2017 Flat Classics thread - will probs have spoilers
Comments
-
Yup. Though he did have a 3rd place in Flanders before that.
Martin's best results in classics are as follows:
MSR: No start
Flanders: 107th
Paris Roubaix: DNF
Amstel Gold: 72nd
LBL: 52nd
Lombardy: No start.
He’s had better placings in the TdF GC.0 -
Rick Chasey wrote:Yup. Though he did have a 3rd place in Flanders before that.
Martin's best results in classics are as follows:
MSR: No start
Flanders: 107th
Paris Roubaix: DNF
Amstel Gold: 72nd
LBL: 52nd
Lombardy: No start.
He’s had better placings in the TdF GC.Twitter: @RichN950 -
I'm not convinced, must be said. His best chance is if a group comes together at 20-10km to go, but a) in sceptical he has the tank beyond 200km and b) in that scenario it's a headwind which is not conducive to his style of winning - nor is he on a team like quick step who will likely have numbers at the finale.
Anyway, we'll watch with interest.
I'd be looking at riders who have been creeping up the results over the past few years rather than a big name who is turning to the classics.
If you're looking at a 'big name turning to the classics', I think Gallopin is a better shout.0 -
Rick Chasey wrote:
I'd be looking at riders who have been creeping up the results over the past few years rather than a big name who is turning to the classics.
If you're looking at a 'big name turning to the classics', I think Gallopin is a better shout.
Agreed. He'll be a dark horse for Flanders, but I expect Sagan to repeat.It's a little like wrestling a gorilla. You don't quit when you're tired. You quit when the gorilla is tired.0 -
RichN95 wrote:Rick Chasey wrote:Yup. Though he did have a 3rd place in Flanders before that.
Martin's best results in classics are as follows:
MSR: No start
Flanders: 107th
Paris Roubaix: DNF
Amstel Gold: 72nd
LBL: 52nd
Lombardy: No start.
He’s had better placings in the TdF GC.
I agree with this. He is unusual in having never tried to win something he may well be good at. The distance is a concern, but I still think he could ride a lot of riders off his wheel over the cobbles. I also think he has a better chance of making a gap stick than my other man Sep. (Less chance of creating the gap though.)0 -
Whether you believe in flat backs or not, Sagan has never really done that well at P-R.0
-
TheBigBean wrote:Whether you believe in flat backs or not, Sagan has never really done that well at P-R.
I was going to make a related point on Martin - what makes him fast on the flat isn't just his legs, but on his body shape - very narrow shoulders, ability to generate long durations of power in a very low position.
That's all less useful on the cobbles, over the big power merchants. He's also right on the lower limit of what's old farts say is workable on cobbles - 75 kilos.
Anyway, this is sounding all like i'm hating on Martin and I'm not. I'm pleased he's turning his head towards the races I enjoy the most - the more big names the better.
I'm a little (only a little) sceptical.0 -
Rick has turned green
Just want to highlight this0 -
-
Rick Chasey wrote:TheBigBean wrote:Whether you believe in flat backs or not, Sagan has never really done that well at P-R.
I was going to make a related point on Martin - what makes him fast on the flat isn't just his legs, but on his body shape - very narrow shoulders, ability to generate long durations of power in a very low position.
That's all less useful on the cobbles, over the big power merchants. He's also right on the lower limit of what's old farts say is workable on cobbles - 75 kilos.
Anyway, this is sounding all like i'm hating on Martin and I'm not. I'm pleased he's turning his head towards the races I enjoy the most - the more big names the better.
I'm a little (only a little) sceptical.Twitter: @RichN950 -
RichN95 wrote:Rick Chasey wrote:TheBigBean wrote:Whether you believe in flat backs or not, Sagan has never really done that well at P-R.
I was going to make a related point on Martin - what makes him fast on the flat isn't just his legs, but on his body shape - very narrow shoulders, ability to generate long durations of power in a very low position.
That's all less useful on the cobbles, over the big power merchants. He's also right on the lower limit of what's old farts say is workable on cobbles - 75 kilos.
Anyway, this is sounding all like i'm hating on Martin and I'm not. I'm pleased he's turning his head towards the races I enjoy the most - the more big names the better.
I'm a little (only a little) sceptical.
(I'm only going on because it's Friday and it's been a successful week) ja and the fact Terpstra did make the move and Wiggins didn't is the difference of experience!0 -
Rick Chasey wrote:
(I'm only going on because it's Friday and it's been a successful week) ja and the fact Terpstra did make the move and Wiggins didn't is the difference of experience!
We'll have our answer on April 9thTwitter: @RichN950 -
-
Omloop boss not entirely over the moon about moving up into the WT.
http://www.cyclingweekly.co.uk/news/rac ... tus-310907"Science is a tool for cheaters". An anonymous French PE teacher.0 -
Blazing Saddles wrote:Omloop boss not entirely over the moon about moving up into the WT.
http://www.cyclingweekly.co.uk/news/rac ... tus-310907
Odd that they bothered. The UCI must have a good salesman.Twitter: @RichN950 -
Rick Chasey wrote:Whaddya mean?0
-
I would say we should keep an eye on Degenkolb.
He showed in 2015 how he can sandbag like a real hitter in the warm up races and turn it on for the big ones.
If he's on form he's the rival to Sagan. He's like a faster, stronger Kristoff.0 -
Agreed. He's got a stronger team this season too, one that has shown repeatedly that it can support a top tier rider well and with both Stuyven and Theuns maturing, they could be consistently strong.0
-
RichN95 wrote:Blazing Saddles wrote:Omloop boss not entirely over the moon about moving up into the WT.
http://www.cyclingweekly.co.uk/news/rac ... tus-310907
Odd that they bothered. The UCI must have a good salesman.
They only bothered because the Abu Dhabi Tour has World Tour points, so to continue attracting stars in the future they have to offer World Tour points instead of Europe Tour points0 -
Degenkolb for me too,. Best part of the season full stop. I prefer it over the gts0
-
TakeTheHighRoad wrote:RichN95 wrote:Blazing Saddles wrote:Omloop boss not entirely over the moon about moving up into the WT.
http://www.cyclingweekly.co.uk/news/rac ... tus-310907
Odd that they bothered. The UCI must have a good salesman.
They only bothered because the Abu Dhabi Tour has World Tour points, so to continue attracting stars in the future they have to offer World Tour points instead of Europe Tour points
Not sure I agree with that. None of the cobbled Classics guys would go to Abu Dhabi instead of Omloop/KBK.0 -
Sagan and Cav would, particularly if they were told to by their teams who need the points.
Sagan is a "cobbled Classics guy" and Cav's won KBK twice.0 -
We are getting closer !!!0
-
jimmythecuckoo wrote:We are getting closer !!!
Start list looks great:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/features/2017-omloop-het-nieuwsblad-elite-start-list/0 -
-
-
Thought he had gone Wanty. So that's a surprise.
They make the best verandas though, the Willems conglomerate.0 -
-
TakeTheHighRoad wrote:Sagan and Cav would, particularly if they were told to by their teams who need the points.
Sagan is a "cobbled Classics guy" and Cav's won KBK twice.
Why would their teams tell them to? It's Abu Dhabi, not the Tour de France. You could maybe understand it if it were California or another market for the sponsors, but a paltry few sprint points for the WT ranking...surely a bit of ideal prep for the cobbles is preferable.0