LEAVE the Conservative Party and save your country!

18618628648668671137

Comments

  • surrey_commuter
    surrey_commuter Posts: 18,867
    Pross said:

    There seems to be a lot of glee from people who profess to want the Tories to sort themselves out and that democracy needs an effective opposition.

    If these results get too bad who would you want Sunak's replacement to be and who do you think it will be?

    They need wiping out at the next General Election in the hope that they then re-emerge as a more moderate centre right party with the lunatic fringe consigned to history.
    I don't think the Tories being wiped out and Labour having 200+ majority would benefit anybody
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,302

    Pross said:

    There seems to be a lot of glee from people who profess to want the Tories to sort themselves out and that democracy needs an effective opposition.

    If these results get too bad who would you want Sunak's replacement to be and who do you think it will be?

    They need wiping out at the next General Election in the hope that they then re-emerge as a more moderate centre right party with the lunatic fringe consigned to history.
    I don't think the Tories being wiped out and Labour having 200+ majority would benefit anybody
    They need something to cause them to split and get rid of the nutcases.
  • surrey_commuter
    surrey_commuter Posts: 18,867

    morstar said:

    There seems to be a lot of glee from people who profess to want the Tories to sort themselves out and that democracy needs an effective opposition.

    If these results get too bad who would you want Sunak's replacement to be and who do you think it will be?

    I think getting a slap down now in the 20 months prior to a GE is maybe a good thing. Gives them a chance to re-position themselves and marginalise the loons in the parliamentary party. But yes, I don't see a massive labour majority as a good thing in the same way the tory majority of this parliament has shown contempt for decency and fairness.

    I have little sympathy for Rishi, but I hardly see these results as the direct result of his leadership, he inherited a mess (to which he was a key contributor of the economic aspects but not the behavioural ones). I'd be surprised if they get rid of him although I'm sure the fringes will see it as an opportunity to do so.
    if you have over a 100 MPs who are 99% sure they will lose their seat/job under Rishi then on a personal level the rational option is to roll the dice and reinstall Boris or some other loon
    They're being punished for giving is us 3 different prime ministers in 2022.

    This idea that at this point the PM is what matters is stupid.

    The party is dysfunctional and anyone who's not blinkered can see it.
    Do you really not think there are 100 dysfunctional/blinkered Tory MPs who know they are fvcked so would happily go for a hail mary
    Worth remembering that even losing 100 MPs, they are starting with around an 80 MP majority, so labour won't have that big a majority.
    Not sure why I am unable to explain myself

    My 100 number refers to people who have given up hope so will try anything such as forcing another leadership contest

    I am not suggesting this is a good idea or whether it will succeeed and if it did whether it would help.

    I am saying there will be a lot (ie 100+) Tory MPs who think they have nothing to lose
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,660

    morstar said:

    There seems to be a lot of glee from people who profess to want the Tories to sort themselves out and that democracy needs an effective opposition.

    If these results get too bad who would you want Sunak's replacement to be and who do you think it will be?

    I think getting a slap down now in the 20 months prior to a GE is maybe a good thing. Gives them a chance to re-position themselves and marginalise the loons in the parliamentary party. But yes, I don't see a massive labour majority as a good thing in the same way the tory majority of this parliament has shown contempt for decency and fairness.

    I have little sympathy for Rishi, but I hardly see these results as the direct result of his leadership, he inherited a mess (to which he was a key contributor of the economic aspects but not the behavioural ones). I'd be surprised if they get rid of him although I'm sure the fringes will see it as an opportunity to do so.
    if you have over a 100 MPs who are 99% sure they will lose their seat/job under Rishi then on a personal level the rational option is to roll the dice and reinstall Boris or some other loon
    They're being punished for giving is us 3 different prime ministers in 2022.

    This idea that at this point the PM is what matters is stupid.

    The party is dysfunctional and anyone who's not blinkered can see it.
    Do you really not think there are 100 dysfunctional/blinkered Tory MPs who know they are fvcked so would happily go for a hail mary
    Worth remembering that even losing 100 MPs, they are starting with around an 80 MP majority, so labour won't have that big a majority.
    Not sure why I am unable to explain myself

    My 100 number refers to people who have given up hope so will try anything such as forcing another leadership contest

    I am not suggesting this is a good idea or whether it will succeeed and if it did whether it would help.

