsterry wrote:

Alejandrosdog wrote:

rjsterry wrote:

Alejandrosdog wrote:

rjsterry wrote:

I think it's the wishing someone dead because of their thoughts or actions. Doesn't sound all that different from "death to the apostates".

I think some more rigorous thinking would help you there.

Well either you wish someone dead or you don't. You've made it pretty clear which side of the fence you sit on.

So to summarise, your deep and intense thinking brings you to the point where governments not acting as you think, or posters on bike radar not having the same terrorist appeasing approach that you appear to prefer, means they are to be dismissed by assigning terrorist tags to them.

Riiiiight. Any more tantrums from bed wetting Islington?

The government hasn't said they want her dead. That's just you. Feel free to keep making chippy but irrelevant references to random bits of London.

Ive never said the government wants her dead, thats just you getting all histrionic again.

Alejandrosdog

rjsterry wrote:

thegreatdivide wrote:

Surrey Commuter wrote:

Man joins website and adopts the persona of a moron

You do realise it's Vino's Ghost don't you? Gave his new alter ego away after posting 'lolol'.

I wonder what his next persona will be after the inevitable flounce/ban. Renshaw's Hamster?

what is this flounce you speak of? ban? quite possibly, snowflakes like you get ever so upset when you dont agree with them their views or PC dogma.

rjsterry

Alejandrosdog wrote:

rjsterry wrote:

Alejandrosdog wrote:

rjsterry wrote:

Alejandrosdog wrote:

rjsterry wrote:

I think it's the wishing someone dead because of their thoughts or actions. Doesn't sound all that different from "death to the apostates".

I think some more rigorous thinking would help you there.

Well either you wish someone dead or you don't. You've made it pretty clear which side of the fence you sit on.

So to summarise, your deep and intense thinking brings you to the point where governments not acting as you think, or posters on bike radar not having the same terrorist appeasing approach that you appear to prefer, means they are to be dismissed by assigning terrorist tags to them.

Riiiiight. Any more tantrums from bed wetting Islington?

The government hasn't said they want her dead. That's just you. Feel free to keep making chippy but irrelevant references to random bits of London.

Ive never said the government wants her dead, thats just you getting all histrionic again.

And I didn't say that you said that either. What else did either of us not say. Not sure where the histrionics are supposed to be, but the argument seems to boil down to whether you think terrorists are just another variety of particularly homicidal criminal or some special category deserving extrajudicial treatment. You seem to favour the latter and others including myself favour the former approach. They're not special. They're just murderers or accessories to murder with some trumped up political or religious 'justification'.

As for the flounce, I seem to remember a stormy exit from your previous login, but perhaps I'm muddling you up with someone else. Sorry if that's not the case.

Alejandrosdog

rjsterry wrote:

Alejandrosdog wrote:

rjsterry wrote:

Alejandrosdog wrote:

rjsterry wrote:

Alejandrosdog wrote:

rjsterry wrote:

I think it's the wishing someone dead because of their thoughts or actions. Doesn't sound all that different from "death to the apostates".

I think some more rigorous thinking would help you there.

Well either you wish someone dead or you don't. You've made it pretty clear which side of the fence you sit on.

So to summarise, your deep and intense thinking brings you to the point where governments not acting as you think, or posters on bike radar not having the same terrorist appeasing approach that you appear to prefer, means they are to be dismissed by assigning terrorist tags to them.

Riiiiight. Any more tantrums from bed wetting Islington?

The government hasn't said they want her dead. That's just you. Feel free to keep making chippy but irrelevant references to random bits of London.

Ive never said the government wants her dead, thats just you getting all histrionic again.

And I didn't say that you said that either. What else did either of us not say. Not sure where the histrionics are supposed to be, but the argument seems to boil down to whether you think terrorists are just another variety of particularly homicidal criminal or some special category deserving extrajudicial treatment. You seem to favour the latter and others including myself favour the former approach. They're not special. They're just murderers or accessories to murder with some trumped up political or religious 'justification'.

As for the flounce, I seem to remember a stormy exit from your previous login, but perhaps I'm muddling you up with someone else. Sorry if that's not the case.

You certainly are confusing me with someone else. Probably not the only thing you find confusing .

How are you getting on with shoe laces?

rjsterry

Alejandrosdog wrote:

rjsterry wrote:

Alejandrosdog wrote:

rjsterry wrote:

Alejandrosdog wrote:

rjsterry wrote:

Alejandrosdog wrote:

rjsterry wrote:

I think it's the wishing someone dead because of their thoughts or actions. Doesn't sound all that different from "death to the apostates".

