Photography Thread
Comments
-
...0
-
pinno builds a few Lego machines (technical Lego?)Ben6899 said:I find that building Lego helps me control anxiety and keep tabs on my MH. I thought I would try and get a nice photo of the latest model:
I find natural surroundings, woods, streams, beaches etc away from crowds great for the soul. It's becoming harder to find in the modern world, though.0 -
masjer said:
pinno builds a few Lego machines (technical Lego?)Ben6899 said:I find that building Lego helps me control anxiety and keep tabs on my MH. I thought I would try and get a nice photo of the latest model:
I find natural surroundings, woods, streams, beaches etc away from crowds great for the soul. It's becoming harder to find in the modern world, though.
Yeh, Pinno builds amazing Technic Lego contraptions that sort balls and split atoms. Very impressive.
Totally with you on the natural surroundings - one of the downsides of living in a city, but I do have Hampstead Heath on my doorstep.Ben
Bikes: Donhou DSS4 Custom | Condor Italia RC | Gios Megalite | Dolan Preffisio | Giant Bowery '76
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ben_h_ppcc/
Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/143173475@N05/0 -
I must have missed his Lego nuclear fission reactor.Ben6899 said:masjer said:
pinno builds a few Lego machines (technical Lego?)Ben6899 said:I find that building Lego helps me control anxiety and keep tabs on my MH. I thought I would try and get a nice photo of the latest model:
I find natural surroundings, woods, streams, beaches etc away from crowds great for the soul. It's becoming harder to find in the modern world, though.
Yeh, Pinno builds amazing Technic Lego contraptions that sort balls and split atoms. Very impressive.
1 -
The lighting director (God, I guess, if you believe in such things) takes the credit for this one.
4 -
A bit more evening fresh air.
5 -
Reset your ISO I see. 😉The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
One last one about the Rocher des Heures...
Here's the path (the green ledge)
And here it is in context:
2 -
But here's my lucky shot of the day... saw the little blighter go in, and had one go at capturing it...
3 -
...and repeat. A couple more from my "escape from reality" drip feed.
Back to the sunshine again. PS - Shot using a phone.
The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.6 -
Having tried a couple of times I know that Lego is remarkably tricky to photograph. All those shiny surfaces throwing the exposure out and getting the right depth of field.Ben6899 said:1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Part of the anti-growth coalition1 -
No way would you catch me walking that!briantrumpet said:One last one about the Rocher des Heures...
Here's the path (the green ledge)The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
Have a look at viaferratahelvetica over on Instagram 😁 or 😬 depending on your taste.pblakeney said:
No way would you catch me walking that!briantrumpet said:One last one about the Rocher des Heures...
Here's the path (the green ledge)1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Part of the anti-growth coalition0 -
Eh, no thanks!rjsterry said:
Have a look at viaferratahelvetica over on Instagram 😁 or 😬 depending on your taste.pblakeney said:
No way would you catch me walking that!briantrumpet said:One last one about the Rocher des Heures...
Here's the path (the green ledge)The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
pblakeney said:
Wowzers, I really like the use of a strong foreground on this. The texture of the grass, clouds and even the cracks in the rock lead the viewer back into the mountains/glacier?
Top marks from me!
0 -
pblakeney said:
No way would you catch me walking that!briantrumpet said:One last one about the Rocher des Heures...
Here's the path (the green ledge)
Nor me, but it's a magnificent lump of limestone, all the same, which I'm very happy to look up at.0 -
If you ever get the chance, the Cime de la Bonnete has the potential for some great compositions in the right light... PB's photo reminded me of that sort of light... I should have spent more time on the photography, but 11,000ft of climbing over 60 miles (and a lovely lunch) took priority the day I was there.masjer said:pblakeney said:
Wowzers, I really like the use of a strong foreground on this. The texture of the grass, clouds and even the cracks in the rock lead the viewer back into the mountains/glacier?
Top marks from me!
