Donald Trump
Comments
-
Tangled Metal wrote:CNN (fake news) has an article / opinion piece about what Trump's twitter posts say about him. A pseudo psychological analysis that's mildly interesting. Comments like he's a street fighter or his comments come about from his battles in the construction industry / life. He's the wealthy son of a wealthy property developer, I wonder how hard his battles have been?
Trump's #1 priority is how he comes across; his brand if you will.
He basically spunked a load of his inherited money on a big bunch of vanity companies which were all a big attempt to cultivate a certain public view of who Trump is. I mean, he's called everything after himself.
He's never even had to contemplate needing to work for anything basic like living. His entire labour has been about his own image. He doesn't know any different. He's never actually needed success in any conventional capacity. The objective was never to grow a company, employ more people, improve the top or bottom line, make himself money or anything like that. It's just a vehicle for him to project his own self image onto the rest of the world.
In essence, the presidency is just the culmination of that. He does not see any responsibility as president to the US, beyond his own image. Nothing in his life has ever been about anything else, and he's in his 70s. Why would that change now?
As such, why take anything he says beyond this fundamental aim. Plainly the truth is irrelevant to him. Perception is everything for him. Why else does he bang on about ratings all the time? He never has any real world worries because of his wealth. So he has defined his entire life, end to end, the full works, his money, his stories, his personal interactions, by how he is perceived and his own self image that he tries to project.0 -
Tangled Metal wrote:CNN (fake news) has an article / opinion piece about what Trump's twitter posts say about him. A pseudo psychological analysis that's mildly interesting. Comments like he's a street fighter or his comments come about from his battles in the construction industry / life. He's the wealthy son of a wealthy property developer, I wonder how hard his battles have been?
as well as "if Ivanka wasn't my daughter i'd probably be dating her" after Stern called her " a piece of Ass"All lies and jest..still a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest....0 -
Rick Chasey wrote:Tangled Metal wrote:CNN (fake news) has an article / opinion piece about what Trump's twitter posts say about him. A pseudo psychological analysis that's mildly interesting. Comments like he's a street fighter or his comments come about from his battles in the construction industry / life. He's the wealthy son of a wealthy property developer, I wonder how hard his battles have been?
Trump's #1 priority is how he comes across; his brand if you will.
He basically spunked a load of his inherited money on a big bunch of vanity companies which were all a big attempt to cultivate a certain public view of who Trump is. I mean, he's called everything after himself.
He's never even had to contemplate needing to work for anything basic like living. His entire labour has been about his own image. He doesn't know any different. He's never actually needed success in any conventional capacity. The objective was never to grow a company, employ more people, improve the top or bottom line, make himself money or anything like that. It's just a vehicle for him to project his own self image onto the rest of the world.
In essence, the presidency is just the culmination of that. He does not see any responsibility as president to the US, beyond his own image. Nothing in his life has ever been about anything else, and he's in his 70s. Why would that change now?
As such, why take anything he says beyond this fundamental aim. Plainly the truth is irrelevant to him. Perception is everything for him. Why else does he bang on about ratings all the time? He never has any real world worries because of his wealth. So he has defined his entire life, end to end, the full works, his money, his stories, his personal interactions, by how he is perceived and his own self image that he tries to project.
and then consider that from the time that he walked into Daddy's company he has been able to fire anybody who said "no" to him. As Rick says this man in his 70s is not going to change0 -
PBlakeney wrote:Rhetorical question. At what point do you have to blame management for poor decision making if they continually have to replace the people they hired?
Rhetorical return question: How long will it take to assemble enough sycophants to staff a whole cabinet and the back room administrators?
...and the FBI and the NSA...and the judiciary (including the Attorney General)...and the US CBI...seanoconn - gruagach craic!0 -
Pinno wrote:PBlakeney wrote:Rhetorical question. At what point do you have to blame management for poor decision making if they continually have to replace the people they hired?
Rhetorical return question: How long will it take to assemble enough sycophants to staff a whole cabinet and the back room administrators?
...and the FBI and the NSA...and the judiciary (including the Attorney General)...and the US CBI...All lies and jest..still a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest....0 -
If Dick Strawbridge was ever on Fox News, he would be a shoo-in for a cabinet post.0
-
All recent appointments and actions seem to point to him about to fire Mueller sooner rather than later, plus weird appointment Bolton, given he's so hawkish on Russia and Korea when Dump was appointed on a "no more foreign wars" ticket?All lies and jest..still a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest....0
-
bianchimoon wrote:All recent appointments and actions seem to point to him about to fire Mueller sooner rather than later, plus weird appointment Bolton, given he's so hawkish on Russia and Korea when Dump was appointed on a "no more foreign wars" ticket?0
-
Isn't their a general belief that when approval ratings are so low or your embroiled in a scandal the best way out is to go to war?!
