BREXIT - Is This Really Still Rumbling On? 😴

1139113921394139613972102

Comments

  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 72,738
    Coopster’s maths is rather off.

    An accountant he would not make
  • Stevo_666
    Stevo_666 Posts: 58,560

    Let's see what the real figures look like rather than those who are trying to dilute them

    There are 9 countries that are net contributors to the EU budget.

    Total from net contributors is £52.2bn of which the UK contributed £9.77bn (18.7%)

    So there is an 18.7% hole in their yearly budget going forward. This is the real impact the EU faces

    Source: https://www.statista.com/chart/18794/net-contributors-to-eu-budget/

    I mean it clearly isn't an 18.7% hole in their budget, it's an 18.7% reduction in net contributions but point taken, it's substantial.
    You got it.
    "I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 72,738
    edited February 2020
    Sorry why is net contribution relevant?

    Surely the cost gets shared in equal proportion to their economy around the 27?

    The equation is the same.
  • Stevo_666
    Stevo_666 Posts: 58,560
    edited February 2020
    My point is that the absence of our contributions makes a difference. What point are you trying to make?
    "I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]
  • tailwindhome
    tailwindhome Posts: 18,941
    It'll be interesting to compare the increase in any member's contribution to the redistribution of the UK empty seats in the EU parliament.

    “New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!
  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 27,699
    So?

    They have 67million fewer people to worry about.

    Sure, they'll all have to chip in more or make do with less. Probably a bit of both.
    I can't see that it's going to change anything fundamentally. There are already voices within the EU arguing for reduced spending.
    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition
  • TheBigBean
    TheBigBean Posts: 20,642

    Sorry why is net contribution relevant?

    Surely the cost gets shared in equal proportion to their economy around the 27?

    The equation is the same.

    If it was that easy there wouldn't be any need for four days of arguments.
  • Stevo_666
    Stevo_666 Posts: 58,560

    Sorry why is net contribution relevant?

    Surely the cost gets shared in equal proportion to their economy around the 27?

    The equation is the same.

    If it was that easy there wouldn't be any need for four days of arguments.
    True, seems like a lot of effort if the formula is already agreed.
    "I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]
  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 27,699
    The argument is on how much to spend and on what, not how it's divvy-ed up between the 27.
    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition
  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 27,699
    Obviously different proposals benefit some states more than others.
    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition
  • rjsterry said:

    So?

    They have 67million fewer people to worry about.

    Sure, they'll all have to chip in more or make do with less. Probably a bit of both.
    I can't see that it's going to change anything fundamentally. There are already voices within the EU arguing for reduced spending.

    Previously, the EU's only worry for the 67 million Brits was how big the UK's credit card was!

    Thankfully we can guarantee this time around that the UK will be paying less than it ever has :)
  • Stevo_666
    Stevo_666 Posts: 58,560
    rjsterry said:

    The argument is on how much to spend and on what, not how it's divvy-ed up between the 27.

    Without the UK, clearly all the other contributors have to pay more so there is more sensitivity on how much overall is spent as that feeds into their bill.
    "I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]
  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 27,699
    edited February 2020
    They all pay more OR they spend less. More detail here.

    https://www.politico.eu/article/8-takeaways-from-the-new-eu-budget-proposal/

    @ Coopster: this may come as a surprise, but we will be contributing to existing commitments until 2064.

    https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-8039

    It'll be 2025 before annual payments drop below a billion.
    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition
  • morstar
    morstar Posts: 6,190
    There is no gloating financially either way as with any divorce.
    We are leaving and paying maintenance whilst having to buy new white goods for our new pad.
    Meanwhile the wife keeps the house and the bills are covered but the discretionary spend is no longer there.
    The lawyers who are typically the winners have their equivalence in the investors who successfully track the market shifts.
  • Stevo_666
    Stevo_666 Posts: 58,560
    rjsterry said:

    They all pay more OR they spend less. More detail here.

    https://www.politico.eu/article/8-takeaways-from-the-new-eu-budget-proposal/

    @ Coopster: this may come as a surprise, but we will be contributing to existing commitments until 2064.

    https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-8039

    It'll be 2025 before annual payments drop below a billion.

