Poo tin... Put@in...

17879818384219

Comments

  • DeVlaeminck
    DeVlaeminck Posts: 9,104
    Quite a lot of newly qualified military strategists on twitter etc claiming the Russian campaign is going a lot better than our media are portraying.

    Lots of talk about the Russian way being to encircle cities and create a siege or "cauldron" and then wait for that to degrade opposition forces that are trapped.
    [Castle Donington Ladies FC - going up in '22]
  • tailwindhome
    tailwindhome Posts: 19,436
    edited March 2022
    Interesting blog post from a professor of War Studies, who is to be on Question Time tomorrow night


    https://samf.substack.com/p/giving-peace-a-chance?r=1czpwg&s=r&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email
    “New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!
  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 29,541

    Meanwhile the war seems to have taken the darker turn we were expecting / fearing.

    Sounds like massive civilian casualties and the Russians are using the terror of proper sieges (no food or water or electricity) and bombardement to try and break the spirit.

    Various mass civilian graves. Awful

    Hand wringing about whether we should or shouldn't hand some planes to Ukraine in case Putin takes umbrage when he is bombing maternity hospitals seems a little grotesque.
    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    edited March 2022
    rjsterry said:

    Meanwhile the war seems to have taken the darker turn we were expecting / fearing.

    Sounds like massive civilian casualties and the Russians are using the terror of proper sieges (no food or water or electricity) and bombardement to try and break the spirit.

    Various mass civilian graves. Awful

    Hand wringing about whether we should or shouldn't hand some planes to Ukraine in case Putin takes umbrage when he is bombing maternity hospitals seems a little grotesque.
    You think?

    You don’t want an escalation beyond Ukraine, surely, unless you have enough evidence that will happen anyway.

    US intelligence which had been accurate is saying delivering fighters risks a big escalation hence their reticence
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,143

    morstar said:

    Bet that gets well received on here. :D:D

    I do find it quite interesting that we were proactively tooling them up for weeks.
    I think Britain has been playing a long game in many areas that we’ll never fully appreciate.
    How much of that is credit to Bojo is another matter.

    First rule of Cake Stop - don't give BJ credit for anything.
    Second rule of Cake Stop - See rule No 1.
    Do you not post in Cake Stop?
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    Bally’s a renegade, fearlessly posting against wokism
  • kingstonian
    kingstonian Posts: 2,847
    Lavrov is meeting his Ukrainian counterpart today in Turkey, which will be the most senior Russia-Ukraine meeting since the war started. Don’t hold out much hope for a de-escalation as a result, but at least the two sides are talking.
  • blazing_saddles
    blazing_saddles Posts: 22,725

    Quite a lot of newly qualified military strategists on twitter etc claiming the Russian campaign is going a lot better than our media are portraying.

    Lots of talk about the Russian way being to encircle cities and create a siege or "cauldron" and then wait for that to degrade opposition forces that are trapped.

    At the same time, Russia can also wait for the sanctions, which become more effective the longer this drags on, to degrade their forces, plus a heck of a lot more besides.
    "Science is a tool for cheaters". An anonymous French PE teacher.
  • blazing_saddles
    blazing_saddles Posts: 22,725
    edited March 2022

    rjsterry said:

    Meanwhile the war seems to have taken the darker turn we were expecting / fearing.

    Sounds like massive civilian casualties and the Russians are using the terror of proper sieges (no food or water or electricity) and bombardement to try and break the spirit.

    Various mass civilian graves. Awful

    Hand wringing about whether we should or shouldn't hand some planes to Ukraine in case Putin takes umbrage when he is bombing maternity hospitals seems a little grotesque.
    You think?

    You don’t want an escalation beyond Ukraine, surely, unless you have enough evidence that will happen anyway.

    US intelligence which had been accurate is saying delivering fighters risks a big escalation hence their reticence
    Since they are already prepared to bomb maternity hospitals and target children, what do you think the US mean by "a big escalation"?

    Chemical, biological, tactical or all 3?
    "Science is a tool for cheaters". An anonymous French PE teacher.
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,320
    edited March 2022

    rjsterry said:

    Meanwhile the war seems to have taken the darker turn we were expecting / fearing.

