BREXIT - Is This Really Still Rumbling On? 😴

1191819191921192319242110

Comments

  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 29,551

    rjsterry said:

    morstar said:

    I probably need to reply to all

    Rick said that Rishi was pushing up taxes on people who do not earn much.

    This is not true and all the inflation whataboutery does not make it so as that would happen anyway.

    Economically this Govt is to the left of Blair with record levels of tax, spending and borrowing. I can't help but think that if they weren't wearing blue rosettes you would be cheering them on

    The inflation is not whataboutery because the tax bands have been frozen.

    Had they not been, then yes.

    Static tax bands drag more low earners into tax every year and the higher rate applies to ever more modest salaries.
    but that was already baked in.
    How can a decision on whether to adjust the tax bands or not be 'baked in'? The lower threshold was only raised at the last minute and the promised tax cut may never happen.
    Because he froze them for the duration of this Parliament
    'Frozen' doesn't mean anything. He can 'unfreeze' whenever he wants.
    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,328
    rjsterry said:

    rjsterry said:

    morstar said:

    I probably need to reply to all

    Rick said that Rishi was pushing up taxes on people who do not earn much.

    This is not true and all the inflation whataboutery does not make it so as that would happen anyway.

    Economically this Govt is to the left of Blair with record levels of tax, spending and borrowing. I can't help but think that if they weren't wearing blue rosettes you would be cheering them on

    The inflation is not whataboutery because the tax bands have been frozen.

    Had they not been, then yes.

    Static tax bands drag more low earners into tax every year and the higher rate applies to ever more modest salaries.
    but that was already baked in.
    How can a decision on whether to adjust the tax bands or not be 'baked in'? The lower threshold was only raised at the last minute and the promised tax cut may never happen.
    Because he froze them for the duration of this Parliament
    'Frozen' doesn't mean anything. He can 'unfreeze' whenever he wants.
    But that would mean this government making a u-turn.
    Ah, okay, fair point, well made.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • surrey_commuter
    surrey_commuter Posts: 18,867
    morstar said:

    rjsterry said:

    morstar said:

    I probably need to reply to all

    Rick said that Rishi was pushing up taxes on people who do not earn much.

    This is not true and all the inflation whataboutery does not make it so as that would happen anyway.

    Economically this Govt is to the left of Blair with record levels of tax, spending and borrowing. I can't help but think that if they weren't wearing blue rosettes you would be cheering them on

    The inflation is not whataboutery because the tax bands have been frozen.

    Had they not been, then yes.

    Static tax bands drag more low earners into tax every year and the higher rate applies to ever more modest salaries.
    but that was already baked in.
    How can a decision on whether to adjust the tax bands or not be 'baked in'? The lower threshold was only raised at the last minute and the promised tax cut may never happen.
    Because he froze them for the duration of this Parliament
    Sorry, but this is whatabboutery.

    It’s his own decision. It’s not like it’s an external factor such as covid or Brexit.

    All his new measures are set against the backdrop of his own decision to drag more people into tax with static bands. That decision already being made has to be considered as context for any further policies.
    So what else do you want to reopen? pension thresholds? child benefit clawback? removal of personal allowance?
  • Jezyboy
    Jezyboy Posts: 3,605
    That chart has the feel of someone trawling through data to find the perfect line that encapsulates their conclusion.
  • ddraver
    ddraver Posts: 26,697
    We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
    - @ddraver
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    Jezyboy said:

    That chart has the feel of someone trawling through data to find the perfect line that encapsulates their conclusion.

    Thought it’d resonate better than most on a bike forum
  • morstar
    morstar Posts: 6,190



    So what else do you want to reopen? pension thresholds? child benefit clawback? removal of personal allowance?

    I think we can draw the line at his own policies for a clear delineation. i.e. freezing tax bands is his policy. Not something either inherited or external.

  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,349
    ddraver said:

    Cheer up... too late to do anything about it now.

    Except to say "Told you so."
  • surrey_commuter
    surrey_commuter Posts: 18,867

    ddraver said:

    Cheer up... too late to do anything about it now.

    Except to say "Told you so."
    Is anybody else starting to doubt the power of the German carmakers
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,349

    ddraver said:

    Cheer up... too late to do anything about it now.

    Except to say "Told you so."
    Is anybody else starting to doubt the power of the German carmakers

    Wait till their gas runs out... they'll come running back to us then.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    Surely a Brexiter here wants to defend Brexit? A third of exporters gone. Is it worth it?
  • surrey_commuter
    surrey_commuter Posts: 18,867

    Surely a Brexiter here wants to defend Brexit? A third of exporters gone. Is it worth it?

    You already know the answer but I will try and do so in a non-perjorative manner.

    Brexiteers do not do macroeconomics, so as long as these issues do not land on their own doormat it is a price worth paying to have less foreigners in your life.

    On a lighter note how many of these 9,000 firms pivoted to Asia?
  • morstar
    morstar Posts: 6,190

    Surely a Brexiter here wants to defend Brexit? A third of exporters gone. Is it worth it?

    To play devils advocate…

    I’d expect there would be some consolidation whereby suppliers better able to handle the red tape do so whilst smaller players back out.

    Far from a good outcome but does not automatically correlate to a drop of a third in trade.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    morstar said:

    Surely a Brexiter here wants to defend Brexit? A third of exporters gone. Is it worth it?

    To play devils advocate…

    I’d expect there would be some consolidation whereby suppliers better able to handle the red tape do so whilst smaller players back out.