    It's the direction of travel that matters, as they say :)
    "I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]
  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 27,699
    It's the same fight in any government: a bunch of guys with brilliant ideas and a smaller bunch
    Stevo_666 said:

    rjsterry said:

    They all pay more OR they spend less. More detail here.

    https://www.politico.eu/article/8-takeaways-from-the-new-eu-budget-proposal/

    @ Coopster: this may come as a surprise, but we will be contributing to existing commitments until 2064.

    https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-8039

    It'll be 2025 before annual payments drop below a billion.

    It's the direction of travel that matters, as they say :)
    Which direction of travel of what are we talking about here. A shame they dodged the opportunity to put proper sanctions on the Polish and Hungarian p***takers.
    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition
  • Stevo_666
    Stevo_666 Posts: 58,560
    rjsterry said:

    It's the same fight in any government: a bunch of guys with brilliant ideas and a smaller bunch

    Stevo_666 said:

    rjsterry said:

    They all pay more OR they spend less. More detail here.

    https://www.politico.eu/article/8-takeaways-from-the-new-eu-budget-proposal/

    @ Coopster: this may come as a surprise, but we will be contributing to existing commitments until 2064.

    https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-8039

    It'll be 2025 before annual payments drop below a billion.

    It's the direction of travel that matters, as they say :)
    Which direction of travel of what are we talking about here. A shame they dodged the opportunity to put proper sanctions on the Polish and Hungarian p***takers.
    Our reducing payments over time.
    "I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]
  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 27,699
    Stevo_666 said:

    rjsterry said:

    It's the same fight in any government: a bunch of guys with brilliant ideas and a smaller bunch

    Stevo_666 said:

    rjsterry said:

    They all pay more OR they spend less. More detail here.

    https://www.politico.eu/article/8-takeaways-from-the-new-eu-budget-proposal/

    @ Coopster: this may come as a surprise, but we will be contributing to existing commitments until 2064.

    https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-8039

    It'll be 2025 before annual payments drop below a billion.

    It's the direction of travel that matters, as they say :)
    Which direction of travel of what are we talking about here. A shame they dodged the opportunity to put proper sanctions on the Polish and Hungarian p***takers.
    Our reducing payments over time.
    The comment was on the length of the tail. I'll be nearly in my 90s by the time we're paid up.
    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition
  • Stevo_666
    Stevo_666 Posts: 58,560
    rjsterry said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    rjsterry said:

    It's the same fight in any government: a bunch of guys with brilliant ideas and a smaller bunch

    Stevo_666 said:

    rjsterry said:

    They all pay more OR they spend less. More detail here.

    https://www.politico.eu/article/8-takeaways-from-the-new-eu-budget-proposal/

    @ Coopster: this may come as a surprise, but we will be contributing to existing commitments until 2064.

    https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-8039

    It'll be 2025 before annual payments drop below a billion.

    It's the direction of travel that matters, as they say :)
    Which direction of travel of what are we talking about here. A shame they dodged the opportunity to put proper sanctions on the Polish and Hungarian p***takers.
    Our reducing payments over time.
    The comment was on the length of the tail. I'll be nearly in my 90s by the time we're paid up.
    Big deal. You said yourself the payments would be under a billion by 2025. That's around 10% of the last full years net contribution.
    "I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 72,738
    edited February 2020
    Stevo_666 said:

    rjsterry said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    rjsterry said:

    It's the same fight in any government: a bunch of guys with brilliant ideas and a smaller bunch

    Stevo_666 said:

    rjsterry said:

    They all pay more OR they spend less. More detail here.

    https://www.politico.eu/article/8-takeaways-from-the-new-eu-budget-proposal/

    @ Coopster: this may come as a surprise, but we will be contributing to existing commitments until 2064.

    https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-8039

    It'll be 2025 before annual payments drop below a billion.