Bolton appointment doesn't look good.0 -
Dinyull wrote:Isn't their a general belief that when approval ratings are so low or your embroiled in a scandal the best way out is to go to war?!
.
Way too much forethought attributed to Trump there.
No way would he think something out like that.
His thought processes last a little shorter than general bowl movements.0 -
He's threatened to veto the spending bill.
He clearly doesn't intend to.
Everyone assumes he isn't going to.
People aren't taking him seriously.
Therefore he will veto the spending bill to prove a point.0 -
Pinno wrote:PBlakeney wrote:Rhetorical question. At what point do you have to blame management for poor decision making if they continually have to replace the people they hired?
Rhetorical return question: How long will it take to assemble enough sycophants to staff a whole cabinet and the back room administrators?
...and the FBI and the NSA...and the judiciary (including the Attorney General)...and the US CBI...The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
Stormy Daniels lawyer just tweeted a pic of a CD in a safe with the caption: If a picture is worth a thousand words, what's this worth?
Please be a video haha.0 -
They snuck new sanctions against Russia into the spending bill.0
-
KingstonGraham wrote:He's threatened to veto the spending bill.
He clearly doesn't intend to.
Everyone assumes he isn't going to.
People aren't taking him seriously.
Therefore he will veto the spending bill to prove a point.
That doesn't even rhyme...0 -
KingstonGraham wrote:If Dick Strawbridge was ever on Fox News, he would be a shoo-in for a cabinet post.1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Part of the anti-growth coalition0 -
-
Heard of blank verse imposter? Possibly the worst sacking in my opinion was the guy who was sacked the day before he retired.0
-
PBlakeney wrote:Pinno wrote:PBlakeney wrote:Rhetorical question. At what point do you have to blame management for poor decision making if they continually have to replace the people they hired?
Rhetorical return question: How long will it take to assemble enough sycophants to staff a whole cabinet and the back room administrators?
...and the FBI and the NSA...and the judiciary (including the Attorney General)...and the US CBI...
Send in your CV. You never know, you might get a high powered, well paid job but not for long.seanoconn - gruagach craic!0 -
Pinno wrote:PBlakeney wrote:Pinno wrote:PBlakeney wrote:Rhetorical question. At what point do you have to blame management for poor decision making if they continually have to replace the people they hired?
Rhetorical return question: How long will it take to assemble enough sycophants to staff a whole cabinet and the back room administrators?
...and the FBI and the NSA...and the judiciary (including the Attorney General)...and the US CBI...
Send in your CV. You never know, you might get a high powered, well paid job but not for long.The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
Imposter wrote:KingstonGraham wrote:He's threatened to veto the spending bill.
He clearly doesn't intend to.
Everyone assumes he isn't going to.
People aren't taking him seriously.
Therefore he will veto the spending bill to prove a point.
That doesn't even rhyme...
Also, I got the last bit wrong.
He will be told that a veto would ruin his weekend golfing.
He will sign the bill.0 -
KingstonGraham wrote:Imposter wrote:KingstonGraham wrote:He's threatened to veto the spending bill.
He clearly doesn't intend to.
Everyone assumes he isn't going to.
People aren't taking him seriously.
Therefore he will veto the spending bill to prove a point.
That doesn't even rhyme...
Also, I got the last bit wrong.
He will be told that a veto would ruin his weekend golfing.
He will sign the bill.
(plus, if he hadn't signed the bill, he would have had to be in DC this past weekend. He really, really wouldn't have wanted that. Worth $1.3 trillion.)0 -
PBlakeney wrote:Pinno wrote:PBlakeney wrote:Pinno wrote:PBlakeney wrote:Rhetorical question. At what point do you have to blame management for poor decision making if they continually have to replace the people they hired?
Rhetorical return question: How long will it take to assemble enough sycophants to staff a whole cabinet and the back room administrators?
...and the FBI and the NSA...and the judiciary (including the Attorney General)...and the US CBI...
Send in your CV. You never know, you might get a high powered, well paid job but not for long.
As an added bonus you might get a lap dance from Ivanka. He's not interested anymore as she's no longer a teenager.
I don't do smileys.
There is no secret ingredient - Kung Fu Panda
London Calling on Facebook
Parktools0 -
cooldad wrote:As an added bonus you might get a lap dance from Ivanka. He's not interested anymore as she's no longer a teenager.0
-
Veronese68 wrote:cooldad wrote:As an added bonus you might get a lap dance from Ivanka. He's not interested anymore as she's no longer a teenager.I don't do smileys.
There is no secret ingredient - Kung Fu Panda
London Calling on Facebook
Parktools0 -
You know, I'm starting to think he's not 100% wholesome.0
-
KingstonGraham wrote:You know, I'm starting to think he's not 100% wholesome.0
-
Hardly a surprise he polls well in the Deep South!0
-
That actually sounds a bit Carry On....0
-
No tweet yet boasting about kicking out 60 Russian spies?0