Poo tin... Put@in...

17778808283219

Comments

  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,337

    Bet that gets well received on here. :D:D


    He's still a liar with no principles.
  • ddraver
    ddraver Posts: 26,697
    They'll learn...

    On arrival in Calais most likely
    We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
    - @ddraver
  • ballysmate
    ballysmate Posts: 15,930

    Bet that gets well received on here. :D:D


    He's still a liar with no principles who sent arms and support to a country facing invasion while a large trading bloc with delusions of grandeur discussed the sale of handbags. ;)
    FTFY

  • morstar
    morstar Posts: 6,190

    Bet that gets well received on here. :D:D

    I do find it quite interesting that we were proactively tooling them up for weeks.
    I think Britain has been playing a long game in many areas that we’ll never fully appreciate.
    How much of that is credit to Bojo is another matter.
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,337

    Bet that gets well received on here. :D:D


    He's still a liar with no principles who sent arms and support to a country facing invasion while a large trading bloc with delusions of grandeur discussed the sale of handbags. ;)
    FTFY


    Even unprincipled liars sometimes make passable calls. You might note that I said so with the omicron wave. Mussolini got trains running on time, but that didn't wipe out his other misdemeanours.
  • ballysmate
    ballysmate Posts: 15,930
    morstar said:

    Bet that gets well received on here. :D:D

    I do find it quite interesting that we were proactively tooling them up for weeks.
    I think Britain has been playing a long game in many areas that we’ll never fully appreciate.
    How much of that is credit to Bojo is another matter.

    First rule of Cake Stop - don't give BJ credit for anything.
    Second rule of Cake Stop - See rule No 1.
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,337

    morstar said:

    Bet that gets well received on here. :D:D

    I do find it quite interesting that we were proactively tooling them up for weeks.
    I think Britain has been playing a long game in many areas that we’ll never fully appreciate.
    How much of that is credit to Bojo is another matter.

    First rule of Cake Stop - don't give BJ credit for anything.
    Second rule of Cake Stop - See rule No 1.

    Did you miss the bit about me giving credit to BJ then?
  • ballysmate
    ballysmate Posts: 15,930
    edited March 2022

    Bet that gets well received on here. :D:D


    He's still a liar with no principles who sent arms and support to a country facing invasion while a large trading bloc with delusions of grandeur discussed the sale of handbags. ;)
    FTFY


    Even unprincipled liars sometimes make passable calls. You might note that I said so with the omicron wave. Mussolini got trains running on time, but that didn't wipe out his other misdemeanours.
    Passable? Arming Ukraine in order to help defend itself is a passable call?
    Mussolini committed misdemeanours? I assume your tongue was firmly in cheek.
  • morstar
    morstar Posts: 6,190

    morstar said:

    Bet that gets well received on here. :D:D

    I do find it quite interesting that we were proactively tooling them up for weeks.
    I think Britain has been playing a long game in many areas that we’ll never fully appreciate.
    How much of that is credit to Bojo is another matter.

    First rule of Cake Stop - don't give BJ credit for anything.
    Second rule of Cake Stop - See rule No 1.
    I thought that may be the manner of response.
    I do think this is more a case of letting the intelligence and military leaders do their bit.
    The vaccine approach I do think was a political success.
  • ballysmate
    ballysmate Posts: 15,930
    morstar said:

    morstar said:

    Bet that gets well received on here. :D:D

    I do find it quite interesting that we were proactively tooling them up for weeks.
    I think Britain has been playing a long game in many areas that we’ll never fully appreciate.
    How much of that is credit to Bojo is another matter.

    First rule of Cake Stop - don't give BJ credit for anything.
    Second rule of Cake Stop - See rule No 1.
    I thought that may be the manner of response.
    I do think this is more a case of letting the intelligence and military leaders do their bit.
    The vaccine approach I do think was a political success.
    I think Ben Wallace has improved his standing no end.
    But pretty sure the PM would have had to have signed off on such a large supply of arms, especially given the circumstances.

  • ddraver
    ddraver Posts: 26,697
    It's fairly old news.

    The Ukranian Ambasador was singing a less happy refugee themed tune to government today.

    I'm sure Bally will be right along with that post
    We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
    - @ddraver
  • ballysmate
    ballysmate Posts: 15,930
    ddraver said:

    It's fairly old news.

    The Ukranian Ambasador was singing a less happy refugee themed tune to government today.

