LEAVE the Conservative Party and save your country!

18568578598618621137

Comments

  • orraloon
    orraloon Posts: 13,308


    ...or a reputable ferry operator.

    That won't be P&O then, the tax dodging Dubai based DP World owned lot that sacked their staff with no notice to boat in cheapo furrin contract staff, and told the parliamentary committee to F off?

  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,631
    edited April 2023
    orraloon said:


    ...or a reputable ferry operator.

    That won't be P&O then, the tax dodging Dubai based DP World owned lot that sacked their staff with no notice to boat in cheapo furrin contract staff, and told the parliamentary committee to F off?

    Fair enough as BJ told business to F off.
    Microsoft seeing it in action.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • First.Aspect
    First.Aspect Posts: 17,503
    orraloon said:


    ...or a reputable ferry operator.

    That won't be P&O then, the tax dodging Dubai based DP World owned lot that sacked their staff with no notice to boat in cheapo furrin contract staff, and told the parliamentary committee to F off?

    There's a market driven win-win solution to P&O staffing problems there somewhere, I'm sure.
  • TheBigBean
    TheBigBean Posts: 22,090
    pblakeney said:

    orraloon said:


    ...or a reputable ferry operator.

    That won't be P&O then, the tax dodging Dubai based DP World owned lot that sacked their staff with no notice to boat in cheapo furrin contract staff, and told the parliamentary committee to F off?

    Fair enough as BJ told business to F off.
    Microsoft seeing it in action.
    Mighty fine flounce from Microsoft.
  • tailwindhome
    tailwindhome Posts: 19,477

    What with both Gullis and the Mail on Sunday's Dan Hodges saying Braverman's gone too far, do you think she might just have gone too far?

    Sometimes its painful watching Hodges work shit out
    “New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!
  • morstar
    morstar Posts: 6,190

    pblakeney said:

    orraloon said:


    ...or a reputable ferry operator.

    That won't be P&O then, the tax dodging Dubai based DP World owned lot that sacked their staff with no notice to boat in cheapo furrin contract staff, and told the parliamentary committee to F off?

    Fair enough as BJ told business to F off.
    Microsoft seeing it in action.
    Mighty fine flounce from Microsoft.
    Yeah, stuff I’ve read saying UK has just been first to respond. Seems likely it won’t/ wouldn’t be approved in US either. More time was bought in Europe but could be blocked there too.
  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 29,926
    Hodges has a pretty credible theory that she is trying to force her own resignation so that in the likely event of the party getting roasted at the next election she is better placed for another leadership bid. In that case perhaps we should all join up and vote for her...
    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition
  • morstar
    morstar Posts: 6,190

    This'll have football supporters flocking back to the Tories.

    Real man of the people stuff.

    Do you give him credit for trying, or grief for failure to recognise your own limitations.
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,631

    This'll have football supporters flocking back to the Tories.

    Give him time.
    He may one day master how to fake sincerity.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • bm5
    bm5 Posts: 605
    He'll be devastated as they lost on penalties.
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,974
    I've he's fine, he'll be perfectly prepared for the type of videos that Farage does where people pay good money for a quick video message. Good planning on Sunak's part.
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,974
    edited April 2023
    I like this interview with Anthony Seldon, headmaster (amongst other things) and co-author of the book on Johnson as PM. Not least as I agree with his mention of Starmer:

    “If Johnson understood more about classical philosophy, he’d have recognised that an antithesis – being against something – isn’t enough. The country now needs a synthesis from whichever party. The great prime ministers are healers and teachers. They need to be able to tell a story of where they have come from and to where they will lead us.”

    Is that leader evident to him?

    “Well,” he says, “this is the reason why for the moment Starmer is disappointing, because there is this enormous desire for renewal. But Starmer seems micro when he could be macro, cautious when he could be passionate, dull where he could be inspirational.”


    https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/apr/30/anthony-seldon-boris-johnson-at-10-biography-interview

    I can't see Starmer ever being inspirational, but at least he's not a Tory, and that'll have to do for now.
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,631
    It's all rather disappointing though. We should be able to produce better.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,302
    pblakeney said:

    It's all rather disappointing though. We should be able to produce better.

    They tried one that excited Labour members.
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,631
    edited April 2023

    pblakeney said:

    It's all rather disappointing though. We should be able to produce better.

    They tried one that excited Labour members.
    I said better, not popular.
    Although you have to be popular to get elected. It's a conundrum.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • Jezyboy
    Jezyboy Posts: 3,678
    pblakeney said:

    pblakeney said:

    It's all rather disappointing though. We should be able to produce better.