    I am saying there will be a lot (ie 100+) Tory MPs who think they have nothing to lose
    Sure, as I said before, Rishi *is* the hail mary.
  • Stevo_666
    Stevo_666 Posts: 62,019
    edited May 2023
    Pross said:

    There seems to be a lot of glee from people who profess to want the Tories to sort themselves out and that democracy needs an effective opposition.

    If these results get too bad who would you want Sunak's replacement to be and who do you think it will be?

    They need wiping out at the next General Election in the hope that they then re-emerge as a more moderate centre right party with the lunatic fringe consigned to history.
    Don't get too carried with away with this leftiebollox excitement:
    https://telegraph.co.uk/politics/2023/05/05/labour-local-election-gains-house-commons-majority/
    "I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,302
    Stevo_666 said:

    Pross said:

    There seems to be a lot of glee from people who profess to want the Tories to sort themselves out and that democracy needs an effective opposition.

    If these results get too bad who would you want Sunak's replacement to be and who do you think it will be?

    They need wiping out at the next General Election in the hope that they then re-emerge as a more moderate centre right party with the lunatic fringe consigned to history.
    Don't get to carried with away with this leftiebollox excitement:
    https://telegraph.co.uk/politics/2023/05/05/labour-local-election-gains-house-commons-majority/
    Lovely stuff - that's even better (but it does somewhat ignore the shift in Scotland).
  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 29,923

    Pross said:

    There seems to be a lot of glee from people who profess to want the Tories to sort themselves out and that democracy needs an effective opposition.

    If these results get too bad who would you want Sunak's replacement to be and who do you think it will be?

    They need wiping out at the next General Election in the hope that they then re-emerge as a more moderate centre right party with the lunatic fringe consigned to history.
    I don't think the Tories being wiped out and Labour having 200+ majority would benefit anybody
    They need something to cause them to split and get rid of the nutcases.
    They've had a reactionary nutcase wing since the early 19th century. If the Blair years didn't sort them out I can't imagine a term against Starmer will do it.
    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition
  • Stevo_666
    Stevo_666 Posts: 62,019
    rjsterry said:

    Pross said:

    There seems to be a lot of glee from people who profess to want the Tories to sort themselves out and that democracy needs an effective opposition.

    If these results get too bad who would you want Sunak's replacement to be and who do you think it will be?

    They need wiping out at the next General Election in the hope that they then re-emerge as a more moderate centre right party with the lunatic fringe consigned to history.
    I don't think the Tories being wiped out and Labour having 200+ majority would benefit anybody
    They need something to cause them to split and get rid of the nutcases.
    They've had a reactionary nutcase wing since the early 19th century. If the Blair years didn't sort them out I can't imagine a term against Starmer will do it.
    Everyone said that what Labour needed when Corbyn was in charge, but it never happened.
    "I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]
  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 29,923
    Stevo_666 said:

    Pross said:

    There seems to be a lot of glee from people who profess to want the Tories to sort themselves out and that democracy needs an effective opposition.

    If these results get too bad who would you want Sunak's replacement to be and who do you think it will be?

    They need wiping out at the next General Election in the hope that they then re-emerge as a more moderate centre right party with the lunatic fringe consigned to history.
    Don't get to carried with away with this leftiebollox excitement:
    https://telegraph.co.uk/politics/2023/05/05/labour-local-election-gains-house-commons-majority/
    Curtice was on the radio this morning. He was pretty clear that a Conservative loss is more or less nailed on. The question is whether Labour win by enough to not need a coalition.
    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition
  • Pross
    Pross Posts: 43,692
    Stevo_666 said:

    Pross said:

    There seems to be a lot of glee from people who profess to want the Tories to sort themselves out and that democracy needs an effective opposition.

    If these results get too bad who would you want Sunak's replacement to be and who do you think it will be?