    I'm sure Bally will be right along with that post

    If you check back, I think it was in the Tory thread, I said that we could and should be doing more in respect of refugees. And sanctions for that matter.
  • ddraver
    ddraver Posts: 26,697
    We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
    - @ddraver
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,337

    Bet that gets well received on here. :D:D


    He's still a liar with no principles who sent arms and support to a country facing invasion while a large trading bloc with delusions of grandeur discussed the sale of handbags. ;)
    FTFY


    Even unprincipled liars sometimes make passable calls. You might note that I said so with the omicron wave. Mussolini got trains running on time, but that didn't wipe out his other misdemeanours.
    Passable? Arming Ukraine in order to help defend itself is a passable call?
    Mussolini committed misdemeanours? I assume your tongue was firmly in cheek.

    Is he a genius for doing what's right (for once)? It's a passable call, as I hope anyone would have made in his position, given the situation.

    He's still an unprincipled liar, which I note you're not arguing. And as such, he shouldn't be Prime Minister.

    And though it might be grudging, here's two of us in one go...


  • pangolin
    pangolin Posts: 6,648
    Watched the QT vid @ballysmate

    Seemed like a sensible chap, the only bit I disagreed with was leaving Poland to deal with the refugees (physically at least). Saying they're all better off there feels quite patronising, why not let them decide?
    - Genesis Croix de Fer
    - Dolan Tuono
  • DeVlaeminck
    DeVlaeminck Posts: 9,104
    Reports (I saw them in the Guardian) of serious concerns Russia is preparing to use unconventional (non-conventional?) weapons such as tactical nukes or biological weapons.

    How does Nato respond to that - if at all?

    [Castle Donington Ladies FC - going up in '22]
  • First.Aspect
    First.Aspect Posts: 17,162

    Reports (I saw them in the Guardian) of serious concerns Russia is preparing to use unconventional (non-conventional?) weapons such as tactical nukes or biological weapons.

    How does Nato respond to that - if at all?

    See above. I suspect that might tip the balance. Possibly under the auspices of humanitarian aid to enter the country.
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,337

    Reports (I saw them in the Guardian) of serious concerns Russia is preparing to use unconventional (non-conventional?) weapons such as tactical nukes or biological weapons.

    How does Nato respond to that - if at all?


    Glad I don't have to make decisions, though from my armchair, I'd suspect that Putin is throwing as much scary stuff out there as he can to try to frighten people into bending to his will. It all reeks of desperation.
  • tailwindhome
    tailwindhome Posts: 19,436

    “New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!
  • tailwindhome
    tailwindhome Posts: 19,436


    “New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!
  • tailwindhome
    tailwindhome Posts: 19,436


    “New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    Meanwhile the war seems to have taken the darker turn we were expecting / fearing.

    Sounds like massive civilian casualties and the Russians are using the terror of proper sieges (no food or water or electricity) and bombardement to try and break the spirit.

    Various mass civilian graves. Awful
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,337

    Meanwhile the war seems to have taken the darker turn we were expecting / fearing.

    Sounds like massive civilian casualties and the Russians are using the terror of proper sieges (no food or water or electricity) and bombardement to try and break the spirit.

    Various mass civilian graves. Awful


    I think that's been obvious for several days. And yes, horrific.

  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661


    I mean yeah. Fascists innit.

    No wonder Trump loves Putin so much.
  • MattFalle
    MattFalle Posts: 11,644

    Pross said:

    .

    Pross said:

    rjsterry said:

    Economist Defence Editor.

    Thus far his analysis has been bang on, both before and during.

    According to Google, a battalion is ~400 men, so ~2500 in total? MF can probably confirm.
    Since he specifically states they are tactical battalions.

    https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a39193732/russian-battalion-tactical-groups-explained/

    Follow the link there and we get:

    The battalion tactical group [batalonnaya takticheskaya gruppa] is a temporary formation for solving certain operational tasks. The BTG is a reinforced battalion that has all the necessary reinforcements. Each BTG consists of 700-800 people, and some - of 900. Each brigade and regiment, as a rule, includes two such battalion groups. The battalion tactical group is a temporary unit. It is created for combat. The BTG is created around a motorized rifle or tank battalion by subordinating to it artillery, anti-aircraft, engineering and other special units necessary to carry out the assigned combat mission. It includes a motorized infantry company(s), 2-4 tanks, units with ATGMs, mortars, reconnaissance, engineering and rear groups. It can be covered by fire support helicopters, divisional artillery and a platoon of anti-aircraft guns.


    https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/army-btg.htm

    So, significantly more bodies than I initially thought.

