Poo tin... Put@in...

1148149151153154219

Comments

  • Pross
    Pross Posts: 43,461
    pangolin said:

    Russia's president says any country interfering in Ukraine will be met with a "lightning-fast" response


    Shame he lacks the self awareness to realise that country is Russia
    And that others have been helping Ukraine for over two months so his understanding of how fast lightning is may be flawed too.
  • morstar
    morstar Posts: 6,190
    Is there a possibility that Putin sees suicide by cop as better than defeat.

    My working hypothesis is he is Ill and this is his closing chapter. Expanding Russia before popping his clogs and going down in the history books as a great leader.

    If it’s all going to shit, why not nuke something? Sod the consequences. Obviously very narcissistic but I think that’s well established now.
  • ddraver
    ddraver Posts: 26,691
    Pross said:

    pangolin said:

    Russia's president says any country interfering in Ukraine will be met with a "lightning-fast" response


    Shame he lacks the self awareness to realise that country is Russia
    And that others have been helping Ukraine for over two months so his understanding of how fast lightning is may be flawed too.
    Now Now! He's sanctioned Andy Burnham you know!!
    We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
    - @ddraver
  • MattFalle
    MattFalle Posts: 11,644
    .
    The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,256
    MattFalle said:

    You misunderstand. If it worked to make Johnson seem important on the world stage to himself, then it was a success.
  • PMark
    PMark Posts: 160
    morstar said:

    Is there a possibility that Putin sees suicide by cop as better than defeat.

    My working hypothesis is he is Ill and this is his closing chapter. Expanding Russia before popping his clogs and going down in the history books as a great leader.

    If it’s all going to censored , why not nuke something? Sod the consequences. Obviously very narcissistic but I think that’s well established now.

    Putin may give the order, but there are those below him that have to carry it out. Thankfully must people do not want nuclear war.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_Soviet_nuclear_false_alarm_incident
    But a lot of this is about his place in history, a kind of immortality for him. I doubt he wants to be remembered as the leader who over saw the end of Russia
  • john80
    john80 Posts: 2,965
    PMark said:

    morstar said:

    Is there a possibility that Putin sees suicide by cop as better than defeat.

    My working hypothesis is he is Ill and this is his closing chapter. Expanding Russia before popping his clogs and going down in the history books as a great leader.

    If it’s all going to censored , why not nuke something? Sod the consequences. Obviously very narcissistic but I think that’s well established now.

    Putin may give the order, but there are those below him that have to carry it out. Thankfully must people do not want nuclear war.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_Soviet_nuclear_false_alarm_incident
    But a lot of this is about his place in history, a kind of immortality for him. I doubt he wants to be remembered as the leader who over saw the end of Russia
    The end of Russia was seen at the cold war. They have pretended that was not the case with a gangster economy based on natural resources that is at frankly a level below that of the middle East in terms of outcome. He is an embarrassment in his achievements over the last twenty years.
  • MattFalle
    MattFalle Posts: 11,644

    MattFalle said:

    You misunderstand. If it worked to make Johnson seem important on the world stage to himself, then it was a success.
    tbh, i have a horrible cynical feeling that it may be yet another dead cat to divert attention from partygate, legsgate, watching pornin parliament, tax evasion - you know, all the other glitches to Tories have at the moment....

    why worry about people being killed if it diverts attention from you for a few days, after all, they're just squaddies, didn't go to Eton you know.....
    .
    The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,256
    MattFalle said:

    MattFalle said:

    You misunderstand. If it worked to make Johnson seem important on the world stage to himself, then it was a success.
    tbh, i have a horrible cynical feeling that it may be yet another dead cat to divert attention from partygate, legsgate, watching pornin parliament, tax evasion - you know, all the other glitches to Tories have at the moment....

    why worry about people being killed if it diverts attention from you for a few days, after all, they're just squaddies, didn't go to Eton you know.....

    The parallels with Trump (remember him saying secret stuff to the Ruskies?) get more obvious by the day.
  • MattFalle
    MattFalle Posts: 11,644

    MattFalle said:

    MattFalle said:

    You misunderstand. If it worked to make Johnson seem important on the world stage to himself, then it was a success.
    tbh, i have a horrible cynical feeling that it may be yet another dead cat to divert attention from partygate, legsgate, watching pornin parliament, tax evasion - you know, all the other glitches to Tories have at the moment....

    why worry about people being killed if it diverts attention from you for a few days, after all, they're just squaddies, didn't go to Eton you know.....

    The parallels with Trump (remember him saying secret stuff to the Ruskies?) get more obvious by the day.
    its almost like de pffeffel and trump have agreed to "accidentally" mention whats going on behind the scenes occasionally.
    .
    The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
  • johngti
    johngti Posts: 2,508
    MattFalle said:

    MattFalle said:

    MattFalle said:

    You misunderstand. If it worked to make Johnson seem important on the world stage to himself, then it was a success.
    tbh, i have a horrible cynical feeling that it may be yet another dead cat to divert attention from partygate, legsgate, watching pornin parliament, tax evasion - you know, all the other glitches to Tories have at the moment....

    why worry about people being killed if it diverts attention from you for a few days, after all, they're just squaddies, didn't go to Eton you know.....