5 -
Hard to say for sure but I heard a tip on a podcast about getting down low and not shooting from the usual perspective. Could have been that. Something to remember anyway. 😉 Oh, yes, a glacier.masjer said:
Wowzers, I really like the use of a strong foreground on this. The texture of the grass, clouds and even the cracks in the rock lead the viewer back into the mountains/glacier?
Top marks from me!
The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
I'd say you did pretty good for someone not trying. 😉briantrumpet said:
If you ever get the chance, the Cime de la Bonnete has the potential for some great compositions in the right light... PB's photo reminded me of that sort of light... I should have spent more time on the photography, but 11,000ft of climbing over 60 miles (and a lovely lunch) took priority the day I was there.
PS - The last few days of mine have been when climbing 3000m+ which explains why there are less, and they are mostly from a phone. I did have my DSLR in a support van but things had to align for me to use it.The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
A belter! Worth the 11,000ft, I reckon.briantrumpet said:
If you ever get the chance, the Cime de la Bonnete has the potential for some great compositions in the right light... PB's photo reminded me of that sort of light... I should have spent more time on the photography, but 11,000ft of climbing over 60 miles (and a lovely lunch) took priority the day I was there.masjer said:pblakeney said:
Wowzers, I really like the use of a strong foreground on this. The texture of the grass, clouds and even the cracks in the rock lead the viewer back into the mountains/glacier?
Top marks from me!
We are going to need a Like+ button at this rate.0 -
rjsterry said:
Have a look at viaferratahelvetica over on Instagram 😁 or 😬 depending on your taste.pblakeney said:
No way would you catch me walking that!briantrumpet said:One last one about the Rocher des Heures...
Here's the path (the green ledge)
Pfft, clipped to a wire.
This is one that left me absolutely slack-jawed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_a0X9rdJ7hc
He's dead now. Everest got him. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ueli_Steck
2 -
These are two others from that day that I quite like... it's a crazy ribbon of road. Nice is about 100 miles away, down that valley somewhere.
3 -
Nice!The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
Fantastic clear sky with the Milky Way clear to the naked eye last night. Set the camera up but due to be so dark I couldn’t see anything in the viewfinder. 30” exposure and just a blurry foreground as I couldn’t focus. Any suggestions? I’ve done it in the past with a phone but can’t with a DSLR. Probably should have cranked the ISO right up to get the image then turned it back down.0
-
I'm no expert, but I'd leave the ISO set as high as possible (with acceptable amount of noise). I think 30 seconds exposure will be too long, (hence the high ISO) as the rotation of the Earth will blur the stars at 30".
I think you'll need to manually focus. You could just set the focus on the moon or a star to make it easier.
0 -
Haha, he shouldn't have given me a nonchalant "Bonjour" as he passed with what looked like a little too much effort. Not only did I manage to get the camera out of the pocket and take a reasonable photo after he'd passed (this is only lightly cropped, and unstraightened), but once the camera was back in the pocket, it was a piece of gâteau to re-overtake him and leave him for dead by the town sign. Novice.
2 -
^ I find the uninvited silent wheelsucker the biggest pest.
An easy clamber down. Almost felt like diving in... almost. Joined by a bull seal who looked on with curiosity.
4 -
No moon at the moment which I think is why the Milky Way is so easily visible. I’ve used 30” previously on my phone (posted the photos on here back in April). I was only using ISO 400 I think then and they came out clear. I did wonder at first why the camera wouldn’t fire then realised it was on auto focus with nothing to focus on. There’s a pretty bright planet about at the moment so might see if I can get a fix on that if the sky is clear tonight.masjer said:I'm no expert, but I'd leave the ISO set as high as possible (with acceptable amount of noise). I think 30 seconds exposure will be too long, (hence the high ISO) as the rotation of the Earth will blur the stars at 30".
I think you'll need to manually focus. You could just set the focus on the moon or a star to make it easier.
0 -
That sounds like a plan. I'd still try a higher iso if you get no joy at 400.
I fancy trying the same sometime.
Good luck.
Oh, when you set it to manual focus and get it focussed, don't change back to auto focus. Does your lens have an infinity setting? If so, that might work too, without having to focus on a planet.0