    I’d expect those battalions comprise mainly tanks and artillery, in which case the continuous supply of Javelins and NLAWs from the West will need to keep coming.
    Is the Javelin still used? I thought it was retired years ago and was considered a bit censored even when it was state of the art (might be confusing it with the Blowpipe that I think had a shoot and hope reputation in the Falklands).
    Not the old anti aircraft missile but the new American anti tank missile.
    Ah that makes sense. I wondered why we were sending stuff that was considered censored 30 years ago!

    Yep, the Javelin is very effective.
    this is the thing cadet bone spurs tried to block going to Ukraine unless they made up stuff on Hunter Biden - got him his first impeachment.
    .
    The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
  • MattFalle
    MattFalle Posts: 11,644
    orraloon said:

    rjsterry said:

    Economist Defence Editor.

    Thus far his analysis has been bang on, both before and during.

    According to Google, a battalion is ~400 men, so ~2500 in total? MF can probably confirm.
    Since he specifically states they are tactical battalions.

    https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a39193732/russian-battalion-tactical-groups-explained/

    Follow the link there and we get:

    The battalion tactical group [batalonnaya takticheskaya gruppa] is a temporary formation for solving certain operational tasks. The BTG is a reinforced battalion that has all the necessary reinforcements. Each BTG consists of 700-800 people, and some - of 900. Each brigade and regiment, as a rule, includes two such battalion groups. The battalion tactical group is a temporary unit. It is created for combat. The BTG is created around a motorized rifle or tank battalion by subordinating to it artillery, anti-aircraft, engineering and other special units necessary to carry out the assigned combat mission. It includes a motorized infantry company(s), 2-4 tanks, units with ATGMs, mortars, reconnaissance, engineering and rear groups. It can be covered by fire support helicopters, divisional artillery and a platoon of anti-aircraft guns.


    https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/army-btg.htm

    So, significantly more bodies than I initially thought.
    Listened to a More Or Less stats episode today; think the number they used was 750 per battalion, which ties with the numbers you quote.
    thats 750 bods, not 750 combat troops.

    call it 100 chefs, 100 mechanics, 100 medics, 20 nurses, 50 storemen...... these numbers soon get eaten up.

    and remember, these are dudes who didn't join up to shoot things so won't go near thr front line.
    .
    The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,337
    Worth checking this thread... how long before they get rebuked *again* for misusing statistics?

  • john80
    john80 Posts: 2,965
    MattFalle said:

    orraloon said:

    rjsterry said:

    Economist Defence Editor.

    Thus far his analysis has been bang on, both before and during.

    According to Google, a battalion is ~400 men, so ~2500 in total? MF can probably confirm.
    Since he specifically states they are tactical battalions.

    https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a39193732/russian-battalion-tactical-groups-explained/

    Follow the link there and we get:

    The battalion tactical group [batalonnaya takticheskaya gruppa] is a temporary formation for solving certain operational tasks. The BTG is a reinforced battalion that has all the necessary reinforcements. Each BTG consists of 700-800 people, and some - of 900. Each brigade and regiment, as a rule, includes two such battalion groups. The battalion tactical group is a temporary unit. It is created for combat. The BTG is created around a motorized rifle or tank battalion by subordinating to it artillery, anti-aircraft, engineering and other special units necessary to carry out the assigned combat mission. It includes a motorized infantry company(s), 2-4 tanks, units with ATGMs, mortars, reconnaissance, engineering and rear groups. It can be covered by fire support helicopters, divisional artillery and a platoon of anti-aircraft guns.


    https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/army-btg.htm

    So, significantly more bodies than I initially thought.
    Listened to a More Or Less stats episode today; think the number they used was 750 per battalion, which ties with the numbers you quote.
    thats 750 bods, not 750 combat troops.

    call it 100 chefs, 100 mechanics, 100 medics, 20 nurses, 50 storemen...... these numbers soon get eaten up.

    and remember, these are dudes who didn't join up to shoot things so won't go near thr front line.
    They will enjoy the drive through a population that hates them.
  • Pross
    Pross Posts: 43,463

    morstar said:

    morstar said:

    Bet that gets well received on here. :D:D

    I do find it quite interesting that we were proactively tooling them up for weeks.
    I think Britain has been playing a long game in many areas that we’ll never fully appreciate.
    How much of that is credit to Bojo is another matter.

    First rule of Cake Stop - don't give BJ credit for anything.
    Second rule of Cake Stop - See rule No 1.
    I thought that may be the manner of response.
    I do think this is more a case of letting the intelligence and military leaders do their bit.
    The vaccine approach I do think was a political success.
    I think Ben Wallace has improved his standing no end.
    But pretty sure the PM would have had to have signed off on such a large supply of arms, especially given the circumstances.

    Just to comply with your stereotype of Cake Stoppers I wonder which Tory party donor has a large stake in Thales