    Sounds like massive civilian casualties and the Russians are using the terror of proper sieges (no food or water or electricity) and bombardement to try and break the spirit.

    Various mass civilian graves. Awful

    Hand wringing about whether we should or shouldn't hand some planes to Ukraine in case Putin takes umbrage when he is bombing maternity hospitals seems a little grotesque.
    You think?

    You don’t want an escalation beyond Ukraine, surely, unless you have enough evidence that will happen anyway.

    US intelligence which had been accurate is saying delivering fighters risks a big escalation hence their reticence
    Since they are already prepared to bomb maternity hospitals and target children, what do you think the US mean by "a big escalation"?

    Chemical, biological, tactical or all 3?
    Chemical and/or biological would possibly be a step too far.
    Extending past Ukraine would be the next step.

    NATO is not going in to defend non-NATO countries.
    Here's a thought though. Has the U.N. been proven to be useless?
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • kingstonian
    kingstonian Posts: 2,847
    Regarding sanctions, I recall hearing that Jaguar Land Rover announced they were pulling out of Russia but does anyone know if other car manufacturers have? I’d kinda hope the likes of Mercedes, BMW and VW Group are doing the same but haven’t heard any confirmation.
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,143

    Regarding sanctions, I recall hearing that Jaguar Land Rover announced they were pulling out of Russia but does anyone know if other car manufacturers have? I’d kinda hope the likes of Mercedes, BMW and VW Group are doing the same but haven’t heard any confirmation.

    Have you heard of Google?
  • seanoconn
    seanoconn Posts: 11,671

    Regarding sanctions, I recall hearing that Jaguar Land Rover announced they were pulling out of Russia but does anyone know if other car manufacturers have? I’d kinda hope the likes of Mercedes, BMW and VW Group are doing the same but haven’t heard any confirmation.

    Have you heard of Google?
    They don’t have Google in Kingston.
    Pinno, מלך אידיוט וחרא מכונאי
  • First.Aspect
    First.Aspect Posts: 17,162
    pblakeney said:

    rjsterry said:

    Meanwhile the war seems to have taken the darker turn we were expecting / fearing.

    Sounds like massive civilian casualties and the Russians are using the terror of proper sieges (no food or water or electricity) and bombardement to try and break the spirit.

    Various mass civilian graves. Awful

    Hand wringing about whether we should or shouldn't hand some planes to Ukraine in case Putin takes umbrage when he is bombing maternity hospitals seems a little grotesque.
    You think?

    You don’t want an escalation beyond Ukraine, surely, unless you have enough evidence that will happen anyway.

    US intelligence which had been accurate is saying delivering fighters risks a big escalation hence their reticence
    Since they are already prepared to bomb maternity hospitals and target children, what do you think the US mean by "a big escalation"?

    Chemical, biological, tactical or all 3?
    Chemical and/or biological would possibly be a step too far.
    Extending past Ukraine would be the next step.

    NATO is not going in to defend non-NATO countries.
    Here's a thought though. Has the U.N. been proven to be useless?
    pblakeney said:

    rjsterry said:

    Meanwhile the war seems to have taken the darker turn we were expecting / fearing.

    Sounds like massive civilian casualties and the Russians are using the terror of proper sieges (no food or water or electricity) and bombardement to try and break the spirit.

    Various mass civilian graves. Awful

    Hand wringing about whether we should or shouldn't hand some planes to Ukraine in case Putin takes umbrage when he is bombing maternity hospitals seems a little grotesque.
    You think?

    You don’t want an escalation beyond Ukraine, surely, unless you have enough evidence that will happen anyway.

    US intelligence which had been accurate is saying delivering fighters risks a big escalation hence their reticence
    Since they are already prepared to bomb maternity hospitals and target children, what do you think the US mean by "a big escalation"?

    Chemical, biological, tactical or all 3?
    Chemical and/or biological would possibly be a step too far.
    Extending past Ukraine would be the next step.

