Flying to outer space

191012141520

Comments

  • focuszing723
    focuszing723 Posts: 8,154

    Sure but the Tesla equity is collateral. If that tanks he can’t afford the loan he bought twitter with.

    That is leverage for China

    No question it's a big risk, which I don't think he wanted to take on.

    I really don't think that's how his mind works. Perhaps that's why he's been so successful and of course the 99% perspiration.
  • Jezyboy
    Jezyboy Posts: 3,644
    Is it not just about buying the biggest most expensive toy?

    As far as I can tell, he's used the value of one grossly over valued company, to buy another grossly over valued one.

  • davidof
    davidof Posts: 3,125



    2 things - stop Tesla manufacturing in China and stopping Tesla selling in China.

    Either would spank the share price

    wouldn't that be in breach of WTO rules?

    BASI Nordic Ski Instructor
    Instagramme
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,660
    davidof said:



    2 things - stop Tesla manufacturing in China and stopping Tesla selling in China.

    Either would spank the share price

    wouldn't that be in breach of WTO rules?

    What about China's behaviour makes you think WTO rules matter to them?
  • focuszing723
    focuszing723 Posts: 8,154
    Clearing the daft draft.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,660
    edited May 2022
    One of wall street’s most respected journalists straight up calls Musk a liar over his reason for backing out of the twitter purchase

    https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-05-17/elon-musk-does-not-care-about-spam-bots

    I think it is important to be clear here that Musk is lying.


    The whole article will almost certainly have had to been cleared at the highest level at Bloomberg. Ooof.
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,204


    He genuinely could be on the hook for an awful lot of money.
  • Pross
    Pross Posts: 43,545
    Being naive to business matters, is it normal for someone to have access to the contracts on these sorts of transactions and to publish them in the public domain (choosing Twitter is a nicely ironic touch)?
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,204
    Pross said:

    Being naive to business matters, is it normal for someone to have access to the contracts on these sorts of transactions and to publish them in the public domain (choosing Twitter is a nicely ironic touch)?
    Apparently...

    When someone buys stock that means they own 5% or more of the company's value, they need to file with the SEC a form that explains their intentions. This is either a 13D if they intend to be a passive investor, or a 13G if they intend to be actively involved.

    Musk initially filed a 13D, which was a problem when he then started to talk about changingthe way it worked/buying it, because filing that means he had said explicitly that he wasn't going to do that. He then filed a 13G followed by various amendments which have to explain what is happening - and the above is part of that filing.

    So he should be on the hook to the sec for filing the wrong form (which would have suppressed the share price while he was still acquiring), and potentially could be held to his offer by twitter which would be a much bigger amount. Turns out he hadn't actually got enough money to do anything he wants without noticing the difference.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,660
    Tesla has fallen 30% since he put the bid in and the price he's paying is somewhere in the 20-30% higher than it probably is worth now.

    Perhaps doing a LBO at the height of a boom without due diligence was not such a smart idea?
  • focuszing723
    focuszing723 Posts: 8,154
    Th

    One of wall street’s most respected journalists straight up calls Musk a liar over his reason for backing out of the twitter purchase

    https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-05-17/elon-musk-does-not-care-about-spam-bots

    I think it is important to be clear here that Musk is lying.


    The whole article will almost certainly have had to been cleared at the highest level at Bloomberg. Ooof.
    That has to be proved and on a business transaction which isn't finalised surely due diligence should be expected.

    It will be interesting to see how the situation develops though.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ux6B3bvO0w
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,660

    Th

    One of wall street’s most respected journalists straight up calls Musk a liar over his reason for backing out of the twitter purchase

    https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-05-17/elon-musk-does-not-care-about-spam-bots

    I think it is important to be clear here that Musk is lying.


    The whole article will almost certainly have had to been cleared at the highest level at Bloomberg. Ooof.
    That has to be proved and on a business transaction which isn't finalised surely due diligence should be expected.

    It will be interesting to see how the situation develops though.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ux6B3bvO0w
    Read the article. Matt knows his stuff.
  • focuszing723
    focuszing723 Posts: 8,154

    Th

    One of wall street’s most respected journalists straight up calls Musk a liar over his reason for backing out of the twitter purchase

    https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-05-17/elon-musk-does-not-care-about-spam-bots

    I think it is important to be clear here that Musk is lying.


    The whole article will almost certainly have had to been cleared at the highest level at Bloomberg. Ooof.
    That has to be proved and on a business transaction which isn't finalised surely due diligence should be expected.

