LEAVE the Conservative Party and save your country!
Comments
-
I don't think the Tories being wiped out and Labour having 200+ majority would benefit anybodyPross said:
They need wiping out at the next General Election in the hope that they then re-emerge as a more moderate centre right party with the lunatic fringe consigned to history.surrey_commuter said:There seems to be a lot of glee from people who profess to want the Tories to sort themselves out and that democracy needs an effective opposition.
If these results get too bad who would you want Sunak's replacement to be and who do you think it will be?0 -
They need something to cause them to split and get rid of the nutcases.surrey_commuter said:
I don't think the Tories being wiped out and Labour having 200+ majority would benefit anybodyPross said:
They need wiping out at the next General Election in the hope that they then re-emerge as a more moderate centre right party with the lunatic fringe consigned to history.surrey_commuter said:There seems to be a lot of glee from people who profess to want the Tories to sort themselves out and that democracy needs an effective opposition.
If these results get too bad who would you want Sunak's replacement to be and who do you think it will be?0 -
Not sure why I am unable to explain myselfrick_chasey said:
Worth remembering that even losing 100 MPs, they are starting with around an 80 MP majority, so labour won't have that big a majority.surrey_commuter said:
Do you really not think there are 100 dysfunctional/blinkered Tory MPs who know they are fvcked so would happily go for a hail maryrick_chasey said:
They're being punished for giving is us 3 different prime ministers in 2022.surrey_commuter said:
if you have over a 100 MPs who are 99% sure they will lose their seat/job under Rishi then on a personal level the rational option is to roll the dice and reinstall Boris or some other loonmorstar said:
I think getting a slap down now in the 20 months prior to a GE is maybe a good thing. Gives them a chance to re-position themselves and marginalise the loons in the parliamentary party. But yes, I don't see a massive labour majority as a good thing in the same way the tory majority of this parliament has shown contempt for decency and fairness.surrey_commuter said:There seems to be a lot of glee from people who profess to want the Tories to sort themselves out and that democracy needs an effective opposition.
If these results get too bad who would you want Sunak's replacement to be and who do you think it will be?
I have little sympathy for Rishi, but I hardly see these results as the direct result of his leadership, he inherited a mess (to which he was a key contributor of the economic aspects but not the behavioural ones). I'd be surprised if they get rid of him although I'm sure the fringes will see it as an opportunity to do so.
This idea that at this point the PM is what matters is stupid.
The party is dysfunctional and anyone who's not blinkered can see it.
My 100 number refers to people who have given up hope so will try anything such as forcing another leadership contest
I am not suggesting this is a good idea or whether it will succeeed and if it did whether it would help.
I am saying there will be a lot (ie 100+) Tory MPs who think they have nothing to lose0 -
Sure, as I said before, Rishi *is* the hail mary.surrey_commuter said:
Not sure why I am unable to explain myselfrick_chasey said:
Worth remembering that even losing 100 MPs, they are starting with around an 80 MP majority, so labour won't have that big a majority.surrey_commuter said:
Do you really not think there are 100 dysfunctional/blinkered Tory MPs who know they are fvcked so would happily go for a hail maryrick_chasey said:
They're being punished for giving is us 3 different prime ministers in 2022.surrey_commuter said:
if you have over a 100 MPs who are 99% sure they will lose their seat/job under Rishi then on a personal level the rational option is to roll the dice and reinstall Boris or some other loonmorstar said:
I think getting a slap down now in the 20 months prior to a GE is maybe a good thing. Gives them a chance to re-position themselves and marginalise the loons in the parliamentary party. But yes, I don't see a massive labour majority as a good thing in the same way the tory majority of this parliament has shown contempt for decency and fairness.surrey_commuter said:There seems to be a lot of glee from people who profess to want the Tories to sort themselves out and that democracy needs an effective opposition.
If these results get too bad who would you want Sunak's replacement to be and who do you think it will be?