I think some more rigorous thinking would help you there.

Well either you wish someone dead or you don't. You've made it pretty clear which side of the fence you sit on.

So to summarise, your deep and intense thinking brings you to the point where governments not acting as you think, or posters on bike radar not having the same terrorist appeasing approach that you appear to prefer, means they are to be dismissed by assigning terrorist tags to them.

Riiiiight. Any more tantrums from bed wetting Islington?

The government hasn't said they want her dead. That's just you. Feel free to keep making chippy but irrelevant references to random bits of London.

Ive never said the government wants her dead, thats just you getting all histrionic again.

And I didn't say that you said that either. What else did either of us not say. Not sure where the histrionics are supposed to be, but the argument seems to boil down to whether you think terrorists are just another variety of particularly homicidal criminal or some special category deserving extrajudicial treatment. You seem to favour the latter and others including myself favour the former approach. They're not special. They're just murderers or accessories to murder with some trumped up political or religious 'justification'.

As for the flounce, I seem to remember a stormy exit from your previous login, but perhaps I'm muddling you up with someone else. Sorry if that's not the case.

You certainly are confusing me with someone else. Probably not the only thing you find confusing .

How are you getting on with shoe laces?

I managed today but sometimes it is a bit tricky Keep 'em coming.

For someone who accused another poster of immature name calling, you seem very happy to pitch in yourself.

rolf_f

Stevo 666 wrote:

Rolf F wrote:

Surely you can understand though. I mean, TM is/was a remainer. It gets confusing. Though, in reality, TM is simply a demented party obsessed Tory who doesn't care much about anything else.

You're welcome to your view Rolf. Just trying to avoid the repeated misunderstandings when I dare to question anything about the EU or those that worship it so unreservedly

It's your own fault for not fitting into the defined binary opinion options for the thread. I felt the same at school when I sympathised with the miners but not Arthur Scargill. Some folk found that very confusing.

To be fair though, is anyone worshipping the EU unreservedly here? I tend to think that that is the distinction (in generalistic terms) between the remain side and leave. Remainers generally don't think that the EU is perfect whereas a lot of leavers seem to think that there is nothing good about the EU at all. Which probably explains the mess we are in.

david37

Ahhhh common sense prevails and the rights of a terrorist are deemed to be less important than the safety and security of all.

Lets hope she rots in her camp
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56209007

MattFalle

smash or no smash?

david37

its a no smash, the eyes are all over the place. Im long past the training phase

elbowloh

slowmart said:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-47237051


mmm, is there even a decision to be made?


Nope, not shared of repentance, we think you are best suited living within the caliphate of extremism.

Brexit Britain?

kingstongraham

What could be more British than blundering into the middle east without any idea what you're doing, then trying to work out how to get out again?

MattFalle

david37 said:

its a no smash, the eyes are all over the place. Im long past the training phase

At least she could make sure no one was creeping up on you.

david37

MattFalle said:

david37 said:

its a no smash, the eyes are all over the place. Im long past the training phase

At least she could make sure no one was creeping up on you.

hahaha yes.

Keep your eye on the door love

and the window

orraloon

david37 said:

kingstongraham said:

What could be more British than blundering into the middle east without any idea what you're doing, then trying to work out how to get out again?

you think we should have let the unrepentant murdering Bangladeshi filth back?

That might be a little bit too, you know, what's that phrase I'm looking for...? 🤔

elbowloh

orraloon said:

david37 said:

kingstongraham said:

What could be more British than blundering into the middle east without any idea what you're doing, then trying to work out how to get out again?

you think we should have let the unrepentant murdering Bangladeshi filth back?

That might be a little bit too, you know, what's that phrase I'm looking for...? 🤔

Wrong?

elbowloh

She is clearly British.

If she's committed crimes, then she should be tried and punished here.

kingstongraham

david37 said:

kingstongraham said:

What could be more British than blundering into the middle east without any idea what you're doing, then trying to work out how to get out again?

you think blah blah blah etc ?

I've got nothing new to say here, doesn't sound like you do either.

carbonclem

I guess those chuffed she can’t return will never suggest sending law breaking ‘forruns’ back to whence they came?

sungod

on that basis, let's send johnson back to the usa, he's caused more damage to the uk than isis