    They need wiping out at the next General Election in the hope that they then re-emerge as a more moderate centre right party with the lunatic fringe consigned to history.
    Don't get to carried with away with this leftiebollox excitement:
    https://telegraph.co.uk/politics/2023/05/05/labour-local-election-gains-house-commons-majority/
    I don't think anyone is suggesting the local elections provide any guide to a General Election result. My comment was purely what I feel would be needed for the Tories to appeal to a wider electorate again. They did well in 2019 by being 'the Party of Brexit' which appeal to some non-traditional Tory voters but the shine has gone off that and Brexit is 'done' so they now need to try to get back to appealing to the middle ground voters which (using my sample of one previous Tory voter) means ditching the loons that have taken over the Party. It's exactly the same problem Labour had under Corbyn, the hardcore voters might love it but elections are won and lost by attracting the moderate voters.
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,302


    Nearly there!
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,628
    Interesting that currently a not tory or labour coalition would hold the majority.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • surrey_commuter
    surrey_commuter Posts: 18,867
    Is Epsom unique in having 26 of the 35 seats held by Residents Association?
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,971


    Nearly there!

    Tis but a flesh wound.
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,971
    The reply tweet from Hodges didn't age too well. Guess he's disappointed the stuff he was fed about Sue Gray didn't pan out.


  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,971
    Just one Tory council left in the whole of Devon.
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,302
    Surely the "this isn't great for Labour " takes ignore the 20% for the Lib dems, which will go straight to Labour where they can win.
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,971

    Surely the "this isn't great for Labour " takes ignore the 20% for the Lib dems, which will go straight to Labour where they can win.


    I think it also overlooks the fact that people will see absolutely that tactical voting will rid us of these turbulent Tories - the Devon results are utterly brutal for Tories (except Torbay). I'd be fascinated to know how much an effect sites like https://stopthetories.vote/ had, but if similar efforts are made at the General Election, the wilderness beckons for Tories, which is where they need to go to rediscover their purpose and intellectual and moral foundations. Perhaps they need to resurrect the cones hotline in place of the 'Stop The Boats' mantra.
  • Pross
    Pross Posts: 43,692
    From the BBC:

    “Education Minister Robert Halfon said this year's election was always "going to be difficult" for his party.
    He said internal Tory Party divisions "didn't help" but claimed the losses were down to external factors, such as the cost-of-living crisis and problems in the NHS.

    I can accept there are external factors at play in the cost of living crisis but it seems odd that the Education Secretary considers ‘problems in the NHS’ to be an external factor. Maybe this is the issue, the Government doesn’t realise the NHS is their responsibility!
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,302
    Surrey Heath 😄
  • dabber
    dabber Posts: 1,986

    Surrey Heath 😄

    Yup, glad my vote wasn't wasted
    “You may think that; I couldn’t possibly comment!”

    Wilier Cento Uno SR/Wilier Mortirolo/Specialized Roubaix Comp/Kona Hei Hei/Calibre Bossnut
  • surrey_commuter
    surrey_commuter Posts: 18,867

    Surely the "this isn't great for Labour " takes ignore the 20% for the Lib dems, which will go straight to Labour where they can win.

    And likewise they will lose votes to the LibDems.

    It is a great result for the Greens and LibDems but I am sure Labour will have hoped to do much better
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,628
    Tories currently -1014.
    That pessimistic prediction has been surpassed.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,971
    pblakeney said:

    Tories currently -1014.
    That pessimistic prediction has been surpassed.


    "It was only a few more than we had predicted, so overall I think Starmer will be disappointed."
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,302
    pblakeney said:

    Tories currently -1014.
    That pessimistic prediction has been surpassed.


  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,660
    Stevo did kent council go red?
  • Stevo_666
    Stevo_666 Posts: 62,019

    Stevo did kent council go red?

    Sevenoaks is still blue :)
    "I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,971
    Stevo_666 said:

    Stevo did kent council go red?

    Sevenoaks is still blue :)

    Must be feeling slightly lonely down there...


  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,971
    So what's trending, Twitter?


  • Stevo_666
    Stevo_666 Posts: 62,019

    Stevo_666 said:

    Stevo did kent council go red?

    Sevenoaks is still blue :)

    Must be feeling slightly lonely down there...


    Nice blue wall we've got there in NW Kent and South Essex. It's a little oasis of success.
    "I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]