I have little sympathy for Rishi, but I hardly see these results as the direct result of his leadership, he inherited a mess (to which he was a key contributor of the economic aspects but not the behavioural ones). I'd be surprised if they get rid of him although I'm sure the fringes will see it as an opportunity to do so.
This idea that at this point the PM is what matters is stupid.
The party is dysfunctional and anyone who's not blinkered can see it.
My 100 number refers to people who have given up hope so will try anything such as forcing another leadership contest
I am not suggesting this is a good idea or whether it will succeeed and if it did whether it would help.
I am saying there will be a lot (ie 100+) Tory MPs who think they have nothing to lose0 -
Don't get too carried with away with this leftiebollox excitement:Pross said:
They need wiping out at the next General Election in the hope that they then re-emerge as a more moderate centre right party with the lunatic fringe consigned to history.surrey_commuter said:There seems to be a lot of glee from people who profess to want the Tories to sort themselves out and that democracy needs an effective opposition.
If these results get too bad who would you want Sunak's replacement to be and who do you think it will be?
https://telegraph.co.uk/politics/2023/05/05/labour-local-election-gains-house-commons-majority/"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
Lovely stuff - that's even better (but it does somewhat ignore the shift in Scotland).Stevo_666 said:
Don't get to carried with away with this leftiebollox excitement:Pross said:
They need wiping out at the next General Election in the hope that they then re-emerge as a more moderate centre right party with the lunatic fringe consigned to history.surrey_commuter said:There seems to be a lot of glee from people who profess to want the Tories to sort themselves out and that democracy needs an effective opposition.
If these results get too bad who would you want Sunak's replacement to be and who do you think it will be?
https://telegraph.co.uk/politics/2023/05/05/labour-local-election-gains-house-commons-majority/1 -
They've had a reactionary nutcase wing since the early 19th century. If the Blair years didn't sort them out I can't imagine a term against Starmer will do it.kingstongraham said:
They need something to cause them to split and get rid of the nutcases.surrey_commuter said:
I don't think the Tories being wiped out and Labour having 200+ majority would benefit anybodyPross said:
They need wiping out at the next General Election in the hope that they then re-emerge as a more moderate centre right party with the lunatic fringe consigned to history.surrey_commuter said:There seems to be a lot of glee from people who profess to want the Tories to sort themselves out and that democracy needs an effective opposition.
If these results get too bad who would you want Sunak's replacement to be and who do you think it will be?1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Part of the anti-growth coalition0 -
Everyone said that what Labour needed when Corbyn was in charge, but it never happened.rjsterry said:
They've had a reactionary nutcase wing since the early 19th century. If the Blair years didn't sort them out I can't imagine a term against Starmer will do it.kingstongraham said:
They need something to cause them to split and get rid of the nutcases.surrey_commuter said:
I don't think the Tories being wiped out and Labour having 200+ majority would benefit anybodyPross said:
They need wiping out at the next General Election in the hope that they then re-emerge as a more moderate centre right party with the lunatic fringe consigned to history.surrey_commuter said:There seems to be a lot of glee from people who profess to want the Tories to sort themselves out and that democracy needs an effective opposition.
If these results get too bad who would you want Sunak's replacement to be and who do you think it will be?"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
Curtice was on the radio this morning. He was pretty clear that a Conservative loss is more or less nailed on. The question is whether Labour win by enough to not need a coalition.Stevo_666 said:
Don't get to carried with away with this leftiebollox excitement:Pross said:
They need wiping out at the next General Election in the hope that they then re-emerge as a more moderate centre right party with the lunatic fringe consigned to history.surrey_commuter said:There seems to be a lot of glee from people who profess to want the Tories to sort themselves out and that democracy needs an effective opposition.
