Drugs in other sports and the media.

19798100102103217

Comments

  • RichN95.
    RichN95. Posts: 27,253
    Pinno wrote:

    I wasn't arguing with you Rich BTW.
    I know. Not everything on the internet needs to be an argument.
    Twitter: @RichN95
  • dish_dash
    dish_dash Posts: 5,647
    Interesting read on Putin's views on the potential ban that Russian athletes face in preparation for tomorrow's announcement.
    http://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/ ... n-athletes

    Key bits if you can't be bothered reading the whole thing
    The wrongdoing couldn't have been confined to Russia: It appears to have been so prevalent there that it's hard to understand how the international sports bodies failed to notice it for years.

    Yet attention is now firmly focused on Russia because it is doing little real damage control. To Putin, this is a personal disaster that can hardly be fixed by sending out the tired message about Western intrigues against Russia. Putin is prepared for the ban to be slapped on Russia -- but he doesn't want to use it for propaganda purposes. More likely, he will work with the international sports bodies -- particularly the International Olympic Commitee -- to allow the participation of Russian athletes who can prove they are clean.

    IOC President Thomas Bach hinted at such a solution in a statement last month, saying the committee "would have to consider, whether in such 'contaminated' federations the presumption of innocence for athletes could still be applied, whether the burden of proof could be reversed. This could mean that concerned athletes would have to demonstrate that their international and independently proven test record is compliant with the rules of their International Federation and the World Anti-Doping Code, providing a level playing field with their fellow competitors."

    This means the possible IAAF ban won't be final. It would fit Putin's purpose, too, if Russian athletes allowed to compete in Rio are proved to be squeaky clean. Then their possible victories won't be questioned, and Russia's tarnished glory will be restored to some extent. That would be much more important than scoring another anti-Western point with Putin's complacent domestic audience.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    There's s Guardian long (i.e. no one has bothered to edit it) about Seb Coe ahead of the Russoan decision for those who are interested (and have the stamina to wade through meandering prose that has a decent article buried in it somewhere )
  • bobmcstuff
    bobmcstuff Posts: 11,435
    There's s Guardian long (i.e. no one has bothered to edit it) about Seb Coe ahead of the Russoan decision for those who are interested (and have the stamina to wade through meandering prose that has a decent article buried in it somewhere )

    Don't they call those "thinkpieces"?

    Guardian is full of them.
  • pinno
    pinno Posts: 52,356
    There's s Guardian long (i.e. no one has bothered to edit it) about Seb Coe ahead of the Russoan decision for those who are interested (and have the stamina to wade through meandering prose that has a decent article buried in it somewhere )

    At least post the link please.

    Better still - you read it and quote bits for us :D
    seanoconn - gruagach craic!
  • dish_dash
    dish_dash Posts: 5,647
    bobmcstuff wrote:
    There's s Guardian long (i.e. no one has bothered to edit it) about Seb Coe ahead of the Russoan decision for those who are interested (and have the stamina to wade through meandering prose that has a decent article buried in it somewhere )

    Don't they call those "thinkpieces"?

    Guardian is full of them.

    Long form man... it's all the rage... it's either that or quotes from twitter.
  • bobmcstuff
    bobmcstuff Posts: 11,435
    dish_dash wrote:
    bobmcstuff wrote:
    There's s Guardian long (i.e. no one has bothered to edit it) about Seb Coe ahead of the Russoan decision for those who are interested (and have the stamina to wade through meandering prose that has a decent article buried in it somewhere )

    Don't they call those "thinkpieces"?

    Guardian is full of them.

    Long form man... it's all the rage... it's either that or quotes from twitter.

    So either too long to be coherent or too short to contain any context :lol:
  • Bo Duke
    Bo Duke Posts: 1,058
    BBC reports that Russia will not be allowed to compete in Rio 2016 Olympics.