    It will be interesting to see how the situation develops though.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ux6B3bvO0w
    Read the article. Matt knows his stuff.
    No don't want to.


    Maybe in the evening.
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,419

    Th

    One of wall street’s most respected journalists straight up calls Musk a liar over his reason for backing out of the twitter purchase

    https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-05-17/elon-musk-does-not-care-about-spam-bots

    I think it is important to be clear here that Musk is lying.


    The whole article will almost certainly have had to been cleared at the highest level at Bloomberg. Ooof.
    That has to be proved and on a business transaction which isn't finalised surely due diligence should be expected.

    It will be interesting to see how the situation develops though.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ux6B3bvO0w
    Read the article. Matt knows his stuff.
    No don't want to.


    Maybe in the evening.
    Was that Musk's attitude too?
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,660
    lol as Levine explains it's not about the due diligence around bots - the reason he said he was buying twitter was to get rid of the bot problem
  • focuszing723
    focuszing723 Posts: 8,154
    pblakeney said:

    Th

    One of wall street’s most respected journalists straight up calls Musk a liar over his reason for backing out of the twitter purchase

    https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-05-17/elon-musk-does-not-care-about-spam-bots

    I think it is important to be clear here that Musk is lying.


    The whole article will almost certainly have had to been cleared at the highest level at Bloomberg. Ooof.
    That has to be proved and on a business transaction which isn't finalised surely due diligence should be expected.

    It will be interesting to see how the situation develops though.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ux6B3bvO0w
    Read the article. Matt knows his stuff.
    No don't want to.


    Maybe in the evening.
    Was that Musk's attitude too?
    I don't know. What I do know is inflation is at 9% and the BOE's remit is to keep it around 2%.

    There's a bloody basking shark frying at the moment.
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,204
    It's a good article. I've been idly watching it through following nycsouthpaw (who knows his stuff), but the article lays it all out very clearly.

    He's trying to welch on a deal, but put enough mud in the water to keep the fanbois on side.
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,419

    pblakeney said:

    Th

    One of wall street’s most respected journalists straight up calls Musk a liar over his reason for backing out of the twitter purchase

    https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-05-17/elon-musk-does-not-care-about-spam-bots

    I think it is important to be clear here that Musk is lying.


    The whole article will almost certainly have had to been cleared at the highest level at Bloomberg. Ooof.
    That has to be proved and on a business transaction which isn't finalised surely due diligence should be expected.

    It will be interesting to see how the situation develops though.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ux6B3bvO0w
    Read the article. Matt knows his stuff.
    No don't want to.


    Maybe in the evening.
    Was that Musk's attitude too?
    I don't know. What I do know is inflation is at 9% and the BOE's remit is to keep it around 2%.

    There's a bloody basking shark frying at the moment.
    Anyone thinking the BoE can control worldwide inflation is deluded.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,204

    pblakeney said:

    Th

    One of wall street’s most respected journalists straight up calls Musk a liar over his reason for backing out of the twitter purchase

    https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-05-17/elon-musk-does-not-care-about-spam-bots

    I think it is important to be clear here that Musk is lying.


    The whole article will almost certainly have had to been cleared at the highest level at Bloomberg. Ooof.
    That has to be proved and on a business transaction which isn't finalised surely due diligence should be expected.

    It will be interesting to see how the situation develops though.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ux6B3bvO0w
    Read the article. Matt knows his stuff.
    No don't want to.


    Maybe in the evening.
    Was that Musk's attitude too?
    I don't know. What I do know is inflation is at 9% and the BOE's remit is to keep it around 2%.

    There's a bloody basking shark frying at the moment.
    What's that got to do with Musk reneging on a deal to buy twitter?
  • surrey_commuter
    surrey_commuter Posts: 18,867
    pblakeney said:

    pblakeney said:

    Th

    One of wall street’s most respected journalists straight up calls Musk a liar over his reason for backing out of the twitter purchase

    https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-05-17/elon-musk-does-not-care-about-spam-bots

    I think it is important to be clear here that Musk is lying.


    The whole article will almost certainly have had to been cleared at the highest level at Bloomberg. Ooof.
    That has to be proved and on a business transaction which isn't finalised surely due diligence should be expected.

    It will be interesting to see how the situation develops though.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ux6B3bvO0w
    Read the article. Matt knows his stuff.
    No don't want to.


    Maybe in the evening.
    Was that Musk's attitude too?
    I don't know. What I do know is inflation is at 9% and the BOE's remit is to keep it around 2%.

