Unpopular Opinions
Comments
-
Good point, well made.rick_chasey said:
Disagree.pblakeney said:
Purely for the sake of argument.rick_chasey said:Gap year is not taking a career break to travel, no?
Your career hasn’t started then!
Those not taking a gap year have one year extra experience over those who do.
Quite important at the early stages.
Makes my opinion unpopular and therefore on topic. 😉The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.1 -
I think most of us should pay a lot more tax.
50% tax rate for anything over 40K is my manifesto... gonna be popular!!left the forum March 20231 -
The aviation industry should not receive any ad hoc help. It needs to be left to shrink to a size which is compatible with a more modern, more sustainable way of living. Those working in the sector typically have good transferable skills which should allow them to get a job in another sector.
I've never seen this thread before, it's brilliant, I could literally post hundreds of unpopular opinionsleft the forum March 20230 -
I think this has been discussed already in cakestop but I believe it is already possible to voluntarily pay more tax. There are also lots of charities who would gladly receive any donations from those who feel they've got spare cash to share out.ugo.santalucia said:I think most of us should pay a lot more tax.
50% tax rate for anything over 40K is my manifesto... gonna be popular!!0 -
Based upon your threshold I am guessing you earn £39,000.
2 -
I think there should be a flat rate of tax on all income of 20% with no exemptions.
One day a week working for the Govt is enough0 -
40k isn't that great in some parts of the country.ugo.santalucia said:I think most of us should pay a lot more tax.
50% tax rate for anything over 40K is my manifesto... gonna be popular!!0 -
You wouldn't even exempt the first 10k from tax and then have a 20% rate?surrey_commuter said:I think there should be a flat rate of tax on all income of 20% with no exemptions.
One day a week working for the Govt is enough0 -
If we want to save money and we accept that the Government should sometimes provide housing, getting rid of housing benefit would be a start.0
-
The tax shortfall in this country is nothing to do with the personal tax take from normal people, it is aggressive tax avoidance by corporations.0
-
This could be achieved by offering free re-housing for those on housing benefit with those who own spacious houses.nickice said:If we want to save money and we accept that the Government should sometimes provide housing, getting rid of housing benefit would be a start.
"Science is a tool for cheaters". An anonymous French PE teacher.0 -
Why is it 'aggressive'?First.Aspect said:The tax shortfall in this country is nothing to do with the personal tax take from normal people, it is aggressive tax avoidance by corporations.
0 -
The newspapers say so.nickice said:
Why is it 'aggressive'?First.Aspect said:The tax shortfall in this country is nothing to do with the personal tax take from normal people, it is aggressive tax avoidance by corporations.
Spending millions on accountants to find ways of avoiding tax that are cleverer than the policy makers strikes me as wrong. Seems to have something in common with the battle between software developers and hackers, or dopers and testers.0 -
Anti virus software companies hire hackers to make their software necessary.The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
It's pretty safe to say you won't get elected on that basis. Even New Old Labour were suggesting 45% over £80k and 50% over £120k IIRC.ugo.santalucia said:I think most of us should pay a lot more tax.
50% tax rate for anything over 40K is my manifesto... gonna be popular!!"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
That is not correct. I can dig out the figures for you later if needed.First.Aspect said:The tax shortfall in this country is nothing to do with the personal tax take from normal people, it is aggressive tax avoidance by corporations.
"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
That's not too unpopular...surrey_commuter said:I think there should be a flat rate of tax on all income of 20% with no exemptions.
One day a week working for the Govt is enough"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
corporation tax will never be big enough to make a significant difference to total tax takeFirst.Aspect said:The tax shortfall in this country is nothing to do with the personal tax take from normal people, it is aggressive tax avoidance by corporations.
0 -
I agree with you in scrapping HB and then would be tempted to align tax exempt with maximum benefit level.nickice said:
You wouldn't even exempt the first 10k from tax and then have a 20% rate?surrey_commuter said:I think there should be a flat rate of tax on all income of 20% with no exemptions.
One day a week working for the Govt is enough0 -
Is this jealousy or a bit of snobbery? (I know it is supposed to be funny)rick_chasey said:Which reminds me: https://youtu.be/eKFjWR7X5dU
0 -
HMRC stats here - click on the report and have a read.
https://gov.uk/government/statistics/measuring-tax-gaps
There is a bar chart summary on page 5 breaking down the shortfall by type of tax payer, reason for shortfall (e.g. avoidance, errors, black economy etc) and by tax type. Avoidance is a small part of the shortfall - as is corporation tax."I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
NO, quite a bit more.surrey_commuter said:Based upon your threshold I am guessing you earn £39,000.
I want to pay more tax, I don't want to donate to charities, I trust governments... even this government... I might not always agree with all they do, but I trust them. They have built hospitals in record times, built up testing capacity from 10K to 200K in a couple of months and sourced medical equipment in very difficult times. Not sure what charities do, there is a lot less scrutiny on their activities.left the forum March 20230 -
i am sure your local hospital will have a variety of charities or ongoing fundraisers, pick the one that resonates and donate your perceived tax shortfall. Arguably more efficient than paying tax and redistributing funds with all the admin costs.ugo.santalucia said:
NO, quite a bit more.surrey_commuter said:Based upon your threshold I am guessing you earn £39,000.
I want to pay more tax, I don't want to donate to charities, I trust governments... even this government... I might not always agree with all they do, but I trust them. They have built hospitals in record times, built up testing capacity from 10K to 200K in a couple of months and sourced medical equipment in very difficult times. Not sure what charities do, there is a lot less scrutiny on their activities.0 -
I agree with ugo on this. I can't see the point of being wealthy in a poor society.0
-
Gift Aid should not exist.0
-
Just give it all away then, it's not difficult.TheBigBean said:I agree with ugo on this. I can't see the point of being wealthy in a poor society.
0 -
Charities that are obviously worthwhile are a stain on society as they shouldn’t have to exist as the government should be doing it.0
-
Pay more into your pension then and take responsibility for your own old age. That way you control it and everyone benefits in the long term. You also get some tax back to pay more money inugo.santalucia said:
NO, quite a bit more.surrey_commuter said:Based upon your threshold I am guessing you earn £39,000.
I want to pay more tax, I don't want to donate to charities, I trust governments... even this government... I might not always agree with all they do, but I trust them. They have built hospitals in record times, built up testing capacity from 10K to 200K in a couple of months and sourced medical equipment in very difficult times. Not sure what charities do, there is a lot less scrutiny on their activities.0 -
That wouldn't lead to a rich society.shortfall said:
Just give it all away then, it's not difficult.TheBigBean said:I agree with ugo on this. I can't see the point of being wealthy in a poor society.
2 -
Presumably not if the recipient is abroad.rick_chasey said:Charities that are obviously worthwhile are a stain on society as they shouldn’t have to exist as the government should be doing it.
1