    The parallels with Trump (remember him saying secret stuff to the Ruskies?) get more obvious by the day.
    its almost like de pffeffel and trump have agreed to "accidentally" mention whats going on behind the scenes occasionally.
    I’m just fuckingangry. First of all, what the AF does Putin think gives him the right to order the killing and maiming of tens of thousands of innocent people and to terrorise even more, forcing them out of their homes and the lives they’ve led being ruined for ever.

    Second of all, where does our OWN FUCKINGGOVERNMENT get off with making statements that they clearly think make them sound tough and hard and allthatshitbut which, in reality, cause the whole situation to become ever more dangerous and unstable and puts the rest of us in more danger? Not in my name, that’s for sure. I mean. “Yeah, we’re training them innit”, “we want to see Russia weakened”, “yeah not a problem if our stuff in involved in bombing Russia”. Of course its ‘common knowledge’ but it doesn’t need stating in public by the joke of a prime minister/foreign secretary that we have giving the mental despot in Russia no option but to ramp up the threats. I’m sure the idiots have the post-Falklands increase in popularity in mind when they spout this cr@p.

    Is it that hard to just supply and support without being @rseholes about it????
  • DeVlaeminck
    DeVlaeminck Posts: 9,092
    I suppose it's about balance - he shouldn't be putting troops or civilians at risk but at the same time if we are doing x, y and z to support Ukraine we are a democracy and that means the public should be kept informed of the sort of involvement the UK has. Of course that isn't a reason for Boris to tell us what Poland are doing. I suspect it's his reluctance to engage in the detail and habit of talking off the cuff that leads to him committing these gaffes rather than a deliberate strategy to big himself up irrespective of the consequences for others but who knows.

    As far as the conflict goes it's difficult to be sure where this is all heading - the rhetoric has been ratcheted up a notch on both sides. Early on I thought some kind of compromise might be achievable but not now.
    [Castle Donington Ladies FC - going up in '22]
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,280

    I suppose it's about balance - he shouldn't be putting troops or civilians at risk but at the same time if we are doing x, y and z to support Ukraine we are a democracy and that means the public should be kept informed of the sort of involvement the UK has...

    I think this is the root of why we disagreed earlier. I expect our forces to be doing a whole load ofshit that we never hear about. We have different expectations.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • ddraver
    ddraver Posts: 26,691
    This is kinda the point though. Putin wants everyone to think he's the genius master tactician when, in reality, his only tactic is a willingness to kill more civilians and conscripts than you.

    Arguably that is in the great tradition of Russian warfare...
    We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
    - @ddraver
  • MattFalle
    MattFalle Posts: 11,644
    pblakeney said:

    I suppose it's about balance - he shouldn't be putting troops or civilians at risk but at the same time if we are doing x, y and z to support Ukraine we are a democracy and that means the public should be kept informed of the sort of involvement the UK has...

    I think this is the root of why we disagreed earlier. I expect our forces to be doing a whole load ofshit that we never hear about. We have different expectations.
    exactly as PB says - no wsy at ll should tbere be general release of everything everyone is up to.

    firstly its too darn dangerous for the bods involved, secondly it would just fry people's brains what sctually happens.
    .
    The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
  • DeVlaeminck
    DeVlaeminck Posts: 9,092
    MattFalle said:

    pblakeney said:

    I suppose it's about balance - he shouldn't be putting troops or civilians at risk but at the same time if we are doing x, y and z to support Ukraine we are a democracy and that means the public should be kept informed of the sort of involvement the UK has...

    I think this is the root of why we disagreed earlier. I expect our forces to be doing a whole load ofshit that we never hear about. We have different expectations.
    exactly as PB says - no wsy at ll should tbere be general release of everything everyone is up to.

    firstly its too darn dangerous for the bods involved, secondly it would just fry people's brains what sctually happens.
    Yes as I said it's about balance - we shouldn't be putting people at risk but neither should we be entering a conflict without Parliament being aware - and I don't mean via MPs picking up Twitter rumours.

    [Castle Donington Ladies FC - going up in '22]
  • MattFalle
    MattFalle Posts: 11,644
    Parliament is always aware, they're just not made aware of individual ops because they don't need to be.
    .
    The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
  • thegreatdivide
    thegreatdivide Posts: 5,807
    New toys for the UF. Scoot and shoot anti-tank teams.


  • DeVlaeminck
    DeVlaeminck Posts: 9,092
    MattFalle said:

    Parliament is always aware, they're just not made aware of individual ops because they don't need to be.

    Nobody suggested they should be. The point was just in a democracy there needs to be some public awareness of what our govt is doing and some parliamentary scrutiny - not a day by day detailed update on troop movements or anything that would put people at risk but not being treated like the Russian public either.
    [Castle Donington Ladies FC - going up in '22]
  • MattFalle
    MattFalle Posts: 11,644
    edited April 2022
    There is and you can a lot of it very easily, the remainder is just a bit of enquiry away.

    none of it - apart from the really secret squirrel stuff that only forms a tiny part of it - is secret/classified.

    what sort of thing would you want to know,,?

    no one is treating the british people like they are russians at all.

    its under constant parlimentary and legal scrutiny.
    .
    The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,280
    Parliamentary and legal scrutiny does not mean it has to be in the public domain.
    That's why we elect leaders*.

