Strava.com - Put your money where your mouth is

1108109111113114139

Comments

  • iPete
    iPete Posts: 6,076
    DonDaddyD wrote:
    Some of the Strava times seem ridiculous to me.

    Let me make it clear I probably wouldn't get close to the times of some of the riders anyway, but I've ridden along many of these roads and on the commute and I can't see how you can average such a fast time and do so safely on a consistent basis.

    Consistent basis? If you ride the same road all week, every now and then an opportunity will present itself. The moons will be aligned, a tailwind will propel you forth and the traffic light gods let you proceed unhindered, its on you to grab that opportunity. Strava isn't about consistency!
  • il_principe
    il_principe Posts: 9,155
    iPete wrote:
    DonDaddyD wrote:
    Some of the Strava times seem ridiculous to me.

    Let me make it clear I probably wouldn't get close to the times of some of the riders anyway, but I've ridden along many of these roads and on the commute and I can't see how you can average such a fast time and do so safely on a consistent basis.

    Consistent basis? If you ride the same road all week, every now and then an opportunity will present itself. The moons will be aligned, a tailwind will propel you forth and the traffic light gods let you proceed unhindered, its on you to grab that opportunity. Strava isn't about consistency!

    +1 Or you get a great draft from a bus/car etc.
  • DonDaddyD
    DonDaddyD Posts: 12,689
    okgo wrote:
    Example?
    All the ones faster than mine.

    The descent down Wimbledon Hill. Unless its 7am in the morning - even then. I cannot see how you can safely descend down it and average 30+mph.

    Must just be more skill and guts than I have.
    Food Chain number = 4

    A true scalp is not only overtaking someone but leaving them stopped at a set of lights. As you, who have clearly beaten the lights, pummels nothing but the open air ahead. ~ 'DondaddyD'. Player of the Unspoken Game
  • jzed
    jzed Posts: 2,926
    So looking at Wimbledon Hill its a 4-5% gradient.Getting an average of 33mph seems completely viable. (especially given people are clocking close to 30 up Balham hill)

    ETA: A comparable hill outside my front door has the KOM's at 39.9mph.
  • DonDaddyD
    DonDaddyD Posts: 12,689
    JZed wrote:
    So looking at Wimbledon Hill its a 4-5% gradient.Getting an average of 33mph seems completely viable. (especially given people are clocking close to 30 up Balham hill)
    Up it is fine, I could go up it much faster if I didn't hold back everything for the rest of the commute.

    Going down it is a different story. Yes its smooth but at the bottom you've got lights before the road levels off then the shops begin and in about 20 meters a second set of lights. I've lived there for 4-5years and I haven't had an opportunity to go balls dangling down it.

    It'd take a very brave soul.
    Food Chain number = 4

    A true scalp is not only overtaking someone but leaving them stopped at a set of lights. As you, who have clearly beaten the lights, pummels nothing but the open air ahead. ~ 'DondaddyD'. Player of the Unspoken Game
  • bigmat
    bigmat Posts: 5,134
    Any downhill segment 30mph+ isn't just doable, its to be expected. Obviously traffic, lights etc can get in the way but sooner or later somebody will get a clean run at it. As pointed out above, there are plenty of (short) uphill segments with 30mph+ averages.
  • jzed
    jzed Posts: 2,926
    DonDaddyD wrote:
    JZed wrote:
    So looking at Wimbledon Hill its a 4-5% gradient.Getting an average of 33mph seems completely viable. (especially given people are clocking close to 30 up Balham hill)
    Up it is fine, I could go up it much faster if I didn't hold back everything for the rest of the commute.

    Going down it is a different story. Yes its smooth but at the bottom you've got lights before the road levels off then the shops begin and in about 20 meters a second set of lights. I've lived there for 4-5years and I haven't had an opportunity to go balls dangling down it.

    It'd take a very brave soul.

    Sunday morning 7am. Check there's a favourable wind. Observe the timing of the lights. Try and hit it perfect.
  • okgo wrote:
    Example?

    http://app.strava.com/rides/25270778#451572949
    To keep up that speed you need to ram the 6 speed ramps full on. Even a bike with serious shockers would badly bounce.
  • jzed
    jzed Posts: 2,926
    hegyestomi wrote:

    http://app.strava.com/rides/25270778#451572949
    To keep up that speed you need to ram the 6 speed ramps full on. Even a bike with serious shockers would badly bounce.