    NATO is not going in to defend non-NATO countries.
    Here's a thought though. Has the U.N. been proven to be useless?
    Disagree. Chemical is next, then blame on Ukraine itself, sponsored by the US. They are already teeing this up and they have done this in the recent past.
  • MattFalle
    MattFalle Posts: 11,644
    remember the asset and equipt tie up re the wounded.

    that's a major part of what will be slowing them down as well.
    .
    The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,320

    pblakeney said:

    rjsterry said:

    Meanwhile the war seems to have taken the darker turn we were expecting / fearing.

    Sounds like massive civilian casualties and the Russians are using the terror of proper sieges (no food or water or electricity) and bombardement to try and break the spirit.

    Various mass civilian graves. Awful

    Hand wringing about whether we should or shouldn't hand some planes to Ukraine in case Putin takes umbrage when he is bombing maternity hospitals seems a little grotesque.
    You think?

    You don’t want an escalation beyond Ukraine, surely, unless you have enough evidence that will happen anyway.

    US intelligence which had been accurate is saying delivering fighters risks a big escalation hence their reticence
    Since they are already prepared to bomb maternity hospitals and target children, what do you think the US mean by "a big escalation"?

    Chemical, biological, tactical or all 3?
    Chemical and/or biological would possibly be a step too far.
    Extending past Ukraine would be the next step.

    NATO is not going in to defend non-NATO countries.
    Here's a thought though. Has the U.N. been proven to be useless?
    pblakeney said:

    rjsterry said:

    Meanwhile the war seems to have taken the darker turn we were expecting / fearing.

    Sounds like massive civilian casualties and the Russians are using the terror of proper sieges (no food or water or electricity) and bombardement to try and break the spirit.

    Various mass civilian graves. Awful

    Hand wringing about whether we should or shouldn't hand some planes to Ukraine in case Putin takes umbrage when he is bombing maternity hospitals seems a little grotesque.
    You think?

    You don’t want an escalation beyond Ukraine, surely, unless you have enough evidence that will happen anyway.

    US intelligence which had been accurate is saying delivering fighters risks a big escalation hence their reticence
    Since they are already prepared to bomb maternity hospitals and target children, what do you think the US mean by "a big escalation"?

    Chemical, biological, tactical or all 3?
    Chemical and/or biological would possibly be a step too far.
    Extending past Ukraine would be the next step.

    NATO is not going in to defend non-NATO countries.
    Here's a thought though. Has the U.N. been proven to be useless?
    Disagree. Chemical is next, then blame on Ukraine itself, sponsored by the US. They are already teeing this up and they have done this in the recent past.
    I obviously wasn't clear. I think Russia using chemical or biological weapons would be a step too far for the west.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • blazing_saddles
    blazing_saddles Posts: 22,725
    pblakeney said:

    rjsterry said:

    Meanwhile the war seems to have taken the darker turn we were expecting / fearing.

    Sounds like massive civilian casualties and the Russians are using the terror of proper sieges (no food or water or electricity) and bombardement to try and break the spirit.

    Various mass civilian graves. Awful

    Hand wringing about whether we should or shouldn't hand some planes to Ukraine in case Putin takes umbrage when he is bombing maternity hospitals seems a little grotesque.
    You think?

    You don’t want an escalation beyond Ukraine, surely, unless you have enough evidence that will happen anyway.

    US intelligence which had been accurate is saying delivering fighters risks a big escalation hence their reticence
    Since they are already prepared to bomb maternity hospitals and target children, what do you think the US mean by "a big escalation"?

    Chemical, biological, tactical or all 3?
    Chemical and/or biological would possibly be a step too far.
    Extending past Ukraine would be the next step.

    NATO is not going in to defend non-NATO countries.
    Here's a thought though. Has the U.N. been proven to be useless?
    Extending past Ukraine has the Russian army faced with even bigger logistical problems.

    "Science is a tool for cheaters". An anonymous French PE teacher.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    MattFalle said:

    remember the asset and equipt tie up re the wounded.

    that's a major part of what will be slowing them down as well.
    Certainly not the dead, there are * a lot* of reports (though it could be propaganda so let's give it a pinch of salt) that the Russians are not really bothering picking up their own dead - presumably for the reason you're describing above.
  • thegreatdivide
    thegreatdivide Posts: 5,807
    Translation: "The battle in the Brovarsky district: a view from above."



