TV Series - Reviews and Recommendations......
Comments
-
Star Trek Discovery.
Just keeps getting better.
The Enterprise deck replication is awesome.
Great storylines. Great characters.
Best Star Trek series without doubt.Always be yourself, unless you can be Aaron Rodgers....Then always be Aaron Rodgers.0 -
Mr Goo wrote:Star Trek Discovery.
Just keeps getting better.
The Enterprise deck replication is awesome.
Great storylines. Great characters.
Best Star Trek series without doubt.Cannondale Synapse Carbon Ultegra
Kinesis Racelight 4S
Specialized Allez Elite (Frame/Forks for sale)
Specialized Crosstrail Comp Disk (For sale)0 -
I've enjoyed Great Anal Journeys with the women that was in Faulty Towers and her husband.0
-
Might want to correct the typo there...0
-
Maybe it's not a typo :shock:0
-
awavey wrote:Mr Goo wrote:Best Star Trek series without doubt.
its not Star Trek,science fiction it maybe, but its no Star Trek
So what about the others such as STNG, DS9 etc? Were they ‘Star Trek series’ or are you making the point that the original is the only one? Please expand.Cannondale Synapse Carbon Ultegra
Kinesis Racelight 4S
Specialized Allez Elite (Frame/Forks for sale)
Specialized Crosstrail Comp Disk (For sale)0 -
ayjaycee wrote:
everything up to and including Enterprise, which wasnt that good tbf, were what Id consider to be Star Trek series, they stayed true to the original series premise, wagon train to the stars, remember classic trek is about a hopeful bright future, they maintained the same tonal quality of the series largely throughout with characters, stories, dialogue and even the way each series was filmed on camera and presented on screen to the viewer, used the same setups, same camera shots, there literally was a visual language of making a Star Trek series, as well as tonal storytelling that links them all together.
Discovery, breaks all of those rules, deliberately, its shot very differently, shaky cam and constant cuts persists, in some scenes, even just dialogue heavy briefing scenes not action scenes, you can get down to a 2.5sec shot ratio, thats on a par with an Avengers movie fight scene cut ratio. The characters are always in conflict it seems, arguing,shouting, never listening to one another or respecting each other, which is totally against the ethos the 50 years worth of Star Trek prior to it had said Starfleet was about, the stories are very different its all about war, conflict and that plays back into how the characters react to each other, theres no reverence or care taken in the material, theyll just chuck in what they think is fan friendly easter eggs to bridge gaps, but its not a logical extension of what had gone before.
and I havent even mentioned the really nerdy Star Trek fan stuff, how theyve bulldozed their way through 50 years of established canon, Klingons, tribbles, space fungus drives or mentioned kelvin or prime timelines.
you want to watch a modern Trek take, watch The Orville.0 -
awavey wrote:ayjaycee wrote:
everything up to and including Enterprise, which wasnt that good tbf, were what Id consider to be Star Trek series, they stayed true to the original series premise, wagon train to the stars, remember classic trek is about a hopeful bright future, they maintained the same tonal quality of the series largely throughout with characters, stories, dialogue and even the way each series was filmed on camera and presented on screen to the viewer, used the same setups, same camera shots, there literally was a visual language of making a Star Trek series, as well as tonal storytelling that links them all together.
Discovery, breaks all of those rules, deliberately, its shot very differently, shaky cam and constant cuts persists, in some scenes, even just dialogue heavy briefing scenes not action scenes, you can get down to a 2.5sec shot ratio, thats on a par with an Avengers movie fight scene cut ratio. The characters are always in conflict it seems, arguing,shouting, never listening to one another or respecting each other, which is totally against the ethos the 50 years worth of Star Trek prior to it had said Starfleet was about, the stories are very different its all about war, conflict and that plays back into how the characters react to each other, theres no reverence or care taken in the material, theyll just chuck in what they think is fan friendly easter eggs to bridge gaps, but its not a logical extension of what had gone before.
and I havent even mentioned the really nerdy Star Trek fan stuff, how theyve bulldozed their way through 50 years of established canon, Klingons, tribbles, space fungus drives or mentioned kelvin or prime timelines.
you want to watch a modern Trek take, watch The Orville.
Well I liked it.Always be yourself, unless you can be Aaron Rodgers....Then always be Aaron Rodgers.0 -
Just watched After Life. 6 x 30 min episodes so doable in one sitting.