    There's a bloody basking shark frying at the moment.
    Anyone thinking the BoE can control worldwide inflation is deluded.
    We have the highest inflation in the G7.

    The BofE has taken the credit for low inflation for 20 years and now it is soaring they say it is nothing to do with them
  • surrey_commuter
    surrey_commuter Posts: 18,867
    There are many sensible people, in the know, who think that 15-20% of all internet traffic is fake so this can not come as news to Elon
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,419

    pblakeney said:

    pblakeney said:

    Th

    One of wall street’s most respected journalists straight up calls Musk a liar over his reason for backing out of the twitter purchase

    https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-05-17/elon-musk-does-not-care-about-spam-bots

    I think it is important to be clear here that Musk is lying.


    The whole article will almost certainly have had to been cleared at the highest level at Bloomberg. Ooof.
    That has to be proved and on a business transaction which isn't finalised surely due diligence should be expected.

    It will be interesting to see how the situation develops though.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ux6B3bvO0w
    Read the article. Matt knows his stuff.
    No don't want to.


    Maybe in the evening.
    Was that Musk's attitude too?
    I don't know. What I do know is inflation is at 9% and the BOE's remit is to keep it around 2%.

    There's a bloody basking shark frying at the moment.
    Anyone thinking the BoE can control worldwide inflation is deluded.
    We have the highest inflation in the G7.

    The BofE has taken the credit for low inflation for 20 years and now it is soaring they say it is nothing to do with them
    My point is the BoE can only control the inflation rate above or below the rest of the G7 at best. We are currently in worldwide inflation.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • TheBigBean
    TheBigBean Posts: 21,989
    He will struggle to make the argument that bots is an MAE. I think he can walk away, but it will be costly because he may be sued for the loss.

  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,204
    Imagine being the "richest man in the world" and pleading poverty to walk away from buying a trinket you have decided you don't want anymore.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,660

    There are many sensible people, in the know, who think that 15-20% of all internet traffic is fake so this can not come as news to Elon

    He gave the reason for buying it was to solve the bot problem, so he can't then decide that bots are putting him off buying it.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,660

    Imagine being the "richest man in the world" and pleading poverty to walk away from buying a trinket you have decided you don't want anymore.

    He's 30% poorer than he was when he tried to buy it, and he's buying it at 20-30% more than it is currently worth.
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,204

    Imagine being the "richest man in the world" and pleading poverty to walk away from buying a trinket you have decided you don't want anymore.

    He's 30% poorer than he was when he tried to buy it, and he's buying it at 20-30% more than it is currently worth.
    He's surely still got enough money to buy it without needing financing, but it would mean selling other stuff which would crash those shares and make him less wealthy.

    Or maybe he just wants a reason to sell a load of shares.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,660
    edited May 2022

    Imagine being the "richest man in the world" and pleading poverty to walk away from buying a trinket you have decided you don't want anymore.

    He's 30% poorer than he was when he tried to buy it, and he's buying it at 20-30% more than it is currently worth.
    He's surely still got enough money to buy it without needing financing, but it would mean selling other stuff which would crash those shares and make him less wealthy.

    Or maybe he just wants a reason to sell a load of shares.
    No. His wealth is tied up in tesla equity.

    If he sells that he needs to pay *a lot* of capital gains tax, which he won't be doing.

    He's basically borrowing against his tesla stock - which is why the stock price of tesla matters. The less Tesla is worth, the more expensive the borrowing is.

    Lucky for him, you don't pay tax on stuff you borrow to buy stuff, so he can have all that paper wealth and then go and buy things.
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,204

    Imagine being the "richest man in the world" and pleading poverty to walk away from buying a trinket you have decided you don't want anymore.

    He's 30% poorer than he was when he tried to buy it, and he's buying it at 20-30% more than it is currently worth.
    He's surely still got enough money to buy it without needing financing, but it would mean selling other stuff which would crash those shares and make him less wealthy.

    Or maybe he just wants a reason to sell a load of shares.
    No. His wealth is tied up in tesla equity.

    If he sells that he needs to pay *a lot* of capital gains tax, which he won't be doing.

    He's basically borrowing against his tesla stock - which is why the stock price of tesla matters. The less Tesla is worth, the more expensive the borrowing is.

    Lucky for him, you don't pay tax on stuff you borrow to buy stuff, so he can have all that paper wealth and then go and buy things.
    Quite - he's absolutely rich enough to buy it without financing, but he doesn't want to accept the consequences of actually turning his shares into cash when the lenders turn scared because he is overpaying.