Donald Trump
Comments
-
Anyone else expecting the black suv's to pull up outside cohen's house today?0
-
I believe the NYAG also referred the defendants to the IRS as well over the charitable foundation case. IIRC apart from the NYAG there's two federal bodies have been relevant passed information. I guess that means they'll have to investigate too.
Just how invasive are the IRS in reality? Are we taking colonic irrigation levels of invasiveness when they get a scent of improprieties? :shock:0 -
Tangled Metal wrote:I believe the NYAG also referred the defendants to the IRS as well over the charitable foundation case. IIRC apart from the NYAG there's two federal bodies have been relevant passed information. I guess that means they'll have to investigate too.
Just how invasive are the IRS in reality? Are we taking colonic irrigation levels of invasiveness when they get a scent of improprieties? :shock:The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
I don't think anyone should have an issue with him saluting a member of his own armed forces, like you say, he is the commander in chief.
I know it's an obvious and easy shot, but imagine what would be the reaction if Obama had done any of the things Trump has done so far this week.0 -
KingstonGraham wrote:I know it's an obvious and easy shot, but imagine what would be the reaction if Obama had done any of the things Trump has done so far this week.
You mean like making the world a safer place by making North Korea no longer a threat in just a few hours of one day?
Or making possible the wishes of those thousands of parents who are over 101 years of age that came up to him on the campaign trail asking for him to help get their wishes granted?0 -
KingstonGraham wrote:I know it's an obvious and easy shot, but imagine what would be the reaction if Obama had done any of the things Trump has done so far this week.0
-
KingstonGraham wrote:I don't think anyone should have an issue with him saluting a member of his own armed forces, like you say, he is the commander in chief.
I know it's an obvious and easy shot, but imagine what would be the reaction if Obama had done any of the things Trump has done so far this week.
It probably depends on who you talk to and what you read, but I felt like Obama wasn't criticised anything like enough and too often got a pass because he wasn't Bush. With hindsight, he now gets even more favourable treatment because not only is he not Bush he is not Trump.
In the grand scheme of Trump mistakes the salute is fairly low on the list. Perhaps I am biased as I have never saluted or been saluted and therefore wouldn't know what the appropriate reaction should be.0 -
TheBigBean wrote:KingstonGraham wrote:I don't think anyone should have an issue with him saluting a member of his own armed forces, like you say, he is the commander in chief.
I know it's an obvious and easy shot, but imagine what would be the reaction if Obama had done any of the things Trump has done so far this week.
It probably depends on who you talk to and what you read, but I felt like Obama wasn't criticised anything like enough and too often got a pass because he wasn't Bush. With hindsight, he now gets even more favourable treatment because not only is he not Bush he is not Trump.
In the grand scheme of Trump mistakes the salute is fairly low on the list. Perhaps I am biased as I have never saluted or been saluted and therefore wouldn't know what the appropriate reaction should be.
Personally, I don't care. But candidate Trump would have gone crazy about it.0 -
I remember going on holiday in Mexico, and one of the channels was Fox News. It was relentless how everything was Obama's fault, he never did anything other than bad things. Unwatchable then for a different reason to now.0
-
Tangled Metal wrote:I believe the NYAG also referred the defendants to the IRS as well over the charitable foundation case. IIRC apart from the NYAG there's two federal bodies have been relevant passed information. I guess that means they'll have to investigate too.
Just how invasive are the IRS in reality? Are we taking colonic irrigation levels of invasiveness when they get a scent of improprieties? :shock:
the irs are like the Spanish inquisition. seriously. once they have you they will rip you apart for year after year after year.
utter bastards.
do not cross them.Postby team47b » Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:53 am
De Sisti wrote:
This is one of the silliest threads I've come across.
Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honoursmithy21 wrote:
He's right you know.0 -
KingstonGraham wrote:I don't think anyone should have an issue with him saluting a member of his own armed forces, like you say, he is the commander in chief.
I know it's an obvious and easy shot, but imagine what would be the reaction if Obama had done any of the things Trump has done so far this week.
Here you are matey, this will help you:Scoob84 wrote:
Page 307, 12 June.0 -
Matthewfalle wrote:Tangled Metal wrote:I believe the NYAG also referred the defendants to the IRS as well over the charitable foundation case. IIRC apart from the NYAG there's two federal bodies have been relevant passed information. I guess that means they'll have to investigate too.
Just how invasive are the IRS in reality? Are we taking colonic irrigation levels of invasiveness when they get a scent of improprieties? :shock:
the irs are like the Spanish inquisition. seriously. once they have you they will rip you apart for year after year after year.
utter bastards.
do not cross them.
