LEAVE the Conservative Party and save your country!
Comments
-
Seems the tories are all up for redistribution of wealth.
From the public purse to their mates as quickly as possible.
If I were to go full on cynical. The raft of spending measures is actually intentional solely to award the contracts to their mates. I.e. it’s not even a case if we need this service, which mate shall we contract it to but rather....
I want to reward x for their loyalty, what contract can we make up?0 -
I get the feeling they have lost the votes they gained up north last time round due to their own actions.The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
See the u turn on school meals has happened.0
-
The BEIS department has a team of about 100 PR / comms people full-time, but Bingham felt this wasn't enough.
One of the things they have been charged with doing is setting up a podcast with Bingham as host.0 -
First thing I thought was; Who has the contract?kingstongraham said:See the u turn on school meals has happened.
Sad.The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
And it looks like the negotiation capitulation on Brexit is very close.kingstongraham said:See the u turn on school meals has happened.
Maggie must be turning in her grave with this current bunch.0 -
So we can add to the list that No 10's comms team can't even manage the basics of producing simple graphics for social media.
Here's the slightly gritted teeth congratulations of Biden.
And here's what you see if you download the image and tweak the levels.
Credit to Guido Fawkes website for spotting this.1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Part of the anti-growth coalition0 -
Setting aside the graphics, why is the congratulatory statement in any way through gritted teeth?rjsterry said:So we can add to the list that No 10's comms team can't even manage the basics of producing simple graphics for social media.
Here's the slightly gritted teeth congratulations of Biden.
And here's what you see if you download the image and tweak the levels.
Credit to Guido Fawkes website for spotting this.
BoJo rightly refused to offer congratulations before the result was called even though the press tried to push him into doing so. That's being sensible.0 -
Possibly gritted teeth is overstating it, but I think it's pretty clear that Johnson had more in common with Trump than Biden.1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Part of the anti-growth coalition0 -
What's up with the graphics?0
-
If you adjust the brightness etc, you can see that it originally was congratulating Trump on a second term, and they just put another image saying Joe Biden on top. I find it difficult to be surprised, but that is genuinely astonishingly amateurish.shirley_basso said:What's up with the graphics?
0 -
I call BS: given that it's all done digitally these days, it takes a bit of effort and skill not to wipe out the old when adding the new.kingstongraham said:
If you adjust the brightness etc, you can see that it originally was congratulating Trump on a second term, and they just put another image saying Joe Biden on top. I find it difficult to be surprised, but that is genuinely astonishingly amateurish.shirley_basso said:What's up with the graphics?
That has been done deliberately.0 -
Never attribute to malice what can be explained by ineptitude. If you are knocking these things up in Photoshop but don't really know what you are doing it would be quite an easy error.bompington said:
I call BS: given that it's all done digitally these days, it takes a bit of effort and skill not to wipe out the old when adding the new.kingstongraham said:
If you adjust the brightness etc, you can see that it originally was congratulating Trump on a second term, and they just put another image saying Joe Biden on top. I find it difficult to be surprised, but that is genuinely astonishingly amateurish.shirley_basso said:What's up with the graphics?
That has been done deliberately.
Open previously drafted file. Realise that as it is already a flattened jpeg that you can't edit the original text. In a hurry, so rather than start from scratch, use the 'rubber' tool to (incompletely) blank out the first message and then insert the new text over the top. Save as a jpeg, locking in the mistake.1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Part of the anti-growth coalition0 -
Why would the rubber tool work more throughly round the edges and not in the middle?0
-
Possibly if the background colour is already dark grey, then there's nothing to rub out around the edge. The above is only one possible explanation. Either way I think it's more likely than a carefully constructed deliberate act. What message would that be trying to send? That the UK PM doesn't have the staff for its official twitter feed?shirley_basso said:Why would the rubber tool work more throughly round the edges and not in the middle?
1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Part of the anti-growth coalition0 -
Not buying any of that. The text looks too regular to have been hit by a poorly aimed eraser tool anyway.
I guess the incompetence of the current government knows no limit, but I would be a bit surprised (and disappointed) if one of my S1s (Y7) was so dim as to choose to produce something like that using GX software on an old bitmap image rather than knock it up from scratch in 30 seconds using - well, practically anything: Word, Powerpoint, even Publisher dammit.
In the unlikely event that they did choose to do it such an awkward and messy way, I would expect them to be able to set the opacity of the eraser tool a bit less carelessly.
TLDR: even a dim child wouldn't do any of that.0 -
i'd guess to save time they took an image with the footer and skewed 0 and attempted to paint over the unwanted text, but missed a bit due to feathered edges on the brush and/or <100% opacityshirley_basso said:Why would the rubber tool work more throughly round the edges and not in the middle?
from a security perspective, reusing images is a bad idea, way too easy for 'masked' information to be recovered, which seems to be what's happened heremy bike - faster than god's and twice as shiny0 -
geek off!