Not too sure how I feel about it. I didn’t really resonate with any of the characters and it didn’t really make me get all teary eyed but it was really really well done.0 -
awavey wrote:
everything up to and including Enterprise, which wasnt that good tbf, were what Id consider to be Star Trek series, they stayed true to the original series premise, wagon train to the stars, remember classic trek is about a hopeful bright future, they maintained the same tonal quality of the series largely throughout with characters, stories, dialogue and even the way each series was filmed on camera and presented on screen to the viewer, used the same setups, same camera shots, there literally was a visual language of making a Star Trek series, as well as tonal storytelling that links them all together.
Discovery, breaks all of those rules, deliberately, its shot very differently, shaky cam and constant cuts persists, in some scenes, even just dialogue heavy briefing scenes not action scenes, you can get down to a 2.5sec shot ratio, thats on a par with an Avengers movie fight scene cut ratio. The characters are always in conflict it seems, arguing,shouting, never listening to one another or respecting each other, which is totally against the ethos the 50 years worth of Star Trek prior to it had said Starfleet was about, the stories are very different its all about war, conflict and that plays back into how the characters react to each other, theres no reverence or care taken in the material, theyll just chuck in what they think is fan friendly easter eggs to bridge gaps, but its not a logical extension of what had gone before.
and I havent even mentioned the really nerdy Star Trek fan stuff, how theyve bulldozed their way through 50 years of established canon, Klingons, tribbles, space fungus drives or mentioned kelvin or prime timelines.
you want to watch a modern Trek take, watch The Orville.
Not sure that I agree with much of what you have said there. As to Discovery not following the principles of the original, call me a heretic and light the bonfire but I reckon that's a good thing as I find the original almost unwatchable nowadays. On The Orville, you're obviously entitled to an opinion. I really wanted to like it and got through the first episode still willing to give it a go, struggled through the second and gave up completely mid-way through the third as I thought it was just puerile tosh - maybe I was just missing the deeper messages and should have persisted but times to precious and there is a lot of better stuff competing with it.
We'll just have to agree to differ this time.Cannondale Synapse Carbon Ultegra
Kinesis Racelight 4S
Specialized Allez Elite (Frame/Forks for sale)
Specialized Crosstrail Comp Disk (For sale)0 -
Not sure if mentioned but it's on the SciFi ilk, The Expanse, really well put together an for me at least an engaging story line, also the books its based on a very good.0
-
Shirley Basso wrote:Just watched After Life. 6 x 30 min episodes so doable in one sitting.
Not too sure how I feel about it. I didn’t really resonate with any of the characters and it didn’t really make me get all teary eyed but it was really really well done.
Agreed, I'm not really a Gervais fan. At least your post got in-between all the star trek talk. I F**cking hate it and all star wars related shite.
And relax...Superstition sets the whole world in flames; philosophy quenches them.
Voltaire0 -
ayjaycee wrote:awavey wrote:
everything up to and including Enterprise, which wasnt that good tbf, were what Id consider to be Star Trek series, they stayed true to the original series premise, wagon train to the stars, remember classic trek is about a hopeful bright future, they maintained the same tonal quality of the series largely throughout with characters, stories, dialogue and even the way each series was filmed on camera and presented on screen to the viewer, used the same setups, same camera shots, there literally was a visual language of making a Star Trek series, as well as tonal storytelling that links them all together.
Discovery, breaks all of those rules, deliberately, its shot very differently, shaky cam and constant cuts persists, in some scenes, even just dialogue heavy briefing scenes not action scenes, you can get down to a 2.5sec shot ratio, thats on a par with an Avengers movie fight scene cut ratio. The characters are always in conflict it seems, arguing,shouting, never listening to one another or respecting each other, which is totally against the ethos the 50 years worth of Star Trek prior to it had said Starfleet was about, the stories are very different its all about war, conflict and that plays back into how the characters react to each other, theres no reverence or care taken in the material, theyll just chuck in what they think is fan friendly easter eggs to bridge gaps, but its not a logical extension of what had gone before.
and I havent even mentioned the really nerdy Star Trek fan stuff, how theyve bulldozed their way through 50 years of established canon, Klingons, tribbles, space fungus drives or mentioned kelvin or prime timelines.
you want to watch a modern Trek take, watch The Orville.
Not sure that I agree with much of what you have said there. As to Discovery not following the principles of the original, call me a heretic and light the bonfire but I reckon that's a good thing as I find the original almost unwatchable nowadays. On The Orville, you're obviously entitled to an opinion. I really wanted to like it and got through the first episode still willing to give it a go, struggled through the second and gave up completely mid-way through the third as I thought it was just puerile tosh - maybe I was just missing the deeper messages and should have persisted but times to precious and there is a lot of better stuff competing with it.
