BREXIT - Is This Really Still Rumbling On? 😴

1161816191621162316242110

Comments

  • First.Aspect
    First.Aspect Posts: 17,172
    rjsterry said:

    Why don’t Brexiters get annoyed by the lying from people like Lewis?

    They’re lying to you as well.

    Tribalism. They might be liars but they are *their* liars.
    This. It is a bit like one of your team's players diving to win a penalty.
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,330

    Why don’t Brexiters get annoyed by the lying from people like Lewis?

    They’re lying to you as well.

    Lying has become the new normal and we are blind to it any more. Wrong, but until there is someone with integrity calling them for it in the HoC then here we are.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 29,562

    rjsterry said:

    Why don’t Brexiters get annoyed by the lying from people like Lewis?

    They’re lying to you as well.

    Tribalism. They might be liars but they are *their* liars.
    This. It is a bit like one of your team's players diving to win a penalty.
    And the lies are winding up 'them' so double win!
    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition
  • rjsterry said:

    Why don’t Brexiters get annoyed by the lying from people like Lewis?

    They’re lying to you as well.

    Tribalism. They might be liars but they are *their* liars.
    rjsterry said:

    Why don’t Brexiters get annoyed by the lying from people like Lewis?

    They’re lying to you as well.

    Tribalism. They might be liars but they are *their* liars.
    But even now new tribes will be forming.

    The anti EU obsessives will probably feign an interest in the Irish border to drive the UK further away and so speed up the demise of the EU.
  • shortfall
    shortfall Posts: 3,288
    An interesting view from the Guardian economics editor (who voted Leave). I know it doesn't count because "it's a comment piece" or something, but some people might find it thought provoking.

    https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/dec/31/the-left-brexit-economic-uk?__twitter_impression=true
  • pangolin
    pangolin Posts: 6,648
    shortfall said:

    An interesting view from the Guardian economics editor (who voted Leave). I know it doesn't count because "it's a comment piece" or something, but some people might find it thought provoking.

    https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/dec/31/the-left-brexit-economic-uk?__twitter_impression=true

    "Now the UK has a choice. It can continue to mourn or it can take advantage of the opportunities that Brexit has provided."

    And yet the only opportunity he mentioned (unless I missed some) was the 'opportunity' for our farmers to spend more money on workers or machinery.
    - Genesis Croix de Fer
    - Dolan Tuono
  • It's clearly true that the left (or centre left) needs to take advantage of this and say "let's do what's best for the people here, rather than just slashing regulations and taxes". The reality of which regulations were apparently stifling the UK is still to be made clear.

    The left left never liked the EU anyway, because it stopped the nation state intervening in the market as much as they would like, but it is more difficult for centrists, as there is less that they would have been prevented from doing. Particularly with the unique half in-half out membership that the UK had.
  • focuszing723
    focuszing723 Posts: 8,151
    I have a bad feeling going it alone in the world where we had a role as the go between with the EU and the US of A, is just a bridge too far!
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    I made this point elsewhere but I suspect the big deciding factor is whether your politics is more aligned with the main parties that make up the main continental blocks than with domestic parties.

    This is certainly the case with me and their consensus, technocratic approach aligned roughly with my own views and so was a source of generally good policy making.

    There are exceptions obviously.
    I have no such faith in the U.K. system, not least as it produces governments dominated by one party with very few checks.
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,154
    edited January 2021
    The fact that the Labour twat wing and the Conservative twat wing were in favour of it doesn't give me a warm feeling about how either bunch would hope to use whatever new found freedom we now have.
  • pangolin said:

    shortfall said:

    An interesting view from the Guardian economics editor (who voted Leave). I know it doesn't count because "it's a comment piece" or something, but some people might find it thought provoking.

    https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/dec/31/the-left-brexit-economic-uk?__twitter_impression=true

    "Now the UK has a choice. It can continue to mourn or it can take advantage of the opportunities that Brexit has provided."

    And yet the only opportunity he mentioned (unless I missed some) was the 'opportunity' for our farmers to spend more money on workers or machinery.
    I suspect that like me you are not a regular Guardian reader and are missing the humour easily spotted by regulars.