;-)0 -
Most of what I read before the election said that Boris preferred Biden.rjsterry said:Possibly gritted teeth is overstating it, but I think it's pretty clear that Johnson had more in common with Trump than Biden.
0 -
Both statements can be true.TheBigBean said:
Most of what I read before the election said that Boris preferred Biden.rjsterry said:Possibly gritted teeth is overstating it, but I think it's pretty clear that Johnson had more in common with Trump than Biden.
0 -
So what are they intending to convey with the barely visible text?bompington said:Not buying any of that. The text looks too regular to have been hit by a poorly aimed eraser tool anyway.
I guess the incompetence of the current government knows no limit, but I would be a bit surprised (and disappointed) if one of my S1s (Y7) was so dim as to choose to produce something like that using GX software on an old bitmap image rather than knock it up from scratch in 30 seconds using - well, practically anything: Word, Powerpoint, even Publisher dammit.
In the unlikely event that they did choose to do it such an awkward and messy way, I would expect them to be able to set the opacity of the eraser tool a bit less carelessly.
TLDR: even a dim child wouldn't do any of that.
It also reeks of someone senior trying to operate software that they have only ever watched the staff using.1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Part of the anti-growth coalition0 -
I disagree. Negotiating with Trump would terrify most people as he is renowned for saying one thing to your face and then another when out the room. I would rather take on Biden and the UK government would probably take the same view. Christ even the queen did not want to deal with trump and she has shaken some very shady hands at the bequest of the UK government.rjsterry said:Possibly gritted teeth is overstating it, but I think it's pretty clear that Johnson had more in common with Trump than Biden.
0 -
BBC and Gov't confirm it was a cock up on their part. Seems like an honest, but wildly amateur screw up.0
-
So you disagree that Boris has more in common with Trump because Trump is a known liar?john80 said:
I disagree. Negotiating with Trump would terrify most people as he is renowned for saying one thing to your face and then another when out the room. I would rather take on Biden and the UK government would probably take the same view. Christ even the queen did not want to deal with trump and she has shaken some very shady hands at the bequest of the UK government.rjsterry said:Possibly gritted teeth is overstating it, but I think it's pretty clear that Johnson had more in common with Trump than Biden.
We have assumed the position and will get fvcked hard regardless of who is President0 -
Honestly, this to me was a super British thing.shirley_basso said:BBC and Gov't confirm it was a censored up on their part. Seems like an honest, but wildly amateur screw up.
Everything is amateur hour - for good and for bad.0 -
Normal office
Senior admin: "We need to get a congratulatory message ready so that Spaffer can suck up to Donnie. Can you draft something, with the No.10 footer on it?"
Junior designer: "Sure. What if Biden wins though?"
Senior admin: "Good point. Do two options, I'll get the different messages from Spaffer. Then clearly label each file. How long will that take?"
Junior designer: "10 mins max. I'll do it as soon as I have the text."
Office of No.10
Senior admin: "We need to get a congratulatory message ready so that Spaffer can suck up to Donnie. Can you draft something, with the No.10 footer on it?"
Junior designer: "Sure. What if Biden wins though?"
Senior admin: "We're a lean org now. No point reinventing the wheel. Spaffer will only talk to Donnie anyway - one message, let's not waste time. We can change it later if the unthinkable happens."
Junior designer: "OK."
Senior admin: "Oh no, it's Biden. Designer? DESIGNER? Where are they? Sod it, I'll do it myself - mask, colourise, feather, what the hell does all this mean? What are these layers anyway? Bodge bodge bodge - hmm, looks good, only took me 30 mins. Send."2 -
Quickly outdone by Micheál Martin to prove that it is not purely a British thing.rick_chasey said:
Honestly, this to me was a super British thing.shirley_basso said:BBC and Gov't confirm it was a censored up on their part. Seems like an honest, but wildly amateur screw up.
Everything is amateur hour - for good and for bad.
0 -
Sure but the whole British things for everything being amateur is real.TheBigBean said:
Quickly outdone by Micheál Martin to prove that it is not purely a British thing.rick_chasey said:
Honestly, this to me was a super British thing.shirley_basso said:BBC and Gov't confirm it was a censored up on their part. Seems like an honest, but wildly amateur screw up.
Everything is amateur hour - for good and for bad.
It's usually charming but Brits have a natural disdain for anything too professional or polished.0 -
I find it slightly bewildering that the message was knocked up in a program where the interface was more complex than a text box on a plain background.0