    Bye bye....
    'Performance analysis and Froome not being clean was a media driven story. I haven’t heard one guy in the peloton say a negative thing about Froome, and I haven’t heard a single person in the peloton suggest Froome isn’t clean.' TSP
  • sherer
    sherer Posts: 2,460
    Bo Duke wrote:
    BBC reports that Russia will not be allowed to compete in Rio 2016 Olympics.

    Bye bye....

    Yes that is what I head, but there is something about letting clean athletes compete. Seeing as they all got caught post competing im not sure how they will work out who is who
  • dinyull
    dinyull Posts: 2,979
    BBC saying despite the ban the IOC could still allow Russia to compete in Olympics.
  • Mad_Malx
    Mad_Malx Posts: 5,183
    John Coates, president of CAS
    “My guess is they’d have to establish they were regularly tested outside of Russia by an anti-doping authority and the samples were analysed outside of Russia on an regular basis.”
    According the guardian
  • dav1d1
    dav1d1 Posts: 653
    Simon Yates 4 month ban.
  • Pross
    Pross Posts: 43,464
    Dinyull wrote:
    BBC saying despite the ban the IOC could still allow Russia to compete in Olympics.

    'Clean' Russian athletes who were outside the Russian testing programme may be allowed to compete as neutral athletes. It seems a reasonable compromise although I'd insist on them all submitting to additional testing first.
  • sherer
    sherer Posts: 2,460
    The Russian's sound a bit annoyed at this. Would be nice to see them open the lid of what they know about other athletes and nations cheating
  • sherer wrote:
    The Russian's sound a bit annoyed at this. Would be nice to see them open the lid of what they know about other athletes and nations cheating


    Ya think?
  • sherer wrote:
    The Russian's sound a bit annoyed at this. Would be nice to see them open the lid of what they know about other athletes and nations cheating


    Ya think?


    They could start owning their own problems. But they won't. Doesn't play well on the domestic front for the Kremlin, Putin & all the cronies
  • sherer wrote:
    The Russian's sound a bit annoyed at this. Would be nice to see them open the lid of what they know about other athletes and nations cheating


    delete
  • sherer
    sherer Posts: 2,460
    sherer wrote:
    The Russian's sound a bit annoyed at this. Would be nice to see them open the lid of what they know about other athletes and nations cheating


    Ya think?

    was trying to get round the swear filters :D
  • sherer wrote:
    sherer wrote:
    The Russian's sound a bit annoyed at this. Would be nice to see them open the lid of what they know about other athletes and nations cheating


    Ya think?

    was trying to get round the swear filters :D


    In which case you, sir, are a master of understatement :D
  • joelsim
    joelsim Posts: 7,552
    sherer wrote:
    The Russian's sound a bit annoyed at this. Would be nice to see them open the lid of what they know about other athletes and nations cheating


    Ya think?


    They could start owning their own problems. But they won't. Doesn't play well on the domestic front for the Kremlin, Putin & all the cronies

    They're not used to dissenters, they typically get an umbrella full of Polonium-210.
  • Bo Duke
    Bo Duke Posts: 1,058
    Dissenters? There are no dissenters in Russia.

    Watch the KGB drug this poor lady for daring to protest when she lost a son in the Kursk disaster.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jFBOfIiqW0o
    'Performance analysis and Froome not being clean was a media driven story. I haven’t heard one guy in the peloton say a negative thing about Froome, and I haven’t heard a single person in the peloton suggest Froome isn’t clean.' TSP
  • itboffin
    itboffin Posts: 20,064
    Makes you wonder why they had someone standing by with the drugs to shut her up in the first place, messed up country.
    Rule #5 // Harden The Feck Up.
    Rule #9 // If you are out riding in bad weather, it means you are a badass. Period.
    Rule #12 // The correct number of bikes to own is n+1.
    Rule #42 // A bike race shall never be preceded with a swim and/or followed by a run.
  • pinno
    pinno Posts: 52,356
    "A riddle wrapped up in an enigma", WC - Nothing's changed.
    seanoconn - gruagach craic!
  • Bo Duke
    Bo Duke Posts: 1,058
    That is the most annoying thing... nothings changed. Not only is Russia sponsoring state cheating but China have been rapidly developing their own drug fueled sport academies to showcase what wonderful, admirable and successful society they have suddenly become. It's soul destroying.
    'Performance analysis and Froome not being clean was a media driven story. I haven’t heard one guy in the peloton say a negative thing about Froome, and I haven’t heard a single person in the peloton suggest Froome isn’t clean.' TSP
  • joelsim
    joelsim Posts: 7,552
    It gets worse as far as Russia are concerned.