    27mph average may be possible with a wind funnelling, but that KOM isn't credible, hitting 47mph. Don't think so.
  • iPete
    iPete Posts: 6,076
    hegyestomi wrote:
    okgo wrote:
    Example?

    http://app.strava.com/rides/25270778#451572949
    To keep up that speed you need to ram the 6 speed ramps full on. Even a bike with serious shockers would badly bounce.


    Not implausible, if you take on the Queens ride segment you will need to hit the speed bumps at around 30mph.

    http://app.strava.com/segments/1122423

    Nearly went into orbit. :shock:
  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 29,558
    JZed wrote:
    So looking at Wimbledon Hill its a 4-5% gradient.Getting an average of 33mph seems completely viable. (especially given people are clocking close to 30 up Balham hill)

    Hitting that speed would be easy, so long as you didn't mind ploughing into the back of the traffic at the lights right at the foot of the slope.
    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition
  • Clever Pun
    Clever Pun Posts: 6,778
    DonDaddyD wrote:
    JZed wrote:
    So looking at Wimbledon Hill its a 4-5% gradient.Getting an average of 33mph seems completely viable. (especially given people are clocking close to 30 up Balham hill)
    Up it is fine, I could go up it much faster if I didn't hold back everything for the rest of the commute.

    Going down it is a different story. Yes its smooth but at the bottom you've got lights before the road levels off then the shops begin and in about 20 meters a second set of lights. I've lived there for 4-5years and I haven't had an opportunity to go balls dangling down it.

    It'd take a very brave soul.

    and that is why you fail...

    Balls out for a segment... then whimper for a bit, you'll be surprised at your bodies recovery. The next day however might be harder
    Purveyor of sonic doom

    Very Hairy Roadie - FCN 4
    Fixed Pista- FCN 5
    Beared Bromptonite - FCN 14
  • pitchshifter
    pitchshifter Posts: 1,476
    iPete wrote:
    hegyestomi wrote:
    okgo wrote:
    Example?

    http://app.strava.com/rides/25270778#451572949
    To keep up that speed you need to ram the 6 speed ramps full on. Even a bike with serious shockers would badly bounce.


    Not implausible, if you take on the Queens ride segment you will need to hit the speed bumps at around 30mph.

    http://app.strava.com/segments/1122423

    Nearly went into orbit. :shock:

    No need to hit the speed bump, just go through the middle :wink:

    Edit: :oops: you are right, there is one full speed bump. I should really remember that.
  • il_principe
    il_principe Posts: 9,155
    Clever Pun wrote:
    DonDaddyD wrote:
    JZed wrote:
    So looking at Wimbledon Hill its a 4-5% gradient.Getting an average of 33mph seems completely viable. (especially given people are clocking close to 30 up Balham hill)
    Up it is fine, I could go up it much faster if I didn't hold back everything for the rest of the commute.

    Going down it is a different story. Yes its smooth but at the bottom you've got lights before the road levels off then the shops begin and in about 20 meters a second set of lights. I've lived there for 4-5years and I haven't had an opportunity to go balls dangling down it.

    It'd take a very brave soul.

    and that is why you fail...

    Balls out for a segment... then whimper for a bit, you'll be surprised at your bodies recovery. The next day however might be harder

    Indeed, recovery time is a mark of fitness as well. Surely most bike riding involves going 'balls out, recover, repeat' whether that be honking up a hill, sprinting for a sign etc.
  • Clever Pun
    Clever Pun Posts: 6,778
    interval training with rewards at the end (excluding the obvious fitness etc)

    Sometimes segment is off limits due to traffic/lights etc so just ride it and line up the next one...
    The annoying bit it attacking a segment and then something happens at the end and you have to hold back thus ruining any real chance at the top spots or bettering your own time
    Purveyor of sonic doom

    Very Hairy Roadie - FCN 4
    Fixed Pista- FCN 5
    Beared Bromptonite - FCN 14
  • okgo
    okgo Posts: 4,368
    Most of the ones on my commute are now fast enough that it would take a big big effort and a nice wind to take them back on the work bike. I think I could take a few without the wind on my other bike but I'm not that fussed on them. They're just a bit of fun.
    Blog on my first and now second season of proper riding/racing - www.firstseasonracing.com
  • DonDaddyD
    DonDaddyD Posts: 12,689
    Clever Pun wrote:
    DonDaddyD wrote:
    JZed wrote:
    So looking at Wimbledon Hill its a 4-5% gradient.Getting an average of 33mph seems completely viable. (especially given people are clocking close to 30 up Balham hill)
    Up it is fine, I could go up it much faster if I didn't hold back everything for the rest of the commute.