Speaking from experience, MF? or was it MF?1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Part of the anti-growth coalition0 -
Robert88 wrote:KingstonGraham wrote:I don't think anyone should have an issue with him saluting a member of his own armed forces, like you say, he is the commander in chief.
I know it's an obvious and easy shot, but imagine what would be the reaction if Obama had done any of the things Trump has done so far this week.
Here you are matey, this will help you:Scoob84 wrote:
Page 307, 12 June.
Yes, I saw that. That was days ago - he's done plenty since then.0 -
rjsterry wrote:Matthewfalle wrote:Tangled Metal wrote:I believe the NYAG also referred the defendants to the IRS as well over the charitable foundation case. IIRC apart from the NYAG there's two federal bodies have been relevant passed information. I guess that means they'll have to investigate too.
Just how invasive are the IRS in reality? Are we taking colonic irrigation levels of invasiveness when they get a scent of improprieties? :shock:
the irs are like the Spanish inquisition. seriously. once they have you they will rip you apart for year after year after year.
utter bastards.
do not cross them.
Speaking from experience, MF? or was it MF?
one of the MFs may have irked them at some point......
utter bastards. (the irs that is, not the MFs. they are just helpful buffoons).Postby team47b » Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:53 am
De Sisti wrote:
This is one of the silliest threads I've come across.
Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honoursmithy21 wrote:
He's right you know.0 -
thing with the irs is that they will destroy you then move onto your family and then destroy them.
utter bastards.Postby team47b » Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:53 am
De Sisti wrote:
This is one of the silliest threads I've come across.
Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honoursmithy21 wrote:
He's right you know.0 -
and as an aside, dotard said that the NKs "explode their cannons" near the beaches.
wtaf does explode their cannons" mean? is it a euphamism for ejaculation?Postby team47b » Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:53 am
De Sisti wrote:
This is one of the silliest threads I've come across.
Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honoursmithy21 wrote:
He's right you know.0 -
-
Postby team47b » Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:53 am
De Sisti wrote:
This is one of the silliest threads I've come across.
Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honoursmithy21 wrote:
He's right you know.0 -
Rick Chasey wrote:Can't imagine MF falling foul of something so simple as tax.
the MFs have just said that they can't imagine Richard earning enough to have to pay tax, in any jurisdiction.
their words, not mine, so don't have a go at me.Postby team47b » Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:53 am
De Sisti wrote:
This is one of the silliest threads I've come across.
Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honoursmithy21 wrote:
He's right you know.0 -
-
KingstonGraham wrote:Robert88 wrote:KingstonGraham wrote:I don't think anyone should have an issue with him saluting a member of his own armed forces, like you say, he is the commander in chief.
I know it's an obvious and easy shot, but imagine what would be the reaction if Obama had done any of the things Trump has done so far this week.
Here you are matey, this will help you:Scoob84 wrote:
Page 307, 12 June.
Yes, I saw that. That was days ago - he's done plenty since then.
Indeed, it's easy to forget stuff from a few pages ago!0 -
Trump on Kim Jong Un:
"He speaks and his people sit up at attention. I want my people to do the same."0 -
Czech president calls press conference for underwear burningPetr Gazdík of the Stan party, wrote that if he did not have respect for the presidency, he "would say that the President has gone mad"
A total amateur by today's standards.0 -
Robert88 wrote:Czech president calls press conference for underwear burningPetr Gazdík of the Stan party, wrote that if he did not have respect for the presidency, he "would say that the President has gone mad"
A total amateur by today's standards.
The original would never do this: "I'm sorry to make you look like little idiots, you really don't deserve it," he told reporters before leaving.0 -
25% tariff on Chinese stuff.0
-
Trump: "I hate the children being taken away. The Democrats need to change that law."0
-
bianchimoon wrote:He's just been sued by the New York attorney General i think for misappropriation of funds from the Trump Foundation
Sounds like a plot line from Billions!0 -
So a Gallup poles reveals that Mr Trump has the highest support within the republican party of any president since WW2.
I'm not going to copy and paste links I leave that to the unsophisticates - that would be you.
Fantastic progress for populism in general....take your pickelf on your holibobs....
jeez :roll:0 -
KingstonGraham wrote:Trump: "I hate the children being taken away. The Democrats need to change that law."
You believe that. I think he does not but says he does. What is wrong with that? Lying is a perfectly well understood mode in communication.
Don't get too excited sonny....take your pickelf on your holibobs....
jeez :roll:0