    Far from a good outcome but does not automatically correlate to a drop of a third in trade.
    Sure, but there happens to be a chart going around from the FT demonstrating a very clear drop in UK trade compared to the rest of the G7 which aligns bang on with the same dates.
  • john80
    john80 Posts: 2,965

    Surely a Brexiter here wants to defend Brexit? A third of exporters gone. Is it worth it?

    Maybe you should question why there is still asymmetry in the rules regarding the export of goods to the UK versus the other way. That is a good question for the current government.
  • ddraver
    ddraver Posts: 26,697
    That's easy - Not having customs checks is a good thing actually...
    We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
    - @ddraver
  • ddraver
    ddraver Posts: 26,697
    edited April 2022
    We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
    - @ddraver
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    john80 said:

    Surely a Brexiter here wants to defend Brexit? A third of exporters gone. Is it worth it?

    Maybe you should question why there is still asymmetry in the rules regarding the export of goods to the UK versus the other way. That is a good question for the current government.
    Which bit of that are you struggling with?
  • john80
    john80 Posts: 2,965

    john80 said:

    Surely a Brexiter here wants to defend Brexit? A third of exporters gone. Is it worth it?

    Maybe you should question why there is still asymmetry in the rules regarding the export of goods to the UK versus the other way. That is a good question for the current government.
    Which bit of that are you struggling with?
    Are you happy with the EU imposing import checks on UK goods but the UK government not returning the favour. Or are you still holding onto the argument that we pursued Brexit so the pain should be entirely on the UKs shoulders.
  • john80
    john80 Posts: 2,965
    ddraver said:

    That's easy - Not having customs checks is a good thing actually...

    Only if it is reciprocated.
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,328
    john80 said:

    john80 said:

    Surely a Brexiter here wants to defend Brexit? A third of exporters gone. Is it worth it?

    Maybe you should question why there is still asymmetry in the rules regarding the export of goods to the UK versus the other way. That is a good question for the current government.
    Which bit of that are you struggling with?
    Are you happy with the EU imposing import checks on UK goods but the UK government not returning the favour. Or are you still holding onto the argument that we pursued Brexit so the pain should be entirely on the UKs shoulders.
    We are not in the EU so of course they are going to impose checks.
    What our government does is up to our government. Sovereign isn't it.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • surrey_commuter
    surrey_commuter Posts: 18,867
    john80 said:

    Surely a Brexiter here wants to defend Brexit? A third of exporters gone. Is it worth it?

    Maybe you should question why there is still asymmetry in the rules regarding the export of goods to the UK versus the other way. That is a good question for the current government.
    we chose to have export checks on our exports and we chose to not have checks on our imports.

    I believe we chose not to check imports because it would be bad for the economy.

    I don't get your problem as this is what you voted for
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    john80 said:

    john80 said:

    Surely a Brexiter here wants to defend Brexit? A third of exporters gone. Is it worth it?

    Maybe you should question why there is still asymmetry in the rules regarding the export of goods to the UK versus the other way. That is a good question for the current government.
    Which bit of that are you struggling with?
    Are you happy with the EU imposing import checks on UK goods but the UK government not returning the favour. Or are you still holding onto the argument that we pursued Brexit so the pain should be entirely on the UKs shoulders.
    What were you expecting by leaving the CU and SM?
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,152
    The German car companies will sort it out.
  • Stevo_666
    Stevo_666 Posts: 61,398

    ddraver said:

    Cheer up... too late to do anything about it now.

    Except to say "Told you so."
    Data from the institute of Export and International Trade says otherwise rather clearly.
    https://export.org.uk/news/594836/New-monitor-shows-boost-in-number-of-UK-exporters.htm

    So cheer up, as you say.
    "I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]
  • surrey_commuter
    surrey_commuter Posts: 18,867
    Stevo_666 said:

    ddraver said:

    Cheer up... too late to do anything about it now.

    Except to say "Told you so."
    Data from the institute of Export and International Trade says otherwise rather clearly.
    https://export.org.uk/news/594836/New-monitor-shows-boost-in-number-of-UK-exporters.htm

    So cheer up, as you say.
    you should read that article
  • TheBigBean
    TheBigBean Posts: 21,915

    Stevo_666 said:

    ddraver said:

    Cheer up... too late to do anything about it now.

    Except to say "Told you so."
    Data from the institute of Export and International Trade says otherwise rather clearly.
    https://export.org.uk/news/594836/New-monitor-shows-boost-in-number-of-UK-exporters.htm

    So cheer up, as you say.
    you should read that article
    A bit more nuance? This is the Brexit thread. Everything should be an extreme take.
  • surrey_commuter
    surrey_commuter Posts: 18,867

    Stevo_666 said:

    ddraver said:

    Cheer up... too late to do anything about it now.

    Except to say "Told you so."
    Data from the institute of Export and International Trade says otherwise rather clearly.
    https://export.org.uk/news/594836/New-monitor-shows-boost-in-number-of-UK-exporters.htm

    So cheer up, as you say.
    you should read that article
    A bit more nuance? This is the Brexit thread. Everything should be an extreme take.
    they did not previously have to register as exporters if only selling to the EU so very thin gruel even by Brexit win standards
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,152

    Stevo_666 said:

    ddraver said:

    Cheer up... too late to do anything about it now.

    Except to say "Told you so."
    Data from the institute of Export and International Trade says otherwise rather clearly.
    https://export.org.uk/news/594836/New-monitor-shows-boost-in-number-of-UK-exporters.htm

    So cheer up, as you say.
    you should read that article
    A bit more nuance? This is the Brexit thread. Everything should be an extreme take.
    they did not previously have to register as exporters if only selling to the EU so very thin gruel even by Brexit win standards
    The article was about it slightly recovering in jan22 after falling since April 21