    Going down it is a different story. Yes its smooth but at the bottom you've got lights before the road levels off then the shops begin and in about 20 meters a second set of lights. I've lived there for 4-5years and I haven't had an opportunity to go balls dangling down it.

    It'd take a very brave soul.

    and that is why you fail...

    Balls out for a segment... then whimper for a bit, you'll be surprised at your bodies recovery. The next day however might be harder

    Indeed, recovery time is a mark of fitness as well. Surely most bike riding involves going 'balls out, recover, repeat' whether that be honking up a hill, sprinting for a sign etc.
    I miss this kind of advice.
    Food Chain number = 4

    A true scalp is not only overtaking someone but leaving them stopped at a set of lights. As you, who have clearly beaten the lights, pummels nothing but the open air ahead. ~ 'DondaddyD'. Player of the Unspoken Game
  • okgo
    okgo Posts: 4,368
    You must have a short memory, you get the same advice every time you post.
    Blog on my first and now second season of proper riding/racing - www.firstseasonracing.com
  • vermin
    vermin Posts: 1,739
    okgo wrote:
    You must have a short memory, you get the same advice every time you post.

    No, he gets many different forms of advice, from what I've seen.
  • DonDaddyD
    DonDaddyD Posts: 12,689
    okgo wrote:
    You must have a short memory, you get the same advice every time you post.
    I probably do. Sorry.
    Food Chain number = 4

    A true scalp is not only overtaking someone but leaving them stopped at a set of lights. As you, who have clearly beaten the lights, pummels nothing but the open air ahead. ~ 'DondaddyD'. Player of the Unspoken Game
  • okgo
    okgo Posts: 4,368
    @ Vermin See my post on SCR.

    Did I see you this morning?
    Blog on my first and now second season of proper riding/racing - www.firstseasonracing.com
  • Does a short segment mess up the GPS tracking?
    Fat lads take longer to stop.
  • dhope
    dhope Posts: 6,699
    Does a short segment mess up the GPS tracking?
    They're often a bit screwy, yes. A poor lock at the start or end can lead to some 30/40/500mph averages
    Rose Xeon CW Disc
    CAAD12 Disc
    Condor Tempo
  • Just uploaded my rides onto Veloviewer, must say I'm impressed with the info it gives you. There were a few surprises in there - segments I didn't know I was well placed on - especially busy ones in RP like these:
    http://app.strava.com/segments/1742382
    http://app.strava.com/segments/676222
    and looking good on some commute CS7 segments too
    http://app.strava.com/segments/1545476
    http://app.strava.com/segments/860800

    Oh, and if anyone sees me on CS7 between Wimbledon and London Bridge I'm riding a black Giant TCR2 with Black Guards - say hello, it would be nice to put some faces to names.
    BMC SLC01 Cosmic Carbones
    Giant TCR2 Composite
    98 GT Zaskar LE
    http://app.strava.com/athletes/170436
  • okgo
    okgo Posts: 4,368
    Lol, nobody shouts about being well placed on Downhill segments!!!

    Where are you on the lap leaderboard? ;-)
    Blog on my first and now second season of proper riding/racing - www.firstseasonracing.com
  • willy b
    willy b Posts: 4,125
    Got to agree i'm never bothered about downhill segments. Guess mainly because they are actually quite dangerous in built up areas! :shock:
  • okgo wrote:
    Lol, nobody shouts about being well placed on Downhill segments!!!

    Where are you on the lap leaderboard? ;-)
    Fair enough, my point was that veloviewer shows you segments you might normally miss (and RP is hardly built up, is it?)
    the lap leader board for RP? Overall about 390 for the cafe lap with 18.20.
    BMC SLC01 Cosmic Carbones
    Giant TCR2 Composite
    98 GT Zaskar LE
    http://app.strava.com/athletes/170436
  • vermin
    vermin Posts: 1,739
    Why do the RP segments keep getting flagged? It's p'ing me off now.
  • iPete
    iPete Posts: 6,076
    DDD thinks they are ridiculous?

    8,000.7 strava miles logged this year, needs a KOM of some sort :!:
  • cyclingprop
    cyclingprop Posts: 2,426
    Get spinning on that plumstead loop, Dhope.
    What do you mean you think 64cm is a big frame?