We'll just have to agree to differ this time.
Stay with it. It gets better and better. And Season 2 absolutely blows Discovery out of the ionosphere.
And I LIKE Discovery.My blog: http://www.roubaixcycling.cc (kit reviews and other musings)
https://twitter.com/roubaixcc
Facebook? No. Just say no.0 -
Pross wrote:Just finished watching The Looming Tower On Amazon. Really good insight into the background to 9/11 and the way the CIA / FBI infighting may have prevented the attackers being caught. I appreciate that it's a dramatised version of events but I'm amazed some of the CIA in particular weren't jailed for their behaviour.
This is being heavily advertised as starting on BBC soon (BBC 2 I think). Worth a watch for anyone without Amazon.0 -
Nothing better than catching something you missed the first time round.
Currently watching Life on Mars on Iplayer
3 episodes in and addicted“New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!0 -
TailWindHome wrote:Nothing better than catching something you missed the first time round.
Currently watching Life on Mars on Iplayer
3 episodes in and addicted
One of my favourite series. I was a bit disappointed with the sequel, Ashes to Ashes.0 -
Pross wrote:TailWindHome wrote:Nothing better than catching something you missed the first time round.
Currently watching Life on Mars on Iplayer
3 episodes in and addicted
One of my favourite series. I was a bit disappointed with the sequel, Ashes to Ashes.The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
Pross wrote:TailWindHome wrote:Nothing better than catching something you missed the first time round.
Currently watching Life on Mars on Iplayer
3 episodes in and addicted
One of my favourite series. I was a bit disappointed with the sequel, Ashes to Ashes.
I in contrast was not, loved life on mars, and the sequel (for me) was every bit as good.
Big fan of Keeley of the Hawes, and wide bodied quattrosFelt F70 05 (Turbo)
Marin Palisades Trail 91 and 06
Scott CR1 SL 12
Cannondale Synapse Adventure 15 & 16 Di2
Scott Foil 180 -
Ash vs Evil dead,missed it when the series first came out but i am glad to have caught up,makes me laugh every episode and there is also good horror and tunes too,groovy.0
-
Just watched all 5+ hours of Chernobyl on a 12 hour flight.
Fascinating to see a lot of the inner detail of what happened in what is still recent times.
Great acting and filming as well.Felt F70 05 (Turbo)
Marin Palisades Trail 91 and 06
Scott CR1 SL 12
Cannondale Synapse Adventure 15 & 16 Di2
Scott Foil 180 -
The Missing Crypto Queen. It's in BBC iPlayer/Sounds and tells the story of a woman who created a currency she said would rival Bitcoin. Investors piled in and then she disappeared, as did the cash. It's utterly fascinating.0
-
Have you heard the BBC podcast Death in Ice Valley ?0
-
For light hearted, slightly quirky entertainment, can strongly recommend 'Living with yourself' on Netflix.
Easy to follow but an ever present uncertainty about exactly where it is going.
A blokes career and marriage are pretty flat and he tries a spa to reinvigorate himself following a personal recommendation. After this, things get a little bit weird.0 -
Watched Bosch after reading recommendations further up the thread. Blew through all 5 seasons/50 episodes in a few weeks. Very good telly. Recommended.0
-
Giri/Haji.
I'm 5 episodes in so far and it has been superb.1 -
The Spy (Netflix mini series).
Based on the life of Mossad agent Eli Cohen who was a very deep cover spy in Syria during the 60s.
Sacha Baron Cohen plays the part superbly.
Nearly finished, it does have an obvious ending.
Only criticism is that the cinematography for scenes in Israel is washed out to give it a 60s cine film feel. Yet all the action in Syria is full glorious colour. Not sure of the thinking behind that.Always be yourself, unless you can be Aaron Rodgers....Then always be Aaron Rodgers.1 -
I read a lot of Tom Clancy's books when I was younger and of course loved some of the subsequent films (Hunt for Red October and Patriot Games especially), so wanted to like the Jack Ryan series on Amazon. I just couldn't get into series 1. Not sure why. I think a lot of the Amazon and Netflix crime/dramas are all very samey in tone and this one was no different.
However, I decided to give series 2 a go and have found it much better. Have watched 4 episodes in the last 24 hours!0