Photography Thread

16970727475222

Comments

  • masjer
    masjer Posts: 2,820

    masjer said:

    I've been looking at cameras on Ebay. I came across a Samsung NX1000. It's only £80 at the mo. 2013 possibly a bit dated, but 20MP compact (easy to take out and about) and very cheap. What do you think?
    https://ebay.co.uk/itm/275234464771?epid=114312666&hash=item401540a403:g:PfYAAOSwB9NiPyB4

    The Samsung range of cameras had a decent reputation back then. Only catch might be finding other lenses if you want different lengths - I think it's a proprietary mount, and adaptors needed?



    Thanks for that Wheelspinner, I'll look into the availability of lenses. I just thought for £80 it might be a good buy. Light, decent shots and not having to worry about it.
  • Wheelspinner
    Wheelspinner Posts: 6,722
    Yep, for that money it's worth a try, pretty cheap for an APS-C sensor camera.

    I've a couple Sony a6000 bodies which are similar size, and which are way more capable than my skills will ever need. I've sometimes thought I'd update to a full frame version but it would mean all new lenses (and I have a few to replace!), and the reality is I'd not notice much difference.
    Open One+ BMC TE29 Seven 622SL On One Scandal Cervelo RS
  • Pross
    Pross Posts: 43,752
    Usk Valley today,a bit less rugged than my usual walks.







  • masjer
    masjer Posts: 2,820
    The `Pembrokeshire dangler` brought some nice clouds in this afternoon.
    IMG_0056
  • masjer
    masjer Posts: 2,820
    I tried for a sunset, which didn't happen, but managed to pick up the pieces.
    IMG_0072
    IMG_0073
  • eric_draven
    eric_draven Posts: 1,192

    tried for bit of a moody sunset last night, with low cloud and the odd storm showers passing by
  • masjer
    masjer Posts: 2,820
    Feeling like a shadow of my former self. I was followed by a big-headed shadowy figure.

  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,698


    tried for bit of a moody sunset last night, with low cloud and the odd storm showers passing by

    Hope you don't mind but that is a scene just screaming out for an ND grad filter.


    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • eric_draven
    eric_draven Posts: 1,192
    pblakeney said:


    tried for bit of a moody sunset last night, with low cloud and the odd storm showers passing by

    Hope you don't mind but that is a scene just screaming out for an ND grad filter.


    I took this on my phone whilst out fishing, but looking at what a ND grad filter is, probs would of come out better
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 21,150

    pblakeney said:


    tried for bit of a moody sunset last night, with low cloud and the odd storm showers passing by

    Hope you don't mind but that is a scene just screaming out for an ND grad filter.


    I took this on my phone whilst out fishing, but looking at what a ND grad filter is, probs would of come out better

    And out of interest, was it actually warmer colours than this in reality? I sometimes get really bizarrely blue photos of sunsets on auto settings, and have to do quite a lot of work with levels to get it back to what I thought it looked like.
  • pinno
    pinno Posts: 52,672

    pblakeney said:


    tried for bit of a moody sunset last night, with low cloud and the odd storm showers passing by

    Hope you don't mind but that is a scene just screaming out for an ND grad filter.


    I took this on my phone whilst out fishing, but looking at what a ND grad filter is, probs would of come out better
    I do like it - it's very moody.

    If you scroll down, there is a grad filter you can muck around with. It's quite revealing.

    https://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/graduated-neutral-density-filters.htm
    seanoconn - gruagach craic!
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,698


    I took this on my phone whilst out fishing, but looking at what a ND grad filter is, probs would of come out better

    Obviously I did the mod post on the laptop. It's probably better to use filters at the time but software versions are pretty good even with shots from a phone. If you're interested.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • eric_draven
    eric_draven Posts: 1,192
    pblakeney said:


    I took this on my phone whilst out fishing, but looking at what a ND grad filter is, probs would of come out better

    Obviously I did the mod post on the laptop. It's probably better to use filters at the time but software versions are pretty good even with shots from a phone. If you're interested.
    I will look into it, bit of a technophobe at the best of times, I do need a newer phone still on a Huawei P10, I've done a few shots that time of light that haven't always come out the way I've wanted them to, do play with the iso and shutter settings sometimes, would love my SLR with me sometimes but salt water just kills everything
  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 29,993

    pblakeney said:


    tried for bit of a moody sunset last night, with low cloud and the odd storm showers passing by

    Hope you don't mind but that is a scene just screaming out for an ND grad filter.