    They tried one that excited Labour members.
    I said better, not popular.
    Although you have to be popular to get elected. It's a conundrum.
    Is there any MP across any of the parties who you look at and go, yep they'd do a better job?

    Angela Raynor's definitely more exciting, but doesn't have the feeling of a safe pair of hands.

  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,660
    edited April 2023
    No labour fan but the hope is Starmer is like a Biden.

    Spends more time listening to experts and acting on it.

    Just a good job would be good. Tbh if he laid out some labour vision for the UK it’d put people off.

    After this shower of sh!t I think we’ve all been put off ideological governance.
  • Stevo_666
    Stevo_666 Posts: 62,019
    Jezyboy said:

    pblakeney said:

    pblakeney said:

    It's all rather disappointing though. We should be able to produce better.

    They tried one that excited Labour members.
    I said better, not popular.
    Although you have to be popular to get elected. It's a conundrum.
    Is there any MP across any of the parties who you look at and go, yep they'd do a better job?

    Angela Raynor's definitely more exciting, but doesn't have the feeling of a safe pair of hands.

    You're the master of understatement there. She's not even a safe pair of legs if 'Growlergate' was anything to go by.
    "I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,660
    I suspect our hopes will be dashed on all accounts. His political experience is exclusively during the sh!tshow era.
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,631
    Jezyboy said:

    pblakeney said:

    pblakeney said:

    It's all rather disappointing though. We should be able to produce better.

    They tried one that excited Labour members.
    I said better, not popular.
    Although you have to be popular to get elected. It's a conundrum.
    Is there any MP across any of the parties who you look at and go, yep they'd do a better job?

    Nope.
    That's why I said it was disappointing. No point in persisting with proven failure though.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,974

    No labour fan but the hope is Starmer is like a Biden.

    Spends more time listening to experts and acting on it.

    Just a good job would be good. Tbh if he laid out some labour vision for the UK it’d put people off.

    After this shower of sh!t I think we’ve all been put off ideological governance.


    On current performances, I'd prefer to see Yvette Cooper at the helm, I think - she seems to marshal her facts well and speaks with authority. I realise that "It'll do" isn't the best selling point for anything, but if Labour can send the Tories off to re-invent themselves into something other than an angry, backward-looking party of people who think that government is about winding up lefties, I don't care at this point if it's scripted from focus-groups. It'll do.

    But I still find the pre-scripting of everything - on both sides - tiresome, and I can't think of anyone on either side who has been able to show a sharpness of wit without a script that inspires and gives a vision, as both Blair and Obama did (even if they weren't your politics), and on the other side, Thatcher and Reagan did previously. Mind you, maybe Reagan didn't share the 'sharpness of wit' for which I pine, but at least he got reasonable scripts which he delivered well.
  • Jezyboy
    Jezyboy Posts: 3,678

    No labour fan but the hope is Starmer is like a Biden.

    Spends more time listening to experts and acting on it.

    Just a good job would be good. Tbh if he laid out some labour vision for the UK it’d put people off.

    After this shower of sh!t I think we’ve all been put off ideological governance.


    On current performances, I'd prefer to see Yvette Cooper at the helm, I think - she seems to marshal her facts well and speaks with authority. I realise that "It'll do" isn't the best selling point for anything, but if Labour can send the Tories off to re-invent themselves into something other than an angry, backward-looking party of people who think that government is about winding up lefties, I don't care at this point if it's scripted from focus-groups. It'll do.

    But I still find the pre-scripting of everything - on both sides - tiresome, and I can't think of anyone on either side who has been able to show a sharpness of wit without a script that inspires and gives a vision, as both Blair and Obama did (even if they weren't your politics), and on the other side, Thatcher and Reagan did previously. Mind you, maybe Reagan didn't share the 'sharpness of wit' for which I pine, but at least he got reasonable scripts which he delivered well.
    Part of me thinks it must be something to do with the modern news cycle, the rolling news channels were bad, but twitter makes it a lot worse.
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,974
    Jezyboy said:

    No labour fan but the hope is Starmer is like a Biden.

    Spends more time listening to experts and acting on it.

    Just a good job would be good. Tbh if he laid out some labour vision for the UK it’d put people off.

    After this shower of sh!t I think we’ve all been put off ideological governance.


    On current performances, I'd prefer to see Yvette Cooper at the helm, I think - she seems to marshal her facts well and speaks with authority. I realise that "It'll do" isn't the best selling point for anything, but if Labour can send the Tories off to re-invent themselves into something other than an angry, backward-looking party of people who think that government is about winding up lefties, I don't care at this point if it's scripted from focus-groups. It'll do.