    *Used in the lightest of terms for the current lot.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • MattFalle
    MattFalle Posts: 11,644
    pblakeney said:

    Parliamentary and legal scrutiny does not mean it has to be in the public domain.
    That's why we elect leaders*.

    *Used in the lightest of terms for the current lot.

    agree, but the vast majority of this stuff is.
    .
    The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
  • thegreatdivide
    thegreatdivide Posts: 5,807
    edited April 2022
    I knew I’d seen Putin somewhere before!




  • DeVlaeminck
    DeVlaeminck Posts: 9,092
    MattFalle said:

    There is and you can a lot of it very easily, the remainder is just a bit of enquiry away.

    none of it - apart from the really secret squirrel stuff that only forms a tiny part of it - is secret/classified.

    what sort of thing would you want to know,,?

    no one is treating the british people like they are russians at all.

    its under constant parlimentary and legal scrutiny.


    Err...you need to have a look at my actual post Matt it was just a quite general point - you seem to have inferred quite a bit I didn't say.
    [Castle Donington Ladies FC - going up in '22]
  • DeVlaeminck
    DeVlaeminck Posts: 9,092
    pblakeney said:

    Parliamentary and legal scrutiny does not mean it has to be in the public domain.
    That's why we elect leaders*.

    *Used in the lightest of terms for the current lot.

    Yes but in a democracy a degree of public awareness is part of the deal - there is more to being democratic than just electing leaders to make decisions.

    Again though I'm not saying that the UK is not keeping the public sufficiently informed.
    [Castle Donington Ladies FC - going up in '22]
  • johngti
    johngti Posts: 2,508

    pblakeney said:

    Parliamentary and legal scrutiny does not mean it has to be in the public domain.
    That's why we elect leaders*.

    *Used in the lightest of terms for the current lot.

    Yes but in a democracy a degree of public awareness is part of the deal - there is more to being democratic than just electing leaders to make decisions.

    Again though I'm not saying that the UK is not keeping the public sufficiently informed.
    But that doesn’t justify the actions of members of the UK government. Truss and Johnson are appealing to the section of the Tory collective who are all for sabre rattling and appearing “tough” for their own - selfish - purposes and that is directly putting people in danger.

    This is a good take - https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/apr/28/liz-truss-ukraine-war-russia-conservative-power

    The war isn’t going to be won by Ukraine beating Russia, no matter how many arms are supplied. The only way it ends (without the rest of the world being destroyed) is through negotiation. Russia aren’t going to give up what they’ve “won”.
  • First.Aspect
    First.Aspect Posts: 17,113
    johngti said:

    pblakeney said:

    Parliamentary and legal scrutiny does not mean it has to be in the public domain.
    That's why we elect leaders*.

    *Used in the lightest of terms for the current lot.

    Yes but in a democracy a degree of public awareness is part of the deal - there is more to being democratic than just electing leaders to make decisions.

    Again though I'm not saying that the UK is not keeping the public sufficiently informed.
    But that doesn’t justify the actions of members of the UK government. Truss and Johnson are appealing to the section of the Tory collective who are all for sabre rattling and appearing “tough” for their own - selfish - purposes and that is directly putting people in danger.

    This is a good take - https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/apr/28/liz-truss-ukraine-war-russia-conservative-power

    The war isn’t going to be won by Ukraine beating Russia, no matter how many arms are supplied. The only way it ends (without the rest of the world being destroyed) is through negotiation. Russia aren’t going to give up what they’ve “won”.
    It is still somewhat realistic that Ukraine might get much of the coast and the donbas back. And any negotiation will be coloured by whatever the current direction of travel is. So if the new Russian assault fizzles out and they increasingly resort to long range potshots, and start getting pressed back and the sanctions start to bite, then "success" could potentially be redefined domestically as Crimea and some territory containing someone who speaks Russian, close to the border.
  • skyblueamateur
    skyblueamateur Posts: 1,498
    Stevo_666 said:

    Quick update on the sponsoring of refugees. Mrs. 666 got the details (via the charity we signed up with) of a Ukrainian lady with 2 young-ish kids who used to live in Enerhodar in the South but is now staying in a village near the Polish border. We will be trying to make contact by email etc initially to see if this is a sensible match.

    Hats off. Good luck to you.
  • shirley_basso
    shirley_basso Posts: 6,195
    Stevo_666 said:

    Quick update on the sponsoring of refugees. Mrs. 666 got the details (via the charity we signed up with) of a Ukrainian lady with 2 young-ish kids who used to live in Enerhodar in the South but is now staying in a village near the Polish border. We will be trying to make contact by email etc initially to see if this is a sensible match.

    Best of luck, Stevo.

    I've just found out that the 2-bed flat I moved out of in February remains empty and is therefore going to be made available to a Ukranian family with 2 children. I don't know any of the details but I do know that it is being sorted through a charity.