    It's the direction of travel that matters, as they say :)
    Which direction of travel of what are we talking about here. A shame they dodged the opportunity to put proper sanctions on the Polish and Hungarian p***takers.
    Our reducing payments over time.
    The comment was on the length of the tail. I'll be nearly in my 90s by the time we're paid up.
    Big deal. You said yourself the payments would be under a billion by 2025. That's around 10% of the last full years net contribution.
    Hahaha
  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 27,699
    Stevo_666 said:

    rjsterry said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    rjsterry said:

    It's the same fight in any government: a bunch of guys with brilliant ideas and a smaller bunch

    Stevo_666 said:

    rjsterry said:

    They all pay more OR they spend less. More detail here.

    https://www.politico.eu/article/8-takeaways-from-the-new-eu-budget-proposal/

    @ Coopster: this may come as a surprise, but we will be contributing to existing commitments until 2064.

    https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-8039

    It'll be 2025 before annual payments drop below a billion.

    It's the direction of travel that matters, as they say :)
    Which direction of travel of what are we talking about here. A shame they dodged the opportunity to put proper sanctions on the Polish and Hungarian p***takers.
    Our reducing payments over time.
    The comment was on the length of the tail. I'll be nearly in my 90s by the time we're paid up.
    Big deal.
    I think that was my original point. Glad you agree.
    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition
  • rjsterry said:


    @ Coopster: this may come as a surprise, but we will be contributing to existing commitments until 2064.

    https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-8039

    It'll be 2025 before annual payments drop below a billion.

    This is mostly Reste a liquider commitments. These should have started to be unwound July 2016. That another £10bn+ that remainers have been willing to p1ss away on the EU project.

    Do you understand what the Reste a liquider is? Basically this is where the EU spends money outside of its budget.

  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 27,699
    Regardless of what you or I think, it's what the UK government has agreed to pay.
    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition
  • More remoaner nonsense being dispelled today.

    36k more EU nationals were working in the UK in Q4 2019 than a year earlier.

    Do any of those idiots who said EU nationals would stop coming to the UK want to own up to their stupidity?
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 72,738
    Only tangentially related, but worth keeping in mind when you want to talk scale.

    HSBC announced 35,000 job cuts this morning (that's across the globe). The associated restructuring costs are $6bn in total, of which $2bn will be in "disposal costs".

    The entire UK fishing industry employed 24,000 people and makes c.£1.4bn per year....
  • Only tangentially related, but worth keeping in mind when you want to talk scale.

    HSBC announced 35,000 job cuts this morning (that's across the globe). The associated restructuring costs are $6bn in total, of which $2bn will be in "disposal costs".

    The entire UK fishing industry employed 24,000 people and makes c.£1.4bn per year....

    Harrods turns over £2bn and employs 12,000 people
  • TheBigBean
    TheBigBean Posts: 20,642

    Only tangentially related, but worth keeping in mind when you want to talk scale.

    HSBC announced 35,000 job cuts this morning (that's across the globe). The associated restructuring costs are $6bn in total, of which $2bn will be in "disposal costs".

    The entire UK fishing industry employed 24,000 people and makes c.£1.4bn per year....

    Harrods turns over £2bn and employs 12,000 people
    I don't see the business case for opening a Harrods in fishing communities.
  • More remoaner nonsense being dispelled today.

    36k more EU nationals were working in the UK in Q4 2019 than a year earlier.

    Do any of those idiots who said EU nationals would stop coming to the UK want to own up to their stupidity?

    I'm confused - wasn't that one of the main selling points of Brexit?
  • More remoaner nonsense being dispelled today.

    36k more EU nationals were working in the UK in Q4 2019 than a year earlier.

    Do any of those idiots who said EU nationals would stop coming to the UK want to own up to their stupidity?

    I'm confused - wasn't that one of the main selling points of Brexit?
    You are confused because you have been intentionally ignorant, no other reason
  • Only tangentially related, but worth keeping in mind when you want to talk scale.

    HSBC announced 35,000 job cuts this morning (that's across the globe). The associated restructuring costs are $6bn in total, of which $2bn will be in "disposal costs".

    The entire UK fishing industry employed 24,000 people and makes c.£1.4bn per year....

    Harrods turns over £2bn and employs 12,000 people
    I don't see the business case for opening a Harrods in fishing communities.
    rick_chasey said:
    Only tangentially related, but worth keeping in mind when you want to talk scale.