    But I still find the pre-scripting of everything - on both sides - tiresome, and I can't think of anyone on either side who has been able to show a sharpness of wit without a script that inspires and gives a vision, as both Blair and Obama did (even if they weren't your politics), and on the other side, Thatcher and Reagan did previously. Mind you, maybe Reagan didn't share the 'sharpness of wit' for which I pine, but at least he got reasonable scripts which he delivered well.
    Part of me thinks it must be something to do with the modern news cycle, the rolling news channels were bad, but twitter makes it a lot worse.

    Yes, indeed, including the speed with which any slight verbal gaffe is seized upon as revealing some mental incapacity or hidden plot... it all works against people speaking openly and honestly, or suggesting that they are equivocal or open to changing their minds as events unfold.

    Obviously an instance at the moment would be how the post-Brexit catastrophe is unfolding, but no-one dare utter anything suggesting that it might have been a mistake.

    I still reckon that if Sunak had any guts at all, he'd make a speech like Kinnock did in denouncing Militant, tell the ERG to booger off to Farage, say that for the sake of the UK and business, the experiment had proved a failure, and say that the UK needs to re-join the Single Market and Customs Union. He could sink cautious Starmer by regaining the centre ground.

    Yeah, I know, it's not going to happen, but at this stage, I don't know what they've got to lose. If he lost anyway, he's never going to be poor, unlike Johnson.
  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 29,926
    Stevo_666 said:

    Jezyboy said:

    pblakeney said:

    pblakeney said:

    It's all rather disappointing though. We should be able to produce better.

    They tried one that excited Labour members.
    I said better, not popular.
    Although you have to be popular to get elected. It's a conundrum.
    Is there any MP across any of the parties who you look at and go, yep they'd do a better job?

    Angela Raynor's definitely more exciting, but doesn't have the feeling of a safe pair of hands.

    You're the master of understatement there. She's not even a safe pair of legs if 'Growlergate' was anything to go by.
    Something on your mind?

    😉
    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition
  • Stevo_666
    Stevo_666 Posts: 62,019
    rjsterry said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    Jezyboy said:

    pblakeney said:

    pblakeney said:

    It's all rather disappointing though. We should be able to produce better.

    They tried one that excited Labour members.
    I said better, not popular.
    Although you have to be popular to get elected. It's a conundrum.
    Is there any MP across any of the parties who you look at and go, yep they'd do a better job?

    Angela Raynor's definitely more exciting, but doesn't have the feeling of a safe pair of hands.

    You're the master of understatement there. She's not even a safe pair of legs if 'Growlergate' was anything to go by.
    Something on your mind?

    😉
    I think it was more on Boris' mind when she did her 'Basic Instinct' routine :smile:
    "I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]
  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 29,926
    No judgement passed here. I'm sure we've all got our kinks.
    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition
  • Pross
    Pross Posts: 43,692
    Stevo_666 said:

    rjsterry said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    Jezyboy said:

    pblakeney said:

    pblakeney said:

    It's all rather disappointing though. We should be able to produce better.

    They tried one that excited Labour members.
    I said better, not popular.
    Although you have to be popular to get elected. It's a conundrum.
    Is there any MP across any of the parties who you look at and go, yep they'd do a better job?

    Angela Raynor's definitely more exciting, but doesn't have the feeling of a safe pair of hands.

    You're the master of understatement there. She's not even a safe pair of legs if 'Growlergate' was anything to go by.
    Something on your mind?

    😉
    I think it was more on Boris' mind when she did her 'Basic Instinct' routine :smile:
    Says more about Boris really.
  • Stevo_666
    Stevo_666 Posts: 62,019
    Pross said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    rjsterry said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    Jezyboy said:

    pblakeney said:

    pblakeney said:

    It's all rather disappointing though. We should be able to produce better.

    They tried one that excited Labour members.
    I said better, not popular.
    Although you have to be popular to get elected. It's a conundrum.
    Is there any MP across any of the parties who you look at and go, yep they'd do a better job?

    Angela Raynor's definitely more exciting, but doesn't have the feeling of a safe pair of hands.

    You're the master of understatement there. She's not even a safe pair of legs if 'Growlergate' was anything to go by.
    Something on your mind?

    😉
    I think it was more on Boris' mind when she did her 'Basic Instinct' routine :smile:
    Says more about Boris really.
    Even if she did do that?
    "I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]