    I took this on my phone whilst out fishing, but looking at what a ND grad filter is, probs would of come out better

    And out of interest, was it actually warmer colours than this in reality? I sometimes get really bizarrely blue photos of sunsets on auto settings, and have to do quite a lot of work with levels to get it back to what I thought it looked like.
    My phone (Sony) always struggles to render reds accurately.

    These tulips were a really vivid red, but look washed out.



    It was taken the same evening as that sunset I posted the other day, which also came out more pink than orange.
    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,698
    edited April 2022
    rjsterry said:



    My phone (Sony) always struggles to render reds accurately.

    These tulips were a really vivid red, but look washed out.

    This is quite common on all digital cameras. For whatever reason red plants tend to be over saturated which gives the result above.I regularly desaturate red plants.
    For sunsets changing the white balance will help. Cloudy, or even shade.

    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 29,993
    pblakeney said:

    rjsterry said:



    My phone (Sony) always struggles to render reds accurately.

    These tulips were a really vivid red, but look washed out.

    This is quite common on all digital cameras. For whatever reason red plants tend to be over saturated which gives the result above.I regularly desaturate red plants.
    For sunsets changing the white balance will help. Cloudy, or even shade.

    Tried fiddling with the saturation but actually found tweaking the hue gave better results. At least based on a two week old memory of what that tulip looked like.


    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,698
    Hue is probably better. It's just not something that I have experimented with as I tend to stick with what was available using film or slide. Old dogs and all that. 😉
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • Pross
    Pross Posts: 43,752
    pblakeney said:


    I took this on my phone whilst out fishing, but looking at what a ND grad filter is, probs would of come out better

    Obviously I did the mod post on the laptop. It's probably better to use filters at the time but software versions are pretty good even with shots from a phone. If you're interested.
    What software are you using PB? My phone software gives loads of options for 'filters' but none seem to match with the effects you would get from various commonly used lens filters.
  • shirley_basso
    shirley_basso Posts: 6,195

  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,698
    edited April 2022
    Pross said:

    pblakeney said:


    I took this on my phone whilst out fishing, but looking at what a ND grad filter is, probs would of come out better

    Obviously I did the mod post on the laptop. It's probably better to use filters at the time but software versions are pretty good even with shots from a phone. If you're interested.
    What software are you using PB? My phone software gives loads of options for 'filters' but none seem to match with the effects you would get from various commonly used lens filters.
    Quite complicated for historical reasons and that while all software works the hardest part is learning how to use it. Once you have a workflow that meets your needs you/I will be reluctant to start learning again. My workflow just for reference -
    NX Studio for tweaking Nikon RAW shots, then export as a TIFF.
    Topaz DeNoise for removing noise and capture sharpening. Not strictly needed for my RAW files but as I use it for phone photos (mostly for noise) and it's simpler just to do the same for all shots.
    Affinity Photo for fine tuning, resizing and final sharpening. I have the NIK Collection as a plug-in for filters (ND for example). This was available for free and Google says it still is but a bit complicated to get.

    This all sounds complicated but takes about 1 minute all in for each shot once you are in the groove.

    If you can get NIK Collection it should work as a plug-in for any software you choose to use. Not sure about phone use though.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • masjer
    masjer Posts: 2,820
    Any ideas how the shadowy cyclist pics were taken?
  • shirley_basso
    shirley_basso Posts: 6,195
    gopro 360 with mount?
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 21,150
    Apologies, I'm probably going to be even more annoying than usual for the next couple of weeks. I'll try to avoid boring holiday snaps, though you can have this "I went shopping" snap for now.



    Boring sunset.
  • masjer
    masjer Posts: 2,820
    I'm not jealous, my Lidl has a view like that! I'll have my £80 camera to annoy with soon, or maybe it'll just annoy me.
  • pinno
    pinno Posts: 52,672


    Lovely chap. What's his name?
    seanoconn - gruagach craic!
  • shirley_basso
    shirley_basso Posts: 6,195
    edited April 2022
    Brian - how did you know he was a he!?