    “The EU specialises with France doing the food and drink”
  • pangolin
    pangolin Posts: 6,648

    pangolin said:

    shortfall said:

    An interesting view from the Guardian economics editor (who voted Leave). I know it doesn't count because "it's a comment piece" or something, but some people might find it thought provoking.

    https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/dec/31/the-left-brexit-economic-uk?__twitter_impression=true

    "Now the UK has a choice. It can continue to mourn or it can take advantage of the opportunities that Brexit has provided."

    And yet the only opportunity he mentioned (unless I missed some) was the 'opportunity' for our farmers to spend more money on workers or machinery.
    I suspect that like me you are not a regular Guardian reader and are missing the humour easily spotted by regulars.

    “The EU specialises with France doing the food and drink”
    Hah, correct I am not
    - Genesis Croix de Fer
    - Dolan Tuono
  • ddraver
    ddraver Posts: 26,698
    Whoop!

    We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
    - @ddraver
  • morstar
    morstar Posts: 6,190
    Is there any other country/principality in the world with a similar governance situation as NI?

    I.e. simultaneously part of two nations.
  • morstar said:

    Is there any other country/principality in the world with a similar governance situation as NI?

    I.e. simultaneously part of two nations.

    Andorra used to be and gibraltar about to be
  • TheBigBean
    TheBigBean Posts: 21,919
    morstar said:

    Is there any other country/principality in the world with a similar governance situation as NI?

    I.e. simultaneously part of two nations.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condominium_(international_law)

  • ddraver
    ddraver Posts: 26,698
    edited January 2021
    I asked this a while back and yes there are quite a few examples involving (mostly) European nations and their colonial outposts on the other side of the world. The Netherlands is in the EU for example but the Dutch Antillies are in a customs union with the rest of its neighbours (there are a number of flip sides the other way too).

    I couldn't find an example of any that were literally next door to each other though. That's 100% Brexit...
    We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
    - @ddraver
  • morstar
    morstar Posts: 6,190
    Thanks, interesting stuff.

    I thought similarly that there may be some old colonies of various empires that are a bit betwixt and between but there's quite a few varieties it seems.
  • morstar
    morstar Posts: 6,190
    I anticipate a united Ireland in my lifetime assuming I stay healthy.
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,374
    morstar said:

    I anticipate a united Ireland in my lifetime assuming I stay healthy.


    On balance, I too think it's going to move in that direction. I'm not going to make a prediction about whether I'm going to be alive to see it though.
  • TheBigBean
    TheBigBean Posts: 21,919
    morstar said:

    Thanks, interesting stuff.

    I thought similarly that there may be some old colonies of various empires that are a bit betwixt and between but there's quite a few varieties it seems.

    There are a lot of quirks around the world. A few come to mind:
    - A town between Brazil and Paraguay where the high st is the border and there are no checks
    - Lots of borders where you need to seek out immigration/customs
    - In central Asia, there are a number of instances where there are archipelago of one country within another. Sometimes only a mile diameter.
    - There are places such as NW Pakistan that can only be accessed in winter by going to another country (Afghanistan)
    - The distance between border posts can be huge e.g. Pakistan to China is about four hours of driving
    - Other countries such as Palau trade their UN vote and use of their waters for citizens having the right to live and work in the US
    - Then there are the countries that don't have border crossings when you think they really should e.g. the Darien gap or India-China (maybe they do now)
    - There are also lots of duty free zones in some countries which effectively creates an internal customs border

    Anyway, my point is that it is a big world with no definitive approach to anything. Countries either make things work or do the opposite.
  • morstar
    morstar Posts: 6,190

    morstar said:

    I anticipate a united Ireland in my lifetime assuming I stay healthy.


    On balance, I too think it's going to move in that direction. I'm not going to make a prediction about whether I'm going to be alive to see it though.
    Apparently, I seem to recall reading that the birth rate makes it likely anyway but the political situation increases the likelihood in my mind.

    The sea border isn’t sufficiently onerous to stop most trade but there will be cases where additional admin and costs will encourage internal re-sourcing. It’s not going to change any bodies politics overnight but such changes can only assist in bringing the island closer together.
  • TheBigBean
    TheBigBean Posts: 21,919
    morstar said:

    morstar said:

    I anticipate a united Ireland in my lifetime assuming I stay healthy.


    On balance, I too think it's going to move in that direction. I'm not going to make a prediction about whether I'm going to be alive to see it though.
    Apparently, I seem to recall reading that the birth rate makes it likely anyway but the political situation increases the likelihood in my mind.