    Their Euro 2016 Military Thugs appear to have links to the Kremlin.

    I despair.
  • sherer
    sherer Posts: 2,460
    Joelsim wrote:
    It gets worse as far as Russia are concerned.

    Their Euro 2016 Military Thugs appear to have links to the Kremlin.

    I despair.

    Where did you read that ?

    I feel sorry for the ones that have been doped with no knowledge of it. That must be a bad situation to be in. Also the few clean atheltes that are out there who are denied a place on the biggest stage there is
  • joelsim
    joelsim Posts: 7,552
    sherer wrote:
    Joelsim wrote:
    It gets worse as far as Russia are concerned.

    Their Euro 2016 Military Thugs appear to have links to the Kremlin.

    I despair.

    Where did you read that ?

    I feel sorry for the ones that have been doped with no knowledge of it. That must be a bad situation to be in. Also the few clean atheltes that are out there who are denied a place on the biggest stage there is

    Here you go.

    https://www.theguardian.com/football/20 ... CMP=twt_gu
  • Joelsim wrote:
    sherer wrote:
    Joelsim wrote:
    It gets worse as far as Russia are concerned.

    Their Euro 2016 Military Thugs appear to have links to the Kremlin.

    I despair.

    Where did you read that ?

    I feel sorry for the ones that have been doped with no knowledge of it. That must be a bad situation to be in. Also the few clean atheltes that are out there who are denied a place on the biggest stage there is

    Here you go.

    https://www.theguardian.com/football/20 ... CMP=twt_gu



    This jives with what a number of journos & political commentators have been reporting for a while now. Loss of prestige threatens a mutual power network of elites who feed at the state trough. Putin isn't a dictator (funnily enough) but he and the network of elites he has to keep happy by ensuring that state trough is always replenished, work on the message for the Russians at home that the rest of the world is working against a strong Mother Russia
  • joelsim
    joelsim Posts: 7,552
    Joelsim wrote:
    sherer wrote:
    Joelsim wrote:
    It gets worse as far as Russia are concerned.

    Their Euro 2016 Military Thugs appear to have links to the Kremlin.

    I despair.

    Where did you read that ?

    I feel sorry for the ones that have been doped with no knowledge of it. That must be a bad situation to be in. Also the few clean atheltes that are out there who are denied a place on the biggest stage there is

    Here you go.

    https://www.theguardian.com/football/20 ... CMP=twt_gu



    This jives with what a number of journos & political commentators have been reporting for a while now. Loss of prestige threatens a mutual power network of elites who feed at the state trough. Putin isn't a dictator (funnily enough) but he and the network of elites he has to keep happy by ensuring that state trough is always replenished, work on the message for the Russians at home that the rest of the world is working against a strong Mother Russia

    It's certainly not hard to imagine, given the attitude towards dissenters, gays et al.
  • Bo Duke
    Bo Duke Posts: 1,058
    A Dutch friend has just mentioned the same to me tonight, the hooli's are possibly army units..... ;-(
    'Performance analysis and Froome not being clean was a media driven story. I haven’t heard one guy in the peloton say a negative thing about Froome, and I haven’t heard a single person in the peloton suggest Froome isn’t clean.' TSP