The Conspiracy Theory

bondurant

Radical free thinkers like Manc don't accept that kind of evidence. Try posting some half baked hypothesis on YouTube that challenges the very tenets of our existence. THEN WE CAN TALK.

chris_bass

This one's on youtube maybe that's OK?
Rotating Earth from Space (Galileo spacecraft 1990) HD: https://youtu.be/UVuqcEuIRgs

I'm guessing he won't like it because it is made up from a series of pictures, its a good job real videos arent made like that!

crispybug2

crispybug2 wrote:

crispybug2 wrote:

For all 9/11 conspiracy theorists....

A f**king big plane slams into a building at 500 + mph

These buildings buckle at points adjacent to the impact point

What is so f**king difficult to understand about this?

C'mon Manc, over three pages ago and no answer.... You can do better than that!

And another three pages elapse...... Ho hum.

Manc33

Then when it comes on it shows this:



That isn't the whole Earth spinning around - the orbit is far too low. My guess is, it appears to be an aircraft at a high altitude filming only a small section of the Earth with a wide angle lens. For a start there's no land in sight anywhere, we're all underwater according to this.

Let me guess, there's some magic effect where when you fly above the Earth, all the land becomes blue? 8)

Oh god it gets worse...



They could try zooming OUT once in a while. Now its just even more zoomed in than 5 minutes ago. :shock:

Do I believe this is really the Earth being filmed?
Absolutely.

Stevo_666

Manc33 wrote:

This could easily be a low orbit aircraft filming only a small section of the Earth.

What's a 'low orbit aircraft'? Is this a plane that flies above the Earths atmosphere?

Manc33

It doesn't need to be in a "low orbit" to do this, it just has to be at a high altitude.

stretchy

Manc33 wrote:

It doesn't need to be in a "low orbit" to do this, it just has to be at a high altitude.

That's way too high for a plane to even work... Ooops

chris_bass

This is worth a watch

moon hoax not: https://youtu.be/sGXTF6bs1IU

Stevo_666

Chris Bass wrote:

This is worth a watch

moon hoax not: https://youtu.be/sGXTF6bs1IU

Very interesting. Manc should watch this and especially the last 2 minutes

city_boy

Chris Bass wrote:

You've still not answered any of my questions btw

Manc33's refusal to respond to certain questions and particular posts actually reveals far more about him than the bollox he does post in his rather selective responses.

He has been asked on many occasions to simply tell us what shape HE believes Earth to be and he deliberately avoids giving us an answer.

Me and Manc33 know why he won't answer, don't we Manc??

Challenge to Manc33: Tell us what shape you think Earth is or offer a plausible explanation of your refusal to answer.

stretchy

Chris Bass wrote:

This is worth a watch

moon hoax not: https://youtu.be/sGXTF6bs1IU

He made the mistake of showing his cheque from NASA, until then I was sold!

Stevo_666

City Boy wrote:

Chris Bass wrote:

You've still not answered any of my questions btw

Manc33's refusal to respond to certain questions and particular posts actually reveals far more about him than the bollox he does post in his rather selective responses.

He has been asked on many occasions to simply tell us what shape HE believes Earth to be and he deliberately avoids giving us an answer.

Me and Manc33 know why he won't answer, don't we Manc??

Challenge to Manc33: Tell us what shape you think Earth is or offer a plausible explanation of your refusal to answer.

Good reminder CB.

Manc33 - ATFQ

rick_chasey

How to people fly around the world Manc? Has someone not seen the edge?

Stevo_666

Manc33 wrote:

That isn't the whole Earth spinning around - the orbit is far too low. My guess is, it appears to be an aircraft at a high altitude filming only a small section of the Earth with a wide angle lens. For a start there's no land in sight anywhere, we're all underwater according to this.

Let me guess, there's some magic effect where when you fly above the Earth, all the land becomes blue? 8)

Good selective use of pics as usual.

Here's some land - not blue. Also included are some parts of the International Space Station that could not possibly be part of any airplane (and aside from the fact that it is clear that the picture is taken from way too high for any plane to be involved):



Anyway, what shape do you think the Earth is? Come on, we're all dying to know

pblakeney

It does look like a flat disc in that there photo.

chris_bass

I think it's a sphere but we are on the inside.

Why else would NASA be lying, pretending we went into space, its so we don't try, fly upwards and end up in Australia.

It also explains why we don't fly off the surfaces as it rotates and is a good explanation for why we are stuck to the surface when gravity isn't real.

It all makes sense.

imposter2.0

Can I just point out that there were no pics of Gillian on p37 or 38. Hope this can be rectified soon...

veronese68

City Boy wrote:

Me and Manc33 know why he won't answer, don't we Manc?? .