    Looks to me like a load of Russian armour comes into a town, gets pumped, reverses as quick as it can and scatters?

  • shirley_basso
    shirley_basso Posts: 6,195
    Thats gonna destroy morale at home if 10,000s people just MIA. Hard to cover that with propoganda.
  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 29,541

    rjsterry said:

    Meanwhile the war seems to have taken the darker turn we were expecting / fearing.

    Sounds like massive civilian casualties and the Russians are using the terror of proper sieges (no food or water or electricity) and bombardement to try and break the spirit.

    Various mass civilian graves. Awful

    Hand wringing about whether we should or shouldn't hand some planes to Ukraine in case Putin takes umbrage when he is bombing maternity hospitals seems a little grotesque.
    You think?

    You don’t want an escalation beyond Ukraine, surely, unless you have enough evidence that will happen anyway.

    US intelligence which had been accurate is saying delivering fighters risks a big escalation hence their reticence
    Putin is escalating anyway. And now engineering a pretext to use chemical weapons by the sounds of it. Russian media is full of rhetoric about reestablishing Greater Russia so why does anyone think he will stop at Ukraine?
    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition
  • kingstonian
    kingstonian Posts: 2,847

    Regarding sanctions, I recall hearing that Jaguar Land Rover announced they were pulling out of Russia but does anyone know if other car manufacturers have? I’d kinda hope the likes of Mercedes, BMW and VW Group are doing the same but haven’t heard any confirmation.

    Have you heard of Google?

    Haha, oops. I just used that new dangled thing called Google and good to see pretty much all the car manufacturers have fallen in line.
  • kingstonian
    kingstonian Posts: 2,847
    https://apple.news/At7orpXVeRvq626uJ7gxulA

    Abramovich sanctioned by UK government today - will likely throw a huge spanner in the works when it comes to him trying to sell Chelsea FC.

    I read that yesterday his yacht sailed out of a Barcelona dock into the Med, so that’s one asset he’s probably managed to get squirrelled away.
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,320

    pblakeney said:

    rjsterry said:

    Meanwhile the war seems to have taken the darker turn we were expecting / fearing.

    Sounds like massive civilian casualties and the Russians are using the terror of proper sieges (no food or water or electricity) and bombardement to try and break the spirit.

    Various mass civilian graves. Awful

    Hand wringing about whether we should or shouldn't hand some planes to Ukraine in case Putin takes umbrage when he is bombing maternity hospitals seems a little grotesque.
    You think?

    You don’t want an escalation beyond Ukraine, surely, unless you have enough evidence that will happen anyway.

    US intelligence which had been accurate is saying delivering fighters risks a big escalation hence their reticence
    Since they are already prepared to bomb maternity hospitals and target children, what do you think the US mean by "a big escalation"?

    Chemical, biological, tactical or all 3?
    Chemical and/or biological would possibly be a step too far.
    Extending past Ukraine would be the next step.

    NATO is not going in to defend non-NATO countries.
    Here's a thought though. Has the U.N. been proven to be useless?
    Extending past Ukraine has the Russian army faced with even bigger logistical problems.

    True, but you are making the mistake of applying logic to an illogical situation.
    Logic dictates that Putin shouldn’t have invaded in the first place.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • First.Aspect
    First.Aspect Posts: 17,162

    https://apple.news/At7orpXVeRvq626uJ7gxulA

    Abramovich sanctioned by UK government today - will likely throw a huge spanner in the works when it comes to him trying to sell Chelsea FC.

    I read that yesterday his yacht sailed out of a Barcelona dock into the Med, so that’s one asset he’s probably managed to get squirrelled away.

    About bloody time.

    Can that yacht actually leave the Med without being embargoed?
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    So Ambramovich has had all his assets frozen, including Chelsea. No more tickets allowed to be sold, only season ticket holders can go etc.
  • First.Aspect
    First.Aspect Posts: 17,162
    I bet he would still pass the fit and proper person test.

    Is he a person?

    Yes.
  • TheBigBean
    TheBigBean Posts: 21,910

    So Ambramovich has had all his assets frozen, including Chelsea. No more tickets allowed to be sold, only season ticket holders can go etc.

    No distributions to him personally. Tickets are not paid to him personally.