If these results get too bad who would you want Sunak's replacement to be and who do you think it will be?
https://telegraph.co.uk/politics/2023/05/05/labour-local-election-gains-house-commons-majority/1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Part of the anti-growth coalition0 -
I don't think anyone is suggesting the local elections provide any guide to a General Election result. My comment was purely what I feel would be needed for the Tories to appeal to a wider electorate again. They did well in 2019 by being 'the Party of Brexit' which appeal to some non-traditional Tory voters but the shine has gone off that and Brexit is 'done' so they now need to try to get back to appealing to the middle ground voters which (using my sample of one previous Tory voter) means ditching the loons that have taken over the Party. It's exactly the same problem Labour had under Corbyn, the hardcore voters might love it but elections are won and lost by attracting the moderate voters.Stevo_666 said:
Don't get to carried with away with this leftiebollox excitement:Pross said:
They need wiping out at the next General Election in the hope that they then re-emerge as a more moderate centre right party with the lunatic fringe consigned to history.surrey_commuter said:There seems to be a lot of glee from people who profess to want the Tories to sort themselves out and that democracy needs an effective opposition.
If these results get too bad who would you want Sunak's replacement to be and who do you think it will be?
https://telegraph.co.uk/politics/2023/05/05/labour-local-election-gains-house-commons-majority/0 -
Nearly there!tailwindhome said:0 -
Interesting that currently a not tory or labour coalition would hold the majority.The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
Is Epsom unique in having 26 of the 35 seats held by Residents Association?0
-
kingstongraham said:
Nearly there!tailwindhome said:
Tis but a flesh wound.0 -
The reply tweet from Hodges didn't age too well. Guess he's disappointed the stuff he was fed about Sue Gray didn't pan out.
0 -
-
Surely the "this isn't great for Labour " takes ignore the 20% for the Lib dems, which will go straight to Labour where they can win.0
-
kingstongraham said:
Surely the "this isn't great for Labour " takes ignore the 20% for the Lib dems, which will go straight to Labour where they can win.
I think it also overlooks the fact that people will see absolutely that tactical voting will rid us of these turbulent Tories - the Devon results are utterly brutal for Tories (except Torbay). I'd be fascinated to know how much an effect sites like https://stopthetories.vote/ had, but if similar efforts are made at the General Election, the wilderness beckons for Tories, which is where they need to go to rediscover their purpose and intellectual and moral foundations. Perhaps they need to resurrect the cones hotline in place of the 'Stop The Boats' mantra.0 -
From the BBC:
“Education Minister Robert Halfon said this year's election was always "going to be difficult" for his party.
He said internal Tory Party divisions "didn't help" but claimed the losses were down to external factors, such as the cost-of-living crisis and problems in the NHS.”
I can accept there are external factors at play in the cost of living crisis but it seems odd that the Education Secretary considers ‘problems in the NHS’ to be an external factor. Maybe this is the issue, the Government doesn’t realise the NHS is their responsibility!0 -
Surrey Heath 😄0
-
Yup, glad my vote wasn't wastedkingstongraham said:Surrey Heath 😄
“You may think that; I couldn’t possibly comment!”
Wilier Cento Uno SR/Wilier Mortirolo/Specialized Roubaix Comp/Kona Hei Hei/Calibre Bossnut0 -
And likewise they will lose votes to the LibDems.kingstongraham said:Surely the "this isn't great for Labour " takes ignore the 20% for the Lib dems, which will go straight to Labour where they can win.
It is a great result for the Greens and LibDems but I am sure Labour will have hoped to do much better0 -
Tories currently -1014.
That pessimistic prediction has been surpassed.The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
pblakeney said:
Tories currently -1014.
That pessimistic prediction has been surpassed.
"It was only a few more than we had predicted, so overall I think Starmer will be disappointed."0 -
pblakeney said:
Tories currently -1014.
That pessimistic prediction has been surpassed.
0 -
-
Sevenoaks is still bluerick_chasey said:Stevo did kent council go red?
"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
Stevo_666 said:
Sevenoaks is still bluerick_chasey said:Stevo did kent council go red?
Must be feeling slightly lonely down there...
0 -
-
Nice blue wall we've got there in NW Kent and South Essex. It's a little oasis of success.briantrumpet said:Stevo_666 said:
Sevenoaks is still bluerick_chasey said:Stevo did kent council go red?
Must be feeling slightly lonely down there..."I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0