I'm pretty sure I know the answer too, I suspect most people on here do. But I doubt it's the reason Simpleton33 would give.

city_boy

Veronese68 wrote:

City Boy wrote:

Me and Manc33 know why he won't answer, don't we Manc?? .

I'm pretty sure I know the answer too, I suspect most people on here do. But I doubt it's the reason Simpleton33 would give.

Absolutely.

Stevo_666

It's all gone quiet on the red side of Manchester - possibly not for the first time today :P

Ouija

Has anyone typed "Manc33" into google and followed the links to the various forums he's been banned from? Almost as entertaining. The dateabilty rating of "0%" on one site made me chuckle.

city_boy

Ouija wrote:

Has anyone typed "Manc33" into google and followed the links to the various forums he's been banned from? Almost as entertaining. The dateabilty rating of "0%" on one site made me chuckle.

He does seem to be a prolific spouter of shyte

http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=127553373

imposter2.0

Ouija wrote:

Has anyone typed "Manc33" into google and followed the links to the various forums he's been banned from? Almost as entertaining. The dateabilty rating of "0%" on one site made me chuckle.

He's even got his own porn channel..!??

veronese68

Ouija wrote:

Has anyone typed "Manc33" into google and followed the links to the various forums he's been banned from? Almost as entertaining. The dateabilty rating of "0%" on one site made me chuckle.

None of that surprises me. Regarding his dateability rating I can't help thinking if all blokes had the personality of Troll33 the human race would soon be extinct as women would all become celibate or carpet munchers.
It must be a lonely life being so special.

Stevo_666

City Boy wrote:

Ouija wrote:

Has anyone typed "Manc33" into google and followed the links to the various forums he's been banned from? Almost as entertaining. The dateabilty rating of "0%" on one site made me chuckle.

He does seem to be a prolific spouter of shyte

http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=127553373

It must be a NASA conspiracy to discredit him

Manc33

City Boy wrote:

Manc33's refusal to respond to certain questions and particular posts actually reveals far more about him than the bollox he does post in his rather selective responses.

Has anyone posted any full images of Earth from space yet?
No.

Do I ask every time I post?
Yes.

Has anyone posted any video of Earth spinning in space yet, fully in the frame?
No.

Do I ask every time I post?
Yes.

Then you complain because I don't answer you? I think you've got that the wrong way around if you look back through the thread. Ever think if you answered me I might be a bit more amicable in answering you?

You might want it as a one way thing but it doesn't quite work like that.

imposter2.0

Manc33 wrote:

Has anyone posted any full images of Earth from space yet?
No.

Do I ask every time I post?
Yes.

Has anyone posted any video of Earth spinning in space yet, fully in the frame?
No.

Do I ask every time I post?
Yes.

Would you even accept them as genuine, even if someone did? (which they have)
No.

city_boy

Manc33 wrote:

City Boy wrote:

Manc33's refusal to respond to certain questions and particular posts actually reveals far more about him than the bollox he does post in his rather selective responses.

Has anyone posted any full images of Earth from space yet?
No.

Do I ask every time I post?
Yes.

Has anyone posted any video of Earth spinning in space yet, fully in the frame?
No.

Do I ask every time I post?
Yes.

Then you complain because I don't answer you? I think you've got that the wrong way around if you look back through the thread. Ever think if you answered me I might be a bit more amicable in answering you?

You might want it as a one way thing but it doesn't quite work like that.

I suggest you look back through the thread :roll:

I tried to engage with you and your tennis ball experiment. It was you that stopped replying (probably when you saw it was going to reach a conclusion that highlighted your ignorance)!

I gave you an explanation of your 9/11 giant ball theory and at the same time discredited the main piece of evidence of the YouTube conspiracy theorists...we are still waiting for your response to that one too!

So you see, I have offered perfectly rational responses to you questions, so now it's your turn...

The Earth...flat or spherical?

Manc33

Computer mock ups and paintings got posted and you claimed they were real.

Try again.

I wouldn't have made the claim if you could just go find real images, ever think of that? Someone would just go find some and post them.

I made the claim knowing no real images exist. I wouldn't be making the claim if any did exist, that would be idiotic.

If you can't see those images are not real life (none are, not one single one) I'm not wasting any more time.

It is far more important to me to tell people this stuff rather than worrying about whether they believe it or not, you don't have to believe it to be told it.

city_boy

Manc33 wrote:

Computer mock ups and CGI images got posted and you claimed they were real.

If you can't see those images are not real life, I'm not wasting any more time.

Oh look, you've chosen to conveniently ignore another post that directly addresses your questions.

Probably best if you don't post again, you're becoming a parody of yourself (which, in itself, is some achievement)