    The sea border isn’t sufficiently onerous to stop most trade but there will be cases where additional admin and costs will encourage internal re-sourcing. It’s not going to change any bodies politics overnight but such changes can only assist in bringing the island closer together.
    Unless, they vote out of the arrangement.
  • morstar
    morstar Posts: 6,190

    morstar said:

    morstar said:

    I anticipate a united Ireland in my lifetime assuming I stay healthy.


    On balance, I too think it's going to move in that direction. I'm not going to make a prediction about whether I'm going to be alive to see it though.
    Apparently, I seem to recall reading that the birth rate makes it likely anyway but the political situation increases the likelihood in my mind.

    The sea border isn’t sufficiently onerous to stop most trade but there will be cases where additional admin and costs will encourage internal re-sourcing. It’s not going to change any bodies politics overnight but such changes can only assist in bringing the island closer together.
    Unless, they vote out of the arrangement.
    Which is Arlenes plan.

    Symptomatic of current British politics, everybody just wants out of everything. No positive vision for anything, just simplistic blame game nonsense.
  • morstar said:

    morstar said:

    morstar said:

    I anticipate a united Ireland in my lifetime assuming I stay healthy.


    On balance, I too think it's going to move in that direction. I'm not going to make a prediction about whether I'm going to be alive to see it though.
    Apparently, I seem to recall reading that the birth rate makes it likely anyway but the political situation increases the likelihood in my mind.

    The sea border isn’t sufficiently onerous to stop most trade but there will be cases where additional admin and costs will encourage internal re-sourcing. It’s not going to change any bodies politics overnight but such changes can only assist in bringing the island closer together.
    Unless, they vote out of the arrangement.
    Which is Arlenes plan.

    Symptomatic of current British politics, everybody just wants out of everything. No positive vision for anything, just simplistic blame game nonsense.
    How long do they have to wait? It may backfire though and simply lead unification.
  • TheBigBean
    TheBigBean Posts: 21,919

    morstar said:

    morstar said:

    morstar said:

    I anticipate a united Ireland in my lifetime assuming I stay healthy.


    On balance, I too think it's going to move in that direction. I'm not going to make a prediction about whether I'm going to be alive to see it though.
    Apparently, I seem to recall reading that the birth rate makes it likely anyway but the political situation increases the likelihood in my mind.

    The sea border isn’t sufficiently onerous to stop most trade but there will be cases where additional admin and costs will encourage internal re-sourcing. It’s not going to change any bodies politics overnight but such changes can only assist in bringing the island closer together.
    Unless, they vote out of the arrangement.
    Which is Arlenes plan.

    Symptomatic of current British politics, everybody just wants out of everything. No positive vision for anything, just simplistic blame game nonsense.
    How long do they have to wait? It may backfire though and simply lead unification.
    Four years, then there is a two year discussion.
  • morstar
    morstar Posts: 6,190
    Arlenes wording was along the lines of ‘benefit from the advantages of Brexit’.

    I guess 4 years grants NI the best of both worlds in the immediate term at relatively low impact and a try before you buy on full Brexit. They can make an informed decision in 4 years time on how wonderful or shit Brexit actually is.
  • elbowloh
    elbowloh Posts: 7,078
    morstar said:

    Arlenes wording was along the lines of ‘benefit from the advantages of Brexit’.

    I guess 4 years grants NI the best of both worlds in the immediate term at relatively low impact and a try before you buy on full Brexit. They can make an informed decision in 4 years time on how wonderful or censored Brexit actually is.

    That's with Eire paying for them to remain in Erasmus and some other schemes.
    Felt F1 2014
    Felt Z6 2012
    Red Arthur Caygill steel frame
    Tall....
    www.seewildlife.co.uk
  • ddraver
    ddraver Posts: 26,698
    BJ had to lie about all the benefits (apart from the racism one) this morning - you'd have thought he'd have just chosen truthful ones seeing as there are so many right...?

    Right..?

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/55522329
    We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
    - @ddraver
  • TheBigBean
    TheBigBean Posts: 21,919
    ddraver said:

    BJ had to lie about all the benefits (apart from the racism one) this morning - you'd have thought he'd have just chosen truthful ones seeing as there are so many right...?

    Right..?

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/55522329

    Which bits were lies? I have read the article. I'll give you that already making cash savings is a bit much only a couple of days into January, but the rest seems to check out.